DigitalEYE Interviews Zaibatsu (Reg Saddler) on Digg’s
Redesign, User Revolt and The Future of Social Media
Posted by Tann...
are right on it and they grab it and say “breaking from
                          Twitter” that’s why I say Twitter is act...
Old Digg

                                                                                  With all
                     ...
welcomed me back and he also talked to J.D.
                                     Rucker and a few other people who mention...
hour, which they haven’t been able to do, they just don’t know how to do that. with
the new Digg and they haven’t been abl...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

01 interview with zaibatsu (reg saddler) on digg's redesign, user revolt and the future of social media

378

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
378
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "01 interview with zaibatsu (reg saddler) on digg's redesign, user revolt and the future of social media"

  1. 1. DigitalEYE Interviews Zaibatsu (Reg Saddler) on Digg’s Redesign, User Revolt and The Future of Social Media Posted by Tanner on Sep 2, 2010 in New Technology, SEO, Twitter, social media | 0 comments DigitalEYE had a chance to interview Zaibastu (Reg Saddler), a heavily influential social media expert who has over 100,000 followers on Twitter and has made a huge impact user news submitted sites such as Digg. We discussed the new Digg redesign, user revolts and the future of Social Media concerning Digg and Twitter. This is the transcript from an audio interview that took place August 31, 2010. What is Digg to you? Digg is always in my eyes. I’ve always enjoyed Digg as a news aggregator. At first that was my appeal. I came to it as a website where I could see content and breaking news stories; it was a little daily newspaper for me. The whole thing, after I got banned and even more changes, I didn’t want to contribute to the site and I was moving around millions of pages views per month. I thought “Why try to get back on and give them the good press?”Maybe it’s a little arrogant, but I really did feel that I was giving them some free love and so why try to get my account back on? I didn’t have the same kind of passion as before. That’s why I moved to Mixx and ultimately Twitter looking for a site—not only for great news but somewhere that’s fun and has a different dynamic and different social media feel. Because social media is fun for me. How do you view Twitter in regards to Digg? The news breaks faster on Twitter than anywhere else on the planet. You’ll see correspondents from CNN to any Blogger for any company out there looking toward Twitter to find out what’s happening in the world. You’ll have someone posting a car bombing that recently happened and you’ll see it instantly on Twitter and it’s picked up instantly, it’s broadcasted and amplified and then the big media sources
  2. 2. are right on it and they grab it and say “breaking from Twitter” that’s why I say Twitter is actually breaking news faster. Do you think Twitter could overtake Digg or coexist? Well they’re two different animals, Digg is your daily newspaper and their goal is to pick the best stories. You know breaking news that is 3-4 hours old isn’t considered breaking anymore on Digg. Sites like Facebook and Twitter try to incorporate a lot of real time feedback that has been going on for a while now. They’re two different animals and Digg is trying to incorporate the best features just like Facebook is from Twitter. What do you think of the new Digg redesign and the user revolt? We’ve seen it happen with every major revision of the site but what makes it different than previous Digg redesigns and previous user revolts? I haven’t been on Digg, it’s not like I was visiting there everyday and looking for top news stories or even looking for a feel of the front page. What I would go there for is the upcoming stories and the majority of that was coming up from friends so that was really enjoyable because I would see Andy Sorcini (MrBabyMan) Muhammad Saleem and a whole bunch of other people and I knew it’s in upcoming and it’s only been popular for 8 or 9 hours it’s still breaking news and that’s where I find a lot of the Digg breaking news. Even if those stories don’t make it to the front page, I know they picked some good content, I know what’s out there. What happened with the new Digg redesign is they let in the big fire hose like CNN and Mashable specifically. I love Mashable and I love their content but they were able to basically push and have Digg pull in every single story that their throwing out there. So It’s like a zillion followers here and a zillion followers there, they’re pulling that content in and people are voting that up rather than going to Andy with his 20,000 followers because Mashable is a big brand name and they’re being pushed on to the front page. I think that was the complaint a lot of old time and new users like top Diggers and non top Diggers had. Now all these big guys are able to force feed and push their content to the front page of Digg. At least before it was fair up to a point with the Digg algorithm picking and choosing the content that is coming from not only top submitters but then lowly, normal submitters. New Digg
