• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Cutaneous Lymphomas
 

Cutaneous Lymphomas

on

  • 334 views

Cutaneous Lymphomas

Cutaneous Lymphomas

Statistics

Views

Total Views
334
Views on SlideShare
333
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
24
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

http://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Cutaneous Lymphomas Cutaneous Lymphomas Presentation Transcript

    • Dr. Shriniwas b Rushi MD
    • A variety of T and B-cell neoplasms can involve skin, either primarily or secondarily.  Primary cutaneous lymphoma : cutaneous Tcell lymphomas (CTCLs) and cutaneous Bcell lymphomas (CBCLs) that present in the skin with no evidence of extracutaneous disease at the time of diagnosis.  Secondary cutaneous lymphomas : systemic lymphomas that secondarily involve the skin.
    •  After the gastrointestinal tract, the skin is the second most common site of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma.  Estimated annual incidence 1:100,000.  Have a completely different clinical behavior and prognosis from histologically similar systemic lymphomas, which may involve the skin secondarily.  Hence, require different types of treatment as opposed to systemic lymphomas.  For that reason, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) classification for primary cutaneous lymphomas and the World Health Organization (WHO) classification for tumors of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues included primary cutaneous lymphomas as separate entities. A consensus classification was developed in 2005 referred to as ―WHO-EORTC Classification of Cutaneous Lymphomas‖.  65% of all Primary Cutaneous Lymphomas are of T-cell type.
    • •CLASSIFICATION •CLINICAL FEATURES •TREATMENT
    • WHO-EORTC Classification Frequency, % 5-Year Survival Rate, % 44 88 —Folliculotropic MF 4 80 —Pagetoid reticulosis <1 100 —Granulomatous slack skin <1 100 —Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma 8 95 —Lymphomatoid papulosis 12 100 Subcutaneous panniculiticlike T-cell lymphoma (provisional) 1 82 Primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium-sized pleomorphic T-cell lymphoma (provisional) 2 75 Indolent Clinical Behavior Mycosis fungoides (MF) MF variants and subtypes Primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder Aggressive Clinical Behavior Sézary syndrome 3% 24% Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma NR* NR Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type NR NR Primary cutaneous peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspecified 2 16 Primary cutaneous aggressive epidermotropic CD8+ T-cell lymphoma (provisional) <1 18 Cutaneous gamma/delta T-cell lymphoma (provisional) <1 NR Precursor Hematologic Neoplasm (not a T-cell lymphoma) CD4+/CD56+ hematodermic neoplasm (blastic NK-cell lymphoma) NR NR
    •  Extranodal Non-Hodgkins lymphoma of T-cell origin, with primary involvement of the skin.  First case described in 1806 by Alibert: ―mushroom like tumors‖ Most common type of CTCL  Accounts for almost 50% of all primary cutaneous lymphomas and 2.2% of all lymphomas.  3 cases/ 1,000,000/ year<1000/year US  Peak age 55-60  Male: female 2:1   More common in African-Americans
    • Heterogeneity in presentation.  Indolent cutaneous eruption with erythematous scaly patches or plaques, typically bathing trunk distribution.  Poikiloderma may be seen - presence of mottled pigmentation, epidermal atrophy, and telangiectasia associated with slight infiltration.   3 Phases of progression: Macular erythematous eruption  Plaque/Patch phase, resembles eczema/psoriasis  Tumor nodules/ generalized erythroderma and associated adenopathy or visceral involvement ( Often seen in Sezary Syndrome)   Circulating Sezary Cells
    • Patch & Plaque Tumor Erythroderma
    • Circulating Sezary Cell This Sezary cell is the malignant pleomorphic T cellseen in mycosis fungoides and has a convoluted nucleus
    •  Sezary cells are mononuclear cells with a cerebriform nucleus  Small numbers of these cells can be seen among healthy individuals  In MF, an increased number of Sezary cells seen in the peripheral blood.  An absolute count ≥1000 Sezary cells/cubic mm is a diagnostic criterion for Sezary syndrome.
    •  Extracutaneous manifestations :        involvement of regional lymph nodes (approximately 30 percent in MF ) Lungs Spleen Liver Gastrointestinal tract. Bone marrow involvement is rare Progression to Extracutaneous disease correlates with extent of skin disease    Limited patch or plaque very rare Generalized plaque 8 % Tumorous or generalized erythroderma30-40%  Hence, extracutaneous is more commonly seen in Sezary syndrome. Hoppe RT, Kim YH,Clinical features, staging, and prognosis of mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome, Uptodate.com, 11/06
    • INVESTIGATION PATHOLOGY SKIN BIOPSY -Atypical SMALL to MEDIUM sized mononuclear cells with cerebriform nuclei infiltrating the upper dermis among epidermal keratinocytes (epidermotropism) or forming intraepidermal aggregates (Pautrier microabscesses). - Pautrier's abscesses – pathognomonic but present only in 38 % cases of MF - Hyperconvoluted intraepidermal lymphocytes - Lymphocytes aligned within the basal layer LYMPH NODE BIOPSY Histology of a enlarged LN may reveal dermatopathic lymphadenitis, with sinus histiocytosis and a small number of atypical lymphocytes. The degree to which the LN is replaced by these atypical cells can be described as a grade. This grade has prognostic significance ( See graph : Extracutaneous involvment – Prognosis) IMMUNOPHENOTYPING Help distinguish MF and Sezary syndrome from reactive or inflammatory lymphoid infiltrates in the skin which display markers of mature lymphocytes. Mature T-cell markers include CD2, CD3, CD5 & CD7 Lack of one or more of these markers indicates a more immature cell and is strongly suggestive of lymphoma MOLECULAR ANALYSIS (Southern Blot analysis or PCR amplification method) TCR gene rearrangements ( to demonstrate clonality  neoplastic T cells exhibit clonal TCR gene rearrangements)
    • Skin biopsy from a patient with mycosis fungoides, showing a large cluster of atypical lymphocytes in the epidermis (Pautrier microabscess, arrow).
    •  ISCL/EORTC Diagnostic algorithm : Point based system  A total of 4 points is required for the diagnosis of MF based on any combination of points from the clinical, histopathologic, molecular biological, and immunopathologic criteria.      Clinical Findings Skin Biopsy ( Histopathology) Molecular criteria Immunophenotyping : CD3+, CD4+, CD8-, CD30, CD45RO+, TCR gene rearrangements
    • CRITERIA Clinical SCORING SYSTEM 2 points for basic criteria and two additional criteria 1 point for basic criteria and one additional criterion Basic 1. Persistent and/or progressive patches/thin plaques Additional: 1. Non-sun exposed location 2. Size/shape variation 3. Poikiloderma Histopathologic 2 points for basic criteria and two additional criteria 1point for basic criteria and one additional criterion BASIC 1. Superficial lymphoid infiltrate Additional: 1. Epidermotropism without spongiosis 2. Lymphoid atypia Molecular biological 1. Clonal TCR gene rearrangement Immunopathologic 1. <50 percent CD2+, CD3+, and/or CD5+ T-cells 2. <10 percent CD7+ T cells 3. Epidermal/dermal discordance of CD2, CD3, CD5, or CD7  cells with enlarged hyperchromatic nuclei and irregular or cerebriform nuclear contours. 1 point for clonality 1 point for one or more criteria
    • Skin evaluation : percentage of involved body surface area must be estimated.  Imaging Studies : CXR, CT Chest/ Abd/ pelvis with or without PET to evaluate the visceral involvement and adenopathy.  Lymph node biopsy : The involved lymphnodes seen clinically or on PET/CT need to be biopsied.  Bone marrow aspirate & Biopsy : Not routinely employed as part of the initial staging procedure for MF. However, indicated in select cases to document visceral disease if marrow involvement is suspected, for eg: as in the setting of B2 blood involvement or in patients with an unexplained hematologic abnormality. 
    • T1 T (skin) Limited patch/plaque/papules (< 10 percent of total skin surface) T2 Generalized patch/plaque/papules (>10 percent of total skin surface) T3 Tumors ( 1 cm diameter) T4 Generalized erythroderma (confluence of erythema covering 80 percent body surface area) N0 N (nodes) # Lymph nodes clinically 1.5 cm (biopsy not required) N1 Lymph nodes enlarged clinically, but histologically uninvolved (includes "reactive" and "dermatopathic" nodes) N2 Lymph nodes enlarged clinically and abnormal cells are present on histology but they do not efface the nodal architecture. Lymph nodes enlarged clinically. On histology, there is partial or complete effacement of the nodal architecture by abnormal cells. N3 M0 M1 B0 M (viscera) No visceral involvement Visceral involvement (histologically confirmed) B (blood) # No circulating atypical (Sezary) cells (<5 percent of lymphocytes) B1 Circulating atypical (Sezary) cells (5 percent of lymphocytes) B2 High blood tumor burden: 1000/microL Sezary cells with positive clone
    • IA IB IIA IIB III IVA IVB T1 T2 N1 T3 T4 N2-N3 M1 - Patch/Plaque Patch/Plaque Clinical Nodes Tumors Erythroderma Path Nodes Visceral Mets
    • 1-4 represent T1 to T4. Mycosis fungoides and Sézary Syndrome. Semin Oncol 1999; 26:276. figure 1, page 279.
    • 1: 543 patients with disease apparently limited to the skin (clinical stages I/II/III); 2: 57 patients with extracutaneous disease (clinical stage IV) at the time of presentation. Kim, YH, Hoppe, RT. Mycosis fungoides and Sézary Syndrome. Semin Oncol . 1999; 26:276. figure 2, page 280.
    •  Good-Risk:    Intermediate-risk:     Patch/Plaque only Survival >12 years Tumors/erythroderma Plaque + node/blood Survival 5 years Poor-risk:   Visceral involvement Survival 2.5 years
    • MYCOSIS FUNGOIDES
    •      Cures generally unattainable Goals of treatment are symptom relief and cosmetic improvement (palliation) Early aggressive therapy results in high complete remission rates but no significant difference in DFS or OS. Patients are susceptible to infections with skin flora; immune suppression is undesirable Skin Directed       Phototherapy : UVB (Ultraviolet B) or PUVA ( Psoralen + UVA photochemotherapy) Topical chemotherapy :- Nitrogen Mustard (HN2) or Carmustine (BCNU) Radiation therapy ( Electron Beam Therapy, TSEBT – Total Skin Electron Beam Therapy) Topical Retinoids ( Baexarotene) Topical Corticosteroids Systemic      Photopheresis Biologic Therapies : ( IFN alfa, Denileukin diftitox) Retinoids/Rexinoids ( Oral Bexarotene or Isotretinoin) HDAC ( Histone Deacetylase inhibitors) - Vorinostat Chemotherapy ( Single agent chemotherapy – Methotrexate, Doxil, Gemcitabine, Chlorambucil, Cyclophosphamide)
    • TYPE TREATMENT MODALITY PATCH/ PLAQUE Skin Directed: Local/Total REFRACTORY PLAQUE Systemic +/- Skin Directed ERYTHRODERMA Systemic +/- Skin Directed TUMOR Rad Rx +/- Systemic LYMPH NODE Rad Rx +/- Systemic
    •  Ingestion of 8-methoxypsoralen (0.6mg/kg, 2 hours before UVA exposure)  Becomes activated when exposed to UV light and increases the skin's sensitivity to UV light and hence, improves the effectiveness of UV light therapy  Treatments 3x/wk with subsequent tapering  65% Complete Response, 95% OR, duration of response 43 months, Mean survival 8.5 years in Stage I  Adverse effects : nausea, erythema, pruritis, dry skin, secondary skin malignancies
    •  Nitrogen Mustard (HN2) or Carmustine (BCNU)  Overall Response Rates 70-90% in Stage I disease  Adverse effects: contact dermatitis, erythema, telangiectasias
    •  CTCL is very radiosensitive  Use of Electron Beam Therapy limits toxicity, <5% of dose travels beyond 2cm  Standard total dose is 36 Gy  CR 56-96% in Stage IA-IIA  Given in combination with other agents to avoid relapse  Toxicity: erythema, pain, swelling, hair and nail loss, secondary skin cancer
    •  Reserved for Sezary Syndrome (Stage IVA1) and Stage IIIB disease  Technique:  Patient ingests 8-MOP. Leukapheresis, mononuclear fraction of patient‘s WBCs are collected and exposed to UVA, then returned to patient. UVA is toxic to cells and reinfused cells stimulate a selective immune response against malignant cells.  RR (response rate) 73%, median survival 5 years in one study of pt‘s with mainly SS
    •  ORR 79% in pts with all stage disease  Maximum dose limited by side effects  Started at 3million U and titrated up to maximum of 15million U 3x/wk  In one study combining PUVA with IFN 12 million Units 3x/wk – ORR 88%, CR 62%, response duration 28 months
    •  Novel Retinoid – Rexinoid  FDA approved for use in advanced MF i.e; Stage IIB to IVB in patients who have not responded to at least one prior systemic therapy  Selectively activates retinoid X receptors (nuclear hormone receptors)  Acts on retinoid response elements to alter gene expression
    •  A phase II/III trial of bexarotene in 94 patients with advanced stage MF (stages IIB to IVB) who were refractory to conventional therapy reported overall response rates of 45 and 55 percent of patients started on oral doses of 300 and greater than 300 mg/m(2) per day, respectively
    •  Adverse  effects : Hypertriglyceridemia  63% Most patients require drugs to reduce hypertriglyceridemia such as statin or fibrates. Diet should include Vitamin E and dietary consultation, especially for monotherapy patients.   Hypothyroidism    These patients need synthroid supplements. Leukopenia  43% 7% Dose adjustments control leukopenia Teratogenic
    • Oral HDAC (Histone Deacetylase) inhibitor  Partial response rates in MF of 30 percent  Approved by the FDA for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in patients with progressive, persistent, or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies.  Common Side effects :       Gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea, nausea, anorexia, weight decrease, vomiting, constipation) Constitutional symptoms (fatigue, chills) Hematologic abnormalities (thrombocytopenia, anemia) Taste disorders (dysgeusia, dry mouth) Abnormal laboratory values include high glucose, abnormal EKGs
    • Hoppe RT, Kim YH,Clinical features, staging, and prognosis of mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome, Uptodate.com, 11/06
    •  Likely represents leukemic phase of mycosis fungoides.  Sezary Syndrome:    Generalized erythroderma + intense Pruritis Lymphadenopathy Atypical T- cells (Sezary cells) in the peripheral blood ( An absolute count ≥1000 Sezary cells/cubic mm is a diagnostic criterion for Sezary syndrome  equivalent to the B2 designation in the TNMB classification syndrome).  Low levels of Sezary-like cells can be detected in the peripheral blood of patients with benign skin conditions. Hence, diagnostic criteria of Sezary syndrome uses an absolute Sezary cell count of >1000/microL with positive clones
    • Diagnosis is made when there is a clonal rearrangement of the T-cell receptor (TCR) in the blood (identified by PCR or southern blot analysis) plus either  an absolute Sezary cell count of at least 1000 cells/microL or one of the following two criteria  Increased CD4+ or CD3+ cells with a CD4 to CD8 ratio of 10 or more.  Increased CD4+ cells with an abnormal phenotype (such as a CD4+ to CD7- ratio ≥40 percent or a CD4+ to CD26- ratio ≥30 percen 
    •  Treatment includes Extracorporeal Photopheresis ( ECP) alone or in combination with other therapies ( IFNα) OR 30-80% and CR 15-25%.  Recent studies report benefitis with Bexarotene and Alemtuzumab (anti-CD52) therapies – more data needed.  Prognosis - generally poor with a median survival between 2 and 4 years.  Most patients die of opportunistic infections that are due to immunosuppression
    • Variant/subtype Clinical/pathological features Folliculotropic MF (follicular cell lymphoma) •Localised form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in which there is a slowly enlarging solitary patch, plaque or tumor. •Lacks Evidence of Epidermotropism. •Biopsy shows characteristic lymphomatous change around hair follicles ( folliculotropism) •Most commonly found in the head and neck area. •Skin lesions are often associated with alopecia, and sometimes with mucinorrhea (see alopecia mucinosa). •Worse prognosis compared to other MF variants – requires aggressive therapy •Localised patches or plaques with an intraepidermal growth of neoplastic T cells. •Presents as a solitary psoriasis-like or hyperkeratotic patch or plaque, usually on the extremities. Pagetoid reticulosis Granulomatous slack skin •Extremely rare subtype characterised by slow development of folds of lax skin in the major skin folds. •Skin folds show a granulomatous infiltrate with clonal T cells. •Occurs most commonly in the groin and underarm regions.
