The State of Our Art: Latest Trends in the Field of European Communications

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    The State of Our Art: Latest Trends in the Field of European Communications - Presentation Transcript

    1. The State Of Our Art:
      Latest trends in the field of European
      communications
      CASE Europe Annual Conference 09
    2. David Willows
      Director of External Relations, International School of Brussels
      Member of the Board, European Association of Communication Directors
      Member, CASE Commission on Marketing and Communications
    3. Key Questions
      What is the EACD?
      A brief introduction
      What is the state of our art?
      Identifying the key trends and challenges we face as communications professionals in the educational field
      What can we learn by looking over the fence towards European Corporations and Organisations?Innovation as Cross-Pollination
      How can we keep the conversation going?
      How to get involved in the EACD and future CASE-EACD collaboration
    4. Introducing
      The European Association of Communication Directors
    5. Why did I get involved?
      A professional development and networking opportunity
      Supporting the work of Communications Directors in Education at a European Level
      Highlighting the pedagogical nature of many communications tasks
    6. What is the state of our art?
      Identifying the key trends and challenges we face as communications professionals in the educational field
    7. Group Activity
      Which of the following issues and themes are most important in your stratetgic plans for next year? Which do you see as being most relevant over the next 3-5 years?
      • Policy issues, public affairs or lobbying
      • Market and socio-demographic shifts
      • Impact of the recession, budgetary and financial concerns
      • Social media and online communications
      • Salaries, qualifications, recruitment and training issues
      • Use of data and empirical evaluation tools
      • The role of communications in the hierarchy of the organisation
      • The role of mass media
      • Crisis communication
      • CSR and sustainability
      • Internal communications
      • Marketing and branding
    8. What can we learn by looking over the fence towards European Corporations and Organisations?
      Innovation as Cross-Pollination
    9. What can we learn by looking over the fence towards European Corporations and Organisations?
      Innovation as Cross-Pollination
      These are the people who look over the fence, explore other industries and cultures, bringing back ideas and solutions that are relevant on home soil.
      The Ten Faces of Innovation (Tom Kelley)
    10. Key facts
      European Communication Monitor 2009
      Most comprehensive analysis of the European market until now with morethan 1,850 participating professionals from 34 countries
      Annual research project conducted since 2007 by renowned universitiesfrom 11 countries, organised by the European Public Relations Education andResearch Association (EUPRERA)
      Partners: European Association of Communication Directors (EACD),Communication Director Magazine; sponsored by Cision
      The research highlights:
      _ Challenges for communication management in the recession and media crisis
      _ Strategic issues, developments of disciplines and instruments
      _ Trends in internal communication, measurement/evaluation and interactive communication
      _ Communication executives‘ influence on management decisions
      _ Salaries and qualification needs
    11. Academic task force
      Research team
      _ Ansgar Zerfass, Prof. Dr., University of Leipzig (GE) – Lead Researcher
      Angeles Moreno, Prof. Ph.D., University Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid (ES)
      Ralph Tench, Prof. Ph.D., Leeds Metropolitan University (UK)
      Dejan Verčič, Prof. Ph.D., University of Ljubljana (SI)
      Piet Verhoeven, Ass. Prof. Dr., University of Amsterdam (NL)
      Advisory board
      Emanuele Invernizzi, Prof. Dr., IULM University, Milano (IT)
      Valerie Carayol, Prof. Dr., University of Bordeaux (FR)
      Francesco Lurati, Ass. Prof. Dr., University of Lugano (CH)
      Sven Hamrefors, Prof. Dr., Mälardalen University (SE)
      Øyvind Ihlen, Prof. Dr., BI Norwegian School of Management, Oslo (NO)
      Ryszard Lawniczak, Prof. Dr., Poznan University of Economics (PL)
    12. Research design andsocio-demographic analysis
    13. Research framework and questions
      E
      Person (Communication Manager)
      Organisation
      A
      B
      Selfperception
      Education
      Jobstatus
      Demo-graphics
      Country
      Culture
      Structure
      European homebase, Q17
      Professionalrole, Q7Optimism, Q16
      Age, Q17Gender, Q17Association Member, Q17Social NetworkMember, Q17
      Experience, Q17Hierarchy, Q17
      Academic, Q17Communicative, Q17
      Characteristics of organisational culture, Q15
      Type of organisation/agency, Q17
      Situation
      Perception
      C
      D
      Future
      Present
      Disciplines and fields of practice, Q4Communication channels, Q5Strategic issues, Q6Impact of the media crisis, Q2Emerging interactive channels, Q10Online communities, Q11Internal communication, Q12, Q13Needs for training and qualification, Q14
      Communication objectives, Q8Evaluation practice, Q9Economic recession, Q1
      Position
      E
      Advisory/executive influence, Q3Personal income, Q17
    14. Sample: 1,863 participants from 34 European countries
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / n = 1,863 PR Professionals from 34 European countries; Q 17
    15. Professional roles, influence and contribution to organisational objectives
    16. A clear majority of practitioners execute communication basedon business strategies, but only 6 out of 10 try to define them
      84,8%
      focus on supporting business goals by planning and executing communication
      60,7%
      feel responsible for helping to define business strategies
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / n = 1,863 PR Professionals from 34 European countries; Q 7: In your dailywork, how much do you focus on supporting business goals by planning and executing communication? (1 = not at all; 7 = very much) / … how much do you feel responsible for helping to define business strategies? (1 = never; 7 = always); considered scale points 5-7
    17. PR professionals enact different roles - this shapes and reflects the relation between communication and business strategies
