The Intersection And Alignment Of Learner Centered Instructional Strategies (Mus)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

The Intersection And Alignment Of Learner Centered Instructional Strategies (Mus)

on

  • 1,044 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,044
Views on SlideShare
1,044
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

The Intersection And Alignment Of Learner Centered Instructional Strategies (Mus) Presentation Transcript

  • 1. The Intersection and Alignment of Learner-Centered Instructional Strategies in Online Learning and their implementation using Course Management Systems
    Mostafa Ewees (PhD)
    Stanford University at California
    Assistant Professor at German University in Cairo (GUC)
    EDUCATIONAL CONSULTANT
    Copyright Dabbagh, N. (2003). This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4. How are teaching practices and learning activities conceptually related?
    What are some theory-based design implications for online learning based on the principles of deep learning?
    What features of course management systems support the implementation of learner-centered practices?
    Presentation Outline
  • 5. Teaching practices = Instructional strategies
    Instructional strategies are what instructors or instructional systems do to facilitate student learning
    “the plans and techniques that the instructor/instructional designer uses to engage the learner” (Jonassen, Grabinger, and Harris (1991)
    “they connect learning theory to instructional practice” (Shuell, 1980)
    How are teaching practices and learning activities conceptually related?
  • 6. Promoting collaboration
    Providing feedback
    Providing advanced organizers
    Sequencing instruction
    Recalling prerequisite knowledge
    Gaining attention
    Providing guidance
    Examples of Instructional Strategies
  • 7. Beliefs
    Theory-based
    Design Framework
    Learning Theories
    Pedagogical
    Models
    Instructional
    Strategies
    Learning Activities
  • 8. Three Component Online Learning Model
    Online
    Learning
    Learning Technologies
    Instructional Strategies
    Pedagogical Models
  • 9. Learning requires ownership
    Learning encourages engagement
    Learning is a social process
    Learning is contextual or situated
    Learning is an active process
    What are some theory-based design implications for online learning based on the principles of deep learning?
  • 10. Three Component Online Learning Model
    Online
    Learning
    Learning Technologies
    • Asynchronous/synchronous communication tools
    • 11. hypermedia, multimedia
    • 12. Web development tools
    • 13. Groupware
    • 14. Video conferencing
    • 15. Course management systems
    Instructional Strategies
    • collaboration
    • 16. social negotiation
    • 17. exploration
    • 18. articulation
    • 19. reflection
    • 20. role-playing
    • 21. problem solving
    Pedagogical Models
    • open/flexible learning
    • 22. distributed learning
    • 23. situated learning
    • 24. communities of practice
    • 25. knowledge building communities
    • 26. asynchronous learning networks
  • Link to:
    http://mason.gmu.edu/~ndabbagh/wblg/matrix1.htm
    Mapping Learner-Centered Instructional Strategies to Web Features
  • 27. Learner-Centered
    Promoting collaboration & social negotiation
    Promoting problem solving
    P
    Promoting articulation
    Promoting exploration
    Promoting multiple perspectives
    Promoting hypothesis generation
    Promoting authentic learning activities
    Promoting reflection
    Promoting
    Role-playing
    Promoting scaffolding
    Promoting coaching
    Promoting modeling & explaining
    Promoting self-directed learning
    Instructional Strategies
  • 28. Hierarchical Intersection and Lateral Alignment of Instructional Strategies
    Promoting authentic learning activities
    Exploratory
    Dialogical
    Learner Guidance
    Promoting self-directed learning
  • 29. Promoting authentic learning activities:
    Real world relevance
    Ill-defined and complex
    Competing solutions, equally viable
    Multiple knowledge domains & skills
    Multiple & diverse levels of expertise
    Use of a variety of resources
    Sustained period of time
    Diversity of learning outcomes
    Intersection & Alignment of Instructional Strategies
  • 30. Promoting exploratory-type activities:
    Problem solving
    Hypotheses generation
    Exploration
    Role playing
    Promoting dialogical-type activities:
    Articulation
    Reflection
    Collaboration
    Multiple perspectives
    Intersection & Alignment of Instructional Strategies
  • 31. Providing learner guidance:
    Scaffolding
    Modeling & explaining
    Coaching
    Promoting self-directed learning:
    the skill of “learning how to learn” or being metacognitively aware of one’s own learning
    Having an awareness of how learning is carried out and the ability and desire to plan and regulate one’s learning process
    Intersection & Alignment of Instructional Strategies
  • 32. Pedagogical Classification of CMS Features:
    Collaborative and Communication Tools
    Content Creation and Delivery Tools
    Administrative Tools
    Learning Tools
    Assessment Tools
    What features of CMS support these learner-centered Instructional Strategies?
  • 33. Collaborative & Communication Tools:
    Include asynchronous communication tools, synchronous communication tools, and group tools
    Content Creation & Delivery Tools:
    Include tools for instructors that enable them to deliver course content and resources, and tools for learners that enable them to contribute course content, submit assignments, and interact with course resources
    Features of CMS
  • 34. Administrative Tools:
    includes tools to manage students and student information, manage teaching assistants, manage student groups, set course features
    Learning Tools:
    Includes tools that enable learners to manipulate content online and create personalized experiences during the learning process in contrast to tools that allow learners to post the end-products of their learning in a Presentation area or Dropbox.
    Features of CMS
  • 35. Assessment Tools:
    Includes tools primarily for instructors to assess student learning, e.g., the ability to create programmed quizzes or tests that are generally true/false, multiple choice, matching, ordering, or fill-in-the-blank
    Most course management systems integrate assessment tools that are objectivist in nature
    Features of CMS
  • 36. Link to the book:
    Online Learning: Concepts, Strategies, and Application
    http://www.it.gse.gmu.edu/ollbook
    This link is password protected and can be obtained with purchase of the book which will be published in January 2004 by Merrill Education Prentice Hall Publishing
    Upon publication, the URL will change to http://www.prenticehall.com/dabbagh
    What features of CMS support these learner-centered Instructional Strategies
  • 37. Pedagogical limitations:
    emphasis on faculty dissemination tools over student processing tools (Oliver, 2001)
    not meant to be a pedagogical tool, but rather a productivity tool for handling the administrative tasks of teaching (Olsen, 2001)
    lack the flexibility to support certain instructional activities satisfactorily (e.g., group-based production of academic deliverables) and/or fail to include certain features instructors may want (e.g., seamless integration with other software) (Klemm, 2001)
    CMS: Next Generation
  • 38. Pedagogical limitations:
    impede the design of more learner-centered, constructivist course designs (Harvey & Lee, 2001; Marra & Jonassen, 2001)
    the inability to support (1) multiple forms of knowledge representation, (2) authentic forms of assessment, and (3) the use of distributed tools that assist students in knowledge construction and meaning making (Marra & Jonassen, 2001)
    Most CMS users tend to choose the most obvious and easily accessible components and features of a CMS to expedite the development of online courses compromising sound pedagogy (Harvey & Lee, 2001)
    CMS: Next Generation
  • 39. If faculty and course designers take the time to redesign their existing courses when using CMS, through a comprehensive examination of their features and the careful integration of the learning activities afforded by these features, much of the replication of traditional face-to-face classroom instruction can be avoided and instructional designs that are learner-centered will emerge.
    CMS: Next Generation
  • 40.
    • Oliver, K. (2001). Recommendations for student tools in online course management systems. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 13(1), 47-70.
    • 41. Olsen, F. (2001). Getting Ready for a New Generation of Course-Management Systems. Chronicle of Higher Education, December 21, 2001.
    • 42. Harvey, D.M. & Lee, J. (2001). The impact of inherent instructional design in online courseware. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, vol. 2(1), 35-48.
    • 43. Klemm, W.R. (2001). Creating online courses: A step-by-step guide. The Technology Source, May/June 2001.
    • 44. Marra, R.M. & Jonassen, D.H. (2001). Limitations of online courses for supporting constructive learning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, vol. 2(4), 303-317.
    • 45. Shuell, T.J. (1980). Learning theory, instructional theory, and adaptation. In R. E. Snow, P. A. Federico, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Aptitude, Learning and Instruction (vol. 1, pp. 277-301). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • 46. Jonassen, D.H., Grabinger, R.S., & Harris, N.D.C. (1991). Instructional strategies and tactics. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 3(2), pp. 29-47.
    References