Managing Cash As Collateral

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Managing Cash As Collateral - Presentation Transcript

    1. Managing cash as collateral A middle office approach to collateral management Daniel Burgos Zarazo September 2009
    2. 1. The role of energy firms as cash managers 1.1 Some background on underlyings Commodity and credit derivative events grow Interest rate derivatives' grow too but equity and forex decline
    3. 1. The role of energy firms as cash managers 1.2 Use of credit support docummentation Credit risk/operational risk of trading similar for non-energy OTC Percentage of reported energy trades covered by CSA kinked
    4. 1. The role of energy firms as cash managers 1.3 Extent of exposure collateralization Exposure collateralization is stronger than trade volume Transactions that are collateralized are more heavily so Cash has moved from energy to other derivatives
    5. 1. The role of energy firms as cash managers 1.3 Extent of exposure collateralization Cash is circa 83% of collateral! Increase in use of government securities and cash, decline of other such as corporate bonds and equity
    6. 2. Cash flow netting as efficient collateral management 2.1 Background "The growth of privately negotiated derivatives markets has led to large, variable credit exposures". "These credit exposures are substantially reduced through the netting of these obligations under master agreements and the collateralisation of the remaining exposures". "Netting and collateralisation are keys to maintaining the stability of the international markets and preventing cascading insolvencies in jurisdictions around the world resulting from the failure of a major participant around the world". "Netting and collateralisation can only achieve these ends, however, if the parties can be certain that the terms of their netting and support agreements will be upheld in the relevant jurisdictions." Source: The ISDA 2002 model netting act
    7. 2. Cash flow netting as efficient collateral management 2.2 How it works "The loss a party will experience from the default of a counterparty is equivalent to the cost of replacing the transaction, less any recovery". "The replacement cost for a derivatives transaction represents the present value, at the time of default, of the expected future net cash flows" those cash flows fluctuate over time with significant volatility. The use of bilatelal netting allows firms to calculate counterparty exposure with respect to derivatives master agreements on a net basis with reduced risks and costs in comparison with multiple settlement gross transactions. Source: The ISDA 2002 model netting act
    8. 2. Cash flow netting as efficient collateral management 2.3 Practical points: Cherry picking "The term "cherry picking" refers to a power that some insolvency officials have under the insolvency laws of certain jurisdictions to reject certain contracts burdensome to the insolvent party while affirming contracts beneficial to the insolvent party." Netting overcomes this problem "by making it clear that the master agreement and all transactions entered under it constitute a single agreement between the parties which must therefore be affirmed or rejected as a whole by the insolvency official". Source: The ISDA 2002 model netting act
    9. 2. Cash flow netting as efficient collateral management 2.4 Practical points: Systemic risk "Market participants face a considerable exposure to risks stemming from the failure of a major market participant causing cascading insolvencies." "Netting considerably lessens this consequential effect by reducing counterparty exposure at each node in the network (...) and by encouraging best practices". A reduction in systemic risk means a possibility to leverage further! Source: The ISDA 2002 model netting act
    10. 2. Cash flow netting as efficient collateral management 2.5 Practical points: Multibranch close-out netting Multibranch netting provisions reduce the amount of cash flowing by requiring money to move "to or from one of the counterparties, regardless of the branch through which any or all of the transactions are booked". 2.6 Practical points: Impact of cash flow netting on collaterallization "Collateral arrangements are entered into mainly as a method of credit enhancement to cut the credit risk remaining under derivatives master agreements once the effects of close-out netting are taken into account." "Collateralisation reduces the capital adequacy risk weighting of exposures under derivatives transactions to the risk weighting of collateral itself." Source: The ISDA 2002 model netting act
    11. 2. Cash flow netting as efficient collateral management 2.7 Enforceability of netting and collateral arrangements It's important to "not only have a netting agreement in place, but also obtain a legal opinion stating that that netting agreement will be upheld in all relevant jurisdictions." Also time and resources needed to ensure or execute enforceable agreements must be noted both for counterparties and the firm itself. Source: The ISDA 2002 model netting act
    12. 2. Cash flow netting as efficient collateral management 2.8 Implementation "Since 1989 laws expressively protecting the enforceability of netting for privately negotiated derivatives transactions in local insolvency proceedings have been enacted in many jurisdictions." Check with your legal consel or trade association! Depending on implementation: Netting legislation may be sketchy "very technical and hardly accessible to non-specialist lawyers. or "generally confirm the effectiveness of close-out netting and the various intermediate steps". Sources: The ISDA 2002 Model Netting act March 2006 memo of implementation
    13. 3. Time and market valuation and execution constraints of collateralized energy transactions 3.1 General automation considerations
    14. 3. Time and market valuation and execution constraints of collateralized energy transactions 3.1 General automation considerations
    15. 3. Time and market valuation and execution constraints of collateralized energy transactions 3.1 General automation considerations
    16. 3. Time and market valuation and execution constraints of collateralized energy transactions 3.1 General automation considerations
    17. 3. Time and market valuation and execution constraints of collateralized energy transactions 3.2 Errors in trade capture Around 10% of commodity derivatives' trade records had to be amended in 2009 (12% for credit) of which 54% were attributable to the front office (49% in credit).
    18. 3. Time and market valuation and execution constraints of collateralized energy transactions 3.3 Automation in electronic confirmations
    19. 3. Time and market valuation and execution constraints of collateralized energy transactions 3.4 Automation in electronic confirmations
    20. 3. Time and market valuation and execution constraints of collateralized energy transactions 3.4 Other time factors in electronic confirmations
    21. 3. Time and market valuation and execution constraints of collateralized energy transactions 3.5 Achievements in confirmation processing times
    22. 3. Time and market valuation and execution constraints of collateralized energy transactions 3.6 Criteria used to prioritize outstanding confirmations
    23. 3. Time and market valuation and execution constraints of collateralized energy transactions 3.7 Trade affirmation benchmarking
    24. 3. Time and market valuation and execution constraints of collateralized energy transactions 3.7 Trade affirmation benchmarking
    25. 3. Time and market valuation and execution constraints of collateralized energy transactions 3.8 Settlements
    26. 3. Time and market valuation and execution constraints of collateralized energy transactions 3.8 Settlements
    27. 3. Time and market valuation and execution constraints of collateralized energy transactions 3.9 Nostro breaks Breaks are typically reconciled within 3 to 5 days
    28. 4. Offshore business centres and cash management
    29. 4. Offshore business centres and cash management What support services do you require from the OBC? Underlying: some OBC's are more familiar with certain industries which should translate to cost advantages if support requirements are important Technical capabilities like IT infrastructure/affinity with communication nodes Counterparts: are they accepting or at synergy with your OBC choice? Legal/diplomatic relations with non-OBC markets
    30. Managing cash as collateral A middle office approach to collateral management Thank you for your interest! You can learn more about me here: http://dburgoszarazo.googlepages.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/dburgoszarazo
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Daniel Burgos ZarazoDaniel Burgos Zarazo Nominate

    custom

    58 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presentation on netting, operational benchmarking a more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 58
      • 58 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 3
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories