What is New In Minimally Invasive Surgery for Urology

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    5 Favorites

    What is New In Minimally Invasive Surgery for Urology - Presentation Transcript

    1. What’s New in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Urology Ho Siew Hong Consultant Urological Surgeon S H Ho Urology and Laparoscopy Centre
    2. Introduction – Basic Qualifications
      • MBBS (S’pore)1993
      • FRCS (Edin & Glas) 1998
      • FAMS (Urol) 2002
      • Consultant Urologist at Changi General Hospital
    3. Introduction – Subspecialty training
      • Fellowship in Endourology & Laparoscopy in Westmead Hospital, Sydney (1999-2001) - Andrew Brooks, Howard Lau
      • Attachment at Institut Mutualiste Monstsouris, Paris, France (2004) - Guy Vallencian
    4. Minimally invasive surgery
      • Avoids open, invasive surgery
      • Achieving similar, if not better results than open surgery
      • Less pain and morbidity
      • Quicker recovery and ‘down-time’
      • Cosmesis
    5. Minimally Invasive Surgery Laparoscopy Endoscopy Percutaneous surgery ESWL
    6. Extracorporal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL) ‘ A thousand grains of sand pass through the eye of a needle before a single pebble’ W. Spencer
    7. ESWL
      • Initially developed by aviation company, Dornier
      • Shock waves generated by a spark
      • Transmitted via water
      • Energy absorbed by acoustic surface (stone)
      • Stone shatters and fragments drained by urine
    8. Development of ESWL
      • Available since 1980s
      • Treatment of choice for kidney stones up to 2cm diameter
      • ureter stones up to 1cm diameter
      • Minimal complications [hematuria, colic, hematoma (2%), no association with long term renal failure ]
    9. What is new in ESWL ?
      • From water bath to water cushion
    10. What is new in ESWL ?
      • GA to sedation
      • Day surgery, quicker return to work
      • Larger choice of manufacturers & machines
      • Spark gap technology to electromagnetic / piezoelectric technology
      • Stone localized with fluoroscopy / ultrasound
      • Lower cost per machine, per treatment
    11. What is new in ESWL ?
      • Treatment for stones in kidney and entire ureter
      • Success rates kidney: 80-90% upp ureter: 70% low ureter: 50%
    12. Endoscopy in Urology (endourology) Cystoscopy TURP / transurethral resection Ureteroscopy
    13. What is new in endourology ?
      • Improvement in technology - better optics, light source, video - miniaturization of instruments - fiber optic, flexible instruments
    14. TURP
      • Transurethral resection of prostate
      • ‘ gold standard’
      • Indicated for ARU, complicated BPH, BPH not responding to medical treatment
    15. What is new in TURP ?
      • TURP is shrinking !
      • Improvement in medical therapy
      • Highly selective alpha blockers e.g. Xatral, Hytrin
      • 5 alpha reductase inhibitors e.g. Avodart
      • Greater awareness, early intervention before complications
    16. What is new in TURP ?
      • Safe surgery with few complications
      • Transfusion rate < 5%, TURP syndrome 1%, sepsis <5%
      • Short hospital stay, 1-2 nights
      • Good results (even for at long term, re-treatment rates at 10 years 20%)
      • No actual age limit for TURP
    17. What is new in TURP ?
      • Standard ‘loop’ TURP using monopolar current
      • Bipolar TURP with normal saline
      • Laser resection, vaporization
      • TUNA, TUMT, HIFU
    18. Bipolar TURP
      • Avoids risks associated with monopolar current
      • Avoids use of glycine, allows use of isotonic normal saline wash-out solution
      • Better hemostasis
      • Minimal increase in cost
      • Tried as ‘day surgery’ TURP
    19. Laser TURP
      • Ablation of prostate tissue
      • PVP, holmium, diode lasers
      • Better hemostasis
      • Day procedure
      • No tissue for histology
      • Cost of fibres
      • Less suitable for larger prostates
      • Long term results are not available, yet
    20. Endoscopic ureter procedures
      • Ureterorenoscope
      • Revolutionized treatment of pathologies in the entire ureter, up to renal pelvis
      • Benefited from technological advances
      • Day surgery procedures
      • Mainstay of treatment
    21. Ureteroscopy for stones
      • Treatment of choice for lower ureter stones > 5mm
      • Good alternative for upper ureter stone > 5mm
      • Lithotripsy – laser, ultrasound, EHL, pneumatic
    22. Ureteroscopy for stones Laser lithotripsy
    23. Percutaneous surgery
    24. Percutaneous surgery
