Science 2.0: Supporting a Doctoral Community of Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning using Social Software

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Science 2.0: Supporting a Doctoral Community of Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning using Social Software - Presentation Transcript

    1. Science 2.0: Supporting a Doctoral Community of Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning using Social Software
      Denis Gillet and Sandy El Helou • EPFLMarie Joubert and Rosamund Sutherland • University of Bristol
      Science 2.0 Workshop • EC-TEL • September 29, 2009
    2. From PALETTE to STELLAR
      PALETTE IP (2006-2008)Facilitating and augmenting individual and organizational learning in Communities of Practice (CoPs) • http://palette.ercim.org
      STELLAR NoEWP4: Building Next Generation CapacityInstruments: Doctoral Academy Events, Scholarships for mobility, and Doctoral Community of Practice (DoCoP)
      2
    3. The DoCoP
      PhD students, PhD advisors and experts in TEL share research practice and learn from each other
      Reduce isolation
      Establish co-coaching
      Enable sharing of testbeds

      3
    4. Lessons Learned from PALETTE
      CoPpractice and interaction modes continuously evolve over time and in context (from simple social interaction to advanced collaborative activities)
      Integration of CoP members is (and has to be) progressive (from passive guest to active contributor and possibly facilitator) • Privacy !
      Roles continuously evolve and depend on activities (someone can be an expert in a context and a novice in another)
      4
    5. Lessons Learned from PALETTE
      Integration of CoP services is (and has to be) progressive and non-invasive (work across members’ personal and professional IT contexts)
      Online spaces and their personalization strongly contribute to the building of the CoP identity and the sense of belonging
      Online spaces and environments (Web 2.0)are boundary objects for the negotiation of usefulness between providers and members (CoP & Service Mediators)
      5
    6. Lessons Learned from PALETTE
      Utility, usability, acceptability, and maybe adoption
      Do not disappoint members once, you will lose them forever
      CoP activity is always a side activity (not so much time to invest, quick adoption necessary)
      Members have some expectations, they do not know necessarily the tools to support them
      Elicitation of requirements
      Detection of passionate members to support the activity momentum
      6
    7. Lessons Learned from PALETTE
      Value all contributions (incentive)
      Unobtrusive information and awareness delivery
      Unobtrusive and contextual notifications
      Ubiquitous access for mobile clients
      Responsiveness in context and fitness for purpose
      CoPsare informal social networks and informal learning opportunity providers
      CoPsoperate and grow via a careful combination of face-to-face and mediated interaction
      7
    8. Results from PALETTE
      3A Interaction Model
      8
      Represents asset
      management system,
task management system
or discussion platform
      Assets correspond
      to content; roles,
      tags, events and
links define the
      context
      Supports integrated
      awareness and
      recommendation
    9. Results from PALETTE
      eLogbook.epfl.ch Social Software
      9
    10. The DoCoP
      A scenario for a DoCoP member
      First face-to-face contact during the Joint Summer or Winter School on TEL (peers, PhD directors, experts)
      Annual contacts at TEL workshops, conferences, meetings, doctoral consortia, …
      Further contacts and interaction through the Web 2.0 Science Portal, a possible integrated DoCoP Space and the associated Web 2.0 services
      What type of interaction ? What type of Services ?… Pilot questionnaire distributed at the EC-Tel DC
      10
    11. The Questionnaire
      How could a DoCoP benefit you in terms of completing your doctoral studies and in your future professional life?
      What type of services would you need in the framework of the DoCoP?
      Please indicate the academic and social platforms you use for professional and research work
      What blogs, Wikis, Twitter channels or RSS Feeds related to TEL do you read?
      What blogs, Wikis, Twitter channels or RSS Feeds related to TEL do you contribute to?
      11
    12. The Questionnaire
      Please indicate which portal or a mash-up platform you think could help in building the DoCoP identity
      What is your academic discipline (outside TEL)?
      Do you see your professional identity as primarily within your discipline or primarily within TEL
      Are you studying for your PhD full time or part time and what is the total expected duration of your PhD study
      Do you have to take PhD courses in your PhD programme? If yes, how many ECTS credits do you need to get?
      12
    13. Possible DoCoP Space
      13
    14. Further Actions
      Revised questionnaire sent to all the participants of the previous Doctoral School in TEL
      Contact with PhD Advisors
      Preliminary aggregation page on the STELLAR Web site
      Progressive integration of requested services in a relevant DoCoP Space
      14
    15. Contacts
      http://www.stellarnet.eu
      http://palette.ercim.org
      http://people.epfl.ch/Denis.Gillet
      http://elogbook.epfl.ch
      http://www.jTELSummerSchool.eu
      The related paper:http://oa.stellarnet.eu/open-archive/browse?resource=2196_v1
      15

    + Denis GilletDenis Gillet, 1 month ago

    custom

    130 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Slides presented at the EC-TEL 09 Workshop on Scien more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 130
      • 130 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories