2009 Trajkov Social Capital - Presentation Transcript
Nevena Trajkov Wayne State University 25 April 2009
Questions
Hypothesis
Overview of Theories
Path Dependence, Social Capital, Civil Society
Theories Applied to Croatia
Concluding Thoughts
What are they?
What is their relationship?
Problem: “Fuzzy Logic”
Lack of explicit distinctions between them
How can Croatia aid in the understanding of path dependence, social capital and civil society?
Bonus Question
What will this reveal about Croatia itself?
H 1 : Path dependence, social capital and civil society can exhibit circular and confusing properties with one another
H 2 : Path dependence and social capital, according to their accepted definitions, have the potential to be detrimental to Croatia
Increasing Return – The “Groove” ( Pierson )
Positive reinforcement
Negative Externalities
Technology: QWERTY board (Page)
Institutions “Lock-In” ( North )
High start up costs, difficult to learn new techniques, risk in changing methods of coordination
Obligations, expectations, trustworthiness
( norm) (reciprocity) (trust)
A does something for B (obligation/norm)
and expects B to reciprocate.
Each repetition (reciprocation) builds TRUST.
- Jewish Diamond Merchants of Brooklyn, New York
Deviation = social and financial costs
Question: Are these not Pierson’s increasing returns and negative externalities?
“ Helps Explain WHY people act the way they do AND how that translates into the bigger” structural picture by exposing limitations.
PEOPLE ARE RATIONAL ACTORS
Trust is key : “without trust, institutions could not exist” as they will experience a loss in membership
Attempt to fuse social capital and institutions
Making Democracy Work (1993)
Social capital: networks, norms and trust
Civil society: citizen involvement in political and non-political groups
Social capital + civil society less corrupt, more efficient government
Social capital increases as more people work together
Civil society necessary to build up social capital
Again, similarities to Pierson’s increasing returns
Social capital is path dependent because of history
Society’s history leaves a lasting impression
Does not mention “investment”; duration
Constant battle between tradition (increasing returns) and modernization (negative externalities, technology)
Economic security :
high priority for free choice and motivates political action (civil society)
Economic development :
reflects changes in people’s beliefs and
motivations modernization break in the “groove”
Definition: London School of Economics
“ arena of un-coerced collective action around shared interests, purposes and values. In theory, its institutional forms are distinct from those of the state, family and market, though in practice, the boundaries between state and civil society, family and market are often complex blurred and negotiated ”
BUT again, the idea is of increasing returns.
Collective action – pursuit of goals by more than one person
Shared interests
Increasing Return
- Trust, Norms, Obligations, Expectations
- Tradition
Negative Externalities
- Cost of change, technological advances
- Modernization
Putnam, Inglehart
Putnam: social capital is networks, norms and trust (increasing returns, tradition) and helps build democracies and institutions
Inglehart: tradition does not promote democratization, but rather modernization
Problems of conceptual stretching?
Extension v/ Intension
Possibility of path dependence, social capital and civil society to exist in the same family?
Need clear distinctions, more explicit definitions
What can Croatia tell us?
Is Croatia in its own “groove”?
Is this “groove” good or bad for the state?
World Bank: Governance Improving
Since government effectiveness is improving, according to the theories, so should score on civil society to indicate modernization/democratization
Results do not support Putnam nor Inglehart/Welzel: civil society remained virtually unchanged while government effectiveness improved
Social Capital and thus civil society is down in Croatia
Three testing variables:
General trust, civic participation, trust in institutions
First tests on civic participation and trust in institutions
Major decrease in trust of institutions Štulhofter: trust indicates perceived corruption
Trust (norms, increasing returns) indicates corruption, NOT government effectiveness
Challenges all presented authors, especially Putnam: who hold that social capital and civil society more effective government
Reality, it makes little difference
Religiosity
90% of Croats trust the Roman Catholic Church more than anything (Bezovan)
Only consistent indicator of civil society (5.03***)
Tradition, non-modernization, increasing returns does not equal democratization, new things, negative externalities.
Croatia showed problems with the logic of path dependence, social capital and civil society
- more explicit definitions are needed
Social capital and path dependence is not always good! Can be too traditional and delay modernization/democratization
“ groove”, lock- in; e.g. Uzelac and judicial reform
Civil Society does not indicate an effective government as Putnam would have it.
Instead, it indicates corruption, therefore
Civil society cannot change government until it exposes it and through democratic processes, it can legitimize governments.
0 comments
Post a comment