      • Small puncture made on skin overlying kidney
      • Tract dilated
      • Access to kidney developed for - removal of stones - ablation of tumour (radio frequency, cyro)
    25. PCNL (percutaneous nephrolithotomy)
      • Small hole for big stones
      • Very large stones can be fragmented with laser and removed via small skin puncture
      • More than 1 puncture can be made
      • General anaesthesia, surgery duration 1-3 hours, hospital stay 3 days
    26. Laparoscopic surgery
    27. Laparoscopic surgery
      • Key hole surgery
      • Latest development in urology
      • Obvious advantages over conventional open surgery
      • Smaller wound
      • Less pain
      • Quicker recovery, discharge, return to work
    28. Challenges of laparoscopic surgery
      • Technically, more demanding
      • Specialized team
      • Slightly more expensive, use of consumables
      • Advantages outweigh challenges
    29. What is new in laparoscopy in urology?
      • Almost all urological procedures can be done laparoscopically
      • Reproducible, similar if not better results than open surgery
      • What is the standard of care ?
    30. Laparoscopic urological surgeries Procedure Standard of care Current opinion Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy Yes Proven long term results for tumour upto 7cm Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy Yes Replaces open Laparoscopic marsupilazation of kidney cyst Yes Replaces open Laparoscopic adrenalectomy Yes Replaces open Laparoscopic pyeloplasty Not yet Very promising, awaiting long term results
    31. Laparoscopic urological surgeries   Procedure Standard of care Current opinion Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy No Divided (laparoscopic, robotic assisted laparoscopic, open) Laparoscopic varicocelectomy No Divided (open microscope) Laparoscopic extra peritoneal herniorraphy No Promising, awaiting long term results Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy No Advantage over open, but other options available Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy No At best, similar to open Laparoscopic radical cystectomy No At best, similar to open Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymp node dissection No Promising, development stage Laparoscopic reimplatation of ureter No Early development stage Laparoscopic augmentation cystoplasty No Early development stage
    32. Laparoscopic Nephrectomy
    33. Laparoscopic nephrectomy
      • Benign, non functioning kidney
      • Renal cell carcinoma - almost all tumours can be removed laparoscopically
    34. Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
      • 5 small incisions
      • Completely mimick all the principles of open surgery
      • Extraperitoneal approach, avoiding contact with intestine
    35. Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
      • 4-5 hours surgery
      • Less blood loss, minimal blood transfusion requirement
      • Magnification allowing more accurate dissection and preservation of continence and erection
      • Hospital stay of 2 nights, early removal of urinary catheter
    36. Radical Prostatectomy
    37. Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy - Our Initial Experience Siew Hong Ho, Li-Tsa Koh , Sam Peh Department of Urology Changi General Hospital Winner of 2 nd best presentation in International College Of Surgeons Meeting, 2006
    38. Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
      • Largest experience in Singapore
      • Follow up of 3 years
      • More than 30 cases (3 in GEH)
    39. Laparoscopic prostatectomy v/s robotic prostatectomy
      • Assistance from robot in suturing
      • 3D view
      • High capital and recurring cost
      • Tactile feed back
      • Technically more demanding – training and experience critical
      • Extraperitoneal, avoiding contact with intestine
      • Allows for dissection of lymph nodes if necessary
      • Lower cost (by at least $10K)
      Laparoscopic prostatectomy v/s robotic prostatectomy
    40. Summary
      • Surgery is moving towards minimally invasive
      • ESWL, endoscopy, percutaneous & laparoscopy
      • More than one or a combination of MIS modalities may be used
    41. Thank you

    + Siewhong HoSiewhong Ho, 2 years ago

    custom

    1364 views, 5 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Dr Ho Siew Hong gave a series of Continous Medical more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 1364
      • 1364 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 5
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories