Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this document? Why not share!







Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft Word

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

psy685termpaperinstr.doc psy685termpaperinstr.doc Document Transcript

  • 1 PSYC 685 COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE GUIDELINES FOR TERM PAPER General Instructions 1. You should aim to write a 10-15 page paper on a cognitive neuroscience topic, discussing research within a specific area of perception, cognition, emotion, or motor function. Choose a function of interest to you or one that you have wanted to learn more about. Attempt to make the domain specific but not too narrow or too broad. For example, “Brain systems of language” would be much too general, whereas “Brain imaging and computational evidence for phonological coding in reading” would be appropriate. However, “Event-related fMRI studies of single-word reading in ADHD children on and off medication” would be much too specific. If you are unsure, email me, and I can probably tell you whether there is a good literature on the topic. The literature need not be large--sometimes 2 or 3 key papers may be sufficient to define a topic area. Your initial choice need not be restricted to the topics I am covering in the course or even those that are covered in text, but can include any domain of cognition, broadly defined, as long as there is cognitive neuroscience research on the topic. 2. Define the important issues in the topic area. For example, suppose your topic is reading. You should pose such questions as, what information processing stages are involved in reading, and are they organized in series or in parallel? Is there more than one route to reading? What brain areas and systems subserve these components of reading? Are the results of computational models of reading consistent with psychological analyses? Do “lesions” of such models effectively capture the effects of actual brain damage? Does evidence provided by brain-damaged individuals with language deficits (e.g., aphasia) support cognitive neuroscience theories of components of reading? ....and so on. 3. Describe research studies that examine and can potentially answer these issues. It is important that you make an attempt to identify research at each of the three levels of analysis consistent with the cognitive neuroscience approach, that is, formal (computational), psychological (behavioral), and neural. The existence of research at all three levels should also be a factor in your choice of topic (see Instruction #1). If there is only limited or no research at one level, be prepared to describe the kinds of studies that should be conducted at that level and what they could reveal. 4. Covering instruction #3 well would be sufficient to earn a good evaluation. However, if it is possible, try and go one step further: discuss to what extent the computational, psychological, and neural levels of analysis are consistent with one another and serve to paint a coherent picture. Also, if possible, discuss perspectives from development and evolution, and, if possible, genetics. Any attempts along these lines, whether successful or not, would earn a bonus evaluation. 5. Avoid topics in “traditional” neuropsychology, for example, those dealing with the diagnosis of a condition or the rehabilitation of that condition. You can certainly refer to neuropsychological or psychiatric studies, but the goal should be to use this evidence to reveal something about normal functioning. So for example, topics such as “The diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease” or “The biological basis of autism” would not be
  • 2 appropriate. However, referring to studies with Alzheimer’s patients in a paper on the mechanisms of episodic memory, or to studies on autistics with respect to attention and social interaction, would be entirely appropriate. Also, it is also appropriate to draw implications for diagnosis and treatment, but these should not be the primary focus of the paper/presentation. The absolute last date for approval of your topic is April 22. Try and get approval well before this date. The paper is due May 6. Some Specific Do's and Don'ts 1. At the beginning of the paper, say why the topic you will discuss is important. That is, you need to present a solid rationale for examining the particular issues you will discuss. Simply stating something like “This paper discusses cognitive and neural models of visual selective attention…….” is insufficient. You need to provide a reason as to why the topic is important and why the reader should read the paper. The rationale can be theoretical, pragmatic, or a combination of the two. 2. In discussing your topic, make sure you develop your arguments in a logical way after identifying the key issues. 3. Make sure you present sufficient evidence to back up your arguments. 4. Do not merely review the literature passively. Be analytical, critical, identify theoretical and methodological weaknesses, and suggest directions for further research. 5. You may use Google or other web search engine to look for relevant research, in addition to scanning journals and books. However the web should never be a substitute for consulting original articles published in scholarly, peer-reviewed journals and in books. Also, resist the temptation (in a “googled” world) or simply providing urls to various web sites, particularly if they are not associated with a scientific institution. And of course, no “pop” psychology articles, blogs, or non peer-reviewed journal papers please! 6. Present the results of at least 2-3 key studies. The number is less important than the amount and importance of the information that the studies yield. Format of Term Paper Write a 15 page paper, with the following sections: Introduction, including Outline of Paper Section 1, 2, 3, etc Conclusions References. Use sub-sections as necessary. You can use APA style or any other style appropriate to a journal article.
  • 3 Topics in Previous Years Are faces special? Evidence from neuroimaging, neuropsychology, and computational models. The false memory debate: Cognitive and brain imaging analyses Components of visual imagery: Evidence from PET, fMRI, and TMS Computational, neuropsychological, and brain imaging studies of vigilance Hot and cold cognition: Inter-relationships of cognition and emotion revealed by PET Cognitive neuroscience of musical expectancy and harmony Brain mechanisms of implicit memory: Evidence from normal and brain-damaged adults ERP and computational studies of selective attention FMRI and behavioral studies of procedural learning Multi-tasking and the brain: From basic neuroscience to neuroergonomics Plasticity and degeneration in memory: Evidence from computational models in Alzheimer’s disease
  • 4 Useful Journals to Browse Biological Psychology Brain Brain and Cognition Brain and Language Cerebral Cortex Cognitive, Behavioral, & Affective Neuroscience Cognitive Brain Research Cognitive Neuropsychology Cognitive Psychology Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Human Brain Mapping Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology Journals of Experimental Psychology Journal, International Neuropsychology Society Journal of Neurophysiology Journal of Neuroscience Nature Nature Neuroscience Nature Reviews Neuroscience Neuroimage Neuron Neuroreport Neuropsychologia Neuropsychology Proceedings of the NY Academy of Science Psychological Science Psychophysiology Science Trends in Cognitive Science Trends in Neuroscience