Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Ge final11249
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Ge final11249

830

Published on

Published in: Business, Economy & Finance
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
830
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
43
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Presentation on General Electric (GE) Matrix By Romi Patel 44 Monali Shah 51 Nidhi Sahu 57
  • 2. Roadmap For The Presentation ROADMAP STRATEGIC PLANNING BCG & GE MATRIX ABOUT GE CLASSIFICATION STRATEGIES BCG v/s GE CASE STUDY
  • 3.  It is the management task concerned with the growth and future of business enterprise.  It provides the route map for the firm and helps to take decision in the future with a greater awareness Strategic Planning
  • 4. BCG & GE Matrix MarketAttractiveness Business Strength MarketGrowth Relative Position (Market Share)
  • 5. About GE Matrix  Developed by McKinsey & Company in 1970’s.  GE is a model to perform business portfolio analysis on the SBU’s.  GE is rated in terms of ‘Market Attractiveness & Business Strength’  It is an Enlarged & Sophisticated version of BCG.
  • 6. ClassificationMarketAttractiveness Strong Medium Weak LowMediumHigh Business Strength 5.00 1.002.333.67 5.00 3.67 2.33
  • 7.  Annual market growth rate  Overall market size  Historical profit margin  Current size of market  Market structure  Market rivalry  Demand variability  Global opportunities Market Attractiveness
  • 8.  Current market share  Brand image  Brand equity  Production capacity  Corporate image  Profit margins relative to competitors  R & D performance  Managerial personal  Promotional effectiveness Business Strength
  • 9. Strategies  Invest to Build • Challenge for leadership • Build selectively on strength  Protect Position • Invest to grow • Effort on maintaining strength  Build Selectively • Invest in most attractive segment • Build up ability to counter competition • Emphasize profitability by raising productivity
  • 10. Strategies  Protect & Refocus • Manage for current earning • Defend strength  Selectivity for Earning • Protect existing program • Investments in profitable segments  Build Selectively • Specialize around limited strength • Seek ways to overcome weaknesses • Withdraw if indication of sustainable growth are lacking
  • 11. Strategies  Manage for Earnings • Protect position in profitable segment • Upgrade product line • Minimize investment  Limited Expansion for Harvest • Look for ways to expand without high risk  Harvest • Sell at time that will maximize cash value • Cut fixed costs and avoid investment meanwhile
  • 12. Factors Weight Rating (1 –5) Value = (Weight * Rating) Resource availability 0.20 2.5 0.5 Overall market size 0.15 3 0.45 Annual Market growth rate 0.20 3 0.6 Profitability 0.15 3 0.45 Competitive intensity 0.10 2.5 0.25 Technological requirements 0.20 2.5 0.5 Total 1.0 2.75 Factors Underlying Market Attractiveness
  • 13. Factors Weight Rating (1 –5) Value = (Weight * Rating) Market share 0.15 5 0.75 New product development 0.10 3.5 0.35 Brand Image 0.10 4 0.40 Sales force 0.15 3 0.45 Pricing 0.15 3 0.45 Distribution capacity 0.10 4.5 0.45 Product quality 0.10 4.5 0.45 R&D Performance 0.15 3 0.45 Total 1.0 3.75 Factors Underlying Market Strength
  • 14. ClassificationMarketAttractiveness Strong Medium Weak LowMediumHigh Business Strength 5.00 1.002.333.67 5.00 3.67 2.33
  • 15. Case Study
  • 16. Overview Business StrengthsMarketAttractiveness Low High LowHigh Attractive Moderate Attractive Unattractive
  • 17. Case Study of TATA  TATA • IT (Information Technology) : TCS • Consumer Durable : Automobiles, Titan etc. •Textiles : Tata Fabrics, West Sides etc
  • 18. GE Matrix For TATA Business StrengthsMarketAttractiveness Low High LowHigh IT Consumer Durables Textiles
  • 19. BCG v/s GE BCG GE Market Growth Market share 4 cell Multi Products Primary tools Market Attractiveness Market strength 9 cell Multi Business Units Secondary tools
  • 20.  Corporate Strategies - Bani Banerjee  Marketing Management - Philip Kotler  Strategic Planning - V S Ramaswamy Bibliography

×