Dammed If You Do, Damned If You Dont - Presentation Transcript
GLOBAL SEA LEVEL RISE AND THE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT 5 JUNE 2008 PROFESSORS MARTIN FISCHER AND BEN SCHWEGLER NATHAN CHASE, VIVIEN CHUA, DAVID NEWELL Dammed if You Do, Damned if You Don’t Inundated areas resulting from 2m SLR http://flood.firetree.net/
Introduction
How we got here… “ With a little research and advice from the professors, putting together a basic dike design was fairly straightforward… after that, I was hooked! Countless hours later, the design process continues…” – Nathan Chase
Some striking results…
David Newell
Gravel shortages
50+ years for China
65+ years for India
Some striking results…
Vivien Chua
The first step in reliable engineering design is modeling - we are closer to creating a better world!
Background and Need
Coastal Development & Ports
Over half of world’s population lives within 200km of the coast (UN, 2001) 1
35% coastal pop. growth projected between 1995-2025 (Columbia U.) 2
7.187 billion metric tons of seaborne trade in 2006 (AAPA) 3
Sea Level Rise – Fact or Fiction? Model does not include “future dynamical changes in ice flow”
Hurricane Katrina
Hurricane Andrew
Natural Disasters
Cyclone Nargis
Project Overview
Project Overview
Analyze coastal protection design alternatives
Quantify current/projected capacity of design & construction industry
Model the response using 2D/3D/4D tools and disseminate information
Compare capacity to what is needed
Limited understanding of DCI capacity
No official statistics for US
Natural disasters can cause significant impact (e.g., Hurricane Katrina/Rita)
Difficulty in compiling global data
Resources are allocated on a regional or national basis e.g. cranes, dredges, steel
How to Protect Ports
Define the protection strategy and scope
e.g. dikes, levees, landfill for port surface
Develop a “minimum reasonable design” for the scope
Obtain cost data reflective of regional conditions
Compare the design and scope to global data on materials, weather, construction goods and services, etc.
Why ports?
Fixed infrastructure that cannot be relocated easily
High economic value, easy to measure
Clear baseline of what will be protected
Data availability
Simplifying assumption (difficulties with residential/commercial developments, undeveloped areas, etc.)
Port Selection 1 Twenty-foot Equivalent Unit (TEU) is one 20-ft container (one 40-ft container = 2 TEUs)
Methodology for Case Studies
Goal: evaluate and strengthen project by performing detailed case studies in different regions
Overall procedure:
Site identification
Conceptual design alternatives evaluation
Schematic design development
Incorporation of results in overall project
Tools have been developed to simplify the data collection and design element
Current Status
Current Status
Port Characteristics
World’s most important 177 ports, integrated into Google Earth
Current Status
GIS model “automatically” determines:
- Protection length
- Average protection height
Current Status
Cost and availability/capacity data (US, Asia, Europe)
RS Means
UN
Countrywatch
Etc.
Current Status
Coastal Protection Design tool
Offshore dike, navigation lock, pump station, maintenance dredging
Dike Lock Pump Port Open Ocean Dredge River flooding Silt Wave overtopping, scour
Long Beach Harbor a Case Study
“ Manual” design 10.5 miles long 25m high
- Cost: $1693 million
Time to construct: 21.1 years
“ Model” design 10 miles long 9m high
- Cost: $712 million
- Time to construct: 9.7 years
Case study: San Francisco Bay
1 meter sea level rise predicted by 2100!!! Sea level record at Golden Gate
Areas at risk in San Francisco Bay
GIS modeling
2D hydrodynamic modeling
1 meter sea level rise http://flood.firetree.net
Sacramento-San Joaquin delta Golden Gate channel Calibration at NOAA station Golden Gate (9414290)
What if we do nothing?
2D hydrodynamic modeling
Flooding risks
Changes to circulation patterns
Deterioration of water quality
Disappearing habitats/ecosystems
Modifications to sediment distributions
Erosion of salt ponds & submerging tidal marshes Average depth of tidal marshes and salt ponds = 0.1 m 1 m sea level rise
Action plan: Partial intrusion barrage at Golden Gate
Regulate amount of sea water entering and leaving the bay
Sea water entering bay as flood tide
A tidal power barrage?
Estimate of tidal power at Golden Gate
where ρ = density of sea water = 1000 kg/m 3 , Q = flow rate, g = acceleration due to gravity = 9.81 m 2 /s, h = tidal amplitude In a neap-spring cycle, Max Q = 5000 m 3 /s Max h = 2 m Max P = 1x10 8 W
Results
Measuring our Results
Google Earth Demonstration
Netherlands
Stanford/S.F. Bay
San Pedro Bay (L.A.)
Port Characteristics
Port Polygons
4D Model
Future Directions
Collaborations, Raising Awareness
New collaborations in Netherlands, India, etc.
Stanford Engineering & Public Policy Framework Project: Climate Change and its Impact on the Built Environment
Write journal articles
Make GoogleEarth project data available
Fall 2008 Undergrad/Grad Course
3 unit CEE course, but need students in economics, public policy, computer science
Focus: Principles & practices for designing a marine construction project, as applied to the Stanford Engineering Framework project
Week 1: Introduction, project background, reading on case studies (Netherlands, Japan, Hurricane Katrina)
Week 2: Marine Construction industry: equipment, materials, labor (guest lecturer from industry)
Week 3: Site selection and characterization (guest lecture on coastal development)
Week 4-6: Conceptual design (guest lecture)
Week 7-9: Schematic design (guest lecture on hydrologic modeling)
Week 10: Writing up and presenting results (in class presentations, final reports)
Other elements: intensive collaboration session with students from Delft, Madras/Chennai
Acknowledgements
Fred Raichlen, California Institute of Technology
Kyle Johnson, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock
Bob Bittner, Ben C. Gerwick Inc.
Andrew Peterman, Walt Disney Imagineering
Chris Holm, Walt Disney Co.
Austin Becker, Rhode Island Sea Grant
Christian Brockmann, Bremen University of Applied Sciences
DAMMED IF YOU DO, DAMNED IF YOU DON'T:
Global sea more
DAMMED IF YOU DO, DAMNED IF YOU DON'T:
Global sea level rise and the consequences for the built environment
In light of the impacts of recent natural disasters, including the cases of Hurricane Katrina and Andrew, the need is evident for a proactive and transparent Engineering Policy approach to protect the coastal built environment. This response is especially critical considering climate change and the potential for global rise in mean sea level accompanied by increases in storm intensity and frequency.
This talk presents our simulation of the design and construction response required to protect the world's major ports from a significant rise in mean sea level. This simulation was developed through engineering design, GIS (Geographical Information System) Science, hydrologic modeling, and time scheduling based on a comparison of the project requirements to the current industry capacity. While our preliminary results show that the cost of protecting only the 177 most significant ports in terms of economic value (amongst nearly 3,000 major ports total) will be significant, our analysis also shows that the most troubling aspect of an engineering and construction response to sea level rise is the requirement for materials. This will cause dramatic shortages in sand, gravel and other materials, which will ripple through the entire construction industry. less
0 comments
Post a comment