Why Things Go Wrong: Peter principle

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    Why Things Go Wrong: Peter principle - Presentation Transcript

    1. Why things go wrongor the peter principle revisited
      Author : Dr Laurence J. Peter
    2. A presentation by
      Sushant Kumar
      Research Scholar (marketing), IIM Lucknow
      www.domainofhope.com
      Including contributions from
      Rohit yadav
      Shiva
      Manish
      Sridevi
      Ravi
    3. About Dr. Laurence J Peter(September 16, 1919 - January 12, 1990)
      • American Psychologist
      • Teacher
      • Consultant
      • Experience of working in prisons and children
      • Authored Peter principle with Raymond Hull in 1968
    4. How did the principle originate ?
      The Peter Principle was first introduced in an article written by Dr. Laurence J. Peter in the January 1967 issue of Esquire magazine
      It struck a chord among American office-dwellers
      With the help of writer Raymond Hull
      wrote the book, “The Peter Principle: Why Things Always Go Wrong”
    5. Peter Principle
      In a Hierarchy Every Employee Tends to Rise to His Level of Incompetence
      • Uncovers a real flaw in hierarchies
      • Companies prefer to promote within the hierarchy
      • Person is eventually promoted to his level of incompetence
    6. But Why ?
      System encourages people to rise to level of incompetence
      If you are competent, you’ll be promoted
      But when you can’t do well, you’ll stay
      Effects
      Bungling your job
      Frustrating your coworkers
      Eroding effectiveness of organization
    7. A deduction or inference that follows a main proposition
      Corollaries of Peter principle lead us to more consequences
      Corollaries of Peter Principle
    8. Useful Work
      All useful work is done by those who have not yet reached their level of incompetence
    9. Hierarchy
      Accomplishment is inversely proportional to its height
    10. Trivial tasks
      There is tendency for the person in the most powerful hierarchical position to spend all his or her time performing trivial tasks
    11. Super (Competence & Incompetence)
      Either super-incompetence or super-competence may be offensive to the establishment
    12. A super-competent case
      Mrs. Abel
      Taught first grade in elementary school
      Parents wanted their children to be in Mrs. Abel’s class
      Ate lunch in classroom with her pupils
      But…
    13. Mrs. Abel cntd…
      She did not attend any staff meeting (except first one)
      Refused to upgrade her qualifications
      Did not take in-service courses
      She said…
      I don’t want a promotion. I don’t want to be an administrator.
      I like working with children.
    14. Mrs. Abel cntd…
      Got low marks for
      Attitude & Cooperation
      Professional advancement
      She had reached her level of competence
    15. Up, Up and Oops!
      Why do humans climb to their level of incompetence ?
      Abraham Maslow
      Proposes human nature as an explanation for struggle upward
      Social needs – One’s positions relative to others
      Ego needs – Recognition, Prestige
      Self Actualization
    16. Success – The trappings
      Impressing others has become such a preoccupation that the image and trappings of success are more valued than success itself
    17. Management insights
    18. Ability to identify genuine levels and requirements of job performance and attributes
      People may then be placed in jobs that they can do and for which they are best suited
      Self check is most important
      Identify boundary of competence
      Hierarchy kills competence and competent individuals
    19. Types of Incompetence
      Professional
      Physical
      Mental
      Social
      Emotional
      Ethical
    20. Communication insight
    21. The style and method used by the author is in itself a lesson on effective communication.
      Presented a boring subject like hierarchy not as a serious scientific work
      Presented in a light, amusing and witty way.
      Gives us relief from what might otherwise be relentless "preaching".
    22. Satire is a form of writing in which the message is serious and the method is humor.
      Benefits of employing satire:
      It’s nonviolent and artistic way of criticizing.
      • Author objects to the form of language that mystifies rather than clarifies.
      • Favors language that expresses
      • coherent ideas
      • Relevant information
      • understandable instructions.
    23. In the end…
      Success is a journey, not a destination
      Ben SweetLand
      Location: IIM Lucknow
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Sushant KumarSushant Kumar Nominate

    custom

    363 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    A summary of the learning from The peter principle more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 363
      • 363 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories