Time Warner Cable Industry/Competitive Analysis


Published on

Competitive and Industry Analysis on Time Warner Cable

Published in: Business, Technology
1 Comment
  • My colleagues were needing a form recently and were made aware of a great service that hosts lots of fillable forms . If others are searching for it too , here's http://pdf.ac/alABlW
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Time Warner Cable Industry/Competitive Analysis

  1. 1. David Green, Frankie Miamen, Tiffany Gray, Nick Foster, Tobi Coker
  2. 2. PEST AnalysisFactor Threats or opportunity ImpactPolitical -Legal proceedings/ regulations 1.moderate -Due to our concentrated market political restriction 2. high are implemented. 3. low + Political AdvertisingEconomic + Economic Growth in Europe and Asia- Pacific. 1.low -Economic Recession. 2. highSocial + 80% of US households subscribe to paid TV services. 1.high(include demographic) + Increase growth in Latin America and Hispanic 2.moderate population. 3.high +ConsumerismTechnological + Technological advancements, such as VOD, new 1.high video format, and internet streaming and 2.high downloading are beneficial. 3.Moderate - Bundles have increased competition. 4.Moderate + Advancement in the use of internet and mobile devices +Fiber Optics
  3. 3. ETOPFactor Threat or OpportunityMarket Size & Growth rate -European and Asia-Pacific markets are growing rapidly. Their market reaches 95,875.2 million in 2009, the CAGR is forecasted to be 5.7% by 2014. +TV Advertising and broadcasting is the largest segment of broadcasting and cable accounting for 49% of total market valueNumber of Rivals -AT&T and Verizon have upgraded their networks to carry two-way video and substantial bandwidth. -Intense competitionDifferentiation -Standardized services -Easy to duplicate new service innovations +Customer Loyalty programsSupply/Demand Conditions -Heavy reliance of suppliersPace of Technological Change -Increase cost of demand for triple play bundles. -Due to the advancement of technology more consumers are able to stream more content from the TV onto their mobile phone. +/-Rapid Technological changes +Fiber Optic Service ( FiOS)
  4. 4. ETOP cont.Changes in Cost and Efficiency -Low profit margins -Programming CostVertical Integration +Reduce programming costIndustry Trends + Growth of large media companies & Television. -Prices increase for programming -Discrete Consumerism. -+oint ventures/mergers and acquisitionsThreats of New Entrants +Very low due to our concentrated market and fragmented customers. -Restrictive government policies and well established viewing power.Internet Expansion +Movie on demand and social media. -Customers can get content such as movies from the internet at no charge. -Piracy and Illegal activities
  5. 5. Revenue from U.S. and The Rest of the World Global Broadcasting and Cable TV Europe 29.7% United States Other 47.7% 51% Asia Pacific 22.6%
  6. 6. Market Share 9 17 DirecTV15 Comcast Time Warner Cable Dish Network 28
  7. 7. Programming Costs 62.00% 50.00% 51.00% 35.10%Time Warner Cable Comcast Corp. DirecTV Dish Network
  8. 8. Name of Company Package What Is It? CostTime Warner Cable Triple Play TV, Internet, phone $124.85 / monthComCast Triple Play TV, Internet, phone $99 / monthDirecTv DirecTv Family Package TV, Internet, phone $75 / month (optional: DVR and HD) + $7 (optional DVR) + $10 (optional HD)Dish Network Dish Family Over 55 channels $20 / month
  9. 9. Industry OutlookMarket Segment: Expected growth: Market Value: (2009-2014) (2014) in millionsUS 3% $147,212Europe 2.9% $110,837Asia Pacific 5.7% $96,472
  10. 10. Force Strength Reason Rivalry Strong • New Service Introductions • Several Mergers & Acquisitions • Slow Market Growth in the U.S. • Price Competition & Increasingly Standardized ProductsPorter’s 5 • Marketing Tactics: Sales Promotions & Advertising •Forces New Entrants Low Industry is Characterized by Economies of Scale • Strong Customer Loyalty and Brand Preference • High Capital Requirements & Restrictive Government PoliciesSummary • Strong Top Competitors Substitutes Moderate • Streamlined Content • Newspapers & Magazines • Libraries • Movie Theatres • Computers, Video Games, Radio • Wireless Devices & tablets. Suppliers Moderate to Strong • Extremely High Switching Costs Between Suppliers • Heavy Reliance on a Limited Number of Programming Vendors & Networks • Integrating Backwards is not Economically Viable for Setup Boxes & Video Programming Buyers Moderate • Low Switching Costs Between Firms • Buyers are Becoming more Informed • Lack of Effective Customer Loyalty and Retention
  11. 11. Overall Competitive Force &Attractiveness Overall Competitive Force-Moderate to Strong Unattractive New Entrants Attractive Current Industry Members
  12. 12. Key Success Factors Customer Relations & Research Economies of Scale Location/Reach Clever Marketing New Service Innovations/Capabilities Programming
  13. 13. Customer Relations & Research Importance weight .10 Customer Retention Loyalty Programs Customer Service Consumer Research Predicting Trends
  14. 14. Economies of Scale Importance weight .17 Cost Reduction Operating Income/profits
  15. 15. Location and Reach Importance weight .23 Subscribers Customer Service Centers States or Internationally
  16. 16. Clever Marketing Importance weight .12 New revenue stream Advanced/Dynamic Advertising Differentiation
  17. 17. New Service Innovations andCapabilitiesImportance weight .23 Diversification Differentiation
  18. 18. Programming Importance weight .15 Programming Cost Content Networks Broadcast Stations
  19. 19. CSAKey Success Time Warner Cable Inc. Comcast Corp. DirecTV Dish NetworkFactor/Strength Measure Importance Strength Score Strength Score Strength Score Strength Score Weight Rating Rating Rating RatingConsumer Relations 0.10 6.0 0.6 7.0 0.7 10.0 1.0 8.0 0.8Economies of Scale 0.17 8.0 1.4 10.0 1.7 9.0 1.5 3.0 0.5Location/Reach 0.23 6.0 1.4 9.0 2.1 8.0 1.8 5.0 1.2Clever Marketing 0.12 8.0 1.0 7.0 0.8 7.0 0.8 7.0 0.8New Service Innovation 0.23 6.0 1.4 9.0 2.1 7.0 1.6 7.0 1.6CapabilitiesProgramming 0.15 9.0 1.4 10.0 1.5 8.0 1.2 5.0 0.8 Sum of Importance 1.00WeightsWeighted Overall Strength 43.00 7.03 52.00 8.88 49.00 8.02 35.00 5.66Rating
  20. 20. SWOT Strengths: Weakness: Brand name Failure to innovate Strong market position Expensive Programming Variety Significant debt Consistent revenue growth Legal investigations Lowest programming cost Heavy dependence of suppliers Social Responsibility Requires Personal Information Diversity Customer Service Opportunities: Threats: Online video content Stand alone services International market Heavy competition Fiber Optics Government regulations Growth of HDTV/3D Licensing Rights Cloud Computing Economic recession Rapid technological changes Slow industry growth rateMergers/acquisitions and joint ventures Piracy/alternative sources of video Cord Cutting