Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Presentation

1,118

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,118
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
33
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Early Childhood Caries: Do We Have Sufficient Evidence of Effective Interventions to Reverse National Trends? Gary Rozier, DDS, MPH USPHS Symposium Dental Category Day Atlanta, GA June 2, 2009
  • 2. Surgeon General’s Report on Oral Health, 2000
    • Dental caries is the most common chronic disease of childhood , affecting about half of children by middle childhood, and over 80% by late adolescence.
    • Research demonstrates that oral and dental diseases have a significant impact on children and families.
    • Many Americans lack access to needed oral health care, including many infants and young children.
  • 3. % Trends in Caries Experience by Dentition Type, U.S., 1971 - 2004 Permanent teeth, 6-11 years of age
  • 4. % Trends in Caries Experience by Dentition Type, U.S., 1971 - 2004 Permanent teeth, 6-11 years of age Primary teeth, 2-5 years of age
  • 5.
    • …… U.S. GAO report concluded, referring to the federal/state health program for poor people.
    • … about 6.5 million children enrolled in Medicaid had untreated tooth decay in 2005 .
    • The GAO report was ordered after…Deamonte Driver, a 12-year-old boy…died last year in suburban Washington when an untreated infected tooth led to a brain infection.
    http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/09/23/dentalcare.medicaid/ind Millions of poor American children have untreated tooth decay, some of them because they cannot find a dentist willing to treat them, a federal report issued Tuesday said. Only 1 in 3 children in Medicaid received any dental care over a year time span...
  • 6. ABC News- March 6, 2009 Brandon had an astounding 16 baby root canals completed at one visit--nearly every tooth in his mouth. "He comes walking out of that door…and he had blood dripping from his mouth. And all I could see was silver shining through.“ [Mother] Hunter, another child who received the same treatment and was just starting pre-kindergarten, was teased by other children as a "metal mouth" and said "it just made me feel, like, bad." "I feel like they took my son's smile away." [Mother]
  • 7. % parents reporting child dental problems or treatment affecting child or family “occasionally, often or very often” among parents of children with obvious caries experience (d 2 mfs>0) Impacts of Dental Disease 4 Smiling, talking 58 Both child and parent impacts 23 Work, finances 36 Upset, guilty 45 Parent overall impacts 16 Sleeping, irritable 17 Pain 26 Eating, drinking, talking, daycare 35 Child overall impacts Percent Impact
  • 8. Response
    • Growing concern over pediatric oral health
    • States are experimenting with new models
    • Physicians are being called upon to provide dental services
      • Surgeon General’s Report & Conference (2000)
      • ADA Future of Dentistry Report (2001)
      • AAP Policy Statements (2003, 2008)
      • Bright Futures Guidelines, 3 rd Ed., 2008
  • 9. “ Maine has 2 DDS for every 2,300 people, compared to 1 MD for every 640. Nationally there is 1 DDS for every 1,600 people.” “ In Maine, training MDs in dentistry provides a dental safety net for the rural poor.” March 3, 2009 Short of Dentists, Maine Adds Teeth to Doctors’ Training Ronald Smart who had not been to a dentist in 5 years, came to Fairfield clinic to have an infected tooth pulled; he has had 3 pulled there before, and likely Will have more.
  • 10. Assumptions
    • ECC is a serious public health problem
    • Its burden can be reduced through prevention targeted to young children
    • Virtually all infants & toddlers obtain care at medical offices and it is a logical place to provide preventive dental services
    • Physicians know that ECC is a problem and they want to help prevent it
  • 11. Assumptions
    • Primary medical care providers need help to learn procedures and to implement them in their practices
    • Evidence of effectiveness is limited and these Innovations should be evaluated for effectiveness
  • 12. Aims of Presentation
    • Review evidence for prevention of ECC
    • Review efforts in North Carolina and elsewhere to involve non-dental primary care clinicians in oral health promotion and dental disease prevention
    • Discuss potential for model to reduce disparities in oral health
    • Future directions
  • 13. Caries Prevention Methods Food Host Bacteria Multifactoral Disease Plague control Fluoride therapy Sealants Fluoride therapy Antimicrobials Anti-caries Vaccine Diet Counseling
  • 14. .... a quick look at preventive methods for primary care setting.....
  • 15. USPSTF Systematic Review
    • How accurate is Primary Care Clinicians’ (PCC) screening in identifying children 0 to 5 years of age who:
      • a) have dental caries requiring referral to a dentist?
      • b) are at elevated risk of future dental caries?
    • How effective is PCC referral of children 0 to 5 years to dentists in terms of the proportion of referred children making a dental visit?
    • How effective is PCC prescription of supplemental fluoride in terms of:
      • a) appropriateness of the supplementation decision?
      • b) parental adherence to the dosage regimen?
      • c) prevention of caries?
  • 16. USPSTF Systematic Review
    • How effective is PCC application of fluoride
    • in terms of :
    • a) appropriateness of the application decision?
    • b) achieving parental agreement for application?
    • c) prevention of caries?
    • How effective is PCC counseling for caries
    • preventive behaviors* as measured by:
    • a) adherence to the desired behavior
    • b) prevention of dental caries
    • * diet, oral hygiene, dental attendance, fluoride use
  • 17. Summary of Evidence
    • Of the 11 questions….
    • 8 questions have no studies or poor evidence
    • 3 questions have fair evidence
      • Professional adherence to guidelines for prescribing fluoride supplements
      • Caries reducing benefits from fluoride supplements
      • Caries reducing benefits from fluoride varnish
    Bader, Rozier et al. Am J Prev Med 2004.
  • 18. Fluoride Varnish
    • First introduced in 1964; has been used widely in European countries since 1980’s.
    • Approved by the FDA for use in the U.S. in 1994 as a cavity liner and for treatment of hypersensitive teeth.
    • Caries prevention is considered an
    • off-label use.
  • 19. Fluoride Varnish Products
    • 5% NaF in resin carrier
    • (2.26% F, 22.6 mg/mL or 22,600 ppm F)
      • Duraphat (Colgate)
      • DuraFlor (Medicom)
      • CavityShield (Omnii)
      • Vanish (3M ESPE)
    • 1% difluorsilane in polyurethane
    • (0.1% F, 1.0 mg/mL F or 1,000 ppm F)
      • Fluor Protector (Ivoclar-Vivadent)
    NO CLINICAL TRIALS
  • 20. Is Fluoride Varnish Effective in Primary Teeth?
    • 6 studies
      • 4 Duraphat (5% NaF)
      • 2 Fluor Protector (1% difluorsilane)
    • 3 RCTs had consistent findings
      • reductions of 37% to 63%
    • 3 CCTs found consistent benefit
      • 1 of 3 statistically significant
  • 21. Fluoride Varnish Study A 2-year randomized, dental examiner masked clinical trial to determine the efficacy of FV and parental counseling in preventing ECC
    • Counseling + FV 2x/year
    • Counseling + FV 1x/year
    • Counseling only
    Weintraub et al., 2005
  • 22. Dental Caries Incidence by Treatment Group p < 0.001; n=280 3-4 % Number of Applications
  • 23.
    • Preventive
    • Fraction 95% CI
    • Varnish 40% 9-72%
    • Gel 21% 14-28%
    • Rinse 26% 22-29%
    • Toothpaste 24% 21-28%
    Fluoride Therapy Marinho Adv Dent Res 2008
  • 24. Geographic Disparities in ECC 27% 61% 63% 29%
  • 25. Response in NC
    • 1997: Pilot “Smart Smiles”
    • 2000: Medicaid demonstration “Into the Mouths of Babes” (IMB)
    Primary medical care model
  • 26. Goals of IMB
    • Increase access to preventive dental care for low income, preschool-aged children
    • Reduce the prevalence of ECC in low-income children
    • Reduce the burden of treatment needs on a dental care system already stretched beyond its capacity to serve young children
  • 27. Will it work?
    • “ The North Carolina study….
    • related the impact of a 2-hour
    • infant oral health training course
    • on pediatricians’ practices...
    • I cannot imagine that a 2-hour
    • crash course in any scientific
    • discipline can make a meaningful impact, particularly on something as complex as caries risk assessment.”
    John Rutkauskas Executive Director, AAPD October 2003
  • 28.  
  • 29. Questions?
    • What services should PCCs provide?
    • What is the best way to train them?
    • How many will adopt once trained?
    • Will access to preventive services increase?
    • How are dental outcomes affected?
      • Caries-related treatments
      • Costs
      • ECC experience
      • Oral-health related quality of life
  • 30.
    • Oral evaluation / referral
    • Counseling
    • Fluoride therapy
    Scope of Services
  • 31. What We’ve Learned
    • Preventive services
      • More than 3,000 providers trained
      • Easily integrated into practice
      • More than 400 participating practices
      • Wide geographic distribution
      • Increased access
        • - 40% of well-child visits
        • Physician preventive visits 4x greater than dentists
        • Multiple visits 20 times greater in medical offices
      • Parents report high levels of satisfaction
  • 32. Number of Visits Per Year Average annual increase = 21% Visits
  • 33. What We’ve Learned
    • Physicians’ referral practices
      • Overall rate = 2.8%
      • With tooth decay = 33% ( vs. 0.2%)
      • 3-fold increase in use (36% vs. 12%)
    • Oral health outcomes
      • Reduced caries-related treatment needs by 12% to 39%
      • Reduced tooth decay by 24% to 36%
  • 34. Referral Effectiveness IMB Visit N=24,403 Referred (33%) Not Referred (67%) Referred (1%) Not Referred (99%) Visit 35.6% 12.0% 11.9% 2.5% ECC (5%) No ECC (95%)
  • 35. Response in NC (Con’t)
    • 1997: “Smart Smiles”
    • 2000: “Into the Mouths of Babes”
    • 2006: “Carolina Dental Home”
    • 2007: “Priority Oral Health Risk Assessment
    • and Referral Tool” (PORRT) Initiative
    • 2008: “ZOE” Early Head Start Initiative
    Expansion of primary medical care model
  • 36.
