0
MODULE 4EVALUATING BEYOND     FORMAT
Other attributes of a research   paper beyond the format:          INTRODUCTION• 1. Is the general purpose of the study cl...
2. Is the study significant?The potential value/s of the study .
3. Will it make a practical or      theoretical contribution?•   Pragmatic potential benefit/s of the study.•   New knowle...
4. Is the introduction well        organized and clear?• The organization of the introduction must  effectively establish ...
REVIEW OF RELATED        LITERATURE• 1. Is the review comprehensive and up to  date?
2. Is there an emphasis on    primary resources?
3. Is there a critical review or a        review of findings?• Advantages• Disadvantages• Limitations
4. Is the review well-organized?
5. Does the review clearly relate previous studies to the current       research problem?
6. Does the review help establish   the importance of the study?
RESEARCH PROBLEM,QUESTIONS OR HYPOTHESIS1. Is the problem or hypothesis clear   and concise?
2. What kind of research is being          carried out?• Qualitative• quantitative
METHODOLOGY: SAMPLES/    PARTICIPANTS• 1. Is the population described adequately?
2. Is the sample clearly       described?
3. Is the method of selection of        the sample clear?
4. Could the method of selection       affect the result?
5. Are subjects likely to be motivated to give biased        responses?
METHODOLOGY:          INSTRUMENTS• 1. Is evidence for validity and reliability  clearly presented and adequate?• Qualitati...
2. Is there a clear description of    how the instrument was          administered?• What instructions and guidelines were...
3. Is it likely that subjects would       fake their responses?
4. Are interviewers and   observers trained?
METHODOLOGY:        PROCEDURES•   1. Are there clear weaknesses in the    design of the study?
2. Are the procedures forcollecting information describedfully?a. kinds of written questionsb. kinds of semi-structuredint...
3. Is it likely that the researcher             is biased?• Use help of colleagues to triangulate  problems.
RESULTS• 1. Are the findings presented clearly?• 2. Is there appropriate use of tables, charts,  and figures?
3. Is the number of subjectstaken into consideration when    presenting the results?
4. Is there sufficient descriptive   information to interpret the             results?
5. Do illustrative quotes andspecific instances accompany the              results?
DISCUSSIONS AND         CONCLUSIONS• 1. Is the discussion based on the research  problem and results, or is there a tenden...
2. Is there an adequateinterpretation of the findings?
3. Is the interpretation separate        from the results? 4. Are the results discussed in relation to previous studies?
• 5. Are limitations due to methodology  included in the discussion?• 6. Are the conclusions clearly stated and  based on ...
• 8. What is the external validity of the  study?• 9. What factors would affect the external  validity?  – Does the sampli...
END OF MODULE 4BY: Jocelyn M. Gallegos
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Evaluating beyond format module 4

245

Published on

Evaluating beyond format

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
245
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
10
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Evaluating beyond format module 4"

  1. 1. MODULE 4EVALUATING BEYOND FORMAT
  2. 2. Other attributes of a research paper beyond the format: INTRODUCTION• 1. Is the general purpose of the study clear?
  3. 3. 2. Is the study significant?The potential value/s of the study .
  4. 4. 3. Will it make a practical or theoretical contribution?• Pragmatic potential benefit/s of the study.• New knowledge?• New processes?• Etc.
  5. 5. 4. Is the introduction well organized and clear?• The organization of the introduction must effectively establish the framework upon which the researcher proposes to undertake the study.
  6. 6. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE• 1. Is the review comprehensive and up to date?
  7. 7. 2. Is there an emphasis on primary resources?
  8. 8. 3. Is there a critical review or a review of findings?• Advantages• Disadvantages• Limitations
  9. 9. 4. Is the review well-organized?
  10. 10. 5. Does the review clearly relate previous studies to the current research problem?
  11. 11. 6. Does the review help establish the importance of the study?
  12. 12. RESEARCH PROBLEM,QUESTIONS OR HYPOTHESIS1. Is the problem or hypothesis clear and concise?
  13. 13. 2. What kind of research is being carried out?• Qualitative• quantitative
  14. 14. METHODOLOGY: SAMPLES/ PARTICIPANTS• 1. Is the population described adequately?
  15. 15. 2. Is the sample clearly described?
  16. 16. 3. Is the method of selection of the sample clear?
  17. 17. 4. Could the method of selection affect the result?
  18. 18. 5. Are subjects likely to be motivated to give biased responses?
  19. 19. METHODOLOGY: INSTRUMENTS• 1. Is evidence for validity and reliability clearly presented and adequate?• Qualitative – matter of degree than absolute state.• Quantitative – – Stability – Equivalence – Internal consistency
  20. 20. 2. Is there a clear description of how the instrument was administered?• What instructions and guidelines were given?• What was the nature of the text? • What was the degree of difficulty?• Was there interview?• Focus-group discussion?• Who conducted the interviews/FGDs?
  21. 21. 3. Is it likely that subjects would fake their responses?
  22. 22. 4. Are interviewers and observers trained?
  23. 23. METHODOLOGY: PROCEDURES• 1. Are there clear weaknesses in the design of the study?
  24. 24. 2. Are the procedures forcollecting information describedfully?a. kinds of written questionsb. kinds of semi-structuredinterview questions.
  25. 25. 3. Is it likely that the researcher is biased?• Use help of colleagues to triangulate problems.
  26. 26. RESULTS• 1. Are the findings presented clearly?• 2. Is there appropriate use of tables, charts, and figures?
  27. 27. 3. Is the number of subjectstaken into consideration when presenting the results?
  28. 28. 4. Is there sufficient descriptive information to interpret the results?
  29. 29. 5. Do illustrative quotes andspecific instances accompany the results?
  30. 30. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS• 1. Is the discussion based on the research problem and results, or is there a tendency to discuss unrelated material or ideas?
  31. 31. 2. Is there an adequateinterpretation of the findings?
  32. 32. 3. Is the interpretation separate from the results? 4. Are the results discussed in relation to previous studies?
  33. 33. • 5. Are limitations due to methodology included in the discussion?• 6. Are the conclusions clearly stated and based on the results and the discussion?• 7. Are the conclusions reasonable?
  34. 34. • 8. What is the external validity of the study?• 9. What factors would affect the external validity? – Does the sampling capture variation in a diverse enough manner? (Profiling) – Is the context fully described so that the reader can judge transferability to other settings? – How well have the concepts been extracted from the data?
  35. 35. END OF MODULE 4BY: Jocelyn M. Gallegos
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×