    • •Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (C-ALCL) •Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) •Borderline cases  Second most common group of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs)  Accounts for approximately 30% of CTCLs.  C-ALCL and LyP form a spectrum of disease  histologic criteria alone are often insufficient to differentiate between these 2 ends of this spectrum.  The clinical appearance and course are used as decisive criteria for the definite diagnosis and choice of treatment.  ―Borderline case" refers : refers to cases in which, despite careful clinicopathologic correlation, a definite distinction between C-ALCL and LyP cannot be made. Clinical examination during further followup will generally disclose whether the patient has C-ALCL or LyP.
    • A 40-year-old woman complains of a recurrent skin rash, which she describes as "bug bites." that spontaneously regress with in 2 to 3 weeks. Skin biopsy results demonstrate an atypical lymphoid infiltrate, which is CD30 positive.
    • A chronic, recurrent, self-healing papulonecrotic or papulonodular skin disease with histologic features suggestive of a (CD30+) malignant lymphoma.
    •  First described by Macau-ley in 1968 – in his words, he discussed a case in which "repeated biopsies of ... skin lesions consistently reveal an alarming infiltrate of large pleomorphic hyperchromatic cells which expert histopathologists and hematologists ... variously classified as highest grade malignant lymphoma, malignant reticulosis, metastatic carcinoma, malignant melanoma, undifferentiated malignant tumor."  ―A self-healing rhythmical paradoxical eruption, histologically malignant but clinically benign.‖  Frequently misdiagnosed.
    •  Despite modern techniques, cannot be definitively diagnosed by pathologists without pertinent clinical information.  Histologically, the proliferation is malignant and may possess any or all of the features of T-cell malignancy, including aberrant T-cell antigen expression and clonal rearrangement of T-cell receptor genes. Clonal T-cell gene rearrangement can be seen in 60 to 70% cases.  The component cells are highly anaplastic and express the CD30 antigen. Histopathologic features considerably overlap those of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma or in some cases, the histologic features more closely resemble those of mycosis fungoides.
    •  These difficulties can lead to a mistaken pathologic diagnosis of malignant lymphoma or other types of cancer.  Clinical  criteria for the diagnosis : The defining clinical feature of this disease is spontaneous regression . The patient must be observed without treatment to determine whether spontaneous regression will occur.
    • Histopathology  Histologic picture is extremely variable.  Three histologic subtypes :     Represent a spectrum with overlapping features. LyP type A : most common ( 75%) - scattered small clusters of large, sometimes multinucleated or Reed-Sternberg-like, CD30+ cells are intermingled with numerous inflammatory cells (histiocytes, small lymphocytes, neutrophils, and/or eosinophils). LyP type B : uncommon (less than 10%) - characterized by an epidermotropic infiltrate of small atypical cells with cerebriform nuclei similar to that observed in MF. . CD30+ large cells are rare or absent, but epidermotropism is more common in this variant. LyP type C : demonstrate a monotonous population or large clusters of large CD30+ T cells with relatively few admixed inflammatory cells. Histologically, indistinguishable from Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, with the exception of the minimal subcutaneous invasion.
    • Clinical Features  Generally occurs in adults (median age, 45 yrs)  Clinically benign.  Recurrent crops of self-healing, red-brown, centrally hemorrhagic or necrotic papules and nodules on the trunk or extremities, which can evolve in to papulovesicular or pustular lesions.  Lesions are much smaller than anaplastic large cell lymphoma (<2 cm)  Spontaneously resolve in 4-6 weeks, leaving hyperpigmentation or atrophic scars.  Unless accompanied by systemic lymphoma, most patients have no constitutional symptoms
    • Clinical Features  No single clinical characteristic at presentation can distinguish Lyp from Lymphoma with absolute certainty. The following features at presentation may indicate the condition is probably malignant : Presence of a solitary skin lesion > 3cm in diameter.  Persistence without a spontaneous regression.  Presence of significant lymphadenopathy. The involved lymphnode must be biopsied to rule out lymphoma. 
    • Treatment  Curative therapy is not available.  None of the available treatment modalities affects the natural course of the disease  Hence, short-term benefits of active treatment should be balanced carefully against the potential side effects.  Beneficial effects have been reported of PUVA (Oral psoralen plus UVA phototherapy) and topical chemotherapy.  Low-dose oral methotrexate (5-20 mg/wk) - most effective therapy to suppress the development of new skin lesions. However, the disease recurs within 1-2 weeks after discontinuing the therapy.  Therefore, in patients with relatively few and nonscarring lesions, long-term follow-up without active treatment should be considered.
    • Prognosis & Predictive factors  Excellent prognosis.  Waxing and waning course. The disease duration may vary from several months to more than 40 years.  10 to 20% cases may progress to or may have an associated malignancies such as Hodgkin disease, mycosis fungoides, or primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma.
    • Prognosis & Predictive factors No single criterion is available to predict evolution to malignant lymphoma.   Careful long-term follow-up is needed. Histologically, not possible to definitively diagnose malignant transformation when the disease is confined to skin.   Suggested features indicative of lymphoma are : a high ratio of atypical cells to inflammatory cells, infiltration of atypical cells in to subcutis and a change in the tumor cell immunophenotype with further loss of T-Cell antigens. On the other hand, when the extracutaneous dissemination occurs, the diagnosis of lymphoma is straightforward. In the disease course, the following clinical features may indicate transformation to lymphoma.    A rapidly growing skin lesion that fails to regress spontaneously A lesion that becomes resistant to topical treatment such as PUVA A lesion that exceeds 3 cm in diameter.
    • A CD30+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma with skin-only involvement without systemic dissemination at presentation.
    •  Accounts  for 9% of all cutaneous Lymphomas. No history of prior or concurrent MF or LyP  Must be differentiated from Secondary cutaneous involvement of Systemic Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma which requires aggressive chemotherapy.    Primary C-ALCL does not have extracutaneous manifestations at presentation. Patients with widespread systemic and cutaneous disease at first presentation should be considered to have the systemic form with skin involvement. No t(2;5) translocation in pC-ALCL ( unlike CD30+ systemic ALCL) No expression of the ALK protein and EMA ( Epithelial Membrane Antigen) in primary cutaneous ALCL.
    •  Differential Diagnosis:  Systemic ALCL involving skin  Lymphomatoid papulosis  Transformed MF • • • • •  Biopsy proven history of MF Infiltrate >25% large T-cells (>x4 small lymphocyte) In 1/3 cases majority of cells CD30+ Usually correlates with tumour-stage lesions Very poor outcome: 5-year survival ~20% Benign lesions with CD30-positive cells • Drug reaction (carbamazepine) • Viral infection (molluscum, herpes simplex) • Arthropod bite reactions (scabies)
    •  Diffuse nonepidermotropic infiltrate of large T-cells  80% anaplastic morphology • Round, oval, irregular nuclei • Prominent nucleoli • Abundant cytoplasm • R-S-like cells  20% large T-cells • Pleomorphic • Immunoblastic Note: ANAPLASTIC or LARGE CELL HAS NO EFFECT ON OUTCOME
    •       Clinical Features Usually, arises as a solitary reddish nodule, which may became ulcerated. Multifocal lesions seen in about 20% of patients. Lesions may show partial or complete spontaneous regression Regional lymph nodes may become involved in 10% of patients PET/CT or CT w/contrast should be performed to exclude the possibility of primary visceral/nodal disease and to evaluate for nodal extension. Prognosis is generally favorable.
    • TREATMENT  Patients presenting with a solitary or few localized nodules or tumors  Radiotherapy or surgical excision is the first choice of treatment.  Patients presenting with multifocal skin lesions  low-dose methotrexate, (as in LyP).  Patients presenting with or developing extracutaneous disease or rare patients with rapidly progressive skin disease  doxorubicin-based multiagent chemotherapy.
    • A) Diffuse dermal infiltrate of large atypical cells admixed with small lymphocytes. B) The large atypical cells are strongly positive for CD30. (C-D) The histologic picture in panels A and B can be found both in C-ALCL and in LyP. The final diagnosis depends on the clinical presentation. C) In combination with the solitary tumor of the patient shown in panel C the definite diagnosis will be CALCL. D) In combination with recurrent, self-healing papulonecrotic skin lesions in D, the final diagnosis is LyP .
    • Alpha-beta
    •     Very rare Primary Cutaneous T cell Lymphoma ( < 1% of CTCL) Described in 1991 by Gonzalez et al and is currently recognized as a distinct lymphoma in WHO classification Malignant alpha/beta+/CD8+, CD4- T cells preferentially infiltrate the subcutaneous tissue. Two groups of SPTL distinguished with a different histology, phenotype, and prognosis :  SPTCL with α/ β T-cell phenotype     SPTCL with γ/δ T-cell phenotype     usually CD8+, CD4restricted to the subcutaneous tissue (no dermal and/or epidermal involvement) indolent clinical Course. CD8-, CD4- and CD56 + neoplastic infiltrates subcutaneous tissue, Epidermis and dermis. very poor prognosis. WHO-EORTC classification uses the term ―SPTL‖ only for cases with an α/ β T-cell phenotype. Cases with a γ/δ Tcell phenotype are seperately classified as cutaneous γ/δ T-cell lymphomas.
    •  Clinical Features :       Multiple subcutaneous nodules involving trunk and extremities, rarely, the face. Constitutional symptoms : fever, fatigue, and weight loss may be present. Pancytopenia : usually, due to cytokine mediated BM suppression ( direct BM involvement is seen only in 8% cases) Hemophagocytic syndrome : less common with SPTCL, more commonly seen with ( in 1/3 cases) cutaneous γ/δ T-cell lymphomas Extracutaneous dissemination is rare. Treatment : The clinical course is indolent and 5 year survival 80% for this α/ β, CD8+ T-cell phenotype . Treatment modailities may include Radiotherapy in localized disease and Systemic corticosteroids. Doxorubicin based chemotherapy can be used in extensive or recurrent disease.
    •      A variant of SPTL with clonal T-Cell receptor gammadelta chain gene rearrangements. Constitutes 25% of SPTL cases. As per WHO-EORTC classification, this is classified as an entity distinct from SPTL. Prognosis extremely poor Clinical Features     Multiple subcutaneous nodules with ulceration/necrosis, mostly on the extremities.. Pancytopenia 1/3 cases may present with or complicated by Hemophagocytic syndrome leading to rapid downhill course { histiocytes engulf RBCs, white cells, platelets  infiltrate spleen (splenomegaly), liver(hepatomegaly) and lead to jaundice, liver failure and sometimes, death due to complications from cytopenias} Rx: Systemic chemotherapy , results disappointing – resistant to multi-agents. Median survival 15 mos.
    • T-cell neoplasm caused by a retrovirus infection with human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV I).  Endemic in areas with a high prevalence of HTLV-1 eg: southwest Japan,the Caribbean islands, South America, and parts of Central Africa.  ATLL develops in 1% to 5% of seropositive individuals after more than 2 decades of viral persistence.  Characterized large numbers of circulating atypical cells.  Skin lesions resemble MF and histologically, indistinguishable from MF. The neoplastic T cells express a CD3+, CD4+, CD8phenotype. CD25 is highly expressed  Genetic features : Clonal TCR-Gene rearrangements seen. Clonally integrated HTLV-1 genes found in all cases  helpful to differentiate chronic ATLL from classic MF or SS. 
    •  Can be divided into acute and chronic types.    Acute ATLL :  Skin lesions ( nodules, tumors, plaques or papules) similar to those found in mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome  Enlarged lymph glands  Hypercalcemia  Bone lesions.  Numerous circulating atypical cells  Prognosis is poor for this type with survival ranging from 2 weeks to more than 1 year. Chronic ATLL  skin lesions only ( closely resemble MF)  Circulating atypical cells are few or absent  Indolent clinical course and better survival, however this may transform into an acute phase with an aggressive course. Rx: Skin targeted therapies similar to MF in chronic cases. Acute ATLL requires systemic chemotherapy.
    • More common in males. Seen in Asia, South America and Central America.  EBV associated Lymphoma.  Multiple plaques and tumors on the trunk/ extremities and in the Nose/ Nasopharynx.  Systemic symptoms such as fever and weight loss. An associated hemophagocytic syndrome may be seen  The malignant cells are usually CD2 and CD56 positive (NK cell phenotype) - Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) are commonly positive. Rarely, cells may have a true cytotoxic T-cell phenotype.  Very aggressive disease, Rx with Systemic Chemotherapy, Median survival < 1yr . 
    •  characterized by a proliferation of epidermotropic CD8 cytotoxic T-cells and an aggressive clinical behavior.  presents with eruptive papules, nodules, and tumors with central ulceration. Visceral involvement (CNS, Lung, Testes ) can be seen but LN are usually spared.  Rx: anthracycline-based systemic chemotherapy  Median survival : 32 months
    • Heterogeneous group which includes all T-cell neoplasms that do not fit into any of the better defined subtypes of T-cell lymphoma/leukemia.  Out of this group, primary cutaneous aggressive epidermotropic CD8 cytotoxic T-cell lymphoma, cutaneous gamma-delta T-cell lymphoma, and primary cutaneous smallmedium CD4 T-cell lymphoma can be separated out as provisional entities.  Remaining diseases that do not fit into either of these provisional entities must be the designated as PTL, unspecified.  In all these cases a diagnosis of MF must be ruled out by complete clinical examination and an accurate clinical history. 
    • •CLASSIFICATION •CLINICAL FEATURES •TREATMENT
    •  Primary cutaneous marginal zone B-cell lymphoma  Primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma  Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type  Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, other  Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma
    • PCMZL
    • An indolent lymphoma composed of small B cells, including marginal zone (centrocyte-like) cells, lymphoplasmacytoid cells, and plasma cells.  Considered as a part of group of extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphomas commonly involving mucosal sites, called MALT (mucosaassociated lymphoid tissue) lymphomas.  Variants include primary cutaneous immunocytoma and primary cutaneous plasmacytoma.  Accounts for 10% of all cutaneous lymphomas.  In some cases of PCMZL in Europe , an association with Borrelia burgdorferi infection has been reported in but not in Asian cases or cases from the United States. 
    •  Clinical     Features: Red to violaceous papules, plaques or nodules on trunk or extremities. Usually, multifocal lesions. In some cases, spontaneous resolution of lesions may occur. Anetoderma ( flaccid or herniated-sac like skin due to loss of dermal elastic tissue) may develop at the site of spontaneous resolution.  Histopathology   : Nodular or diffuse skin infiltrates of small lymphocytes, marginal zone B cells (centrocyte-like cells), and plasma cells with sparing of epidermis. Immunophenotyping reveals marginal zone B cells expressing CD20, CD79a, and bcl-2, but are negative for CD5, CD10, and bcl-6 (distinction from PCFCL)
    •  Characteristic clinical presentation with multiple nodules and small tumors on the back and arms
    •  Solitary or a few lesions   Patients with associated B.burgdorferi infection     Chlorambucil or Intralesional or subcutaneous administration of interferon alpha  CR 50% Intralesional or systemic anti-CD20 antibody (Rituximab) Frequent skin relapses – options    Systemic antibiotics - Doxycycline at 100 mg twice daily for 3 weeks or pulse therapy with cefotaxime Multifocal skin lesions   Treat with radiotherapy or surgical excision. topical or intralesional steroids or Observation alone ( as in other indolent B-cell lymphomas) Prognosis : Excellent, 5 yr survival 100%
    • PCFCL
    • A tumor of neoplastic follicle center cells, usually a mixture of centrocytes (small and large cleaved follicle center cells) and variable numbers of centroblasts (large noncleaved follicle center cells with prominent nucleoli)  Variants ( according to growth pattern) : follicular, follicular and diffuse, diffuse variants.  Immunophenotype: Neoplastic B cells express CD20, CD79a and bcl-6. bcl-2 protein not expressed by PCFCL( unlike nodal or secondary cutaneous follicular lymphomas). Does not have t(14.18) unlike systemic follicular lymphoma.  C/F : Solitary nodules or grouped plaques/ tumors - found most frequently in the head and neck area. Multifocal lesions are rare  Prognosis : Excellent, 5yr Survival > 90% 
    • (A) Typical presentation with tumors on the chest surrounded by less infiltrated erythematous skin lesions. (B) Presentation with multiple tumors confined to the scalp. (C) Diffuse dermal infiltrate mainly consisting of large centrocytes and multilobated cells (D) Serial sections stained for CD20 (D) and bcl-2 (E). Bcl-2 is expressed by perivascular T cells, but not by the neoplastic B cells.).
    •  Localized or few scattered skin lesions  radiotherapy is the preferred mode of treatment ( even in cases with a predominance of large ―cleaved‖ cells).  Cutaneous relapses can be seen in 20% cases and does not indicate progressive disease. Rx with Radiotherapy.  Extensive cutaneous disease and extracutaneous disease  Anthracycline-based chemotherapy .  Systemic or intralesional Rituximab  benefits in some studies. Need more data.
    • PLBCL-Leg
    • A tumor with predominance or confluent sheets of centroblasts and immunoblasts ( mostly large B-cells. Small cells are lacking).  Characteristically, appears on the lower legs. Can occur on other parts of the body.  Most commonly affects Elderly Women.  Neoplastic B-cells express CD-20 and CD79a. Also, show strong bcl-2 expression and express MUM-1/IRF4 protein ( unlike PCFCL). t(14,18) is absent.
    •     Red or bluish-red appear on the lower legs and frequently grow into large tumors that extend deep into the fat. Unlike cutaneous follicle center lymphoma, LBCL-L tumors develop quickly over weeks and months, usually becoming open sores and spreading outside the skin ( extracutaneous dissemination). Prognosis is worse than PCFCL. 5-year survival 55%. PCLBCLs on the leg have an inferior prognosis compared to PCLBCLs presenting at other sites.  The presence of multiple skin lesions at diagnosis is a significant adverse risk factor. In a recent study, patients presenting with a single skin tumor on one leg had 5-year survival of 100%, whereas patients presenting with multiple skin lesions on one or both legs had a diseaserelated 5-year survival of 45% and 36%, respectively
    • A. B. C. Clinical presentation with multiple tumors on right lower leg. Monotonous proliferation of centroblasts and immunoblasts Characteristically, the neoplastic B cells strongly express bcl-2 (C) and Mum-1/IRF-4 (D).
    • Treated as systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphomas with anthracycline-based chemotherapy.  In patients presenting with a single small skin tumor  radiotherapy may sometimes be considered.  Systemic administration of anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab) has proved effective in some patients, but long-term follow-up data are not available and the place of rituximab in the treatment of PCLBCL, either as single agent therapy or in combination with systemic chemotherapy remains to be established 
    • PLBCL-Other
    •  ―PCLBCL-Other‖ refers to cases of large B-cell lymphoma arising in the skin which do not belong to the groups of PCFCL and PCLBCL, leg type.  They include morphologic variants of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas    anaplastic BCL plasmablastic lymphoma T-cell/histiocyte rich large B-cell lymphomas.  The lymphomas usually appear on the head, trunk or extremities. Most often these are cutaneous manifestations of systemic lymphomas and have to be treated the same way.  The prognosis is excellent unlike their nodal counterparts.  Plasmablastic lymphomas are seen almost exclusively in the setting of HIV infection or other immune deficiencies.
    •  Well-defined subtype of large B-cell lymphoma.  Defined by an accumulation of large neoplastic B cells within blood vessels. Usually, affects the central nervous system, lungs, and skin .  Histologically, dilated blood vessels in the dermis and subcutis are filled and extended by a proliferation of large neoplastic B cells.  Prognosis : poor. Patients often have widely disseminated disease, but cases with only skin involvement may occur. 3 yr Survival 56% vs. 22% for skin only vs. disseminated disease.  CF: Presents as violaceous patches and plaques or teleangiectatic skin lesions usually on the (lower) legs or the trunk.  Rx : Multiagent chemotherapy, both for disseminated and skin-limited disease.
    • •CLASSIFICATION
    •  Group of conditions that simulate a lymphoma , but behave in a harmless manner.  Usually, a reactive process, though a number of these can be difficult to distinguish from a lymphoma  T-cell and B-Cell Pseudolymphomas.