    • “ Every infant should receive an oral health risk assessment from his/her primary health care provider or qualified health care professional by 6 months of age.”
    • “ Parents or caregivers should establish a dental home for infants by 12 months of age.”
    • Guidelines for Infant Oral Health Care . AAPD Reference Manual, V29 No7, 2008.
    • AAP Committee on Practice / Ambulatory Medicine and Bright Futures Steering Committee Recommendations for Preventive Pediatric Health. Pediatrics, 2007.
    AAPD & AAP Guidelines for Age of 1 st Dental Visit
  • 37. ≠ All EHS programs in NC. † dela Cruz et al., Pediatrics , 2004. ‡ Prada E et al., 2008. Guideline Awareness 48.4%
    • Dentists ‡
      • A child should receive his or her first dental exam by one year of age.
    43.8% 26.5%
    • Parents ≠
    • All children should be checked by a dentist around the time the first baby tooth comes in.
    • Physicians †
      • Referral to a dentist by 12 months of age should be part of routine well-child care visits?
    % Agree Question
  • 38. Reviewer’s Name
    • Review of risk-assessment guidelines
    • Systematic review of the literature on risks
    • Experience with PORRT in Carolina Dental Home
    P riority O ral Health R isk Assessment & R eferral T ool (PORRT)
  • 39. Percent Sleep with bottle Family has dental problems No fluoride in water Fluoride toothpaste not used Drink juice between meals Other oral condition Dental caries Enamel defects White spot lesions Visible plaque Behavioral Clinical Percent of Patients with Risk Factors n-=1,825; Not mutually exclusive categories
  • 40. Referral Guidelines Cavitation or CSHCN White spot lesions Enamel defects Other concerns > 3 risk factors <3 risk factors Pediatric dentist General dentist Physician manages caries risk Yes (6%) No Yes (23%) No (72%)
  • 41. Percent of Children Referred %
  • 42. Sufficient Evidence?
    • Physicians will expand oral health services, increasing access:
      • Risk assessment
      • Fluoride varnish
    • Evidence is emerging to support effectiveness of model as a way to address disparities
    • Medical, dental, pubic health and social services are yet to be fully integrated, and evidence about how to do this is lacking
  • 43.
    • 73-2001. Resolved, that it be policy of the American Dental Association that topical application of fluoride varnish is a part of comprehensive dental care which requires an examination and supervision by a licensed dentist.
    ADA Resolution: Application of Fluoride Varnish Trans.2001:430-432. ADA House of Delegates
  • 44. Expected Medical Practice
    • Oral health risk assessment
    • Help establish dental home at 12-18 mo.
    • Counsel parents
    • If no dental home, continue to:
      • Counsel parents
      • Apply fluoride varnish
    Preventive Oral Health for Pediatricians. Pediatrics . 2008;122:1387-94.
  • 45. Stage of Adoption of Medical Model by State Medicaid Programs Sams et al., 2009. = No Initiative in place; no plans for one (n=13) = Existing Program (n=28) = Plans to implement initiative in next 12 months (n=10) 3 states confirmed by telephone (Mississippi, Illinois, West Virginia) 1 state by guidelines (Wisconsin) RI TX FL NC CA OR WA AZ NM UT NV ID MT CO WY HI AK NE SD ND OK KS IA MO WI MN LA AR IL MI GA TN KY IN OH MS AL WV VA ME VT NH NY PA MD NJ DC MA CT SC Delaware
  • 46. AAPD ‘Talking Points’
    • “ AAPD policy does not support the application of fluoride varnish absent a comprehensive dental exam. Current AAPD policy supports the delegation of fluoride application to auxiliary dental personnel or other trained allied health professionals, by prescription or order of a qualified dentist, after a comprehensive oral examination has been performed. Fluoride varnish interventions are not a substitute for the establishment of a dental home.”
    • AAPD perspective on physicians or other non-dental providers
    • applying fluoride varnish . Talking points . June 2006.
  • 47. It’s been a wild ride!
  • 48. Screening? Referral? Counseling? Fluoride? Diet? Risk Assessment? CME? Tx?
  • 49. Acknowledgements
      • Funding sources
        • Appalachian Regional Commission
        • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
        • Health Resources and Services Administration
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        • National Institutes of Health (NIDCR)
        • NC Department of Health and Human Services
      • Early Childhood Oral Health Collaborative (ECOHC)
        • NC Division of Medical Assistance
        • NC Chapter AAP
        • NC Academy of Family Physicians
        • NC Oral Health Section
        • UNC-CH School of Dentistry
        • UNC-CH Gillings School of Global Public Health
        • NC Division of Child Development, Head Start Collaboration Office
        • NC Dental Society
        • El Pueblo, Inc.
  • 50.
    • … coordination of preventive and treatment services among physicians, dentists and community programs will allow communities to manage and improve the oral health of all children so that they begin school with no untreated tooth decay…
    Thank You!

×