      Operational
      Supporters
      29.1%
      Strategic
      Facilitators
      55.7%
      Business
      Advisers
      5.0%
      Isolated
      Experts
      10.2%
      ALWAYS
      HELPING TO DEFINE BUSINESS STRATEGIES
      Scale: 5-7
      NOT AT ALL
      SUPPORTING BUSINESS GOALS BY MANAGING COMMUNICATION
      VERY MUCH
      SUPPORTING BUSINESS GOALS BY MANAGING COMMUNICATION
      Scale: 1-4
      Scale: 5-7
      Scale: 1-4
      NEVER
      HELPING TO DEFINE BUSINESS STRATEGIES
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / n = 1,863 PR Professionals from 34 European countries;Q 7: In your daily work, how much do you focus on supporting business goals by planning and executing communication? (1 = notat all; 7 = very much) / … how much do you feel responsible for helping to define business strategies? (1 = never; 7 = always)
    18. 64% of top level communicators are strategic facilitators,but 6% are not linked to business strategies in any way
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / n = 1,863 PR Professionals from 34 countries; Q 7; Q 17
    19. Communication executives are trusted advisors,but only two-thirds are involved in management decision
      73.0%are taken seriously by senior management.
      64.4%are involved in decision making and planning.
      Appraisal of the profession has risen slightly (+2% since 2008), yet executive influence is still as low as the year before (+0.4%).
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,267 PR Professionals in communication departments;Q 3: In your organisation, how seriously are PR recommendations taken by senior management? (1-7); To what extent are PR andreputational considerations factored into strategic decision making and planning in your organisation? (1-7); considered scale points 5-7
    20. On average, professionals acting as strategic facilitators and those working in Northern Europe are more influential
      Business Advisors
      Operational Supporters
      Strategic Facilitators
      Isolated Experts
      46.9%
      52.5%
      68.6%
      83.5%
      Advisory influence
      34.7%
      57.4%
      52.8%
      79.0%
      Executive influence
      Southern
      Europe
      Eastern
      Europe
      Western
      Europe
      Northern
      Europe
      67.8%
      63.0%
      74.6%
      76.4%
      Advisory influence
      60.9%
      59.3%
      63.4%
      68.9%
      Executive influence
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,267 PR Professionals in communication departments; Q 3; Q 16; Q 17
    21. So here’s what I am wondering…
      What’s going on in myorganisation?
      What’s my role?
      Am I taken seriously, or do I prefer to be the lone cowboy?
      Does the organisational chart work for me?
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,267 PR Professionals in communication departments; Q 3; Q 16; Q 17
    22. Impacts of the recessionand the media crisis
    23. How the global downturn influences PR practice in Europe
      “Focus on value to the core mission”
      “Projects delayed till things get better”
      “Costs”
      “PR has to be more a tool – more sell than tell”
      “In no way”
      “Delaying important decisions”
      “Reduce travel costs”
      “Enforced focus on internal communication”
      “Budget shift from
      image to marketing”
      “Move to digital”
      “Harder to convince management
      to replace staff leaving”
      “Less big contracts,
      but more small ones“
      “More quality for less money”
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / n = 1,863 PR Professionalsfrom 34 European countries;Q 1: How has the global downturn influenced your daily work? (open question)
    24. PR practitioners face serious budget cuts; focusing activities and evaluating results gets more important
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / n = 1,863 PR Professionalsfrom 34 European countries;Q 1: How has the global downturn influenced your daily work? (1 = not at all; 5 = significantly); considered scale points 4-5
    25. PR professionals face the media crisis and try to adapt belief in the power of journalism and mass media is still strong
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / n = 1,863 PR Professionalsfrom 34 European countries; Q 2: Publishers and broad-casters face serious difficulties: While commercial revenues are declining due to recession, audiences are switching to internet news and online communities. What does this mean for comm. management? (1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree); agreement = scale points 4-5
    26. So here’s our story…
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,267 PR Professionals in communication departments; Q 3; Q 16; Q 17
    27. So here’s our story…
      Focus on the data
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,267 PR Professionals in communication departments; Q 3; Q 16; Q 17
    28. www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,267 PR Professionals in communication departments; Q 3; Q 16; Q 17
    29. So here’s our story…
      Focus on the data
      Look at what history was teaching us
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,267 PR Professionals in communication departments; Q 3; Q 16; Q 17
    30. Whatdoeshistoryteach us?
    31. Whatdoeshistoryteach us?
      1st Oil Crisis
      Gulf War
      9/11
      2nd Oil Crisis
    32. So here’s our story…
      Focus on the data
      Look at what history was teaching us
      See the ‘crisis’ as a real opportunity
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,267 PR Professionals in communication departments; Q 3; Q 16; Q 17
    33. So here’s our story…
      Focus on the data
      Look at what history was teaching us
      See the ‘crisis’ as a real opportunity
      Reconsider our positioning in the marketplace
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,267 PR Professionals in communication departments; Q 3; Q 16; Q 17
    34. www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,267 PR Professionals in communication departments; Q 3; Q 16; Q 17
    35. When school opened yesterday, our enrolment was higher than ever before and significantly higher than our most optimistic projections.
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,267 PR Professionals in communication departments; Q 3; Q 16; Q 17
    36. Development of disciplines and communication channels
    37. Most important disciplines in communication management
      In 2012
      Today
      Corporate Communication
      1
      1
      Corporate Communication

      Marketing/Brand and Consumer Communication
      2
      Internal Communication and Change Management
      2

      Marketing/Brand and Consumer Communication

      Crisis Communication
      3
      3
      CSR and Sustainability

      Internal Communication and Change Management
      4
      4
      5
      Public Affairs / Lobbying

      Public Affairs / Lobbying
      5
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,863 PR Professionals from 34 European countries;Q 4: How important are the following fields of practice in your organisation or consultancy? Will they gain more or lessimportance within the next three years? (1 = not important; 5 = very important); important discipline = scale points 4-5.Arrow symbols indicate changes within the ranking of most important disciplines; in general, all disciplines are ascending.
    38. Long-term development of communication disciplines:Internal may overtake marketing/consumer in 2012
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,863 PR Professionals from 34 European countries; Q 4;Zerfass et al. 2008 / n = 1,524 PR Professionals from 37 countries; Q 2; Zerfass et al. 2007 / n = 1,087 from 22 countries; Q 3
    39. PR professionals expect a tremendous boost for online channels
      Increase comparedto average
      Interactive channels relevant for public relations
      +11.6
      +7.0
      +1.3
      +0.1
      +2.4
      -2.8
      -4.6
      -15.2
      Importance todayImportance in 2010
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / n = 1,863 PR Professionals from 34 European countries; Q 10: Can you indicate the level of importance for public relations today and in the next year of the following communication tools (1= not important; 5= very impor-tant); important = scale points 4-5. All are considered more important in 2010; comparison shows difference to avg. increase (29.28%).
    40. 85% of European communication professionals are membersof online communities like LinkedIn, Facebook and XING
      No member (15.0%)
      Professional and private profile (41.3%)
      Private profile only (16.5%)
      Professional profile only (27.3%)
      Most popular social networks: LinkedIn (professional), Facebook (private)
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / n = 1,863 PR Professionals; Q 17: Are you a member of one of those social networks? Facebook, LinkedIn, MySpace, Plaxo, XING, Other (With my professional profile/With a private profile)
    41. So here’s some key questions….
      How are we using social media to have better conversations?
      How are we using social media to listen to our customers?
      What about internal communications?
      How are we using old media in different ways?
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,267 PR Professionals in communication departments; Q 3; Q 16; Q 17
    42. Strategic issues, evaluationand communication performance
    43. Most important strategic issues for PR professionals in Europe(compared to previous surveys)
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / n = 1,863 PR Professionals from 34 European countries; Q 6; Zerfass et al. 2008 /n = 1,524 PR Professionals from 37 countries; Q 6; Zerfass et al. 2007 / n = 1,087 PR Professionals from 24 countries; Q 5: Here are some issues that might become relevant for public relations and communication management within the next three years.Please pick those 3 items which are most important from your point of view.
    44. When measuring their activities, communication professionalsfocus on a small part of the overall process
      Outflow
      Outcome
      Value Creation
      Impact onStrategic and/or Financial Targets(Value Chain)
      Impact onTangible and/orIntangible Ressources(Capital Accumulation)
      Output
      46.4%
      Direct Outcome
      PerceptionUtilization
      Knowledge
      Indirect Outcome
      OpinionAttitudesEmotion
      Behavioral DispositionBehavior
      57.6%
      Internal OutputProcess Efficiency
      Quality
      External OutputCoverageContent
      Input
      Resources
      Personnel CostsOutsourcing Costs
      38.3%
      41.4%
      73.9%
      53.9%
      38.8%
      33.1%
      ORGANISATION
      STAKEHOLDERS
      ORGANISATION
      MEDIA/CHANNELS
      Results ofCommunication Processes
      Communication Processes
      Initiation of Communication Processes
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / n = 1,863 PR Professionals from 34 European countries;Q 9: Which items do you monitor or measure to assess the effectiveness of public relations / communicationmanagement? (1 = do not use at all; 5 = use continuously; methods used = scale points 4-5)Figures depicted within the DPRG/ICV (2009) framework for communication measurement, www.communicationcontrolling.com
