Introduce: help to coordinate the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership (NNIP) #1 question from cities is how do I get started in accessing all the datasets that Claudia just described. So, with funding from the Annie E Casey Fndn , we decided to look across our partner cities and collect the lessons that we have learned into a guidebook. Starting point – hope people will continue to share and refine strategies and tools beyond this. Go through presentation order.
National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership (NNIP)
xxxx
xxxx
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Atlanta Baltimore Boston Camden Chattanooga Chicago Cleveland Columbus Dallas Denver Des Moines Grand Rapids Hartford Indianapolis Louisville Los Angeles Memphis Miami Milwaukee Minneapolis Nashville New Orleans New York City Oakland Philadelphia Providence Sacramento Seattle Washington, DC National Neighborhood Indicators Partners
Strategies for negotiating data access
What You Need to Get Started
Knowledge of regulations that can restrict or facilitate access to data
Time and patience to identify and cultivate the right people
Careful procedures for handling data
Staff to evaluate, process, analyze data
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Why Data Providers Say No…
Preparing the file will burden my already overworked staff.
We’re afraid of being burned by bad publicity.
I’m worried about mishandling or improper release of the data.
The source data is a mess.
We’re making money from selling the data.
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Why Data Providers Should Say Yes…
Quid pro quo
Access to information from other agencies
Geocoding/maps/supplemental analysis
We have qualified staff to deal with the data
And future requests can be referred to us.
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
“ Preparing the file will burden
my already overworked staff.”
Why Data Providers Should Say Yes…
Examples where agencies and communities have benefited (or at least not been harmed)
Defining credit or disclaimers
Peer pressure: other cities have these systems
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
“ We’re afraid of being burned by bad publicity.”
Common Stumbling Blocks to Sharing Data
Staff turnover on both sides
Data really is too terrible to be useful
Potential tensions between data provider relationships & issue advocacy
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Elements of Formal Data Agreements
Major Sections of MOU
Purpose of agreement & organizations involved
Data transmission and description
Treatment of data and analysis
Procedural and contractual issues
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
ELEMENTS OF FORMAL AGREEMENTS Data Transmission & Description
Data transmission
Format, approved delivery methods
Data description
fields, time period, geographic levels, identifiers
Agency disclaimers of quality and liability
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
ELEMENTS OF FORMAL AGREEMENTS Treatment of Data and Analysis
Data security requirements and confidentiality protections
Conditions for release of data to third parties
Conditions for release of data analysis
Source requirements
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
ELEMENTS OF FORMAL AGREEMENTS Procedural & contractual issues
Update schedule and process
Amendment process
Termination causes
Authorized signatures
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Towards a Culture of Data Sharing
Over time, trusted community-based institutions can develop an expectation of data-sharing, and can level the playing field around access to information.
A peer network and tools developed from experience in the field facilitates the spread of these ideas and practices to other communities.
Draft Data Sharing Guidebook from Kathy Pettit of t more
Draft Data Sharing Guidebook from Kathy Pettit of the Urban Institute/National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership. Funded by the Annie E. Casey Foundation. less
0 comments
Post a comment