Preliminary results

123 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
123
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Preliminary results

  1. 1. Preliminary Results
  2. 2. Subjects 580 complete surveys (total including last night) 315 Statistics have been run  168 Females 65-Athletes  147 Males 53-Athletes
  3. 3. LCU Athletes Non-Athletes = 72.42 Athletes = 59.44
  4. 4. University HBVCI Scores104 97 90 83 71.56 76 67.83 69 62 55 48 41 Student Athlete Nonathlete
  5. 5. Moral Reasoning Females= 68.17  Freshman = 65.13 Males= 66.82  Sophomores = 66.28 Total LCU = 67.54  Juniors= 69.05  Seniors = 71.11
  6. 6. Compare to High School Freshman and Sophomore Scores are comparable to High School students of 15 years ago
  7. 7. Telling Statement Grade on the HBVCI Scores104 97 90 83 76 69 62 55 66.63 67.83 69.23 69.27 48 41 Ninth Tenth Eleventh Twelfth University
  8. 8. Extended Adolescences Start of data to support the qualitative notion of the theory We are data collecting at Texas A&M-Kingsville  Support our data
  9. 9. Findings cont. Athletes are low on Moral Reasoning  Confirms previous research  All Team Sports, not enough individual sports ESS Majors Low on Moral Reasoning  Sport may function as a structure  Qualitative Interviews  Last Phase of this semester
  10. 10. Qualitative Interviews 5 Athletes 5 Former Athletes 5 Intramural Beasts**Hypothesis not yet proven 5 Students in ESS 5 Students in General Pop 5 Students in Bible Talk with them about sport
  11. 11. Future Student Led  AASP –Dean submitted  AAHPERD-Dean --deadline approaching  NCUR-Groups of two-deadline fall  Others?--

×