John Carlo Bertot, Successful eGovernment Takes a Village: Inclusion and the Role of Community Anchors
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

John Carlo Bertot, Successful eGovernment Takes a Village: Inclusion and the Role of Community Anchors

  • 609 views
Uploaded on

#CeDEM13 day 2 afternoon, Keynotes. (John Carlo Bertot, Successful eGovernment Takes a Village: Inclusion and the Role of Community Anchors)

#CeDEM13 day 2 afternoon, Keynotes. (John Carlo Bertot, Successful eGovernment Takes a Village: Inclusion and the Role of Community Anchors)

More in: Education
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
609
On Slideshare
590
From Embeds
19
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 19

http://digitalgovernment.wordpress.com 19

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Successful eGovernment Takes aVillage: Inclusion and the Role ofCommunity AnchorsJohn Carlo BertotDirector and ProfessorInformation Policy & Access CenterCollege of Information StudiesUniversity of Maryland College Parkjbertot@umd.edu
  • 2. Some trends and concerns
  • 3. Growth Rate—  103% growth rate between 1950 and2009◦  From 152 million to 308 million◦  Germany: 21%◦  Italy: 30%—  Continued growth anticipated◦  ~440 million by 2050http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpp2008/wpp2008_highlights.pdf
  • 4. ImmigrationShrestha, L.B., & Heisler, E.J. (2011). The changing demographic profile ofthe United States. CRS Report RL32701.
  • 5. Agehttp://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2008/summarytables.html050.000100.000150.000200.000250.000300.000201020152020202520302035204020452050Under 1818-6465 and over85 and over* In thousands
  • 6. Racehttp://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2008/summarytables.html201020152020202520302035204020452050050.000100.000150.000200.000250.000WhiteAll Others* In thousands
  • 7. Poverty
  • 8. Broadband Plateau—  $7.2 billion spent on broadband diffusion aspart of the Stimulus Bill◦  Funds end August/September 2013—  Broadband (home) penetration around 65%◦  No, mobile access is not the answer—  Who are the non-adopters?◦  Those who do not adopt technologies–  Older, less educated, less wealthy◦  Recession–  Cut Internet access◦  Stagnating/declining income–  Less spending on ICTs
  • 9. Inability to Govern—  Inability of federal government to makeany decisions—  States financially strapped◦  Though bottom may have been reached◦  Burden shifting to local governments/communities—  Local governments taking on more ofgoverning/governance to resolve nation’schallenges
  • 10. Trust in government10How much ofthe time doyou trust thegovernment inWashington?http://www.people-press.org/2013/01/31/trust-in-government-interactive/Pew ResearchCenter
  • 11. Open Government and EngagementOpportunities—  Radical redistribution of power away fromgovernment and to communities and people(Cameron, 2011)—  Redesign institutions around collaborativeproblem solving (Noveck, 2009)—  Government as platform for the creation ofpublic value and social innovation (Tapscott, 2010)—  Reinvention of government through digitalengagement, crowdsourcing, open data(Newsome & Dickey, 2012)—  Reinvention through “nudging” (Sunstein, 2012)
  • 12. Community Challenges—  What is a healthycommunity/society?◦  Basic needs◦  Economy◦  Health and wellness◦  Education◦  Arts and Culture◦  Neighborhoods andCommunities◦  Environment◦  Seattle Foundation, 2006—  Digital inclusion◦  Access: Availability,affordability, design forinclusion, and public access◦  Adoption: Relevance, digitalliteracy, and consumersafety◦  Application: Economic andworkforce development,education, health care,public safety andemergency services, civicengagement, and socialconnections◦  IMLS, 2012
  • 13. Assumptions of eParticipation—  Informed citizenry—  Participation is broad—  Digitally inclusive communities—  Digitally literate citizenry◦  Data literacy—  Engagement is intermediated bytechnology, and directly between citizensand governments (G2C)
  • 14. Public Libraries in the US
  • 15. Public Libraries—  Trusted—  Neutral—  Ubiquitous—  Community-based social innovators
  • 16. Engagement at the Library—  Hartford Public Library (CT)◦  Community & Civic Participation–  Strategy 1: Recruit and train volunteers to serveas Cultural Navigators–  Strategy 2: Build coalitions among keystakeholders–  Strategy 3:  Community - two approaches: CityWide and Neighborhood–  Strategy 4: Bridging cultures through facilitated.    –  Strategy 5: Communicate the value thatstakeholders bring
  • 17. Engagement at the Library—  Sacramento Public Library (CA)◦  I Street Press
  • 18. Engagement at the Library—  Howard County Libraries (MD) HiTech◦  Partners include Institute for Learning Innovation,Mindgrub Technologies, Howard County Public SchoolSystem, Howard Community College, University ofMaryland’s Clark School of Engineering◦  Digital Media - Internet collaboration, web sitedesign, and e-publication development◦  Mobile Collections - mobile apps and e-bookcreation◦  Games - game play, logic, design, and game building◦  International Relations - domestic andinternational networking, linguistics exploration, andinternational news and current event observation
  • 19. It’s about—  Leveraging community resources◦  (space, people, organizations, skills, infrastructure,trust)—  Engagement at the local level—  Engagement through intermediaries andtechnology—  Digital literacy and data skills—  Inclusive community building◦  Not just for the connected and skilled—  Community transformation in critical areas ofneed—  Innovation and creativity
  • 20. References—  Cameron, D. (2011). PM on Government Transparency.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQTt4l2Qmd4&feature=player_embedded—  Institute of Museum and Library Services. (2012). Building DigitalCommunities:A framework for action. Washington, DC: Institute of Museumand Library Services.Available at:http://www.imls.gov/assets/1/workflow_staging/AssetManager/2140.PDF—  Newsome, G, & Dickey, L. (2013). Citizenville: How toTake theTown SquareDigital and Reinvent Government. Penguin Press.—  Noveck, B. S. (2009). Wiki Government: HowTechnology Can Make GovernmentBetter, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful. Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press.—  Seattle Foundation. (2006).A Healthy Community:WhatYou Need toKnow to give Strategically. Seattle,WA:The Seattle Foundation.Available at:http://www.seattlefoundation.org/aboutus/Documents/10029170_HCReport_web.pdf—  Sunstein, C.R. (2012). Simpler: The Future of Government. Simon & Schuster.—  Tapscott, D. (2010). Foreward. In D. Lathrop & L. Ruma, Eds. OpenGovernment: Collaboration,Transparency, and Participation in Practice. OReillyMedia.