the expectable rise,...pyrrhic victory, and designerly future of game
studies as an interdiscipline
Sebastian Deterding
Ro...
“Game studies are an
interdisciplinary field …”
Aarseth 2001, Krzywinska, Mäyrä & Crogan 2005, Mäyrä 2008, Egenfeldt-Niels...
Game studies as interdiscipline
• ID seen as logical consequence of the newness of GS
• ID seen as necessity, given overco...
1 What is ID?
2 how ID-y are game studies?
3 what are the challenges?
4 so what do we do?
<insert data here>
<1>
what is
interdisciplinarity?
multidisciplinarity
Juxtaposition of disciplines
transdisciplinarity
Transcendence of disciplines
interdisciplinarity
Inte...
<2>
How interdisciplinary
are game studies?
drivers of interdisciplinary fields
• New epistemic questions give rise to topical IDs:
interactive fiction, ...
• New tec...
trajectories of iD fields
• Initial groundswell of young scholars driven by new
ground, little competition, freedom from s...
full,broad interdisciplinarity
• Educational: Experiential, collaborative, problem-based
learning; support & practicing of...
multidisciplinarity
Juxtaposition of disciplines
transdisciplinarity
Transcendence of disciplines
interdisciplinarity
Inte...
game
studies
Hermeneutic, formal,
qualitative media
studies
game
studies
Hermeneutic, formal,
qualitative media
studies
th...
Boutet, Coavoux & Zabban 2014 (Category “Interdisciplinary” removed from data set)
3%5%
5%
6%
7%
10%
11%
12%
16%
4%
22%
Co...
ludic
paidic
liminalliminoid
cultural form
Aesthetics, media studies
perfect feedback
Neoclassical economics
nudges
Behavi...
<3>
what are the
challenges?
hurdles for interdisciplinary fields
• Less recognition, doubts over lacking quality/rigour
• Less resources (journals, jo...
<4>
so what do we do?
Answer
#1
Boradkar 2010
Answer
#2
game *design* studies
• Design is inherently cross-disciplinary problem-
solving, with integrative pedagogies (studio, pro...
Enable & bridge
epistemological
pluralism
Answer
#3
discourses .
stake-
holder
frames
media
producer
frames
media text
frames
audience
frames
with middle range theories/objec...
discourses .
stake-
holders
game
creation
games audiences
imagine a procedural rhetorics ...
… that cuts across epistemica...
sebastian@codingconduct.cc
@dingstweets
codingconduct.cc
Thank you.
The Expectable Rise, Pyrrhic Victory, and Designerly Future of Game Studies as an Interdiscipline
The Expectable Rise, Pyrrhic Victory, and Designerly Future of Game Studies as an Interdiscipline
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

The Expectable Rise, Pyrrhic Victory, and Designerly Future of Game Studies as an Interdiscipline

2,386
-1

Published on

My talk for the Critical Evaluation of Game Studies Seminar at the University of Tampere, April 28, 2014.

Published in: Design, Technology

The Expectable Rise, Pyrrhic Victory, and Designerly Future of Game Studies as an Interdiscipline

  1. 1. the expectable rise,...pyrrhic victory, and designerly future of game studies as an interdiscipline Sebastian Deterding Rochester Institute of Technology Critical Evaluation of Game Studies Seminar, Tampere, April 28, 2014 c b
  2. 2. “Game studies are an interdisciplinary field …” Aarseth 2001, Krzywinska, Mäyrä & Crogan 2005, Mäyrä 2008, Egenfeldt-Nielsen, Heide Smith & Tosca 2012, Waern & Zagal 2013
  3. 3. Game studies as interdiscipline • ID seen as logical consequence of the newness of GS • ID seen as necessity, given overcomplexity of games • ID seen as primary strength of GS (relative to …?) • ID seen as major challenge of GS: What’s “core”, how to organize & integrate? Aarseth 2001, Krzywinska, Mäyrä & Crogan 2005, Mäyrä 2008, Egenfeldt-Nielsen, Heide Smith & Tosca 2012, Waern & Zagal 2013
  4. 4. 1 What is ID? 2 how ID-y are game studies? 3 what are the challenges? 4 so what do we do?
  5. 5. <insert data here>
  6. 6. <1> what is interdisciplinarity?
  7. 7. multidisciplinarity Juxtaposition of disciplines transdisciplinarity Transcendence of disciplines interdisciplinarity Interaction & integration of disciplines partial full auxiliary supplementary structural auxiliary supplementary structural contextualising integrated generalising theorymethoddata degree of integration narrow broad scope of disciplines few disciplines, epistemologically homogenous many disciplines, epistemologically heterogeneous increasing dissolution of disciplinary boundaries Adapted from Klein 2010
  8. 8. <2> How interdisciplinary are game studies?
  9. 9. drivers of interdisciplinary fields • New epistemic questions give rise to topical IDs: interactive fiction, ... • New technology creates new societal issues: video game violence, game-based learning • Social groups legitimise and push their interests through forming life experience IDs: aca/fans • New vocations create economic demand for professional preparation IDs: game design Jacobs & Frickel 2009
  10. 10. trajectories of iD fields • Initial groundswell of young scholars driven by new ground, little competition, freedom from structure, big student & public interest • As field matures, resistance of traditional disciplines, struggle for institutionalization • Internal differentiation into sub-communities • Traditional disciplines develop critical mass of scholars & bodies of work that pull scholars back Raasch et al. 2013, Pfirman & Martin 2010, Jacobs & Frickel 2009, Holbrook 2010, van Rijnsoever & Kessels 2011
  11. 11. full,broad interdisciplinarity • Educational: Experiential, collaborative, problem-based learning; support & practicing of perspective-taking, contextualization, critical thinking, synthesis, application across disciplines & theory/practice: ? • Empirical: Routine & necessary integration of divergent data forms to answer research questions: ? • Methodological: Unique new methods from mixing old ones: gameplay reviews (Williams), TRUE (Kim)? • Theoretical: Germane new concepts & theories driven by & valuable for divergent disciplines and social domains; organise new research across epistemically divergent methods, disciplines: procedural rhetorics (Bogost)? Klein 2010, Huutoniemi et al. 2010, DeZure 2010
  12. 12. multidisciplinarity Juxtaposition of disciplines transdisciplinarity Transcendence of disciplines interdisciplinarity Interaction & integration of disciplines partial full auxiliary supplementary structural auxiliary supplementary structural contextualising integrated generalising theorymethoddata degree of integration narrow broad scope of disciplines few disciplines, epistemically homogenous many disciplines, epistemically heterogeneous increasing dissolution of disciplinary boundaries Adapted from Klein 2010
  13. 13. game studies Hermeneutic, formal, qualitative media studies game studies Hermeneutic, formal, qualitative media studies the phyrric victory of game studies relevanceofgames recognitionofgameresearch volume of game research(ers), resources hci Playability, game UX, game UR communication Presence, MMT, SDT, Involvement economics Virtual economies, marketing, nudging, IP psychology Aggression, addiction, motivation ... cf. Jacobs & Frickel 2009, van Rijnsoever & Kessels 2011 game studies Hermeneutic, formal, qualitative media studies
  14. 14. Boutet, Coavoux & Zabban 2014 (Category “Interdisciplinary” removed from data set) 3%5% 5% 6% 7% 10% 11% 12% 16% 4% 22% Communication Computer Science Social Sciences Media Studies Education Art Game Studies Literature Humanities Cultural Studies Design authors in Game studies journals
  15. 15. ludic paidic liminalliminoid cultural form Aesthetics, media studies perfect feedback Neoclassical economics nudges Behavioural economics exploitation Critical theory status display Marketing, social psych. communal performance Perf. studies, anthrop. immersive performance Perf. studies, art reinforcement Behavioural psychology hedonic wellbeing Positive psychology eudaimonic wellbeing Design, philosophy pleasure UX design, advertising playfulness Design, philosophy expressive systems Computer science, rhetorics microworlds Education Deterding, in print differentiation of rhetorics “Player studies” “Formal” game studies “Second wave Colonizers” “Indigeneous”
  16. 16. <3> what are the challenges?
  17. 17. hurdles for interdisciplinary fields • Less recognition, doubts over lacking quality/rigour • Less resources (journals, jobs, funding bodies, teaching materials, political representation) • Friction of epistemic cultures (e.g. in peer review) • No overarching theories, epistemic objects • Unclear/traditional hiring & promotion criteria • Disciplinarily organized job markets Raasch et al. 2013, Pfirman & Martin 2010, Jacobs & Frickel 2009, Holbrook 2010, van Rijnsoever & Kessels 2011
  18. 18. <4> so what do we do?
  19. 19. Answer #1
  20. 20. Boradkar 2010 Answer #2
  21. 21. game *design* studies • Design is inherently cross-disciplinary problem- solving, with integrative pedagogies (studio, project) and methods (design-based research, research- design, critical making, carpentry, ...) • Applied focus gives relevance across social domains, design research gives critical corrective • Institutionalised through interlocking educational programs, PhD/MFA degrees, and hiring/promotion criteria that create a self-sustaining job market Jacobs & Frickel 2009, Boradkar 2010
  22. 22. Enable & bridge epistemological pluralism Answer #3
  23. 23. discourses . stake- holder frames media producer frames media text frames audience frames with middle range theories/objects … that cut across epistemically divergent sites, theories, operationalizations: like news framing media studies, comm. research Close readings, formalization, content analysis media studies, comm. research Corpus analysis, discourse analysis media psych. Experiments, questionnaires journalism r. Interviews, studies of work public relations Interviews, document analysis cf. Merton 2004, Entman 1993, De Vreese 2005
  24. 24. discourses . stake- holders game creation games audiences imagine a procedural rhetorics ... … that cuts across epistemically divergent sites, theories, operationalizations cs, digital humanities Close readings, formalization, content analysis media studies, comm. research Corpus analysis, cultural analytics media psych., qual. sociology Experiments, questionnaires, interviews, observation cs, anthropology, digital humanities Interviews, studies of work, ANT, code analysis sociology, media studies Interviews, document analysis
  25. 25. sebastian@codingconduct.cc @dingstweets codingconduct.cc Thank you.
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×