Bandwidth for all, Peruvian case — Presentation Transcript
Bandwidth for all – The Peruvian case Roxana Barrantes Instituto de Estudios Peruanos ACORN/REDECOM (Ciudad de México) (5 de setiembre de 2009)
Content
1. What is the need and viability of building an alternate IP backbone network?
2. What safeguards should be in place to promote fair competition under this scenario?
3. What institutional conditions are necessary to avoid falling into the same oversights that have caused uneven network development and market inefficiencies in the region?
Current market
Do we need an alternate IP backbone network?
In fact, what Peru needs is an IP backbone network!
Only one backbone along the coast and few kilometers into the highlands.
Mapa FibraOptica 2006.pdf
TdP’s fiber optic network Brazil Colombia Bolivia Chile Ecuador
Safeguards
The efficiency – competition dilemma keeps popping up!
TdP should not be prevented from participating –that will increase competition for the market but keep retail prices high.
Regulatory failure is non negligible.
Given TdP’s position in the Peruvian market, safeguards must be in place.
Fixed – June 2009: 75% (LIS)
Mobile – June 2009: 63% (LIS)
Cable TV – March 2009: 69.5% (subscribers)
Internet – March 2009: 93.8% (subscribers)
Which safeguards?
Institutions matter
If promoted by the public sector, market design is key.
What kind of auction?
Should FITEL money be used?
If so, what is the correct subsidy amount?
Regulator to monitor compliance
What extra powers are needed to be effective?
Remember, the Peruvian regulator is the competition authority in telecom.
Regulatory model matters
Shall we change the regulatory model?
Regulate networks / Deregulate retail services
Retailers are not to own networks (physical infrastructure).
New divestiture!
Calculate welfare losses from market concentration.
Roxana Barrantes [email_address] Instituto de Estudios Peruanos Horacio Urteaga 694 Teléfonos: (51 1) 332 6194 Fax: (51 1) 332 617399999999 [email_address] www.iep.org.pe
