Echo assessment of lv systolic function and swma
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Echo assessment of lv systolic function and swma

on

  • 2,833 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,833
Views on SlideShare
2,833
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
2
Downloads
85
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Echo assessment of lv systolic function and swma Presentation Transcript

  • 1. Fuad Farooq
  • 2.  Assessment of ventricular systolic function, theessential part of all echocardiographyexaminations
  • 3.  2D echo allows visualization of theendocardium and it’s thickening, by whichglobal and regional ventricular systolicfunctions are assessed Quantitative assessment of global systolicfunction is usually based on changes inventricular size and volume
  • 4.  Fractional shortening of LV Ejection fraction Stroke volume and cardiac index Systolic tissue velocity of the mitral annulusand myocardium Tissue tracking Regional wall motion analysis
  • 5.  Percentage change in LV dimensions with eachLV contraction Reflects global ventricular functionLVED - LV end-diastolic dimensionLVES - LV end-systolic dimension
  • 6.  Assesses ventricular function only at the levelbeing interrogated If regional dysfunction is present, which is not in theinterrogation plane, it may result in a misleadingestimate of global ventricular function
  • 7.  Expression of global LV function Strong predictor of clinical outcome in almostall major cardiac conditions Determined visually by eyeballingechocardiographic images of the LV Considerable inter-observer variation but withexperienced readers variation is less than 5%
  • 8.  Measured quantitatively by using volumetricmeasurements from M-mode, 2D and 3DechocardiogramsLVEDV - LVESVLVEDVLVEF =
  • 9.  EF can also calculated from LV dimensionsmeasured with M-mode Measurement of LV dimensions from the midventricular level is used to calculate LVEFLVEDD2 – LVESD2LVEDD2Add 15% for normal, 5% for hypokinetic apex, 0% forakinetic apex, -5% for dyskinetic apex, and -10% forapical aneurysmLVEF = x 100
  • 10.  Not a true indicator of systolic function Determined by multiple factors Provides the amount of blood volume ejectedwith each cardiac cycle
  • 11.  Stroke volume can be measured as thedifference between the LV end-diastolicvolume and LV end-systolic volume obtainedby the Simpson method
  • 12.  The difference should be equal to SV across theLVOT if there is no valvular regurgitation If there is MR, regurgitant volume needs to besubtracted to obtain stroke volume across theLVOT
  • 13. Calculated asSV = LVOT area x LVOT TVI(time velocityintegral)
  • 14.  Cardiac output is calculated as:CO = SV x HR Cardiac index is calculated as:COBody Surface Area (BSA)CI =
  • 15.  Tissue Doppler imaging records the velocity ofmyocardial tissue The systolic component (S’) of the mitralannulus correlates well with the LVEF
  • 16.  Value of 8cm/s was selected as a cutoff point Vinereanu et al. have reported (80%sensitivity, 89% specificity) for the same cutoffpoint of S’ measured at the medial mitralannulus and (80% sensitivity, 92% specificity)for S’ measured at the lateral mitral annulusEstimation of global left ventricular function from the velocity of longitudinal shortening.Echocardiography 2002;19(3):177-185
  • 17.  Systolic contraction of the ventricles isperformed optimally when regionalcontractions are coordinated All walls should contract within 20 to 30milliseconds of each other Disrupted by conduction delay, atrialfibrillation, or a pacemaker
  • 18.  Assessed best with tissue Doppler imaging Reliably provide timings of cardiac events ormyocardial movement
  • 19. TDI in systoleTDI in diasystole
  • 20. Tissue colour Doppler in M-mode
  • 21.  It is byproduct of tissue Doppler imaging Basoapical views of each ventricular segmentare displayed as seven color bands, with eachcolor representing a particular distance thetissue moves during systole Tissue tracking provides a rapid assessment ofsystolic motion
  • 22.  Mitral anulus displacement can be determinedinstantaneously with tissue tracking Normal mitral annular systolic motion is>8mm (average 12 + 2 on apical 4 or apical 2views) A systolic mitral anulus displacement of lessthan 5 mm determined by tissue trackingcorrelates well with a severe decrease in theLVEF (<30%)
  • 23.  Normal ventricular contraction consists ofsimultaneous myocardial thickening andendocardial excursion toward the center of theventricle Regional contractility or wall motion of the LV isgraded by dividing the LV into segments In 2002, a 17-segment model was recommended bythe American Society of Echocardiography LV is divided into three levels - basal, mid orpapillary and apicalCirculation, 2002;105: 539-542
  • 24. Basal1.Anteroseptum2. Anterior3. Lateral4. Inferolateral5. Inferior6. InferoseptumMid1.Anteroseptum2. Anterior3. Lateral4. Inferolateral5. Inferior6. InferoseptumApical1. Anterior2. Lateral3. Inferior4. SeptalApical cap
  • 25.  Numerical score is assigned to each wallsegment on the basis of its contractility asassessed visually:1= Normal (>40% thickening with systole)2= Hypokinesis (10-30% thickening)3= Severe hypokinesis to akinesis (<10% thickening)4= Dyskinesis (out of phase)5= Aneurysm (thinned and bulging outwards)
  • 26.  On the basis of this wall motion analysisscheme, a wall motion score index (WMSI) iscalculated to semiquantitate the extent ofregional wall motion abnormalitiesNormal WMSI is 1WMSI > 1.7 may suggest perfusion defect > 20%
  • 27. Qualitative estimation errors due to: Underestimation of EF due to endocardial echodropout and seeing mostly epicardial motion Underestimation of EF with enlarged LV cavity; alarge LV can eject more blood with less endocardialmotion Overestimation of EF with a small LV cavity Significant segmental wall motion abnormalities
  • 28. NormalAbnormal
  • 29. Myocardial performance indexTEI index = IVRT + IVCTLVET IVCT - Isovolumic contraction time IVRT - Isovolumic relaxation time LVET - LV ejection time Normal in 0.39 +/- 0.05
  • 30. 1. E-point septal separation2. Aortic valve opening pattern
  • 31.  The magnitude of opening of the mitralvalve, as reflected by E-wave height, correlateswith transmitral flow and, in the absence ofsignificant mitral regurgitation, with leftventricular stroke volume Mitral valve E point (maximal early opening) iswithin 6 mm of the left side of the ventricularseptum In the presence of a decreased ejectionfraction, this distance is increased
  • 32. Severe systolic dysfunction
  • 33.  If left ventricular forward stroke volume isdecreased, there may be a gradual reduction inforward flow in late systole, which results ingradual closing of the aortic valve in latesystole. This results in a rounded appearance ofthe aortic valve in late systole