Implementing whole disk encryption State Wide, the good, the bad and the encrypted

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Implementing whole disk encryption State Wide, the good, the bad and the encrypted - Presentation Transcript

    1. Implementing whole disk encryption State Wide, the good, the bad and the encrypted  
    2.   Background First
        • USB drives stolen that had
      • " personal information on them of students and staff members"
      •  
        • Data breaches that caused campus to spend several $$,$$$  getting fraud protection for each person that
      •        " might have gotten there information stolen " 
      •   
        •   Started to get laptops stolen from instructors, and other staff members cars, homes, or just misplaced
      •   "Which had several years of students personal information on them, like SS Numbers"
    3.  
    4. Along comes Policy & Standards UCSS ( U niversity C omputer S ecurity S tandards) What it means: The University Computer Security Standard (UCSS) is designed to help protect the university’s central and distributed telecommunications and computing environment from accidental or intentional damage and from alteration or theft of data while preserving university community members’ appropriate access and use.
      • That include:
      •  
        • Minimum Computer Security Standard (MCSS)
        • Critical Server Security Standard (CSSS)
        • Web Service Security Standard (WSSS)
        • Database Server Security Standard (DSSS)
      UCSS is comprised of multiple standards What we are working on is MCSS !
    5. Minimum Computer Security Standard Scope This Standard applies to all computer and telecommunications devices, whether owned by the university, a university community member or a 3rd party organization, that connects to the university data network or support infrastructure either directly or indirectly . Compliance with the standard is the responsibility of all university community members, including students, faculty, staff, agents, guests or employees of affiliated entities who connect a device, either directly or indirectly, to the university data network or support infrastructure.
    6. All university community members using computing and communications devices at the university and all computing and communication devices connected to university resources in any manner must comply with this Standard. Central and distributed unit information technology staff will scan or examine devices for compliance and will disconnect any noncompliant device from the university data network and support infrastructure until the device is brought into compliance. In addition, central and distributed unit information technology staff may seize or quarantine noncompliant university-owned devices. Individual university community members who do not comply with this standard are in violation of the Policy on Responsible Use of University Computing and Network Resources. In accordance with that policy, violators may be denied access to university computing resources and may be subject to other penalties and disciplinary action including university disciplinary procedures appropriate to their university status.   Enforcement
    7.   Focusing on data theft
      • We started looking at ways to protect data...
      •  
        • No Sensitive data on laptops
        • No external devices like: (flash drives, portable HD)
      •  
      •  
      •  
      • *Other groups started talking encryptions*
    8.   Encryption Options     PGP - The console lacked the a bility to give administrative rights to certain staff   TrueCrypt - Open Source, great for personal use only, no way to recover.   Safeboot - Great console, ability to give admin rights to certain sections to staff members.
    9.   Time line   A plan was made to send laptops off to a outside vendor to encrypt and update for time purpose.   Desktops were encrypted by local techs.   Total machines sent out: 233 Total done locally:1282
    10.   Along Comes SafeBoot
    11.   Which is now McAfee Endpoint Encryption
    12.   Installation issues we have seen
        • Discovered a few machines still running old OS
          • some equipment retired
        • Vendor utility partitions - had to be removed
          • Used Symantec Partition Magic or 
          • Acronis Disk Director
        • Performed updates while at each machine
        • Time require to encrypt each machine
    13.   Installation issues we have seen
        • Machine/user naming convention adopted 
        • Image backup essential
        • Bandwidth issues 
          • downloading/synchronizing database
    14.   Install Process
    15.   After Re-Start
    16.   After Encrypted   Cross your fingers and re-start the machine
    17. The bad screen after installing The good screen after installing   The Good / The Bad
    18.   Log-on Troubles
    19.   How to Get into the Machine
    20.   And a Challenge it is "Sometimes"
    21.   Client enters the recovery code
    22.   Windows Log-in after recovery
    23. I am not able to log-in to Safeboot
    24.  
    25. Catch -22 How do we demonstrate that a device does not have restricted data, especially if it is stolen? During our analysis, the incidence response team will need to determine what that machine was used for and “guess” at the likelihood of restricted data’s presence.      http://buckeyesecure.osu.edu/Policy/ImplementationPlanFAQ
        • Performance hit on older hardware
        • Rescuing data more challenging
          • Tools see drive as empty or unformatted
        • Removing malware more challenging
          •   Safe Mode entry more difficult
        • "Lost" valuable tools / techniques
          • 3rd party diagnostic utilities
          • Disk optimization utilities 
          • Removing drive and "slaving" internal or external
        Challenges
    26.   In a Perfect World
      •   We would have had ...
        • More 
        • More testing on all OS installed
        • More testing on all hardware
          • McAfee Encryption vs. some Sony models
        • More end user training / education
    27.   btw... Did You Know Questions ?
    28.  
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Duane RigsbyDuane Rigsby Nominate

    custom

    247 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Implementing whole disk encryption State Wide, the more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 247
      • 247 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories