• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
0000457
 

0000457

on

  • 253 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
253
Views on SlideShare
232
Embed Views
21

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

2 Embeds 21

http://movilityseniorsystem1.blogspot.com 17
http://movilityseniorsystem3.blogspot.com 4

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    0000457 0000457 Document Transcript

    • J. &mechanics Vol. 25. No. 5. pp. 519.-528. 1992. OX-92!30/92 55.00+.00Printed in Great Britain CC 1992 Pergamon Press plc MOBILITY IMPAIRMENT IN THE ELDERLY: CHALLENGES FOR BIOMECHANICS RESEARCH ALBERTB. SCHULTZ Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125,U.S.A. Abstract-The problems of mobility impairment in the elderly constitute new and major challenges for biomechanics research. This paper outlines what some of the important problems are, discusses the relevance of biomechanics research to these problems, and reviews some of the current state of knowledge about factors related to the biomechanics of mobility impairments in the elderly. The population of old adults is growing rapidly and the incidence of mobility impairments in old adults is high. Mobility impairment biomechanics research is needed to make the assessments of impairments more precise, to design therapeutic programs that are more effective and to learn more about how mobility impairments can be prevented. THE MAGNITUDE THE CHALLENGES OF THE RELEVANCE BIOMECHANICS OF RESEARCHThe population of elderly adults is a growing one; Physical-task performance requires that the masseslife expectancy continues to increase. In the United and inertias of body segments be supported andStates, mean life expectancy at birth for females was moved by the skeletal system through its muscular49.1 yr in 1900, 77.5 yr in 1980, and is projected to actions. Changes in cognition and central nervousbe 82.2 yr in 2020. The corresponding figures for males system processing; changes in visual, vestibularare 46.6, 69.8 and 74.4 yr (Olshansky and Ault, 1986). and proprioceptive sensing abilities; the effects ofIn 1986, there were 29.2 million residents of the United physical inactivity and disuse; the effects of neurologicStates who were 65 or more years old and 2.8 million and musculoskeletal pathologies; the effects of medic-residents who were 85 or more years old (Public ations; and the effects of motivation and fear allHealth Service, 1989a). If projected conservatively, ultimately express themselves as changes in the bio-these numbers will grow to 52 million and 6.7 million mechanics of physical-task performance.by the year 2020 (Schneider and Guralnik, 1990). Research on the biomechanics of mobility impair- What will be the quality of these additional years of ment in the elderly is needed to quantify impair-life? Will they be years of freedom and personal ment magnitudes, to determine what elements arefulfillment or years of confinement and dependence? critical to these impairments, to improve therapies forMaintenance of mobility is central to this issue. For remediation and to design more effective programs forexample, the risk of hip fracture increases dramatically their prevention. Current evaluations of impairmentsafter age 50, and almost 50% of hip fractures occur in are largely qualitative. Biomechanical measurementspersons who are 80 or more years old. In 1987, that quantify mobility impairments need to be devisedapproximately 220,000 hip fractures occurred in the to define more carefully the levels of functioning inUnited States. This number will grow to over 400,000 cross-sectional studies and to serve as more preciseby the year 2020. Approximately 20% of women who outcome measures in studies of the effects of therapeu-experience a hip fracture do not survive the first year tic interventions. Of more importance is the fact thatafter the fracture. Another 20% do not regain the qualitative measures of impairment serve poorly, if atability to walk without assistance (Schneider and all, as indicators of subtle changes in functioning overGuralnik, 1990). The inability to walk without assist- time, yet there are major needs to understand theseance often leads to institutionalization. changes. What will be the costs to society of these additional One of the most important goals for biomechanicsyears of life? The costs for nursing home care of the research in this context is to find what the criticalelderly in 1985 averaged $23,600 per resident and elements of a mobility impairment are. The wide-totalled $31.1 billion (Schneider and Guralnik, 1990). spread occurrence of gait impairments in the elderlyThe number of nursing home residents is projected to will be documented subsequently. Many elements areincrease 3.5 fold by 2040 (Olshansky and Ault, 1986). involved in the ability to walk: joint ranges of motion,The costs of hip fractures, which were approximately joint torque strengths, muscle latency times, muscle-$1.6 billion in 1987, are projected to be $6 billion by sequencing programs, joint and cutaneous pro-2040 (Schneider and Guralnik, 1990). prioception, control of balance and planning of move- ments, to name just a few. Are all these elements involved in every age-related gait impairment? How Received in final form 6 August 1991. can a gait impairment be remedied if it is not known 519BM25:5-D
    • 520 A. B. SCHULTZwhich of these elements have major responsibilities for (1974) reported an approximately 20% decline be-the impairment? The need for biomechanics research tween ages 45 and 70 yr, among 411 subjects, in hipinto questions like these requires little explanation. rotation and 10% declines in wrist and shoulder Physical therapy is sometimes prescribed for old ROM. A comparison of the ROM of lower extremityadults with mobility impairments. This therapy is joints reported by Boone and Azen (1979) and Roaassometimes directed at increasing the muscular and Andersson (1982) for young and middle-agedstrength. However, biomechanical analyses show that adults with those reported by Walker et al. (1984) forthe strength requirements for the maintenance of elderly adults shows declines ranging from negligiblebalance (Chun et al., 1992; Gu et al., 1992) and even to 57%. Svanborg (1988) found that at age 79, one-those for rising from a chair (Schultz et al., 1991) are fifth of a large group of subjects had restricted kneeusually smaller and, in the former case, considerably joint motion and two-thirds had restricted hip jointsmaller than the available strengths in even quite old motion. Battie et al. (1987), in 3020 blue-collar work-adults. Might other forms of therapy be more appro- ers, found an approximately 25% decline in the abilitypriate for at least some impairments? Balance training, to bend to the side and a 45% decline in shoulderfor example, might be more effective than strength motion over the ages of 20-60 yr. Einkauf et al. (1987)training in remediation of balance problems. Ledin et in 109 healthy females, found declines of 25-50% inal. (1991) demonstrated that nine weeks of balance various ranges of motion of the lumbar spine over agestraining significantly improved the balance abilities in of approximately 2&80 yr. However, Walker et al.persons 70-75 yr old. Therapies and programs for the (1984) reported no significant differences in 28 differ-prevention of impairments can be made more effective ent joint ROM between two groups with mean ages ofonce a better understanding is achieved of the specific approximately 65 and 80 yr.factors which are important for the restoration and The effects of decreased ROM on the ability tomaintenance of a given function. Biomechanics re- perform various activities of daily living are less wellsearch is likely to contribute to this understanding. studied, not only in old but even in young adults. Badley et al. (1984) found, when studying 95 subjects of ages 28-84 yr with arthritis, that the ability to move AGE EFFECTS ON MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM around in one’s environment correlated significantly COMPONENTS with ROM in knee flexion, the ability to bend down correlated with hip flexion ROM, and the ability for This and the subsequent sections of this paper will activities requiring the use of hands and arms correl-review representative studies of functional decline ated significantly with ROM of the upper extremities.with age in the performance of physical tasks. Studies Bergstrom et al. (1985a) reported that restricted kneeof functional decline with age should be interpreted motion in 79 yr olds correlated with the disability towith caution. Their outcome often depends critically enter public transport vehicles. However, they foundon subject inclusion criteria. Unless these are quite that joint impairment did not generally associate withstringent and clearly explained, it is difficult to separ- commitment to institutional care. Bergstrom et al.ate the effects of natural aging from the effects of (1985b) found that the majority of a group of 134disease processes, medication, and the state of physical people of age 79 yr had enough spinal mobility tofitness, for example. perform the common activities of daily living. Bio- mechanics research further detailing the relationshipsAnthropometry between decreased ROM and mobility impairments The anthropometry of the elderly differs somewhat seems merited.from that of young adults (Ward and Kirk, 1967; Burrand Phillips, 1984; Shimokata et al., 1989; Kelly and Muscle functionKroemer, 1990, for example). Stoudt (1981) points out The decline in the muscle strength that accompaniesthat in the mean, persons 65-74 yr old are approxim- aging has long been recognized (Quetelet, 1835; Cath-ately 3% shorter than those 18-24 yr old. Elderly cart et al., 1935, for example). The order of magnitudemales are slightly lighter and elderly females approx- of this decline, say between ages 25 and 65, is one-imately 11% heavier than young adult males and third. However, precise strength values reported varyfemales. These differences result from both secular widely because they depend on many factors: fortrends in the population and biological changes inher- example, they depend very substantially on the sub-ent in the aging process. In illustration of the latter jects studied, the joint angles, whether under isometricfactor, most of the decrement in stature takes place in or constant-velocity conditions, and whether, at thethe trunk and results from a flattening of the inter- constant velocity, muscle shortening or lengthening isvertebral disks and vertebral bodies and changes in occurring. Table 1 provides typical literature data onkyphosis. extremity joint muscle strengths for young and old adults. Viitisalo et al. (1985) report that hand grip,Joint ranges of motion elbow flexion and trunk flexion and extension The ranges of motion (ROM) of body joints gen- strengths decline 3545% between the early thirtieserally diminish with age. For example, Allander et al. and the early seventies. Vandervoort et al. (1990)
    • Mobility impairment in the elderly 521 Table 1. Literature values for joint torque strengths (N m)* Young adults? Old adultst Data source Females Males Females Males Ankle dorsiJlexors Oberg et al. 49 Sepic et al. 44 78 46 74 Ankle plantarflexors Oberg et al. 188 Gerdle and Fugl-Meyer 78 139 Falkel 58 87 Sepic et al. 100 129 82 131 Knee Jexors Knabic et al. 87 195 Borges 100 155 65 109 Murray et al. 78 50 Knee extensors Knapic et al. 160 250 Dannenskiold et al. 75 120 Aniansson et al. 108 191 Borges 183 289 128 188 Murray et al. 176 110 Hip jiexors Markhede and Grimby 120 Cahalan et al. 66 108 51 89 Hip extensors Markhede and Grimby 248 Cahalan et al. 126 204 110 203 Shoulder flexors Murray et al. 50 104 38 84 Shoulder extensors Murray et al. 53 80 35 74 * Adapted from Schultz et al. (1991). Data sources are cited in that paper. Most values quoted are for isometric strengths, but a few are for low-rate isokinetic strengths. t Mean ages approximately 25-30 yr, see references. 1 Mean ages approximately 6&80 yr, see references.report age differences in strength to be smaller whenmuscles lengthen than when they shorten. A prevalent casual belief is that many of the mobil-ity impairments that arise in the elderly are due to adecline in the muscular strength. This belief warrantscareful consideration. Studies were cited above sug-gesting that the joint torques needed to maintainpostural balance and even to rise from a chair areoften well below the available joint torque strengths.Further, comprehensive biomechanical studies areneeded of the muscle strength requirements for allcommon activities of daily living in order to relate thestrength requirements, strength availabilities and per-formance in these activities. I I I I I I I I I II I I I I The decline with aging in the ability of muscles to IO 20 30 40 50 60 70 0produce power is perhaps well illustrated by records of Age (~0peak athletic performances. Moore (1975), in his studyof age effects in record running performance, shows Fig. 1. Age effects in world record running speeds. Data fromthat in both short- and long-distance races, male elite Moore (1975).runners over 70 yr old run one-third slower than eliteyoung adult male athletes (Fig. 1). The latter tend to be absolute terms and 20% on a per unit muscle massin their twenties. In their review of muscle function basis. Age-related changes in muscle morphology andwith age, Faulkner et al. (1990) point out that rodent physiology have been reviewed by Grimby and Saltinmuscle power outputs decline approximately 30% in (1983) and Faulkner et al. (1990), for example. The
    • 522 A. B. SCHULTZlatter concluded that the maximum speed of shorten- for experimental methods and the frequent use of testing, contraction times and fiber types do not seem to conditions that are biomechanically complex makechange significantly with aging, but fast/slow fiber data on reaction times sometimes difficult to interpretinnervation ratios do seem to. Muscle power reduc- for the purposes of biomechanical analyses of rapidtion with aging may also be due to systemic factors, task performances. For example, Welford’s (1984)such as decline in cardiopulmonary function (Gorman review article tabulates mean simple premotor timesand Posner, 1988). in young adults that range from 109-255 ms. More A number of studies suggest that exercise in later data on age effects in SRT when attempts are made toyears can help maintain muscular strength (review move only single body joints are needed. Studies of theof Shepard, 1990, for example) and improve factors effects of different SRT on the ability to performwhich indirectly influence muscle function (Gorman complex tasks rapidly are also needed. These probablyand Posner, 1988, for example). However, Block et al. can be conducted only through the use of direct(1989) point out that studies of this kind have some- dynamics biomechanical simulation models suited fortimes yielded conflicting results and have sometimes ‘what-if’ parameter studies.been marred by methodological flaws, such as failureto use a randomized study design, failure to assess Proprioceptionoutcomes blindly and too short a study duration. Relatively few studies have examined the changes in proprioception with aging (Stelmach and Worrin- gham, 1985). Skinner et al. (1984) found joint positionReaction times sense in the knee to deteriorate with age in their study Reaction times, the delays that occur between the of 29 subjects over a 62 yr age span. In approximateonset of a stimulus and the onset of response to it, are terms, joint angles could be reproduced to within 2” byof fundamental importance to biomechanical analyses 20 yr olds, but only to within 6” by 80 yr olds. Twenty-of any tasks performed rapidly. Reaction times are year olds could detect passive joint motions of 4”, butoften categorized into simple (SRT) and choice (CRT) 80 yr olds could detect only motions larger than 7”.reaction times, the latter involving selection among Kokmen et al. (1978) compared joint motion sensationseveral possible response options and, thus, presum- in 52 subjects over 60 yr old with that in 10 youngably involving more central processing of motor com- adult subjects. In contrast to the findings of Skinner etmands. Reaction times are further divided into pre- al., they found no major decline with age in motionmotor times, from stimulus onset to the onset of perception in finger and toe joints. Kokmen et al.myoelectric activity, and motor times, from the onset (1977), examining 51 old adults who were active andof myoelectric activity to the onset of force production self-declared as neurologically normal, confirmed aor movement. Usually, the main issue in the studies of previously reported decline of vibration perceptionthe slowing down of performance with age has been with aging.the extent to which the slowing down results from‘central’ mechanisms in contrast to ‘neuromuscularmechanisms’ (for example, Welford, 1984, 1988). CRT MOBILITY IMPAIRMENTSare thought to associate more with the former andSRT more with the latter. Thus, Rogers and Chan Epidemiology of mobility impairments in the elderly(1988) interpreted their findings, that patients with Leon and Lair (1990) examined the functional statusParkinson’s disease did not differ significantly from of non-institutionalized persons 65 yr and older usingcontrol subjects in their SRT but did differ in their data from the 1987 National Medical ExpenditureCRT, as suggesting that parkinsonian akinesia may Survey. The deterioration in functional status wasinvolve a disturbance in the central processing related measured in terms of the difficulty encountered into motor planning. walking and in performing activities of daily living The data Welford (1984,1988) reviewed suggest that (ADL). ADL include performances other than walkingSRT of old adults are approximately 20% longer than that are essential for self-care, such as bathing, dres-those of young adults. Salthouse (1985) reviewed 11 sing, feeding oneself and toileting. Of the 27.9 millionstudies of the effects of age on SRT. Uniformly, age elderly persons in the United States, 3.6 millionand reaction time show a positive linear correlation, (12.9%) had difficulty with at least one of these tasks.but the correlation coefficients ranged from only Difficulty with bathing affected 2.5 million (8.9%),0.19-0.47. Gottsdanker (1982) found SRT to increase difficulty with walking, 2.2 million (7.7%) and diffi-with age at a rate of only 2 ms per decade. A number of culty with bed or chair transfers, 1.6 million (5.9%).studies suggest that higher levels of physical fitness The rate of problems increases progressively after ageassociate with shorter reaction times (Era et al., 1986, 65, rising sharply in the eighties to reach 34.5% in non-for example), but Clarkson (1978), for example, found institutionalized persons 85 yr or older (Fig. 2). At allsuch effects to be rather weak. The fitness level affected the ages studied, females had higher rates of ADLthe time needed to make movements more than it limitations than did males. Jette and Branch (1981)affected the reaction time. found that, of persons 75-84 yr old, 23% have diffi- The lack of precise definitions, the lack of standards culty in walking one-half mile, 24% have difficulty
    • Mobility impairment in the elderly 523 ADL Limitations levels have generally been assessed through self- or Community Residents proxy-report and that measures of physical per- formance are needed to supplement these. Tinetti (1986) notes that locomotor, sensory and cognitive functioning are each intimately related to mobility. Assessments of function in the elderly have often relied solely on a disease-oriented approach. Clinically prac- tical, performance-oriented assessments of mobility are also needed. Tinetti and Ginter (1988) found that currently used neuromuscular examinations for iden- tifying mobility problems are not adequately able to identify these problems and that systematic evalu- 65-69 70-74 75-79 60-84 E-64 ations of position changes and balance maneuvers are Age (yr) needed to identify specific problems. Potvin et al. (1981) present a comprehensive review of quantitativeFig. 2. Percentage of community-dwelling residents 65 or methods for the assessment of neurological function.more years old who have difficulty with at least one activity of daily living. Data for 1987 (Leon and Lair, 1990). Feinstein et al. (1986) critically review 43 different indices of ADL performance that are in current use and point out some of the problems in the construc- tion of meaningful indices of this kind. Walking and ADL Llmltatlons These and other authors outline the needs to better Nursing Home Residents - WalkmnQ AD_ quantify the degree of impairment, largely for pur- poses of clinical evaluations of patient status. A more fundamental rationale for quantifying impairments in biomechanical terms was given in the second section of this paper: one of the most important goals for biomechanics research in the present context is to find which elements of a mobility impairment are the critical ones. Quantifying impairments in biomechani- cal terms is a major requirement for the success of this search. 18-54 55-64 65-74 75-79 60-64 85-89 Postural balance Age (yr) Many studies of age effects in the ability to maintain postural balance have been reported. Horak et al.Fig. 3. Percentage of nursing home residents who requirePersonal assistance with walking or at least one activity of (1989) in a recent review of this topic pointed to the daily living. Data for 1987 (Lair and Lefkowitz, 1990). ample evidence of deterioration in many sensorimotor systems underlying postural control, even in elderly populations without obvious signs of disease. Theylifting a weight of less than 1Olb and 55% have concluded, however, that aging alone cannot accountdifficulty in stooping, crouching or kneeling. for the heterogeneity of postural control problems in Increasing levels of ADL impairment often lead to the elderly. Winter et al. (1990) noted that responses toinstitutionalization. Lair and Lefkowitz (1990) report postural perturbations are task- and perturbation-that at least 56% of nursing home residents older than specific, so that a single assessment technique cannot64 yr need personal assistance in walking and at least serve as a true indicator of the overall integrity of the83% need personal assistance with one or more ADL. balance control system.For residents older than 84 yr these numbers become Reports of age effects on sway while standing69 and 92% respectively (Fig. 3). generally show sway to increase with age over adult- hood. The studies of Sheldon (1963), Murray et al.Evaluation of mobility impairments in the elderly (1975) and Hasselkus and Shambes (1975) were among Impairments are anatomical or physiological ab- the earliest to report this. More recently, Era andnormalities of the body; disabilities are declines in an Heikkinen (1985) and Maki et al. (1990) confirmedindividual’s functional performance, including phys- that standing postural sway is more pronounced in theical and social performance. Jette and Branch (1985) elderly, although the former authors found disturbedfound musculoskeletal and visual impairments to be postural sway to be the same in young, middle-agedstrongly related to physical, but not to social, dis- and old adults.ability in the elderly. Reports of myoelectric responses to postural dis- Biomechanics research is needed to improve the turbances include those of Woollacott et al. (1986),evaluations of mobility impairments in the elderly. Inglin and Woollacott (1988) and Manchester et al.Guralnik et al. (1989) point out that physical-function (1989). Woollacott et al. (1986) found a statistically
    • 524 A. B. SCHULTZsignificant difference in the mean ankle muscle lat- ments. More recent studies have confirmed many ofencies between young and old adults, but this differ- these findings (Cunningham et al., 1982; Hageman andence was only 7 ms in the approximately 100 ms Blanke, 1986; Himann et al., 1988, for example), butlatencies. The biomechanical significance of such not without exception. Blanke and Hageman (1989)small differences is unknown and the latency values found no significant differences in their age groups invary, depending upon the methods used to determine step and stride length, velocity, and movements of thethem. Moreover, Manchester et al. (1989) found that ankles, pelvis and total-body mass center. Gabell andduring involuntary responses to postural disturb- Nayak (1984) concluded from their study that in-ances, muscle latencies did not differ among the creased variability in gait should not be regarded as avarious age groups. Inglin and Woollacott (1988) normal concomitant of old age.found that when arm movements were carried out Cunningham et al. (1982) reported normal walk-voluntarily while standing, lower-leg muscle response ing speed to be associated with the maximum aerobiconset latencies were often significantly longer in old power, independent of age. Bassey et al. (1988) foundadults than in the young ones, and arm muscle that the normal walking speed of elderly subjectsresponse latencies showed even more pronounced age significantly associates with their muscle strength,differences. Manchester et al. (1989) found that old while Bendall et al. (1989) found that among elderlyadults used more antagonistic muscle contractions subjects more than 40% of the variance in the normalthan the young ones during involuntary responses to walking speed can be accounted for by differences inpostural disturbances, and that the sequence in which height, calf muscle strength and the presence of healththe leg muscles were contracted differed from that of problems such as leg pain. These various study out-young adults in five out of 12 old adults. comes are perhaps a good illustration of the effects of Few studies to date have analyzed in depth subject inclusion criteria on the outcome of studies ofwhole-body biomechanics or even body segment mo- mobility problems in the elderly.tions or joint torques developed in response to pos- Difficulties in walking seem to relate to cognitivetural disturbances. Allum et al. (1988) and Manchester impairment. Visser (1983) found demented elderlyet al. (1989) made limited measurements indicative of patients to have a significantly shorter step length,ankle torques, and Horak and Nashner (1986) and step frequency, step-to-step variability and lower gaitKeshner et al. (1987) made limited measurements of speed. Friedman et al. (1988) found that a geriatricbody movements. Two more comprehensive studies of rehabilitation program led to greater gains in thethe motions and torques needed to maintain balance walking speed in subjects with normal cognition thanare those of Alexander et al. (1992) and Gu et al. (1992). in those with impaired cognition. Moreover, Fried-The required motions and torques are generally mod- man et al. found walking speed to be closely related toest compared to the literature-reported capacities of the ability to rise from a chair and a powerful predic-healthy old adults. tor of patient placement upon discharge from the Bohannon et al. (1984) reported on the ability to rehabilitation program. Of the 116 elderly subjectsbalance for 30 s on one leg with eyes closed. They studied, none were able to live alone or even in a resttested 184 healthy subjects between ages 20 and 79 yr. home if they were discharged with a walking speedEvery subject younger than 30 yr could balance for at below 0.15 ms-‘.least 22 s. No subject over 70 yr could balance for The relationships between difficulties in walkingmore than 13 s. It would be useful to learn why this and tendencies to fall are not yet clear. Wolfson et al.occurs. Does it result from reduced ankle joint lateral (1990) found stride length and walking speed to bebending muscle strength or endurance, increased significantly impaired in elderly failers compared tomuscle latency times, decreased cutaneous or joint controls, but Heitmann et al. (1989) found no corres-proprioception, or decreased willingness to allow the ponding significant differences in step width.center of the floor reaction to deviate from thecentroid of the foot support area? These are some Fallsquestions well suited to biomechanics inquiry. The One of the most serious problems of mobilityanswers to them are likely to be of fundamental impairment is the tendency of old adults to fall.importance in reducing problems of mobility impair- During a one-year prospective study of 336 commun-ment in the elderly. ity-dwelling persons 75 or more years old, 32% fell at least once. Of those who fell, 24% sustained seriousGait injuries, and more than 5% experienced fractures In their pioneering studies of gait in the elderly, (Tinetti et al., 1988; Tinetti and Speechley, 1989).Murray et al. (1964) found that men in their sixties Among the elderly, falls account for 87% of alldemonstrated significantly shorter step and stride fractures (Fife and Barancik, 1985). Retrospectivelengths and decreased ankle extension and pelvic interviews found that 35% of 1042 community-rotation compared to younger males. Murray et al. dwelling persons 65 or more years old reported one or(1969) found that men 65-87 yr old, when compared to more falls in the preceding year (Blake et al., 1988).younger men, have significantly different stride lengths Death rates from falls per 100,000 persons in 1984and cadence, and head, shoulder and ankle move- were 1.5 for those younger than 65 and 147.0 for those
    • Mobility impairment in the elderly 525 Death Rates From Falls can direct seating improvements and therapeutic in- per 100,000 terventions. More fundamentally, as emphasized 70 I earlier, biomechanical analyses of transfer task per- formance enable the effects of natural aging and illness on mobility impairment to be explored and help delineate the factors that are crucial to the mainten- ance of mobility. Alexander et al. (1991) and Schultz et al. (1992) review previous studies of chair transfers. Most have involved only limited measurements of body kinemat- ics, joint torques or myoelectric activities and few have included sizeable samples of elderly subjects. These 1-4 5-14 15-24 25-44 45-54 65-74 a74 two studies seem to be among the few that included Age (yr) elderly subjects who have difficulty in rising. More research on chair rise biomechanics is needed.Fig. 4. Age effects in death rates per 10’ persons from falls. Data for 1984 (National Safety Council, 1987). Fractures and osteoporosis Fractures lead directly to mobility impairments.85 or more years old (Lambert and Sattin, 1988). The alarming prevalence of hip fractures and the factFigure 4 illustrates age effects in fall death rates. that this prevalence will virtually double over the nextThe majority of falls in old people go unreported 30 years was pointed out in the Introduction. More-(Tideiksaar, 1988). over, at age 50 yr a white female has approximately a While the mechanisms related to increased falls in 15% lifetime risk of a Colles’ fracture of her distalthe elderly remain unclear, it was pointed out above forearm. Five to 20% of 70 yr old females have hadthat tendencies to fall and increases in postural sway fractures of their vertebrae (Cummings et al., 1985).while standing are related to each other. The elderly Cummings et al. (1985) review the literature on thesway more than young adults while standing, as relations between osteoporosis and fractures. It is wellalready noted, and elderly persons with a history of known that bone strength is highly correlated withfalls sway more while standing than elderly persons bone mass and mineral content, and that bone masswithout such a history (Overstall et al., 1977; Fernie et declines with age over the adult years. Nevertheless,al., 1982). the literature suggests that while osteoporosis is the There is an urgent need for further studies of the primary determinant of vertebral fractures, other fac-biomechanics of maintaining standing posture and tors are important in hip and Colles’ fractures. Cum-responding to fall-provoking stimuli. Why do old mings et al. (1985) proposed that a combination ofadults sway more and fall more often than young decreased bone mass and an increased frequency ofadults? Does the apparent motor response deteri- trauma due to falls may combine to produce theoration with age result from reduced muscular pattern of increased risk of fractures with age. In astrengths and joint ROM, increased reaction times, later paper, Cummings and Nevitt (1989) hypothes-inappropriate body segment motion sequencing, or ized that this combination alone does not explain thecombinations of these or other mechanisms? Rela- exponential rise of hip fracture incidence with age.tively little is known about these issues, and quantitat- They felt that several other changes in neuromus-ive rather than qualitative studies would seem needed cular function with age, including changes in gaitto arrive at an understanding of them. speed, reaction times and muscle strengths, may also be involved in the incidence of hip fractures.Bed and chair transfers Lotz and Hayes (1990) found that the work needed It was pointed out above that almost 6% of, or over to fracture an isolated femur is only about one-1.6 million, non-institutionalized persons of ages 65 yr twentieth of the kinetic energy developed in a typicaland over have difficulty in getting in and out of beds fall. They suggest that the energy absorbed duringand chairs. Four percent of non-institutionalized per- falling and impact, rather than bone strength, is thesons (Leon and Lair, 1990) and at least 54% of nursing dominant factor in the biomechanics of hip fracture.home residents (Lair and Lefkowitz, 1990) over age Cummings et al. (1985) remarked that prevention of64 yr need assistance in these transfer tasks. Depend- falls in the elderly may be the most promising way toency in transferring associates with an increased risk prevent fractures.of institutionalization (Branch and Meyers, 1987) and Exercise has often been advocated to prevent osteo-immobility-related disease (Harper and Lyles, 1988). porosis, but Block et al. (1989) concluded that exercise Again, no matter what underlying mechanisms in- may have only limited value in its short-term effects onfluence the transfer task abilities, these abilities are bone mass. The methodological flaws in the 27 studiesultimately expressed in biomechanical terms. Bio- on this issue that Block et al. reviewed have alreadymechanical analyses of chair transfers, for example, been noted in the section on Muscle Function.
    • 526 A.B. SCHULTZArthritis Allander. E., Biornsson. 0. J.. Ok&son, 0.. Siafusson, N. and Thorsien&, J. (1974) Normal range of jc&t movements Arthritis is relevant to mobility impairment in that in shoulder, hip, wrist and thumb with special referenceit produces joint pain and limits joint ROM. Arthritis to side: a comoarison between two oonulations. Inc. J. . .is the most prevalent chronic condition in persons Epidemiol. 3, 253-261.older than 44 yr, occurring at rates of approximately Allum, J. H. J., Keshner, E. A., Honegger, F. and Pfaltz, C. R. (1988) Organization of leg-trunk-head equilibrium move-280 per 1000 persons in the 45-64 yr old group and ments in normal and patients with peripheral vestibular510 per 1000 persons in those older than 74 yr (Collins, deficits. Prog. Brain Res. 76, 277-290.1988). The prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) is clearly Badley, E., Wagstaff, S. and Wood, P. H. N. (1984) Measuresrelated to age. Roentgenographic evidence of OA was of functional ability (disability) in arthritis in relation tofound in 4% of persons under age 24 yr, but up to 85% impairment of range of joint movement. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 43, 563-569.in persons 75-79 yr old (Moskowitz, 1987, citing Bassey, E. J., Bendall, M. J. and Pearson, M. (1988) Muscleearlier epidemiological studies). A cross-sectional strength in the triceps surae and objectively measuredstudy of 537 persons of age 79 yr in Gothenburg, customary walking activity in men and women over 65Sweden (Bergstrom et al., 1986) found radiographic years of age. Clin. Sci. 74, 85-89. Battie, M. C., Bigos, S. J., Sheehy, A. and Wortley, M. D.evidence of OA in the wrist or hand of 65% and in the (1987) Spinal flexibility and individual factors that influ-knee of 14%. Symptoms of OA in the knee were found ence it. Phys. Ther. 67,653-658.in approximately 7% and, in the hips, in approxim- Bendall, M. J., Bassey, E. J. and Pearson, M. B. (1989) Factorsately 6% of the above-cited population. Their study affecting walking speed of elderly people. Age and Ageingalso found a 10% prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis. 18, 327-332. Bergstrom, G., Aniansson, A., Bjelle, A., Grimby, G., Lund- gien-Lindquist, B. and Svanborg, A. (1985a) Functional CLOSURE consequences of joint impairment at age 79. Stand. J. Rehab. Med. 17, 183-190. Bergstrom, G., Bjelle, A., Sorensen, L. B., Sundh, V. and In its report, Year 2000 Objectives for the Nation, Svanborg, A. (1985b) Prevalence of symptoms and signs ofthe Public Health Service (1989b) noted that there is joint impairment at age 79. Stand. J. Rehab. Med. 17,wide variation between chronological and physiolo- 173-182.gical age evident in the older population. A major Bergstrom, G., Bjelle, A., Sorensen, L. B., Sundh, V. andresearch need is to ‘understand aging processes and Svanborg, A. (1986) Prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, chondrocalcinosis and gouty arthritis athow aging is distinct from disease, in order to better age 79. J. Rheumatol. 13, 527-534.understand the changes which are inevitable and open Blake, A. J., Morgan, K., Bendall, M. J., Dallosso, H.,to modification’. This report called for ‘. . a high Ebrahim, S. B. J., Arie, T. H. D., Fentem, P. H. and Bassey,priority . . to be placed on . . how to prevent dis- E. J. (1988) Falls by elderly people at home: prevalence and associated factors. Age and Aging 17, 365-372.ability.’ This review has attempted to sketch the Blanke, D. J. and Hageman, P. A. (1989) Comparison of gaitbiomechanics research that should possibly be under- of young men and elderly men. Phys. Ther. 69,taken in order to help achieve that understanding and 144/61-148165.to learn how to prevent disability. To highlight some _ - Block, J. E., Smith, R., Friedlander, A. and Genant, H. K.of its main ideas: physical disabilities ultimately ex- (1989) Preventing osteoporosis with exercise: a review with emphasis on methodology. Med. Hypotheses 30, 9-19.press themselves as changes in the biomechanics of Bohannon, R. W., Larkin, P. A., Cook, A. C., Gear, J. andphysical-task performance. Quantitative measures of Singer, J. (1984) Decrease in timed balance test score withmobility impairment are sorely needed because they aging. Phys. Ther. 64, 1067-1070.can serve as indicators of subtle changes in the func- Boone, D. C. and Azen, S. P. (1979) Normal range of motiontioning over time. Perhaps the most important single of joints in male subjects. J. Bone Jt Surg. 61A, 756-759. Branch, L. G. and Meyers, A. R. (1987) Assessing physicalgoal for biomechanics research into mobility impair- function in the elderly. C/in. Geriatr. Med. 3, 29-51.ments in the elderly is to find what the critical elements Burr, M. L. and Phillips, K. M. (1984) Anthropometric normsof a mobility impairment are. The needs that have in the elderly. Br. J. Nutr. 51, 165-169.been outlineh clearly constitute new and major chal- Cathcart, E. P.: Hughes, D. E. R. and Chalmers, J. G. (1935) The physique of man in industry. Medical Research Coun-lenges for biomechanics research. cil Industrial Health Research Board, Report No. 71, pp. l-43.Acknowledgements-The support of PHS Grants AG 06621 Chun, S. P., Alexander, N. B., Schultz, A. B. and Ashton-and AG 08818 and the Vennema Endowment for the pre- Miller, J. A. (1992) Impending fall response biomechanicsparation of this paper is gratefully acknowledged. in young and old adults. J. Biomechanics (submitted). Clarkson, P. M. (1978) The effect of age and activity level on simple and choice fractionated response time. Eur. J. appl. Physiol. 40, 17-25. REFERENCES Collins, J. G. (1988) Prevalence of selected chronic condi- tions, United States, 1983-85. U.S. Department of HealthAlexander, N. B., Gu, M. J., Schultz, A. B. and Shepard, N. B. and Human Services, Vol. 155, pp. I-16. (1992) Postural control in young and elderly adults when Cummings, S. R., Kelsey, J. L., Nevitt, M. C. and O’Dowd, K. stance is perturbed: kinematics. J. Gerontol: Med. Sci. (in J. (1985) Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic press). fractures. Epidemioi. Rev. 7, 178-208.Alexander, N. B., Schultz., A. B. and Warwick, D. N. (1991) Cummings, S. R. and Nevitt, M. C. (1989) A hypothesis: the Rising from a chair: effects of age and functional ability on causes of hip fractures. J. Gerontol.: Med. Sci. 44, performance biomechanics. J. Gerontol.: Med. Sci. 46, MlO7-Mill. M91-M98. Cunningham, D. A., Rechnitzer, P. A., Pearce, M. E. and
    • Mobility impairment in the elderly 527 Donner, A. P. (1982) Determinants of self-selected walking Kelly, P. L. and Kroemer, K. H. E. (1990) Anthropometry of pace across ages 19 to 66. J. Gerontol. 37, X&564. the elderly: status and recommendations. Hwn. Factors 32,Einkauf, D., Gohdes, M. L., Jensen, G. M. and Jewell, M. J. 571-595. (1987) Changes in spinal mobility with increasing age in Keshner, E. A., Allum, J. H. J. and Pfal& C. R. (1987) women. Phys. Ther. 67, 37&375. Postural coactivation and adaptation in sway stabilizingEra, P. and Heikkinen, E. (1985) Postural sway during responses. Exp. Brain. Res. 69, 77-92. standing and unexpected disturbance of balance in ran- Kokmen, E., Bossemeyer, R. W., Barney, J. and Williams, W. dom samples of men of different ages. J. Gerontol. 40, J. (1977) Neurological manifestations of aging. J. Gerontol. 287-295. 32,411-419.Era, P., Jokela, J. and Heikkinen, E. (1986) Reaction and Kokmen, E., Bossemeyer, R. W., Jr and Williams, W. J. (1978) movement times in men of different ages: a population Quantitative evaluation of joint motion sensation in an study. Perceptual and Motor Skills 63, 11l-130. aging population. J. Gerontol. 33, 62-67.Faulkner, J., Brooks, S. V. and Zerba, E. (1990) Skeletal Lair, T. and Lefkowitz, D. (1990) Mental health and func- muscle weakness in old age: underlying mechanisms. Ann. tional status of residents of nursing and personal care Rev. Gerontol. Geriatr. 10, 147-166. homes. DHHS Publication No. PHS 90-3470, NationalFeinstein, A. R., Josephy, B. R. and Wells, C. K. (1986) Medical Expenditure Survey Research Findings, Vol. 7. Review: scientific and clinical problems in indexes of Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, functional disability. Ann. Int. Med. 105, 413-420. MD.Femie, G. R., Gryfe, C. I., Holliday, P. J. and Llewellyn, A. Lambert, D. A. and Sattin, R. W. (1988) Deaths from falls, (1982) The relationship of postural sway in standing to the 1978-1984. MM WR CDC Surveill. Summ. 37,21-26. incidence of falls in geriatric subjects. Age and Ageing 11, Ledin, T., Kronhed, A. C. and Moller, C. (1991) Effects of 11-16. balance training in elderly evaluated by clinical tests andFife, D. and Barancik, J. I. (1985) Northeastern Ohio trauma dynamic posturography. J. Vestib. Res. 1, 129-138. study: III. Incidence of fractures. Ann. Emergency Med. 14, Leon, J. and Lair, T. (1990) Functional status of the non- 244-248. institutionalized elderly: .estimates of ADL and IADLFriedman, P. J., Richmond, D. E. and Baskett, J. J. (1988) A difficulties. DHHS Publication No. PHS 90-3462. Na- prospective trial of serial gait speed as a measure of tional Medical Expenditure Survey Research Finbings, rehabilitation in the elderly. Age and Aging 17, 227-235. Vol. 4. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research,Gabell, A. and Nayak, U. S. L. (1984) The effect of age on Rockville, MD. variability in gait. J. Gerontol. 39, 662-666. Lotz, J. C. and Hayes, W. C. (1990) The use of quantitativeGorman, K. M. and Posner, J. D. (1988) Benefits of exercise computed tomography to estimate risk of fracture of the in old age. Common Clinical Challenges in Geriatrics, hip from falls. J. Bone Jr Surg. 72A, 689-700. pp. 181-192. Maki, B. E., Holliday, P. J. and Fernie, G. R. (1990) AgingGottsdanker, R. (1982) Age and simple reaction time. J. and postural control. A comparison of spontaneous- and Gerontol. 37, 342-348. induced-sway balance tests. J. Am. Geriatr. Sot. 38, l-9.Grimby, G. and Saltin, B. (1983) Review: the aging muscle. Manchester, D., Woollacott, M., Zederbauer-Hylton, N. and Chin.-Physiol. 3, 209-218. Marin, 0. (1989) Visual, vestibular and somatosensoryGu. M. J.. Schultz. A. B.. Sheoard. N. T. and Alexander. contributions to balance control in the older adult. J. k. B. (1492) Posiural controiin ybung and elderly adults Gerontol. 44, Ml18-M127. when stance is perturbed: dynamics. J. Biomechanics Moore, D. H. (1975) A study of age group track and field (submitted). records to relate age and running speed. Nature 253,Guralnik, J. M., Branch, L. G., Cummings, S. R. and Curb, J. 264-265. D. (1989) Review: physical performance measures in aging Moskowitz, R. W. (1987) Primary osteoarthritis: epidemi- research. J. Gerontol. 44, Ml41-M146. ology, clinical aspects, and gegeral management. Am. J.Hageman, P. A. and Blanke, D. J. (1986) Comparison of gait Med. 83, 5-10. of young women and elderly women. Phys. Ther. 66, Murray. M. P., Drought, A. B. and Kory, R. C. (1964) 1382-1387. Walking patterns of normal men. J. Bone Jr Surg. 46A,Harper, C. M. and Lyles, Y. M. (1988) Physiology and 335-360. complications of bed rest. J. Am. Geriatr. Sot. 36. Murray, M. P., Kory, R. C. and Clarkson, B. H. (1969) 1047.-1054. Walking patterns in healthy old men. J. Gerontol. 24,Hasselkus, B. R. and Shambes, G. M. (1975) Aging and 169-178. postural sway in women. J. Gerontol. 30,661667. Murray, M. P., Seireg, A. A. and Sepic, S. B. (1975) NormalHeitmann, D. K., Gossman, M. R., Shaddeau, S. A. and postural stability and steadiness: quantitative assessment. Jackson, J. R. (1989) Balance performance and step width J. Bone Jt Surg. 57A, 510-516. in noninstitutionalized, elderly, female fallers aid non- National Safety Council (1987) Accident Facts. National failers. Phvs. Ther. 69. 923143-931151. Safety Council, Chicago.Himann, J. k., Cunningham: D. A.,‘Rechnitzer, P. A. and Olshansky, S. J. and Ault, A. B. (1986) The fourth stage of the Paterson, D. H. (1988) Age-related changes in speed of epidemiologic transition: the age of delayed degenerative walking. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise 20, 161-166. diseases. Milbank Q. 64, 355-391.Horak, F. B. and Nashner, L. M. (1986) Central program- Overstall, P. W., Exton-Smith, A. N., Imms, F. J. and ming of postural movements: adaptation to altered sup- Johnson, A. L. (1977) Falls in the elderly related to postural port-surface configurations. J. Neurophysiol. 55, imbalance. Br. Med. J. 1, 261-264. 1369-1381. Potvin, A. R., Tourtellotte, W. W., Syndulko, K. and Potvin,Horak, F. B., Shupert, C. L. and Mirka, A. (1989) Compon- J. (1981) Quantitative methods in assessment of neurologic ents of postural dyscontrol in the elderly: a review. Neuro- function. CRC Crit. Rev. Bioengng 6, 177-224. biol. Aging 10, 727-738. Public Health Service (1989a) Health United States 1988.Inglin, B. and Woollacott, M. (1988) Age-related changes in U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, DHHS anticipatory postural adjustments associated with arm Pub. PHS 89-1232. movements. J. Gerontol. Med. Sci. 43. M105-M113. Public Health Service (1989b) Promoting health/preventingJette, A. M. and Branch, L. G. (1981j The Framingham disease: year 2000 objectives for the nation. U.S. Depart- disability study: II. Physical disability among the aging. ment of Health and Human Services. AJPH 71, 1211-1216. Quetelet, L. A. J. (1835) Sur Phomme et le developpemenc de sesJette, A. M. and Branch, L. G. (1985) Impairment and facultes. (Edited by Hauman, L. and Cie), Vol. 2. Bachelier, disability in the aged. J. Chronic Dis. 38, 5965. Imprimeur-Librairie: Paris.
    • 528 A.B. SCHULTZRoaas, A. and Andersson, G. B. J. (1982) Normal range of Tinetti, M. E. and Ginter, S. F. (1988) Identifying mobility motion of the hip, knee and ankle joints in male subjects, dysfunctions in elderly patients-standard neuromuscular 30-40 years of age. Acta orthop. stand. 53,205-208. examination or direct assessment? JAMA 259,1190-l 193.Rogers, M. and Chan, C. W. Y. (1988) Motor planning is Tinetti, M. E. and Speechley, M. (1989) Prevention of falls impaired in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Res. 438, 271-276. among the elderly. N. Engl. J. Med. 320, 1055-1059.Salthouse, T. A. (1985) Speed of behavior and its implications Tinetti, M. E., Speechley, M. and Ginter, S. F. (1988) Risk for cognition. In Handbook of the Psychology of Aging factors for falls among elderly persons living in the com- (Edited by Birren, J. E. and Schaie, K. W.), pp. 40&426. munity. N. Engl. J. Med. 319, 1701-1707. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. Vandervoort, A. A., Dramer, J. F. and Wharram, E. R. (1990)Schneider, E. L. and Guralnik, J. M. (1990) The aging of - - Eccentric knee strength of elderly females. J. Gerontol.: America-impact on health care costs. JAMA 263, Biol. Sci. 45, B125-Bl28. 2335-2340. Viitisalo, J. T., Era, P., Leskinen, L. and Heikkinen, E. (1985)Schultz, A. B., Alexander, N. B. and Ashton-Miller, J. A. Muscular strength profiles and anthropometry in random (1992) Biomechanical analyses of rising from a chair. samples. Ergonomics 28, 1563-1574. J. Eiomechanics (submitted). Visser, H. (1983) Gait and balance in senile dementia ofSheldon, J. H. (1963) The effect of age on the control of sway. Alzheimer’s type. Age and Ageing 12, 296-301. Geront. Clin. 5, 129-138. Walker, J. M., Sue, D., Miles-Elkousy, N., Ford, G. andShepard, R. J. (1990) The scientific basis of exercise pre- Trevelyan, H. (1984) Active mobility of the extremities in scribing for the very old. J. Am. Geriatr. Sot. 38, 62-70. older subjects. Phys. Ther. 64, 919-923.Shimokata, H., Andres, R., Coon, P. J., Elahi, D., Muller, D. Ward, J. S. and Kirk, N. S. (1967) Anthropometry of elderly C. and Tobin, J. D. (1989) Studies in the distribution of women. Ergonomics 10, 17-24. body fat. II. Longitudinal effects of change in weight. Int. J. Welford, A. T. (1984) Between bodily changes and per- Obes. 13,455+X formance: some possible reasons for slowing with age. Exp.Skinner, H. B., Barrack, R. L. and Cook, S. D. (1984) Age- Aging Res. 10, 73-88. related decline in proprioception. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. Welford, A. T. (1988) Reaction time, speed of performance, 184, 208-211. and age. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 515, 1-17.Stelmach, G. E. and Worringham, C. J. (1985)Sensorimotor Winter, D. A., Patla, A. E. and Frank, J. S. (1990) Assessment deficits related to postural stability. Implications for falling of balance control in humans. Med. Prog. Technol. 16, in the elderly. C/in. Geriatr. Med. 1, 679694. 31-51.Stoudt, H. (1981) The anthropometry of the elderly. Hum. Wolfson, L., Whipple, R., Amerman, P. and Tobin, J. N. Factors 23, 29-37. (1990) Gait assessment in the elderly: a gait abnormalitySvanborg, A. (1988) Practical and functional consequences of rating scale and its relation to falls. J. Gerontol.: Med. Sci. aging. Gerontology 34, 11-15. 45, M12-M19.Tideiksaar, R. (1988) Falls in the elderly. Bull. N.Y. Acad. Woollacott, M. H., Shumway-Cook, A. and Nashner, L. M. Med. 64, 145-163. (1986) Aging and postural control: changes in sensoryTinetti, M. E. (1986) Performance-oriented assessment of organization and muscular coordination. Int. J. Aging mobility problems in elderly patients. J. Am. Geriatr. Sot. Hum. Develop. 23, 97-l 14. 34, 119-126.