    45. Back to the dashboard: A three-dimensional approach to measurementorIt’s not just about the bottom line, coverage or productivity. It is about value creation
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,267 PR Professionals in communication departments; Q 3; Q 16; Q 17
    46. www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,267 PR Professionals in communication departments; Q 3; Q 16; Q 17
    47. Salary and qualification needs
    48. Basic annual salary of European PR practitioners (Euro)
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / n = 1,768 PR Professionals from 34 European countries; Q 17: In which of the following bands does your basic annual salary fall?
    49. Annual salaries of female and male PR practitioners
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / n = 1,768 PR Professionals from 34 European countries; Q 17: In which of the following bands does your basic annual salary fall?; What is your gender?
    50. 60% of EACD members earn more than 90.000 Euro annually
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / n = 1,768 PR Professionals from 34 European countries; Q 17: In which of the following bands does your basic annual salary fall?; Are you a member of a professional organisation?
    51. Annual salaries in Western Europe are significantly higher
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / n = 1,768 PR Professionals from 34 European countries; Q 17: In which of the following bands does your basic annual salary fall?
    52. Training and qualification needs of PR professionals in Europe
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / n = 1,863 PR Professionals from 34 European countries; Q 14: Thinking ofyour own skills: if you have the right to choose one area of personal development next year, which of the following would you select?
    53. Time to become a corporate, or is education still a vocation?What’s the ‘product’ we sell anyway?
      www.communicationmonitor.eu / Zerfass et al. 2009 / nmax = 1,267 PR Professionals in communication departments; Q 3; Q 16; Q 17
    54. Disclaimer and copyright
      Preliminary results – not to be re-produced or published
      This presentation contains preliminary results of the European Communication Monitor 2009 survey. Data and interpretations presented here may still be altered due to the ongoing analysis and interpretation of the data by the international research team.
      Due to this fact, these charts are not authorized and may not be re-produced or published.Please refer to the full set of results, to be published in September 2009 as a book by EACD.
      See www.communicationmonitor.eu for updates about the publication and the survey.
      Copyright
      © 2009 by Ansgar Zerfass and the research team for the whole document and all parts, charts and data. The material presented in this document represents empirical insights and interpretation by the research team. It is intellectual property subject to international copyright.
      Illustration licensed by istockphoto.com. Title graphic provided by EACD.
      Acknowledgements
      Special thanks to Stephanie Krahl B.A. and Peter Schmiedgen B.A. (University of Leipzig) for statistical analysis and constructing the charts and to Grit Fiedler (EACD, Brussels) for valuable support and suggestions. Many thanks to all partners and the sponsor CISION.
      Contact
      Please contact any member of the research team or the advisory board in your country/regionif you are interested in discussing the insights of this survey or in joint research projects. Questions regarding the research project itself and future activities may be directed to thelead researcher, Prof. Dr. Ansgar Zerfass, zerfass@uni-leipzig.de
    55. How can we keep this conversation going?
      Join the EACD!
      pass me your contact details after this workshop for a welcome pack
      or visit www.eacd-online.eu
      Future CASE-EACD Collaborations
      Let’s design a survey, write an article or simply keep in touch
      willowsd@isb.be
    56. Thank you for your attention

    + David WillowsDavid Willows, 1 month ago

    custom

    146 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presentation given at the CASE Europe Annual Confer more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 146
      • 146 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories