Measuring Progress in the
Degrowth Transition to a
 Steady State Economy

          Daniel W. O’Neill
     CENTER for the ...
The Degrowth Transition to a SSE
                             Growth      Degrowth   SSE
Size of Economy




             ...
The Conceptual Framework
                     Those goals that are desired only for
                      • Life Satisfact...
The Steady State Economy Accounts
 Socio-economic Accounts:
   Measure the functioning of the socio-economic
   system, an...
Stocks, Flows, and Scale

                      Environment



                        Human
            Energy           ...
Biophysical Accounts: The Indicators
 Stocks
   Population growth rate
   Built capital growth rate

 Flows
   Energy use ...
The Indicators (in Practice)
 Stocks
   Population growth rate            Data readily available
   Built capital growth r...
Some Results: Growth Economies
               Change in Stocks (%)                 Change in Flows (%)                Scal...
Some Results: Degrowth Economies
                Change in Stocks (%)                  Change in Flows (%)                ...
Some Results: Stable Economies
               Change in Stocks (%)                 Change in Flows (%)                  Sc...
The Pathway to a SSE
                   Degrowth         Stability           Growth
             10




                  ...
The Pathway to a SSE – Results
                                           0.7
                                            ...
The Pathway to a SSE – Results
                                           0.7
                                            ...
Life Expectancy & Life Satisfaction
                                   Life Expectancy   Life Satisfaction
               ...
Unemployment & Inflation
                                  Unemployment    Inflation
                                  (%)...
Conclusion
 To measure progress we need two sets of
 indicators:
   Biophysical and Socio-economic
 The Steady State Econo...
Conclusion
 Life expectancy and life satisfaction
   Higher in degrowing and stable economies than in
   growth economies
...
Thank you!

           Dan O’Neill
       d.oneill@leeds.ac.uk


CENTER for the                SUSTAINABILITY
ADVANCEMENT ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Measuring progress towards a steady state economy

1,815

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,815
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
56
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Measuring progress towards a steady state economy

  1. 1. Measuring Progress in the Degrowth Transition to a Steady State Economy Daniel W. O’Neill CENTER for the SUSTAINABILITY ADVANCEMENT of the RESEARCH STEADY STATE ECONOMY INSTITUTE 2nd Conference on Economic Degrowth, Barcelona March 26–29, 2010
  2. 2. The Degrowth Transition to a SSE Growth Degrowth SSE Size of Economy Carrying Capacity Time 2
  3. 3. The Conceptual Framework Those goals that are desired only for • Life Satisfaction • Hedonic Well-being Socio-economic Ultimate Ends themselves, and are not Flourishing to • Health • the means achieve any other end. Accounts • Meaningful Work • Community The goals that the economy is expected • Leisure • Education Intermediate Ends to Meeting Basic Needs • Good Governance • deliver. • Equality • Stability The factories, machines, and skilled labour Intermediate Means that transform natural resources into • Built Capital • Population Biophysical products and services. Accounts • Materials • Biocapacity The natural resources that sustain life and Ultimate Means allEnergy • economic transactions. 3
  4. 4. The Steady State Economy Accounts Socio-economic Accounts: Measure the functioning of the socio-economic system, and how effectively it delivers well- being Include subjective and objective indicators Biophysical Accounts: Measure the annual rate of change of biophysical stocks and flows over a 10-year period (e.g. 1995–2005), and the scale of these flows in relation to ecosystem sources and sinks 4
  5. 5. Stocks, Flows, and Scale Environment Human Energy Energy Population Sources Sinks Material Built Material Inputs Capital Outflows 5
  6. 6. Biophysical Accounts: The Indicators Stocks Population growth rate Built capital growth rate Flows Energy use growth rate Material inputs growth rate Material outflows growth rate Scale Ratio of material throughput to the capacity of ecosystems to: Regenerate materials Assimilate wastes 6
  7. 7. The Indicators (in Practice) Stocks Population growth rate Data readily available Built capital growth rate Working on this… Flows Data readily available Energy use growth rate Material inputs growth rate Biomass, Minerals, and Fossil Fuels Material outflows growth rate CO2 Emissions Scale Ratio of material throughput to the capacity of ecosystems to: Ratio of Per Capita Regenerate materials Ecological Footprint to Fair Earthshare Assimilate wastes 7
  8. 8. Some Results: Growth Economies Change in Stocks (%) Change in Flows (%) Scale Country Built Population Energy Materials CO2 EF Ratio of Capital (In) (Out) EF to FES Cambodia .. 2.0 9.9 0.9 9.4 3.7 0.5 China .. 0.8 6.5 3.9 6.3 4.3 1.0 Spain .. 1.0 4.3 3.3 4.7 3.1 2.8 U.S. .. 1.0 0.8 0.2 1.0 1.4 4.6 World .. 1.3 2.2 1.9 2.3 1.5 1.3 Yellow Shrinking (< –0.5%/year) or Scale Too Small (<0.8) Green Stable (–0.5 to 0.5%/year) or Optimal Scale (0.8 to 1.2) Red Growing (>0.5%/year) or Scale Too Large (>1.2) 8
  9. 9. Some Results: Degrowth Economies Change in Stocks (%) Change in Flows (%) Scale Country Built Population Energy Materials CO2 EF Ratio of Capital (In) (Out) EF to FES Moldova .. -1.3 -1.5 -3.1 -3.3 -1.3 0.6 Poland .. -0.1 -1.1 0.4 -1.8 -0.7 1.9 Romania .. -0.5 -2.1 -1.1 -2.3 -0.2 1.4 Ukraine .. -0.9 -0.3 -0.6 -1.0 -2.6 1.3 Yellow Shrinking (< –0.5%/year) or Scale Too Small (<0.8) Green Stable (–0.5 to 0.5%/year) or Optimal Scale (0.8 to 1.2) Red Growing (>0.5%/year) or Scale Too Large (>1.2) 9
  10. 10. Some Results: Stable Economies Change in Stocks (%) Change in Flows (%) Scale Country Built Population Energy Materials CO2 EF Ratio of Capital (In) (Out) EF to FES Cuba .. 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 2.6 0.9 Germany .. 0.1 0.2 -2.4 -0.3 -1.0 2.0 Sweden .. 0.2 -0.2 3.3 -1.4 0.2 2.5 Switzerland .. 0.4 0.5 2.1 0.2 -0.2 2.4 Yellow Shrinking (< –0.5%/year) or Scale Too Small (<0.8) Green Stable (–0.5 to 0.5%/year) or Optimal Scale (0.8 to 1.2) Red Growing (>0.5%/year) or Scale Too Large (>1.2) 10
  11. 11. The Pathway to a SSE Degrowth Stability Growth 10 Large Too Desirable Undesirable Degrowth Growth Optimal Scale 1 SSE Undesirable Desirable Degrowth Growth Small Too 0.1 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 Change in Flows 11
  12. 12. The Pathway to a SSE – Results 0.7 5 US Desirable Undesirable Degrowth Growth Ratio of Per Capita Ecological Footprint Switzerland UK Spain Germany Poland Country Years to to Fair Earthshare FES Ukraine Romania Germany 64 China Poland 91 1 0.0 Cuba Switzerland 156 Ukraine 17 Moldova Cambodia Undesirable Desirable Degrowth Growth 0.2 -0.7 -5 0 5 Change in Ecological Footprint (% /year) 12
  13. 13. The Pathway to a SSE – Results 0.7 5 US Desirable Undesirable Degrowth Growth Ratio of Per Capita Ecological Footprint Switzerland UK Spain Germany Poland Life Satisfaction (0–10) to Fair Earthshare Ukraine Romania Happy (≥7) China Relatively Happy (6–6.9) 1 0.0 Brazil Cuba Colombia Relatively Unhappy (5–5.9) Unhappy (<5) Moldova Cambodia Undesirable Desirable Degrowth Growth 0.2 -0.7 -5 0 5 Change in Ecological Footprint (% /year) 13
  14. 14. Life Expectancy & Life Satisfaction Life Expectancy Life Satisfaction (Years) (0-10) Too Small 62 5.4 Size of Ecological Fair Earthshare 70 6.7 Footprint Too Large 75 6.9 Degrowing 72 6.5 Change in Ecological Stable 69 6.3 Footprint Growing 68 6.2 Decreasing 69 5.3 Change in Stable 75 6.7 Population Increasing 67 6.2 Life expectancy and life satisfaction are highest when: Ecological footprint is large (but degrowing) Population is stable 14
  15. 15. Unemployment & Inflation Unemployment Inflation (%) (%) Too Small 6.0 7.6 Size of Ecological Fair Earthshare 5.7 5.0 Footprint Too Large 7.8 13.8 Degrowing 9.3 18.1 Change in Ecological Stable 8.1 12.4 Footprint Growing 5.6 6.2 Decreasing 11.4 50.0 Change in Stable 8.7 12.4 Population Increasing 6.0 7.2 Unemployment and inflation are lowest when: Ecological footprint is close to a fair earthshare Population and the ecological footprint are growing 15
  16. 16. Conclusion To measure progress we need two sets of indicators: Biophysical and Socio-economic The Steady State Economy Accounts provide a framework with these indicators Preliminary results indicate: We live in a world of growth economies A number of economies are degrowing Not the ones where degrowth is needed most Rates are slow There are no steady state economies Some economies are closer than others Social conditions are good in these countries 16
  17. 17. Conclusion Life expectancy and life satisfaction Higher in degrowing and stable economies than in growth economies Correlate with resource use that is too high Unemployment and inflation remain key issues to resolve Significant structural and policy changes will be required To achieve a SSE we must change our macroeconomic goals 17
  18. 18. Thank you! Dan O’Neill d.oneill@leeds.ac.uk CENTER for the SUSTAINABILITY ADVANCEMENT of the RESEARCH STEADY STATE ECONOMY INSTITUTE www.steadystate.org
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×