Multidimensional Scaling

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Multidimensional Scaling - Presentation Transcript

    1. Toolbox Presentation #4: Multidimensional Scaling and OS Perceptual Maps Diana Laboy-Rush Laboy- October 25 2006 25, EMGT 510
    2. Agenda g  Why use Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) and Overall Similarity (OS) Perceptual Maps  What is MDS?  Background and History  Tips for Implementation  Things to Consider  Example Application
    3. Challenges with AR Perceptual Maps Maps  Users have difficulty scoring attributes, even when they are aware of them  Purchase d i i P h decisions are sometimes made using ti d i implicit attributes, that are not easily identified  Absence of phantom attributes as map dimensions distort analysis  AR views products as bundles of attributes, attributes which need to be complete in order to be effective
    4. What is Multidimensional Scaling? g  Goal – to determine GAPs in the market based on consumer / purchaser’s perception.  Data D t analysis methodology f mapping l i th d l for i similarities and dissimilarities among items  Used in Market Research to map consumer perceptions of products to draw out attributes not otherwise easily communicated  Analysis often graphically represented in order to identify gaps in the market
    5. Background and History g y  1938 - Pioneered by Young & Householder y g  1958 – Psychometrician Torgerson revived with the earliest application in market research  C Consumer perceptions of silverware patterns ti f il tt  1969 – Stefflre was the first to use systematically, focused on visual representation of consumer’s perceptions of consumer s brand similarities –developed “Tinkertoys”  1975 – Green discussed the issues surrounding new product development  1983 – present : Numerous developments in methodology and applications in market research
    6. Recent Developments in MDS p  3-way unfolding models  Stochastic MDS models  Non-symmetric matrix models  MDS / Clustering combinations (hybrid models
    7. Steps for Implementation p p  What brands and how many? y Formulate the Problem 8<x<20 ideal  What is the purpose of the analysis? l i ? Obtain Input Data  Perception data : direct approach Run MDS Q = N (N - 1) / 2 Statistical Program Where # of questions depends on # of brands  Metric (interval) or Nonmetric Map the results and (ordinal) MDS programs define dimensions  2 D Map, often subjective
    8. Example Application – OS Perceptual Map of Search Engines  Overall Si il it P O ll Similarity Perceptual M of Search t l Map f S h Engines using Multidimensional Scaling technique  14 Subjects 5B Brands/Products d /P d t  Yahoo, Google, Copernic, AOL, MSN.com  2 Di Dimensions i  Usability and Overall Value  5 point Ordinal Measurement Scale
    9. Tools used  Data Gathering  Online Survey Tool : QuestionPro www.questionpro.com  Data Analysis and Visual Representation  Excel Statistics Plugin : XLStat g www.xlstat.com
    10. MDS Proximity Map y p Configuration (Kruskal's stress (1) = 3.952E-5) 1 0.8 Go o gle 0.6 Co pernicus 0.4 0.2 02 Dim2 0 -1.2 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 M SN.co m 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 -0.2 -0.4 Yaho o -0.6 A OL -0.8 Dim 1
    11. OS Perceptual Map p p Go o gle Gap 1 p Co pernicus Usability M SN.co m Value Yaho o A OL
    12. Things to consider [3] “Comparison of MDS Methods for Perceptual Mapping”, 7f t factors varied over 4 diff i d different MDS algorithms t l ith  Large samples are best –  Analysis of <10 subjects should be interpreted cautiously  The same holds true for # of brands, to lesser extent  Greater than 6, less than 12 ideal  Dissimilarity judgements should be collected on interval scales or on ordinal scales with large number of scale values  Most frequent criticism of MDS is that assumptions must be made on the error components components.
    13. References 1) Crawford, Crawford Merle; DiBenedetto Anthony: New DiBenedetto, Products Management, eight edition 2) ) Carroll, J. Douglas; Green, Paul R., , g ; , , “Psychometric Methods in Marketing Research: Part II, Multidimensional Scaling”, Journal of Marketing Research, (May 1997), pp. 193-204 193 204 3) Bijmolt, Tammo H.A.; Wedel, Michel: “A Comparison of Multidimensional Scaling Methods for Perceptual Mapping”, Journal of Mapping Marketing Research, (May 1999), pp. 277-283 4) “How do I run a Multidimensional Scaling ( g (MDS) ) with XLSTAT?”, http://www.xlstat.com/tutorials
    14. Q Questions??
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Diana Laboy-RushDiana Laboy-Rush Nominate

    custom

    169 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Multidimensional Scaling as Market Research Tool

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 169
      • 169 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories