Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
15번 김안석 microleakage assessment of fissure sealant following by a fisuuratomy bur and a pumice
15번 김안석 microleakage assessment of fissure sealant following by a fisuuratomy bur and a pumice
15번 김안석 microleakage assessment of fissure sealant following by a fisuuratomy bur and a pumice
15번 김안석 microleakage assessment of fissure sealant following by a fisuuratomy bur and a pumice
15번 김안석 microleakage assessment of fissure sealant following by a fisuuratomy bur and a pumice
15번 김안석 microleakage assessment of fissure sealant following by a fisuuratomy bur and a pumice
15번 김안석 microleakage assessment of fissure sealant following by a fisuuratomy bur and a pumice
15번 김안석 microleakage assessment of fissure sealant following by a fisuuratomy bur and a pumice
15번 김안석 microleakage assessment of fissure sealant following by a fisuuratomy bur and a pumice
15번 김안석 microleakage assessment of fissure sealant following by a fisuuratomy bur and a pumice
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

15번 김안석 microleakage assessment of fissure sealant following by a fisuuratomy bur and a pumice

110

Published on

Published in: Health & Medicine, Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
110
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Journal Presentation 2조 15번 김안석
  • 2. Sealant • Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 Sep-Oct; 10(5): 643–646. • PMCID: PMC3858740 • Microleakage assessment of fissure sealant following fissurotomy bur or pumice prophylaxis use before etching • Ali Bagherian,1 Majid Akbari,2 Mohsen Rezaeian,3 and Ghassem Ansari4 • 1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran • 2Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran • 3Department of Social Medicine, Medical School, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran • 4Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti Medic al University, Evin, Tehran, Iran
  • 3. Background #### - A prolonged life of fissure to prevent invulnerable newly erupted teeth - The use of preparatory techniques bur introduction 1) fissuratomy bur 2) pumice prophylaxis to reduce microleakage
  • 4. Microleakage Any sign of microleakage…. -Considered the weak point -Failure to isolate pit and fissures -providing the retention of bacteria, nutrients, and their acidic metabolic products ##eventually leading to Sealant failure!!##
  • 5. • Group A • Group B
  • 6. Materials and Methods 90 freshly extracted healthy human maxillary premolar teeth  randomly divided into 3 groups (each for 30 teeth) Group A  a fissuratomy bur on a high speed reduction on all the occlusal fissures Group B  20 seconds thorough prophylaxis pumice on a low speed reduction on all the occlusal surfaces Group C  no preparation
  • 7. Continued …. 1) Teeth etched for 20s with phosphoric acid gel and then washed and dried for 20s 2) Teeth received an adhesive 3) LED light cured 4) Sealant applied to all to the prepared fissures through a syringe tip 5) Thermocycled with 1,000cycles between 5~55C for 20s 6) Covered with two layers of nail varnish and then with a layer of sticky wax 7) immersed in a 3% basic fuchsin dye solution for 72 h. 8) washed under the tap water for 1 min to remove excess dye 9) embedded in acrylic blocks and sectioned in the bucco- lingual plane through the sealant for two identical sections using a water-cooled diamond disk on an Isomet saw
  • 8. result - Examined under a stereomicroscope dye penetration score # 0 - no dye penetration # 1 - dye penetration to the outer half of the ena mel-sealant interface # 2 - dye penetration in the inner half of the ena mel-sealant interface # 3 - dye penetration into the underlying fissure **Kruskall-Wallis Analysis of Variance and Mann - Whitney U-tests
  • 9. Fissuratomy bur – 80% Prophylaxis pumice – 79.2% No preparation (conventional) – 66.7%
  • 10. Conclusion - Findings of this study indicate that the use of fissurotomy bur along with etc hant gel enhances adhesiveness of seala nt to the tooth - The use of prophylaxis paste would be advantageous in microleakage reduction to the use of etching alone

×