  3. 3. Old Digg With all these major brands (Mashable, CNN) overtaking Digg, do you think it makes it redundant to see a story from Mashable and then go to their website? It doesn’t really make it redundant, but here is where the problem lies and I think I have a better handle on it. If you talk to Muhammad Saleem and J.D. Rucker they might have a better feel and better answer but what happened with all of these larger sites pushing out their content in volumes and you’re a normal user on Digg and you see Apple’s having a special event September 1st, you’re more apt to click that than little Johnie who submitted the story that came out an hour or even a day earlier. To address your question, again will it just make Digg a placeholder for these larger firms? In fact, that was the problem. Mashable got on the front page, 4 or 5 were Mashable stories just a few days early on in the redesign and then just recently I think it was yesterday, Digg users revolted and so they hopped on board Reddit’s news feed and started promoting Reddit’s stories so every single top Reddit story was now on the front page of Digg and I guess users were trying to show Digg and the populace of users out there just how silly the redesign is, where you can actually force content from a competitor on to the front page because of the way they’re aggregating news. Since users are revolting and like you said, promoting top Reddit stories on to the Reddit front page, do you think Digg is going to notice this and make changes? Yea, Kevin, believe it or not is on top of it. I’ll tell you why, he doesn’t know I’m not a regular on my old show called “The Drill Down” where we could talk about Digg specifically and talk about Social Media in general. So when I told Kevin and other people “Hey I’m back on Digg” but I have a little fake account with my name, Kevin Rose
  4. 4. welcomed me back and he also talked to J.D. Rucker and a few other people who mentioned him specifically about the new Digg redesign so he knows we’re influences in Social Media and I think he was trying to nip some of the bad press. He’s being proactive, I don’t think he knows where all the fires are at right now, I don’t know if he’s not getting good feedback from his users or he’s not listening to the end users. I think he is now, initially he wasn’t. So yea I think they’re going to bring back a lot of the popular features that Digg had tossed out in the redesign, I just don’t know if they know how to properly address the problems that have arisen and have forced them down Alexa wise by a third when it comes to traffic volume. Where do you see Digg going in the future whether it’s a revamp of V4, a whole new system for version 5, and in the next few years in terms of redesigns and content distribution. My comment to Kevin Rose “You want to listen to your popular users, the people that make your site what it is.” I don’t care if you think a small percent of the top Digg users control the front page, I specifically said this to Kevin “You don’t want to be a Blockbuster you want to be a Netflix” that means listening to your people. With that said, the only way I think Digg can stay relevant is to push in or embrace the people they pushed out before. Top Diggers, these are people who are passionate about content, they have a great feel for it. Just like Twitter isn’t kicking out Lady Gaga because people like her, I really think Digg should do the same thing and give Andy and some love and everyone else out there who have been passionate about their content. Obviously the users have spoken and made him number one on Digg and everyone that’s 2 all the way down to 2,000 should be getting some love because these are unpaid content/social media experts trying to submit the best content that they can find to Digg.com if it’s spammy, other users will call them out. If you work for Time magazine, or you doing a social media promotion and say you’re a top Digger promoting it, the users will call you out saying “Reg, I’ve seen 10th time article.” The Digg community sort of forces you rise beyond mediocrity. But now with the revamp, they came in and said hey “Mashable, Time, Newsweek, all you guys, we got some good news; we’re going to get your content on the front page every day. We’re going to make it front and center, we’re going use your influence.” They’re going to have to go back to their old business model to get breaking news on to the front page. At best they will have a 3-4 hour lag time. They have to move that up to 15 minutes to half an
  5. 5. hour, which they haven’t been able to do, they just don’t know how to do that. with the new Digg and they haven’t been able to do so. So that’s the new Digg, all that matters is timeliness you know, control people and timing. I mean news is dead, you go to CNN.com and you heard about a story on Digg, people are going to stop going back. ShareThis

×