9. intel prez sesiune hw

This slide MUST be used with any slides removed from this presentation Legal Disclaimer • Intel may make changes to specifications and product descriptions at any time, without notice. • Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations • Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmarks or Web sites referenced in this document. Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmarks are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmarks are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase. • Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. See www.intel.com/products/processor_number for details. • Intel, processors, chipsets, and desktop boards may contain design defects or errors known as errata, which may cause the product to deviate from published specifications. Current characterized errata are available on request. • Hyper-Threading Technology requires a computer system with a processor supporting HT Technology and an HT Technology-enabled chipset, BIOS and operating system. Performance will vary depending on the specific hardware and software you use. For more information including details on which processors support HT Technology, see here • Intel® Turbo Boost Technology requires a PC with a processor with Intel Turbo Boost Technology capability. Intel Turbo Boost Technology performance varies depending on hardware, software and overall system configuration. Check with your PC manufacturer on whether your system delivers Intel Turbo Boost Technology. For more information, see http://www.intel.com/technology/turboboost • Intel Virtualization Technology requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, virtual machine monitor (VMM) and applications enabled for virtualization technology. Functionality, performance or other virtualization technology benefits will vary depending on hardware and software configurations. Virtualization technology-enabled BIOS and VMM applications are currently in development. • 64-bit computing on Intel architecture requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, operating system, device drivers and applications enabled for Intel® 64 architecture. Performance will vary depending on your hardware and software configurations. Consult with your system vendor for more information. • Lead-free: 45nm product is manufactured on a lead-free process. Lead is below 1000 PPM per EU RoHS directive (2002/95/EC, Annex A). Some EU RoHS exemptions for lead may apply to other components used in the product package. • Halogen-free: Applies only to halogenated flame retardants and PVC in components. Halogens are below 900 PPM bromine and 900 PPM chlorine. • Intel, Intel Xeon, Intel Core microarchitecture, and the Intel logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries. • © 2009 Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC) logo is reprinted with permission 2 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Intel® Xeon® 5600 Energy Efficiency Building on Xeon® 5500 Leadership Capabilities 130W Lower Power CPUs Intelligent Power Technology 95W Better performance/Watt 80W Integrated Power Gates and Automated Low Lower power consumption Power States with Six Cores 60W (6C) 40W (4C) Intel® Intel® Xeon® 5600 Xeon® 5600 CPU Power Management Lower Power DDR3 Memory Reduced power consumption through Up to 1.5W per DIMM reduction in more efficient Turbo Boost and memory memory power1 power management Intel® Xeon® 5600 delivers greater platform Energy Efficiency Lower power CPU TDP options for Xeon® 5600 1 DDR3L supported for Xeon® 5600 only. System level power testing sing Samsung 1.35V DIMMs as compared to Samsung 1.5V DIMMs reduced power by 0.52W per DIMM at active idle, and 1.42W per DIMM under 100% load. Source: Intel internal measurements Feb 2010 using server side java benchmark across a load line. Power measurement at the wall using same 3 system configuration; memory was the only variable changed. See backup for system configuration. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Xeon® 5500  Xeon® 5600 Oracle Validated CPU Option Transition Xeon 5600® Freq-Optimized X5680 6C 130W X5677 4C 130W Usage Xeon 5500 ® 3.33 GHz 3.46 GHz Advanced X5570 95W X5670 6C 95W X5667 4C 95W • 6.4 GT/s QPI 2.93 GHz Maximum 2.93 GHz 3.06 GHz • 8MB / 12MB Performance X5560 95W X5660 6C 95W • DDR3 1333 2.80 GHz 6 Cores 2.80 GHz 4 Cores • Turbo Boost (freq optimized) X5650 6C Low Power Options • HT X5550 95W 95W L5640 6C 2.66 GHz 2.66 GHz 60W 2.26 GHz1 Standard E5540 80W E5640 4C 80W L5630 4C 40W • 5.86 GT/s QPI 2.53 GHz 2.66 GHz 2.13 GHz2 Best Price 80W • 8MB / 12MB Performance E5630 4C E5530 80W 80W • DDR3 1066 2.40 GHz Higher Freq 2.53 GHz L5609 4C More Cache 40W • Turbo Boost E5620 4C 1.86 GHz3 E5520 80W 80W • HT 2.26 GHz 2.40 GHz Basic E5506 80W E5507 80W • 4.8 GT/s QPI 2.13 GHz 2.26 GHz (4C) • 4M cache Cost-Optimized E5504 80W E5506 80W • DDR3 800 2.00 GHz Higher Frequency 2.13GHz (4C) Xeon E5500 SKUs ® E5502 80W E5503 80W 1.86 (2C) 2.00 GHz (2C) Xeon 5600 (Westmere-EP) SKUs ® 1 SKU supports 5.86 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1333MHz 2 SKU supports 5.86 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1066MHz Xeon 5500 SKUs ® 3 SKU supports 4.80 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1066MHz, with Turbo and HT off. 4 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

New Security Features with Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Advanced Encryption Standard Intel® Trusted Execution New Instructions (AES-NI) Technology (TXT) Enables broad usage of Prevents the insertion of encryption throughout the malicious software prior to enterprise VMM launch Ready for Today Prepared for Tomorrow 5 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

― To help organizations protect data privacy at a lower cost, Oracle today announced a breakthrough in the speed of the Transparent Data Encryption feature of Oracle Advanced Security for Oracle® Database 11g Release 2 running on Intel® Xeon® 5600 series processor based servers with Intel Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions (Intel AES-NI). According to benchmark results, Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Transparent Data Encryption shows 10x speedup in AES encryption processing rate and 8x speedup of decryption processing rate using 256 bit keys on Intel® Xeon® X5680 processor utilizing AES-NI as compared to Intel® Xeon® X5560 processor without AES-NI. ORACLE OPENWORLD, SAN FRANCISCO September 21, 2010 6 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Refresh and Future-Proof with Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series 2007 Xeon® 2008 Xeon® 2009 Xeon® 2010 5300 5400 5500 Xeon® 5600 REFRESH RETIRE Intel® VT FlexMigration Greater VM capacity / performance, lower power Intel® VT FlexMigration compatibility Advanced capabilities (Intel® VT, Intel® AES-NI, Intel® TXT) Refresh Your Pools to Support New Services and Business Growth Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup. 7 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series Performance Summary Technical Compute Servers Mainstream Enterprise Servers Up to Up to 63% 46% Performance Performance Life Financial Energy Java HPC Sciences Virtualization Efficiency Floating Integer Memory 1.63 ERP CAD Point 1.61 Bandwidth 1.40 1.42 1.42 1.46 1.44 1.25 1.27 1.20 1.21 1.00 1.00 Bandwidth Frequency Sensitive Sensitive Xeon 5600-EP (6C, 3.33 GHz) vs. Intel Xeon X5570 (4C, 2.93 GHz) Xeon 5600-EP (6C, 3.33 GHz) vs. Intel Xeon X5570 (4C, 2.93 GHz) Baseline Stream Computer SPECfp Life LINPACK Black Baseline SAP-SD SPEC VMmark* SPEC_power Specjbb Aided rate Sciences Scholes* int_rate 2005 Eng. 2006 2006 Up to 63% performance boost over Xeon® 5500 Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate int_rate fp_rate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components Downbin they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm 8 Source: Intel Internal measurements Jan 2010. See backup for additional details Virtualization * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Greater Datacenter Energy Efficiency Xeon® 5570 vs. Xeon® L5640 Power and Performance Comparison Same Relative Performance and System Power Performance Up to 30% Lower Power1 X5570 (4C) L5640 (6C) 2.93GHz 6C, 2.26GHz 95W 60W Peak power under load (W) Performance Maximize Performance or Energy Efficiency 1 Source: Internal Intel estimates comparing Xeon® X5670 vs. X5570 SKUs using SPECpower. See backup for system configurations. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm 9 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Server Refresh Opportunities in 2010 If you delayed ~76% of the server refresh in 2009, then install base is still up you’re not alone for refresh IDC believes replacement Estimated 34% single-core Approximately 1 million servers have cycles being delayed from and 42% dual-core1 had their replacement delayed by a year. 3-4 years to every 4-5 years. Source IDC, 2009 Source: Gartner press release single core dual core four core + http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1209913 Approximately 1 million 2010 will mark an important return to servers have had their installedreplacement delayedby an base refreshes driven by uptick in enterprise budgets, new technological a year. 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 innovations, and a return to economic growth. Source: Gartner press release Source: Intel. Intel® Xeon® shipments, 2005-2009. Source: IDC, February 2010 http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1209913 Maintaining Aging Servers Limits Innovation & Growth Now is the Time to Refresh! 1 Source: IDC 2009 Q4 Server Tracker. Install base calculated by using this IDC data and a standard life-cycle distribution, and assumes 4- to 5-year replacement cycle in 2008 and 2009 when the recession hit. 10 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Server Refresh: 2010 Single Core  Xeon® 5600 2005 2010 Efficiency 95% Annual Energy Refresh Cost Reduction (estimated) 15:1 As Low as 5 Month 1 rack of Intel® Xeon® Payback 5600 Based Servers – OR – Performance Up to 15x Refresh Performance 1:1 15 racks of Intel® Xeon® 8% Annual Energy 15 racks of Intel® Costs Estimated Single Core Xeon® 5600 Based Reduction (estimated) Servers Servers Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup. Dual core refresh Refresh benefits for smaller deployments 11 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Server Refresh: 2010 Dual Core  Xeon® 5600 2006 2010 Efficiency 85% Annual Energy Refresh 5:1 Cost Reduction (estimated) As Low as 15 Month 1 rack of Intel® Xeon® Payback 5600 Based Servers – OR – Performance Up to 5x Refresh Performance 1:1 5 racks of Intel® Xeon® 10% Annual Energy 5 racks of Intel® Xeon® Costs Estimated Dual Core 5600 Based Servers Reduction (estimated) Servers Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup. Back 12 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

The Cost of Waiting in 2010 Monthly costs for NOT refreshing 500 Single-core Servers with 30 Intel® Xeon® 5600 Servers Software support: $50,920 per month Utility costs: $18,380 per month Warranty costs: $31,250 per month up to $100,000 per month1 Refresh: If Not NOW, When? 1 Monthly Savings in utility and SW support costs determined by comparing the incremental costs associated with not refreshing 50 older single-core servers purchased back in 2005 vs. refreshing on an approximate 15:1 ratio with a Xeon 5680-based servers in Year 1. Warranty cost assumes $750/year per server if purchased after the initial OEM 3-year warranty period has expired. Actual total cost is $100,750. Source: Consolidation ratio calculated using the Xeon Server Refresh Savings Estimator (www.intel.com/go/xeonestimator) and uses publicly available RHEL OS support costs, default utility settings, and SPECint*_rate_base2006 performance and power data for the Xeon® X5680 as found in the backup. See the backup for system configurations. 13 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Nehalem EX 8-socket Nehalem EX 1 TB 4-socket Westmere EP 512 GB 2-socket Westmere EP 144 GB Sun Fire X4800 2-socket 144 GB Sun Fire X4470 Westmere EP 2-socket 96GB Sun Fire X4170 M2 Sun Fire X4270 M2 Sun Fire X2270 M2 Nehalem EX Westmere EP Nehalem EP 8-socket 1 TB 4-socket Westmere EP 192 GB 2-socket Oracle Exadata Database Machine X2-8 144 GB Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud Nehalem EP 2-socket 144 GB Sun Blade X6275 Sun Netra X4270 Sun Blade X6270 M2 14 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Traditional Big Server Usages Volume 2-socket Servers Bigger Servers Business Processing (DB, ERP, CRM, batch) Decision Support (data warehouse, Business Intelligence) Large-scale Virtualization Application Development High Performance Computing Collaboration Web Infrastructure IT Infrastructure The Most Demanding Applications Require Big Server Capabilities Source: Internal Intel assessment & 2009 IDC Server Workloads Forecast and Analysis Study 15 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Xeon® 7500 Nehalem Generation Intel® Microarchitecture Technology Advantages Intel® 7500 Chipset Nehalem architecture 8-cores Xeon® 7500 Xeon® 7500 24MB Shared L3 Cache 64 DIMM slots support up to 1 terabyte of memory (4 sockets) Xeon® 7500 Xeon® 7500 72 PCIe Gen2 lanes Memory Scaling from 2-256 sockets Intel® Scalable Memory Buffer PCI Express* 2.0 Intel Virtualization Technologies Mission Critical Class Reliability features Intel® 82599 ICH 10/10R 10GbE Controller 16 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500/6500 Series Product Options 8 and 4 socket/ Scalable ¥Max Processor Scale Cores/ QPI Max Mem ** Usage Number/Freq Glueless Threads Cache Speed Speed TDP Turbo HT X7560 (2.26GHz) 8 skt 24M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3  Advanced 8/16 X7550 (2 GHz) 8 skt 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3  X7542 (2.66GHz) 8 skt 6/6 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 130W +1 No Standard E7540 (2 GHz) 8 skt 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 105W +2  6/12 E7530 (1.86GHz) 4 skt 12M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 105W +2  Basic E7520 (1.86GHz) 4 skt 4/8 18M 4.8 GT/s 800 MHz 95W No Turbo  L7555 (1.86 GHz) 8 skt 8/16 24M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 95W +5  Low Voltage L7545 (1.86 GHz) 8 skt 6/12 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 95W +5  2 socket/ Scalable ¥Max Processor Scale Cores/ QPI Max Mem ** Usage Number/Freq Glueless Threads Cache Speed Speed TDP Turbo HT Advanced X6550 (2 GHz) 2 skt 8/16 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3  Standard E6540 (2 GHz) 2 skt 6/12 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 105W +2  Basic E6510 (1.73 GHz) 2 skt*** 4/8 12M 4.8 GT/s 800 MHz 105W No Turbo  2 skt only Advanced features available on higher end processors + 1066 Mhz frequency runs at an effective frequency of 978 Mhz when run at 5.86GHz SMI link speed ¥Max Scale Glueless: Scaling capability refers to maximum supported number of CPUs in a ―glueless‖ Boxboro-EX platform (e.g. 8 skt means this SKU can be used to populate up to 8 sockets in a single system) **Max Turbo Boost frequency based on number of 133 MHz increments above base freq (+2 = 0.266 GHz, +3 = 0.400 GHz) ***E6510 may not be scaled above 2 sockets even with a customer node controller 17 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Performance Enhancements Intel® Xeon® 7500 Series Processor Intel® Turbo Boost Intel® Hyper-threading Technology Technology Increases performance by increasing processor Increases performance for threaded applications frequency and enabling faster speeds when delivering greater throughput and responsiveness conditions allow <8C Turbo 8C Turbo Normal Frequency Core1 Core8 Core0 Core1 Core8 Core0 Core1 Core0 … … … All cores All cores Fewer cores operate at operate at higher may operate at rated frequency frequency even higher frequencies Higher Performance Higher Performance on Demand For Threaded Workloads 18 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500 series-based Servers 4S Standard Benchmarks Performance Summary Memory Bandwidth (GB/s) 8.24 HPC Intel® Xeon® Processor X7560 SPECfp*_rate_base2006 3.87 VMmark* Consolidation 3.70 SAP* SD 2-tier 3.43 SPECjbb*2005 3.19 TPC Benchmark* E 2.77 SPECint*_rate_base2006 2.64 SPECjAppServer*2004 2.51 Relative results Xeon® X7460 Baseline 1.0 3x average improvement Higher is better Xeon X7460 = Intel Xeon processor X7460 (16M Cache, 2.66GHz, 1066MHz FSB, formerly codenamed Dunnington) Xeon X7560 = Intel Xeon processor X7560 (24M Cache, 2.26GHz, 6.40GT/s Intel® QPI, formerly codenamed Nehalem-EX) Average of 3x performance improvement over 7400 series across a range of benchmarks Source: Best published / submitted results comparison of best 4-socket Xeon X7460 and X7560 models as of 7 May 2010. See previous “Broad Performance Claim” foil and notes for more information. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm 19 Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. * Other names claimed as the claimed as the property of others. * Other names and brands may be and brands may be property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500 4S Enterprise Standard Benchmarks Comparison to 2S Xeon® 5600 Series 2.19 4S/64T Intel® Xeon® Processor X7560 (24M SPECfp*_rate_base2006 Cache, 2.26 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI) 2.17 SPECjbb*2005 SPECjAppServer*2004 2.13 SAP* SD 2-tier 2.12 SPECmpi*2007 2.11 SPECint*_rate_base2006 2.04 VMmark* 2.01 SPECompM*2001 1.95 Relative results Xeon® X5680 Baseline (6C, 12M Cache, 3.33GHz) 1.00 Higher is better Xeon® 7500 and Xeon® 5600 benchmark results represent best top-bin published results as of 29 March 2010. See notes for details. Up to 2.2x the performance of Xeon® 5600 Source: Best published results on SPEC.org or VMware.com as of 29 March 2010. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. 20 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Advanced RAS Starts With Silicon Requires An Ecosystem Mission Critical OS Oracle Innovation Intel Silicon Mission Critical Solutions Span Silicon, Firmware & OS 21 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Advanced Reliability Starts With Silicon Xeon® 7500 Reliability Features Memory I/O Hub CPU/Socket • Inter-socket Memory Mirroring • Physical IOH Hot Add • Machine Check Architecture • Intel® Scalable Memory • OS IOH On-lining* (MCA) recovery Interconnect (Intel® SMI) • PCI-E Hot Plug • Corrected Machine Check Lane Failover Interrupt (CMCI) • Intel® SMI Clock Fail Over • Corrupt Data Containment • Intel® SMI Packet Retry Mode • Memory Address Parity • Viral Mode • Failed DIMM Isolation • OS Assisted Processor Socket • Memory Board Hot Migration* Add/Remove • OS CPU on-lining * • Dynamic Memory Migration* • CPU Board Hot Add at QPI • OS Memory On-lining * • Electronically Isolated (Static) • Recovery from Single DRAM Partitioning Device Failure (SDDC) plus • Single Core Disable for Fault random bit error Resilient Boot • Memory Thermal Throttling • Demand and Patrol scrubbing • Fail Over from Single DRAM Device Failure (SDDC) Intel® QuickPath Interconnect • Memory DIMM and Rank Sparing • Intel QPI Packet Retry • Intra-socket Memory Mirroring • Intel QPI Protocol Protection • Mirrored Memory Board Hot via CRC (8bit or 16bit rolling) Add/Remove • QPI Clock Fail Over • QPI Self-Healing Over 20 New RAS features across the entire platform Bold text denoted new feature for Xeon® 7500 * Feature requires OS support, check with your OS vendor for support plans Some features require OEM server implementation and validation and may not be provided in all server platforms 22 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Machine Check Architecture Recovery First Machine Check Recovery in Xeon®-based Systems Previously seen only in RISC, mainframe, and Itanium-based systems MCA Recovery System works in conjunction with OS or System Normal Status VMM to recover or restart processes and Recovery With Error continue normal with OS Prevention operation Error information passed to OS / VMM Bad memory location flagged so data will not Error Error Error be used by OS or Contained Detected* Corrected applications Un-correctable Errors Errors HW Un-correctable HW Correctable Errors Allows Recovery From Otherwise Fatal System Errors *Errors detected using Patrol Scrub or Explicit Write-back from cache 23 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Server Refresh Benefits Single Core  Xeon® 7500 2005 2010 Performance Refresh Up to 20x 1:1 Performance (Estimated) 20 Racks of Intel® Xeon® 7500 Based Servers – OR – Up to 92% Efficiency Refresh Annual Energy 20:1 Costs Reduction (Estimated) 20 Racks of Intel® Xeon® As Little as Single Core 1 Rack of Intel® Xeon® 12 months 7500 Based Servers Servers Payback (Estimated) Source: Intel measurements as of March 2010 of Xeon 7500 and single-core 4-socket systems. Performance comparison using SPECint_rate_base2006. Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup. 24 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Server Refresh & Consolidate Single Core 4-socket  Xeon® 7500 8-socket 2005 2010 Up to 91% Efficiency Refresh Annual Energy 36:1 Costs Reduction (Estimated) As Little as 1 Rack of Intel® Xeon® 14 months 7500 Based Servers Payback (Estimated) – OR – Performance 36 Racks of Refresh 1:1 Up to 36x Intel® Xeon® Performance Single Core, (Estimated) 4-socket 36 Racks of Intel® Xeon® 7500 Based 8- Servers socket Servers Source: Intel measurements as of March 2010 of Xeon 7500 and single-core 4-socket systems. Performance comparison using SPECint_rate_base2006. Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup. 25 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Oracle Database with Intel Xeon® 7500 When simplification & cost reduction for your DB environment is your goal IT BENEFITS 2005: 30 servers 2010: 2 servers Floor Space 94% REDUCTION 15:1 ~$70k HW Annual Investment Energy Costs Single Core New Xeon® 7500 series 90% REDUCTION Lower Operating Costs Lower Software Costs As low as Business BENEFITS Over 4 years $200K $1.28M 4 Month Power / Cooling SAVINGS SW Licensing SAVINGS Estimated Payback Source: Intel estimates as of February 2010. Performance comparison using internal workload. Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software 26 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Enhancing Platform Value Beyond the Processor Network Optimizations Impact1 • Unified networking • Up to 10X increase IO bandwidth • Eliminate switches/cables • >5X port count reduction • Scalable with multi-core CPUs • Up to 4.5X power per Gb reduction Intel® 10GbE Solid State Drives • Lower power consumption Impact1 • Up to 46X lower power • No moving parts • Lower TCO (fewer drives) • Dramatic performance Intel® X25-M • Up to 6X read perf improvement increases SSDs 1 Based on Intel internal results. Actual results may vary significantly based on workload and product configurations. See backup for more details on the results. 27 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Nehalem EX 8-socket Nehalem EX 1 TB 4-socket Westmere EP 512 GB 2-socket Westmere EP 144 GB Sun Fire X4800 2-socket 144 GB Sun Fire X4470 Westmere EP 2-socket 96GB Sun Fire X4170 M2 Sun Fire X4270 M2 Sun Fire X2270 M2 Nehalem EX Westmere EP Nehalem EP 8-socket 1 TB 4-socket Westmere EP 192 GB 2-socket Oracle Exadata Database Machine X2-8 144 GB Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud Nehalem EP 2-socket 144 GB Sun Blade X6275 Sun Netra X4270 Sun Blade X6270 M2 28 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Sun Fire X4800 New World Record - SPECint_rate2006 (June 28, 2010) New World Record - SPECfp_rate2006 (June 28, 2010) New World Record - SPECjbb2005 (June 28, 2010) New World Record - SAP Sales and Distribution Parallel Sun Fire X4470 Standard Application Benchmark (September 20, 2010) New World Record - SPEC OMP2001 Benchmark (June 28, 2010) New World Record - SPEC OMP2001L Benchmark (June 28, 2010) Source - http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/performance-scalability/sun- x86-systems-gateway-082396.html 29 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500 series-based Server platforms 4S On-Line Transaction Processing (OLTP) Warehouse Database Performance TPC Benchmark* C 1,807,347 Faster database servers for 2.8x Online Transactions Transactions per minute C 1,193,472 Higher is better 639,253 516,752 318,407 256GB 1,024GB 512GB Xeon 7140 Xeon X7350 Xeon X7460 Xeon X7560 Opteron (4P/8C/16T, (4P/16C/16T, (4P/24C/24T, (4P/32C/64T, 6176SE 16M, 3.40GHz, 8M, 2.93GHz, 16M, 2.66GHz, 24M, 2.26GHz, (4P/48C/48T, 800MHz FSB) 1066MHz FSB) 1066MHz FSB) 6.4GT/s QPI) 12M, 2.3GHz) $1.88/ $2.59/ $0.97/ $0.49/ $0.68/ tpmC tpmC tpmC tpmC tpmC Source: Comparison based on results published at www.tpc.org as of 25 August 2010. See notes or backup section for configuration details. Xeon 7500 series delivers more on-line server transactions than X7460 and is up to 50% faster than AMD & 25% cheaper per transaction! P=Processors, C=Cores, T=Threads Xeon X7460 – Intel® Xeon® Processor X7460 (“Dunnington 2.66GHz”, Six-Core) Xeon 7140 – Intel® Xeon® Processor 7140 (“Tulsa 3.40GHz”, Dual-Core) Xeon X7560 – Intel® Xeon® Processor X7560 (“Nehalem-EX 2.26GHz”, Eight-Core) Xeon X7350 – Intel® Xeon® Processor X7350 (“Tigerton 2.93GHz”, Quad-Core) Opteron 6176SE – AMD Opteron* Model 6176SE (“Magny-Cours 2.30GHz”, 12-Core) Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or 32 components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, Go to: http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/benchmark_limitations.htm. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

Performance Claim Backup 60% Performance, 40% Perf/Watt, and 30% Lower Power • Up to 1.6x performance compared to Xeon 5500 series claim supported by a CPU intensive benchmark (Blackscholes). Intel internal measurement. (Feb 25, 2010) – Configuration details: - Blackscholes* – Baseline Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 18.74 seconds. – New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 11.51 seconds. • Up to 40% higher performance/watt compared to Intel® Xeon® Processor 5500 Series claim supported by performance results on a server side java benchmark in conjunction with power consumption across a load line. Intel internal measurement (Jan 15, 2010) – Baseline platform: Intel preproduction server platform with two Quad-Core Intel® Xeon® processor X5570, 2.93 GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4QPI, 8GB memory (4x2GB DDR3-1333), 1 PSU, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Enterprise SP2. Intel internal measurement as of January 15,2010. – New platform: Intel preproduction server platform with two six-Core Intel® Xeon® processor X5670, 2.93 GHz, 12MB L3 cache, 6.4QPI, 8GB memory (4x2GB DDR3-1333), 1 PSU, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Enterprise SP2. Intel internal measurement as of January 15, 2010. • Intel® Xeon® processor 5600 series with Intel microarchitecture Nehalem delivers similar performance as previous-generation servers but uses up to 30 percent less power – Baseline Configuration and Score on Benchmark: - Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S5 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor sX5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev. R1.09 , Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 5 x Fans, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1 x Fujitsu MBD2147RC 147GB 10K RPM 2.5‖ SAS HDD, 1x800W PSU, SLES 11 (X86_64) Kernel 2.6.27.19-5-default. Source: Fujitsu Performance Lab testing as of Mar 2010. SPECint_rate_base2006 score: 250. http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=0140b19d-56e3-4b24-a01e-26b8a80cfe53 – New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processors L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Hex-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev R1.00A , Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 5 x Fans, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 LV DR registered ECC), 1 x Fujitsu MBD2147RC 147GB 10K RPM 2.5‖ SAS HDD, 1x800W PSU, SLES 11 (X86_64) Kernel 2.6.27.19-5-default. Source: Fujitsu Performance Lab testing as of Mar 2010. SPECint_rate_base2006 score: 250 http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=4af74e10-24b1-4cf8-bb3b-9c4f5f177389 33 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Performance Summary Backup Mainstream Server Benchmarks 42% gain on Single Node server SPECpower*_ssj2008 at similar power level over previous generation processors supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: Referenced as published at 2053 overall ssj_ops/watt http://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results/res2009q4/power_ssj2008- 20091023-00205.html • New Configuration and Score: IBM x3650 M3 was configured with the Intel Xeon Processor X5670 (2.93GHz, 256KB L2 cache per core, 12MB L3 cache per processor—12 cores/2 chips/6 cores per chip) and 12GB of PC3L-10600R(6 x 2GB) memory and ran IBM Java™6 Runtime Environment and Microsoft® Windows® Server 2008 R2 Enterprise x64 Edition. Score: 2,927 overall ssj_ops/watt. Submitted and in review at www.spec.org 46% gain on SPECjbb2005 supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: 632,425 bops, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 158106 http://www.spec.org/osg/jbb2005/results/res2010q1/jbb2005-20100210- 00803.html • New Configuration and Score: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processors X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, Data Reuse Optimization disabled, all prefetchers disabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1 x Seagate 73GB 10K RPM 2.5‖ SAS HDD, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise, IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Windows Server 2008 amd64-64 jvmwa6460sr6-20090923_42924). Source: Fujitsu Performance Lab testing as of Mar 2010. SPECjbb2005 score: bops= 928393, bops/JVM= 154732 http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=71488796-7a53-46b8-9163-61373214c2ef 27% boost on SAP ERP 6.0 Unicode over previous generation supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: 3800 Number of SAP SD benchmark users http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7C259FFE6AB54898440C838DED66684AFD7D58B23A917F4C0D • New Configuration and Score : Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), 88 GB main memory, Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Edition, SQL Server 2008, SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode). Source: www.sap.com Score: 4860 Number of SAP SD benchmark users 40% gain on SPECint_rate_2006 over previous generation supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: Score: 253 • http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q1/cpu2006-20100202-09561.html • New Configuration and Score: Dell PowerEdge R710 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, six-core, 130W TDP), Maximum Performance Power Management mode, Data Reuse Disabled, C1E Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 1x146GB 15K RPM SAS HDD, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (2.6.27.19-5-smp). Source: Submitted to www.spec.org for publication as of March 15 2010. Geomean Score of 12 workloads: 355 42% gain on VMMark* over previous generation supported by the following: • Baseline Configuration and Score: Cisco result referenced as published at 25.06 at 17 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Cisco-2010-01-12-B200M1.pdf • New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Cisco UCS B250 M2 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, 6-core, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 192GB memory (48x4GB DDR3 1333), EMC CLARiiON CX4-240 storage system with 25x73GB SSD, 20 x 450GB 15K RPM, 5 x 300GB 15K RPM, VMware vSphere 4,0 U1 Source: www.cisco.com. Score of 35.83@26 tiles. For more information see: www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/ps10265/at_work_promo.html#~industry_benchmarks. 34 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Performance Summary Backup Technical Computing Benchmarks • STREAM: Baseline Configuration and Score on Stream-MP Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Disabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing TR1012. Score of workloads: 36588.0 MB/s New Configuration and Score on Stream-MP Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Disabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: MB/s. • CAE: Baseline Configuration and Score on CAE Vertical: 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 95W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for nine applications New Configuration and Score on CAE Vertical: Intel pre-production 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for nine applications • SPECfp_rate: 25% gain on SPECfp_rate_base2006 over previous generation supported by the following: Baseline Configuration and Score: Score 197, Referenced as published at http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q2/cpu2006-20090511-07354.html New Configuration and Score: Dell PowerEdge R710 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, six-core, 130W TDP), Maximum Performance Power Management mode, Data Reuse Disabled, C1E Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 1x146GB 15K RPM SAS HDD, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (2.6.27.19-5-smp). Source: Submitted to www.spec.org for publication as of March 15 2010. Geomean Score of 17 workloads: 248. • LIFE SCIENCES: Baseline Configuration and Score on Life Sciences Vertical: 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 95W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for ten applications New Configuration and Score on Life Sciences Vertical: Intel pre-production 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for ten applications • LINPACK: Baseline Configuration and Score on Linpack Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 02/23/2009, C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U3 kernel 2.6.18-128.el5 for x86_64). Source: Intel internal testing TR1011A. Score of workloads: 91 GFlops. New Configuration and Score on Linpack Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex- core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010, C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 146 GFlops. • BLACKSCHOLES*: Baseline Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 18.74 seconds. New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 11.51 seconds. 35 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

5 Month Single Core Refresh ROI Claim – Back Up • 5 month ROI claim estimated based on comparison between 2S Single Core Intel® Xeon® 3.80 with 2M L2 Cache and 2S Intel® Xeon® X5680 based servers. Calculation includes analysis based on performance, power, cooling, electricity rates, operating system annual license costs and estimated server costs. This assumes 8kW racks, $0.10 per kWh, cooling costs are 2x the server power consumption costs, operating system license cost of $900/year per server, per server cost of $7200 based on estimated list prices and estimated server utilization rates. All dollar figures are approximate. Performance and power comparisons are based on measured server side java benchmark results (Intel Corporation Feb 2010). Platform power was measured during the steady state window of the benchmark run and at idle. Performance gain compared to baseline was 15x. – Baseline platform: Intel server platform with two 64-bit Intel Xeon Processor 3.80Ghz with 2M L2 Cache, 800 FSB, 8x1GB DDR2-400 memory, 1 hard drive, 1 power supply, Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003 Ent. SP1, Oracle* JRockit* build P27.4.0-windows-x86_64 run with 2 JVM instances – New platform: Intel server platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5680 (12M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 1 SATA 10krpm 150GB hard drive, 1 800w power supply, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 64 bit SP2, Oracle* JRockit* build P28.0.0-29 run with 4 JVM instances • Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations. 36 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Single Core Energy Efficient Refresh Calculation Details 2005 2010 Delta / Notes Product Intel® Xeon® 3.8GHz Intel® Xeon® X5680 with 2M cache (3.33GHz) Performance 1 Up to 15x increase Intel internal measurements on a per Server server side java benchmark as of Feb 2010 Server Power 228W idle / 382W 117W idle / 383W Server idle for 16 hours per day Idle / Active Power active active and active for 8 hours per day # Servers needed 315 21 ~ 15:1 server consolidation # Racks needed 15 racks 1 rack 15:1 Rack Consolidation Annual Server kWh 772,904 37,938 Up to 95% lower energy costs Total Annual $154,581 $7,588 $146,993 electricity cost reduction per year. Energy Costs Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor Operating System $283,500 $18,900 $264,600 less per year Licensing Costs Assumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900 Source www.dell.com as of 12/16/08 Estimated Annual Cost Savings of $411,593 Cost of new HW n/a $151,200 Assume $7,200 per server Estimated Payback Period of 5 months 37 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

15 Month Dual Core Refresh ROI Claim – Back up • 15 month ROI claim estimated based on comparison between 2S Dual Core Intel® Xeon® 5160 (3.0GHz) and 2S Intel® Xeon® X5680 based servers. Calculation includes analysis based on performance, power, cooling, electricity rates, operating system annual license costs and estimated server costs. This assumes 8kW racks, $0.10 per kWh, cooling costs are 2x the server power consumption costs, operating system license cost of $900/year per server, per server cost of $7200 based on estimated list prices and estimated server utilization rates. All dollar figures are approximate. Performance and power comparisons are based on measured server side java benchmark results (Intel Corporation Feb 2010). Platform power was measured during the steady state window of the benchmark run and at idle. Performance gain compared to baseline was 5x. – Baseline platform: Intel server platform with two Dual-core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160, 3.33GHz, 1333MHz FSB, 8x2GB FBDMIMM DDR2-667 memory, 1 hard drive, 1 power supply, Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003 Ent. SP1, Oracle* JRockit* build P27.4.0-windows-x86_64 run with 2 JVM instances – New platform: Intel server platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5680 (12M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 1 SATA 10krpm 150GB hard drive, 1 800w power supply, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 64 bit SP2, Oracle* JRockit* build P28.0.0-29 run with 4 JVM instances • Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations. 38 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Dual Core Energy Efficient Refresh Calculation Details 2005 2010 Delta / Notes Product Intel Xeon 5100 series Intel® Xeon® X5680 (3.00GHz) (3.33GHz) Performance 1 Up to 5x increase Intel internal measurements on a per Server server side java benchmark as of Feb 2010 Server Power 252W idle / 354W 117W idle / 383W Server idle for 16 hours per day Idle / Active Power active active and active for 8 hours per day # Servers needed 105 21 5:1 server consolidation # Racks needed 5 racks 1 rack 5:1 Rack Consolidation Annual kWhr 281,883 37,938 Estimated 85% lower energy costs Annual Energy $56,376 $7,588 $45,169 electricity cost reduction per year. Costs Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor OS Licensing Costs $94,500 $18,900 $75,600 less per year Assumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900 Source www.dell.com as of 12/16/08 Estimated Annual Cost Savings of $120,769 Cost of new HW n/a $151,200 Assume $7,200 per server Estimated Payback Period of 15 months 39 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Intel Xeon® 5600 Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 Benchmark:- SPECCPU2006 V1.1 • X5680: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 352.0. • X5677: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5677 (3.46 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 283.0. • X5670: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5670 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 334.0. • X5667: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5667 (3.06 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 269.0. • X5660: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5660 (2.80 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 326.0. • X5650: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5650 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 316.0. • E5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5640 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 226.0. • E5630: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5630 (2.53 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 218.0. • E5620: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5620 (2.40 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 211.0. • E5507: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5507 (2.26 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 143.0. • E5506: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5506 (2.13 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 137.0. • E503: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5503 (2.00 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 72.9. • L5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 259.0. 40 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Intel Xeon® 5600 Downbins: SPECfp_rate2006 Benchmark:- SPECCPU2006 V1.1 • X5680: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5670 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 247.0. • X5677: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5677 (3.46 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 213.0. • X5670: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5670 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 235.0. • X5667: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5667 (3.06 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 206.0. • X5660: upermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5660 (2.80 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 232.0. • X5650: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5650 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 226.0. • E5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5640 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 171.0. • E5630: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5630 (2.53 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 168.0. • E5620: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5620 (2.40 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 164.0. • E5507: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5507 (2.26 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 119.8. • E5506: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5506 (2.13 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 117.0. • E5503: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5503 (2.00 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 72.6. • L5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 189.0. 41 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Xeon® L5600 SKU Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 and SPECint*_rate2006 Source: Highest published results on www.spec.org as of April 16, 2010 • SPECint*_rate2006 – L5640: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 269 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100317-10097.html – L5630: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 181 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10131.html – L5609: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 136 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10135.html • SPECfp*_rate2006 – L5640: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 193 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100317-10098.html – L5630: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 134 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10132.html – L5609: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 116 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10136.html 42 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Xeon® L5500 SKU Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 and SPECint*_rate2006 Source: Highest published results on www.spec.org as of March 24, 2010 • SPECint*_rate2006 – L5530: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 194 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08776.html – L5520: UCS C210 M1.Score: 188 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q1/cpu2006-20100119-09411.html – L5506: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 133 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08772.html • SPECfp*_rate2006 – L5530: IBM System x3550 M2. Score: 158 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20091007-08823.html – L5520: PowerEdge R510. Score: 155 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20091012-08892.html – L5506: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 115 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08775.html 43 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series SPECint*_rate_base2006 Integer Throughput Performance on SPECint*_rate_base2006 benchmark Comparison based on published/submitted results to www.spec.org as of February 2010. • Intel® Xeon® processor 3.80 with 2M L2 cache based platform details • HP* ProLiant* DL380 G4 server platform with two 64-bit Intel Xeon processor 3.80GHz with 2M L2 cache, 800 FSB, 8GB memory, Microsoft Windows Server 2003* Ent. SP1, Intel® C++ Compiler 9.1 for 32-bit apps, Build 20060323Z Package ID: W_CC_P_9.1.020. Referenced as published at 20.9. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2006q3/cpu2006-20060513-00027.html. • Intel® Xeon® processor 5160 based platform details • IBM System X* 3550 platform with two Intel Xeon processors 5160 3.00GHz, 4Mb L2 cache, 16GB memory (8 x 2GB DDR2-5300F ECC), SUSE* Linux* Enterprise Server 10 (x86_64) 2.6.16.21-0.8-smp, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux* version 10.0. Published in August 2007. Referenced as published at 60.8. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q3/cpu2006-20070803-01638.html. • Intel® Xeon® processor 5365 based platform details • Dell PowerEdge 1950 with two Intel Xeon X5365, 3.00 GHz, 1333MHz system, 8 MB (4 MB shared / 2 cores L3 Cache), 16GB memory (8x2 GB 667 MHz ECC CL5 FB-DIMM), SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 10 Compiler: Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32 and Linux64. Published August 2007. Referenced as published at 99.1. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q4/cpu2006-20070916-02063.html • Intel® Xeon® processor X5470 based platform details • Fujitsu Siemens PRIMERGY* RX200 S4 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5470 3.33GHz, 12MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 16GB memory (8x2GB DDR2 PC2- 5300F, 2 rank, CAS 5-5-5, with ECC), SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 x86_64 Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.21-smp*, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32* and Linux64* version 11.0 build 20080730. Referenced as published at 140. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q3/cpu2006-20080901-05156.html. • Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 based platform details • ASUS Z8PE-D12X based server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5570 2.93GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, 24 GB memory (6x4GB PC3-10600R, CL9-9-9, ECC), SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 x86_64 Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.34-smp, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32 and Linux64 version 11.0 build 20090131. Referenced as published at 241. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q1/cpu2006-20090316-06703.html • • Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (WSM-EP) platform (Score: 352) • New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 352.0. Source: Published/submitted/approved results as of Feb 2010. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Copyright © 2009, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. 44 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 Series VMmark* Performance (generational) • Virtualization Performance on VMware* ESX using VMmark* benchmark • Comparison based on published/submitted/approved results as of April 27, 2009. Results are posted at http://www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/results.html • Intel® Xeon® processor 5160 based platform details • Dell PowerEdge* 2950 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors 5160 3.00Ghz, 4MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 32GB memory (8x4GB 667MHz ECC CL5 DDR2 FB-DIMM), VMware ESX Server* V3.0.1. Published at 3.89@3 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark_dell3.PDF • Intel® Xeon® processor X5365 based platform details • Dell PowerEdge 2950 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5365 3.00GHz, 2x4MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 32GB memory, VMware ESX Server V3.0.1.Published at 7.03@5 tiles. For more information see http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/vmmark_dell2.PDF • Intel® Xeon® processor X5470 based platform details • HP Proliant* ML370 G5 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5470 3.33GHz, 2x6MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 48GB memory, VMware ESX V3.5. Update 3 Published at 9.15@7 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-HP-2008- 10-09-ML370.pdf • Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 based platform details: • Dell PowerEdge* R710 Server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5570 2.93GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, 96 GB memory (12x8 GB DDR3-1066MHz), VMware ESX v4.0. VMmark V1.1. Result measured at 24.0@17 tiles. For more information see http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Dell-2009-04-21-R710.pdf • Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 based platform details: • Intel reference platform using two Intel Xeon processors X5680 (12 M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 96 GB memory (12x 8 GB DDR3-800 Reg ECC DIMMs), VMware ESX* V4.0 Update 1. Performance measured at 32.25@ 26 tiles. Source: Published/submitted/approved results as of Feb 2010 Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Copyright © 2009, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. 45 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

DDR3L Power Testing: System Configuration Source: Intel internal measurements Feb 2010 using server side java benchmark across a load line Power measurement at the wall using same system configuration; memory was the only variable changed Before: 4 x 4GB Samsung PC3-10600R - M393B5170FH0-CH9 (1.5V) After: 4 x 4GB Samsung PC3L-10600R - M393B5170FH0-YH9 (1.35V) Note: System level power reductions of 0.52W at idle and 1.42W under 100% load were approx the same per DIMM with 6 DIMMs installed Item Details Server Intel 1U S5500WBV server Processor 2x Xeon® X5650 (Westmere 2.66GHz, 6 cores, 95W TDP, pre-production parts) Power Supply 1x 450W PSU Hard Disk: 1x Seagate Barracuda 120GB, ST3120026AS Memory: Before (1.5v): Samsung PC3-10600R - 4x4GB DDR3-1333 M393B5170FH0-CH9 2 DIMMs installed per CPU After (1.35v): Samsung PC3L-10600R - M393B5170FH0-YH9 46 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Tick-Tock Development Model Sustained Microprocessor Leadership Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock 65nm 45nm 32nm 22nm Intel® Core™ Nehalem Sandy Bridge Microarchitecture Microarchitecture Microarchitecture Intel® Xeon® 5600 Intel’s first 32nm SERVER processor with 6 cores and 12 threads 47 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Tick-Tock Development Model Sustained Microprocessor Leadership Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock Tick Tock 65nm 45nm 32nm 22nm Intel® Core™ Nehalem Sandy Bridge Microarchitecture Microarchitecture Microarchitecture Intel® Xeon® 7500 Intel’s first 45nm SERVER processor with 8 cores and 16 threads 48 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Intel® AES-NI Ecosystem Usage Model Application/OS Description Status Secure Transactions Microsoft Windows Server IIS for SSL/TLS Available now 2008 R2 OpenSSL patch Intel(R) AES-NI enabled Available now SSL patches RHEL6 beta OS with openSSL Available now Fedora 12 OS with openSSL Available now Full Disk Encryption (FDE) McAfee FDE software Available now Microsoft bitlocker Bitlocker for FDE Available now Checkpoint Endpoint security R73, FDE Available now 7.4 HFA1 Enterprise Software Oracle Berkeley database Available Now VMware vSphere 4.1 Provides pass through Available now support for Intel® AES-NI Tools/Libraries Compilers Intel V11.0, GCC v4.4.0, MS VS 2008 Compilers Available now SP1 Libraries Microsoft* OS CNG library WS2008R2, Crypto Libraries Available now IPP crypto library v7.0 beta, NSS 3.12.3 SSL “Data in Motion” and Full Disk Encryption Ready Now, Enterprise Apps later in 2010 49 49 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Intel® Xeon® 5600 Series Encryption Performance Database Web Banking Workload Encryption/Decryption Full Disk Encryption (MS IIS/PHP)1 (McAfee Endpoint Encryption) 3 (Oracle 11g)2 Lower is Higher is Decryption Time(us) 23% provisioning time better Lower is better 4.5x -42% (seconds) better users -89% 16000 158 17 13000 12 3500 20 Intel Xeon Intel Xeon Intel Xeon Intel Xeon Intel Xeon Intel Xeon Intel Xeon 5100 w/o 5500 w/o 5600 with encryption encryption 5500 w/o Intel IPP 5600 5500 5600 encryption Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations. 1 Windows 2008 R2 x64 Enterprise Server. PHP banking sessions /users measured with Intel® Xeon® X5680 processor (WSM, 3.33 GHz) vs Inel® Xeon® 5160 processor (Woodcrest, 3 GHz) and Intel® Xeon® X5570 processor (NHM, 2.93 GHz), 24 SSD RAID 0 arrays, TLS_RSA_with_AES_128_CBC_SHA cipher suite. 2 Oracle 11g with TDE, time takes to decrypt a 5.1 million row encrypted table with AES-256 CBC mode on Intel® Xeon® X5680 processor (WSM, 3.33 GHz) optimized with Intel® Performance Primitives crypto library (IPP) vs Intel® Xeon® X5560 processor (NHM, 2.8 GHz) without IPP. Timing measured is per 4K of data. 3 McAfee Endpoint Encryption for PCs (EEPC) 6.0 package with McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) 4.5 encrypting a 32GB X25E SSD with Intel® Xeon® X5680 processor (WSM, 3.33 GHz) vs. Intel® Xeon® X5570 (NHM, 2.93 GHz). 24GB of memory. Intel AES-NI Helps Make Encryption More Feasible for More Workloads 50 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

9. intel prez sesiune hw

by Doina Draganescu on Nov 04, 2010

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Usage Rights

Statistics

9. intel prez sesiune hw — Presentation Transcript