Basd Data Summary 2011

289 views
241 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
289
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Each year I put together an updated data summary booklet that serves as a reference for Board Members and administrators throughout the year. Available online.
  • What do we learn from the data and what questions do we have as a result of examining the data? What are the root causes of problems AND successes. Here is a photo of teachers looking at data. The above is the simple definition of Professional Learning Communities, a key component of building action plans. ROOT CAUSE ACTIVITY: Mrs. Kinney How do we find the root cause. This was done at the data inservice for all school data teams.
  • More students than last year.
  • These data are very encouraging because all of our students at all grade levels have high attendance rates.
  • We had only 18 English Language Learners in the district up three from last year. The levels begin with “entering” where the student cannot read or write English to “reaching” where a student exits the ESL program.
  • High participation rates, however a slight drop.
  • Just a sample of the many clubs offered. A drop from last year.
  • A slight drop from last year.
  • Current figures based on 1:1 support from counselors and encouragement from teachers.
  • More data in data report.
  • Must be college and career ready: Fewer students are seeking employment, and more are attending junior or community colleges. 172 75 50 52 35 11 59 60 18
  • Up from 72% last year.
  • Writing issue in Data Summary: RA training and support, and we are looking to increase writing over time, needs more emphasis. Will include writing and science in this report next year.
  • Raised the percentage that must be proficient this year.
  • The state groups the scores in K-3, 6-8 and then grade 11. What assumptions can you make based on these data? What additional data do we need to confirm or refute our assumptions? 4Sight Benchmark Assessments Fountis and Pennel Levels DIBELS Demographics Attendance
  • What do these data tell us? Grade level issues: 5 th grade assessment statewide issue, includes more to be assessed. Why differences in buildings, grade levels, etc.? Sue and Karen led two data days in which teams: Analyzed data Determined root causes (not just data, but contextual data) And began to develop building action plans with this information (will be available November 5 th ) Remember varied successes depending on the school. All want 100% proficiency K-12 for ALL students.
  • What do these data tell us?
  • The focus on the five themes of high performing schools is paying off and we must keep that focus for the students of this district. Building Action Plans focus our efforts on key effective components for running a school: Climate (safe and orderly environment) SMART Goals (focus on a viable curriculum) Professional Learning Communities and subsequent interventions for any student who needs assistance or enrichment, or other supports
  • Basd Data Summary 2011

    1. 1. Boyertown Area School District Data Summary October 2011
    2. 2. Examining Data <ul><ul><li>Ensuring that Students Learn </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>A Culture of Collaboration </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>A Focus on Results </li></ul></ul>
    3. 3. Student Enrollment Data
    4. 4. Student Attendance Rates
    5. 5. 89
    6. 6. (2009-2010 - 1,638)
    7. 7. <ul><li>The totals may include the same students involved in more than one activity. </li></ul><ul><li>Each student takes a club. Some clubs are ½ year and some students are selecting the full year clubs. </li></ul><ul><li>More tutoring is now being provided as part of RtI, reducing some club experiences. </li></ul>(2009-2010 - 5,761) Student Clubs and Activities Participation Number of Students Participating at: Total Senior High Junior High Arts Expo/Open Art Studio 553 -- 553 Chess Club 8 -- 8 Key Club 65 -- 65 National Honor Society 51 -- 51 Scrapbooking Club -- 36 36 Sports Cluster/Debate -- 465 465 Student Council 150 50 200 Technology Cluster -- 307 307 Yearbook Club 21 32 53 Other 561 3,939 4,500 Total 1,409 4,829 6,238
    8. 8. (2009-2010 – 1,728)
    9. 9. Dual Enrollment for High School and College Credit <ul><li>School Year / Totals </li></ul><ul><li>05-06 23 </li></ul><ul><li>06-07 66 </li></ul><ul><li>07-08 74 </li></ul><ul><li>08-09 184 </li></ul><ul><li>09-10 213 </li></ul><ul><li>10-11 274 </li></ul><ul><li>Commendation: BASD has the highest number of students at Montco. </li></ul><ul><li>Courses: Advanced Drawing, Astronomy, Computer Applications, CPR / First Aid, English 101, Environmental Science, Intro to Education, </li></ul><ul><li>Spanish III, Spanish IV </li></ul>
    10. 10. Advanced Placement <ul><li>2005 - 18 subjects </li></ul><ul><ul><li>229 tests </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>164 scored 3 or higher (72%) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2006 - 14 subjects </li></ul><ul><ul><li>174 tests </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>132 scored 3 or higher (76%) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2007 - 17 subjects </li></ul><ul><ul><li>189 tests </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>133 scored 3 or higher (70%) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2008 - 13 subjects </li></ul><ul><ul><li>239 tests </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>173 scored 3 or higher (72%) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2009 – 14 subjects </li></ul><ul><ul><li>233 tests </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>179 scored 3 or higher (77%) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2010 – 12 subjects </li></ul><ul><ul><li>210 tests </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>174 scored 3 or higher (83%) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2011 – 14 subjects </li></ul><ul><ul><li>414 tests </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>277 scored 3 or higher (67%) </li></ul></ul>
    11. 11. SAT Results <ul><li>2006 – 495 Graduates </li></ul><ul><ul><li>360 Students Participating </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>77% of Students on to Post-Secondary Education </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2007 – 523 Graduates </li></ul><ul><ul><li>364 Students Participating </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>66% of Students on to Post-Secondary Education </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2008 – 563 Graduates </li></ul><ul><ul><li>382 Students Participating </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>72% of Students on to Post-Secondary Education </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2009 – 531 Graduates </li></ul><ul><ul><li>351 Students Participating </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>72% of Students on to Post-Secondary Education </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2010 – 507 Graduates </li></ul><ul><ul><li>329 Students Participating </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>74% of Students on to Post-Secondary Education </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2011 – 534 Graduates </li></ul><ul><ul><li>381 Students Participating </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>75% of Students on to Post-Secondary Education </li></ul></ul>
    12. 12. Plans for the Class of 2011 State Colleges and Universities in Pennsylvania 157 Private Colleges and Universities in Pennsylvania 104 Colleges and Universities outside of Pennsylvania 48 Junior or Community Colleges 69 Other Post-Secondary Schools 22 Armed Services 15 Employed 61 Seeking Employment 44 Other 14 Total: 534
    13. 13. Colleges and Universities <ul><li>75% of our graduates pursuing higher education (74% last year) </li></ul><ul><li>58% - Four-year colleges (52% last year) </li></ul><ul><li>17% - Two-year colleges (22% last year) </li></ul>
    14. 14. <ul><ul><ul><li>The broad purpose of the State Assessments is to provide information to teachers and schools to guide the redesign of curricula and instructional strategies to enable students to achieve the academic standards categories. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>The areas assessed this year were mathematics and reading at grades 3-8 and 11; writing at grades 5, 8 and 11; and science at grades 4, 8 and 11. </li></ul></ul></ul>PSSA Results
    15. 15. Performance Levels <ul><ul><li>Advanced: Superior academic performance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Proficient: Satisfactory academic performance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Basic: Marginal academic performance, work approaching, but not yet reaching satisfactory performance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Below Basic: Inadequate academic performance </li></ul></ul>
    16. 16. PA Department of Education Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Goals Percent Proficient/Advanced Year 2002-04 2005-07 2008-10 2011 2012 2013 2014 Reading   45   54   63   72   81   91   100 Math   35   45   56   67   78   89   100
    17. 17. BASD PSSA Reading Proficiency Did not meet AYP – Grade 11 Score
    18. 18. BASD PSSA Math Proficiency Did not meet AYP – Grade 11 Score
    19. 19. Area of Concern BASH 11 th Grade PSSAs Action Planning for Immediate Improvement <ul><li>Need to Improve Student Motivation </li></ul><ul><li>Provide remediation during “Open Campus” for students who are not Proficient on the 11 th grade PSSAs </li></ul><ul><li>Use of “Effort Rubric” to determine if motivation to take the test continues to be a problem </li></ul><ul><li>Need to Improve Student Skills </li></ul><ul><li>Implement Common Assessments 1 st Quarter </li></ul><ul><li>Analyze Results in Collaborative Subject Specific Meetings </li></ul><ul><li>Provide targeted instruction and interventions </li></ul><ul><li>Make instructional adjustments based on student performance data throughout the school year using benchmark assessments and classroom data </li></ul>
    20. 20. *Per pupil expenditures based on PDE reported actual instructional spending for the 2010-2011 fiscal year; the most recent information available. **Boyertown has the fifth lowest per pupil expenditures in Berks County and lowest in Montgomery County. 2011 School Assessment (PSSA) Averages 2011 PSSAs MATH READING PER PUPIL EXPENDITURES* Boyertown Area SD 87 82 $ 8,350 Berks County 81 77 $ 9,267 Montgomery County 87 85 $ 11,827 Pennsylvania 77 73 $ 9,059
    21. 21. Keys to Improvement and High Achievement Strategic Plan High Performing Schools Practices Building Action Plans Core Classroom Practices

    ×