Transportation Fuels & Green House Gas Emissions Reduction

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Group

    Transportation Fuels & Green House Gas Emissions Reduction - Presentation Transcript

    1. Transportation fuels  and GHG emissions reduction Steven J. Taff Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota
    2. Goal: Reduce GHG from transportation • Drive less – tax on gas, miles, or GHG (miles) • Better cars – CAFE  (miles/gallon) • Cleaner cars – GreenCar (GHG/mile) • Cleaner fuel – RFS, LCFS (GHG/gallon) 2
    3. Scoring and Standards • None can be easily or directly measureed • All need models and averaging and broad  standards 3
    4. Scoring  • What included (field, plant, car, iLUC) • Where measured (local…world) • What number (LCA or direct) • What model (GREET, BESS, MnGREET?) 4
    5. population prosperity policy Indirect  land use  CROP  change? • PRICE CROP  DEMAND Increase  Change land  management   use intensity Environment  CROP  weather change SUPPLY 5
    6. Scoring  matters 6
    7. Policy linkages • Independent / Summable • Complementary / Synergistic • Conflicting / Redundant 7
    8. MGA policy linkages model • This is a “what‐if” model, not a “what‐should‐ we‐do” model • Emphasis on how policies might change  activities • Focus on links among policy actions, not on  implication of stand‐alone actions 8
    9. How policies influence outcomes economy policy DECISIONS outcomes parameters 9
    10. • People/Firms do the best they can with what  they’ve got • People/Firms choose lowest‐cost activity that is  financially, legally, and technically feasible. • Government sets the stage so that people/firms,  in doing what’s best for themselves, do what’s  best for Society. 10
    11. Policies  Electricity Energy, Emissions, and  Transportation Expenditures— and Jobs Building  efficiency   11
    12. GHG accounting Sequestration  Electricity reduction Transportation Total GHG  emissions Buildings 12
    13. Life cycle accounting Direct  (combustion) Production  facility Supplies and  Total Hauling manufacturing Farm/Wellfield Indirect landuse change 13
    14. Policies • Convince people to do something good • Require people to do something good • Pay people to do something good • Make people pay to do something bad 14
    15. Today: When Policies Collide  • Stricter CAFE standard • GHG tax 15
    16. CAFE Standard CAFE  fuel use  standard  by car  (MPG) (MPG) GHG  from  vehicles Cost to  Annual  meet CAFE  average fuel  ($/Vehicle) cost per car Fuel use  (BTU) Other Vehicle  Costs Car  choice 16
    17. GHG tax Energy  intensity  (BTU/ton) GHG Tax Carbon  ($/ton GHG) intensity  (GHG/BTU) Total cost  ($/BTU) Technical  costs  ($/BTU) GHG  Energy  emissions portfolio  Demand  (BTU) for energy  (BTU) 17
    18. • Let’s go to the MGA model 18
    19. Steven J. Taff Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota 612.625.3103 sjtaff@umn.edu 19
    20. 20

    + Clean Energy Resource TeamsClean Energy Resource Teams, 9 months ago

    custom

    350 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 350
      • 343 on SlideShare
      • 7 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 9
    Most viewed embeds
    • 7 views on http://www.cleanenergyresourceteams.org

    more

    All embeds
    • 7 views on http://www.cleanenergyresourceteams.org

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Groups / Events