    • Clinicopathologic condition Simulated malignant lymphoma •Actinic Reticuloid •Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis •Lymphomatoid drug reaction, T cell type •Solitary T-cell pseudolymphoma (‘unilesional mycosis fungoides’) •Lichenoid (‘lymphomatoid’) keratosis •Lichenoid pigmented purpuric dermatitis •Lichen sclerosus •Mycosis Fungoides/ Sezary Syndrome •Atypical lymphoid infiltrates (CD30+) associated •Lymphomatoid papulosis / Anaplastic large cell with:Orf– Milkers nodule lymphoma – CD30+ •Herpes simplex & •Molluscum contagiosum •Arthropod (insect) reactions (including nodular scabies) •Lupus panniculitis •Subcutaneous T-cell lymphoma Lymphocytoma cutis •B cell lymphomas Follicle center lymphoma •Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma •Large B-cell lymphoma •Lymphomatoid drug reaction, B cell type •Follicle center lymphoma •Pseudolymphoma after vaccination •Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma •Pseudolymphoma in tattoos •Pseudolymphoma caused by Hirudo medicinalis therapy •Morphoea, inflammatory stage •Syphilis (secondary) • Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma •Jessner's lymphocytic infiltrate •Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, B cell type •Inflammatory pseudotumour •Plasmacytoma •Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma
    • Definition 1. Lymphoid infiltrate highly suggestive of CTCL 2. Clinical features NOT consistent with CTCL • Identification of causative agent • Uncommon presentation or course
    • 1. Well defined clinicopathological entities : • Drug induced  Anticonvulsants; phenytoin, carbamazepine  ACE inhibitors  Miscellaneous; atenolol, allopurinol, mexilitine, cyclosporine, antihistamines, griseofulvin • • Insect bite reactions Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis Actinic reticuloid;  chronic photosensitive dermatitis  Scaly erythema of exposed skin  2. Idiopathic • Clinical course/ HISTOLOGY/ IMMUNOPHENOTYPING/ MOLECULAR ANALYSIS to be used in differentiating them from true CTCL
    • TWO PATTERNS: 1. Band-like infiltrate (MF-like) • Subepidermal infiltrate • Atypical medium sized cerebriform cells +/- blasts, histiocytes • Few/no eosinophils, plasma cells Seen in all types of CTCPL except insect bite reactions. 2. Nodular pattern • Many small round T-cells • Scattered T-blasts & medium/large cerebriform cells • Histiocytes usually numerous +/- plasma cells, eosinophils Seen in • Drug induced CTCPL • Persistent arthropod bite reactions • Idiopathic CTCPL
    •  Features which strongly suggest MF 1. Pautrier‘s microabscesses 2. Medium/large cerebriform cells in epidermis 3. Linear epidermotropism 4. Disproportionate epidermotropism 5.  ‗Haloed‘ lymphocytes in epidermis ACTINIC RETICULOID vs MYCOSIS FUNGOIDES • CD8+ T-cells, MF usually CD4+ Multinucleate giant cells – fibroblasts, histiocytes • Vertically orientated collagen in papillary dermis •
    • ABERRANT PHENOTYPE  1.Loss of pan-T-cell antigens CD2, CD3, CD5, CD7 BUT also lost in some benign conditions (esp CD7)  2. Ratio of CD4:CD8    vast excess dual expression no expression MONOCLONAL TCR RE-ARRANGEMENT  BUT monoclonality found in typically benign lesions also e.g. lichen planus, pityriasis lichenoides, LSA  thus monoclonal but benign infiltrates may arise in the skin
    • Additional Useful Notes
    • Neoplastic cells show clonal TCR GENE REARRANGEMENTS.  Clonal TCR rearrangements ( dominant T-CELL Clone) does not always indicate malignancy  Several benign lymphocyte-mediated dermatoses exist, including lymphomatoid papulosis, MuchaHabermann disease, lymphomatoid drug eruptions, actinic reticuloid, and lichen planus, all of which demonstrate a dominant T-cell clone in some cases.  Detection of Clonal alpha-beta vs. gamma-delta TCR gene rearrangments is of prognostic significance in SPTL. Gamma-delta carries very poor prognosis. 
    • CD Type Representative Cells Also Known As CD2 T, NK Sheep RBC CD3 T CD4 T subset CD5 T CD7 T, NK Prothymocyte CD 8 T subset, NK Suppressor CD25 Active T, B, M IL-2R (Tac) CD30 Active T, B Ki-1 CD45 T subset CLA CD56 CD20-B-cell marker Cd138 and CD79a– plasma cell markers 9 usually CD20 – VE) NK NCAM Helper
    •    Immunophenotyping in anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) exhibits consistently strong CD30 expression in all clinical and pathologic subtypes – Most tumor cells are T Cell Phenotype ( frequent CD3 expression, clonal T-cell receptor gene rearrangements and lack of B-cell – associated markers) or null cell phenotype. In ALCL, B-cell antigenic expression is rare and is commonly observed in the HIV-related clinical form. In fact, these B-cell cases of ALCL are classified separately in the World Health Organization classification under diffuse, large, B-cell lymphoma Primary systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is typically in an advanced stage at patient presentation, and the disease is rapidly progressive. These patients demonstrate an increased frequency of bone marrow involvement (30%) and extranodal involvement, including skin (21%), bone (17%), soft tissues (17%), lung (11%), liver (8%), and, rarely, the gastrointestinal tract and central nervous system. Systemic symptoms are observed in 75% of patients, with fever the most common symptom. The primary systemic form, unlike the primary cutaneous form, generally stains positive for EMA and usually displays the t(2;5) translocation and the chimeric p80 protein ( NPM-ALK fusion protein – NPM on chromosome 5 joined with ALK on chromosome 2) with PCR and antibody studies. Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) usually manifests as a single or localized cluster of erythematous skin nodules, some of which may demonstrate superficial ulcerations. As many as 25% of patients have some degree of spontaneous regression of these lesions. Although most cases present with local involvement, patients may rarely present with disseminated cutaneous disease and are at higher risk of developing spread to other organs.
    •    Most cases of HIV-related anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) are actually of B-cell origin and seem instead to be related to the anaplastic variant of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Many patients demonstrate infection with the Epstein-Barr virus, which is absent in those with the T-cell or null-cell types of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Secondary anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) evolves from other lymphomas, most frequently from peripheral T-cell lymphomas, mycosis fungoides, Hodgkin disease, or lymphomatoid papulosis. This form of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) tends to arise in older adults, is commonly ALK negative (chr 2, 5 translocation), and carries a poor prognosis. Patients with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) present with either a primary cutaneous form or a systemic form of the illness. Patients may present with isolated lymphadenopathy or with extranodal disease at any site, including the gastrointestinal tract and bone. Patients with infiltration into musculoskeletal tissues (eg, psoas muscle) can present with backache.