Google Tech Talk: Reconsidering Relevance

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

3 comments

Comments 1 - 3 of 3 previous next Post a comment

Post a comment
Embed Video
Edit your comment Cancel

Notes on slide 1

Friends, Countrymen, Googlers, I come to bury relevance, not to praise it. Well, that’s overstating the case. But I am here today to challenge your approach to information access, and more importantly to tease out and question its philosophical underpinnings. I realize that I’m singling you out as Googlers for holding a belief that is far more widely held, but you are the standard bearers of relevance. And you invited me.  Notes: this presentation was delivered at the Google NYC office on 1/7/09. The title is an allusion to Tefko Saracevic’s article, “Relevance Reconsidered”. If you are interested in learning more about the history of relevance I highly recommend his 2007 Lazerow Memorial Lecture on “Relevance in information science” (http://mediabeast.ites.utk.edu/mediasite4/Viewer/?peid=fb8f84cb-9f82-499f-b12c-9a56ab5cf5ba).

27 Favorites

Google Tech Talk: Reconsidering Relevance - Presentation Transcript

  1. Reconsidering Relevance Daniel Tunkelang Chief Scientist, Endeca
  2. howdy!
    • 1988 – 1992
    • 1993 – 1998
    • 1999 -
  3. overview
    • what is relevance?
    • what’s wrong with relevance?
    • what are the alternatives?
  4. but first let’s set the stage
  5. iconic businesses of the 20 th and 21 st centuries I’m Feeling Lucky
  6. process and scale orchestration
  7. but there’s a dark side
  8. users are satisfied
  9. an interesting contrast
    • “ Search on the internet is solved. I always find what I need. But why not in the enterprise? Seems like a solution waiting to happen.”
    • - a Fortune 500 CTO
  10. the real questions
    • What is “search on the internet” and why is it perceived a solved problem?
    • What is “search in the enterprise” and why is it perceived as an unsolved problem?
    • And what does this have to do with relevance?
  11. easy vs. hard search problems
    • easy where to buy Ender in Exile ?
    • hard good novel to read on the beach?
    • easy proof that sorting has n log n lower bound?
    • hard algorithm to sort partially ordered set, given a constant-time comparator?
    • what is relevance?
    • what’s wrong with relevance?
    • what are the alternatives?
  12. defining relevance
    • Relevance is defined as a measure of information conveyed by a document relative to a query. It is shown that the relationship between the document and the query, though necessary, is not sufficient to determine relevance.
    • William Goffman, On relevance as a measure, 1964.
  13. we need more definitions
  14. let’s work top-down
    • information retrieval (IR) = study of retrieval of information (not data) from collection of written documents retrieved documents aim at satisfying user information need
  15. IR assumes information needs
    • user information need = natural language declaration of informational need of user
    • query = expression of user information need in input language provided by information system
  16. relevance drives IR modeling
    • modeling = studies algorithms used for ranking documents according to system assigned likelihood of relevance
    • model = a set of premises and an algorithm for ranking documents with regard to a user query
  17. a relevance-centric approach information Need query select from results rank using IR model USER: SYSTEM: tf-idf PageRank
    • what is relevance?
    • what’s wrong with relevance?
    • what are the alternatives?
  18. our first communication problem information need query
    • 2 words?
    • natural language?
    • telepathy?
  19. and the game of telephone continues query rank using IR model
    • cumulative error
    • relevance is subjective
    • what Goffman said
  20. and hopefully users feel lucky rank using IR model
    • selection bias
    • inefficient channel
    • backup plan?
    select from results
  21. queries are misinterpreted Results 1-10 out of about 344,000,000 for ir
  22. ranked lists are inefficient
  23. assumptions of relevance-centric approach
    • self-awareness
    • self-expression
    • model knows best
    • answer is a document
    • one-shot query
  24. can we do better?
    • what is relevance?
    • what’s wrong with relevance?
    • what are the alternatives?
  25. human-computer information retrieval
    • don’t just guess the user’s intent
      • optimize communication
    • increase user responsibility and control
      • require and reward human intellectual effort
    “ Toward Human-Computer Information Retrieval” Gary Marchionini
  26. human computer information retrieval
  27. a concrete use case
    • Colleague: Hey Daniel! You should check out what this guy Steve Pollitt’s been researching. Sounds right up your alley.
    • Daniel: Sure thing, I’ll look into it.
  28. google him!
  29. google scholar him?
  30. rexa him?
  31. getting better
  32. hcir-inspired interface
  33. tags provide summarization and guidance
  34. my information need evolves as i learn
  35. hcir – implementing the vision
  36. scatter/gather: a search for “star”
  37. faceted search
  38. practical considerations
    • which facets to show
    • which facet values to show
    • when to suggest faceted refinement
    • how to automate faceted classification
  39. showing the right facets: microwaves
  40. showing the right facets: ceiling fans
  41. query-driven clarification before refinement
    • Matching Categories include:
      • Appliances > Small Appliances > Irons & Steamers
      • Appliances > Small Appliances > Microwaves & Steamers
      • Bath > Sauna & Spas > Steamers
      • Kitchen > Bakeware & Cookware > Cookware >
      • Open Stock Pots > Double Boilers & Steamers
      • Kitchen > Small Appliances > Steamers
  42. results-driven clarification before refinement Search : storage
  43. crowd-sourcing to tag documents
  44. hcir cheats the precision / recall trade-off recall precision
  45. set retrieval 2.0
    • set retrieval that responds to queries with
      • overview of the user's current context
      • organized set of options for exploration
    • contextual summaries of document sets
      • optimize system’s communication with user
    • query refinement options
      • optimize user’s communication with system
  46. hcir using set retrieval 2.0
    • emphasize set summaries over ranked lists
    • establish a dialog between the user and the data
    • enable exploration and discovery
  47. think outside the (search) box
    • relevance-centric search solves many use cases
    • but not some of the most valuable ones
    • support interaction, exploration
    • human-computer information retrieval
  48. one more thing …
  49. “ Google's mission is to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful.”
  50. organizer or referee?
  51. thank you
    • communication 1.0
    • email: [email_address]
    • communication 2.0
    • blog: http://thenoisychannel.com
    • twitter: http://twitter.com/dtunkelang

+ Daniel TunkelangDaniel Tunkelang, 10 months ago

custom

5231 views, 27 favs, 14 embeds more stats

Reconsidering Relevance

We've become complacent ab more

More info about this document

© All Rights Reserved

Go to text version

  • Total Views 5231
    • 4746 on SlideShare
    • 485 from embeds
  • Comments 3
  • Favorites 27
  • Downloads 230
Most viewed embeds
  • 226 views on http://thenoisychannel.com
  • 185 views on http://www.cs.cmu.edu
  • 40 views on http://blogs.oracle.com
  • 11 views on http://vielmetti.typepad.com
  • 5 views on http://catacroquer.blogspot.com

more

All embeds
  • 226 views on http://thenoisychannel.com
  • 185 views on http://www.cs.cmu.edu
  • 40 views on http://blogs.oracle.com
  • 11 views on http://vielmetti.typepad.com
  • 5 views on http://catacroquer.blogspot.com
  • 4 views on http://www.agglom.com
  • 3 views on http://skydivedadpublishing.com
  • 2 views on http://sambalewa.web.id
  • 2 views on http://gmsvmd48
  • 2 views on http://translate.googleusercontent.com
  • 2 views on http://www.slideshare.net
  • 1 views on http://smartdatacollective.com
  • 1 views on http://static.slideshare.net
  • 1 views on http://www.bloggen.be

less

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint
Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

Categories