Future Proof Post-Trade Matching

299 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
299
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
55
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • In a fast-moving post-trade environment, financial institutions are often hard-pushed to ensure that their technology can keep up with changing requirements. Changing regulation, increasing volumes across multiple asset classes, and a desire to reduce risk all lead to new requirements for communicating and matching data. In particular, connecting internal systems to external ones, whether post-trade counterparties, CCPs, settlement locations, or other services becomes ever more complex and unpredictable. This presentation will look at what's driving the changes, and discuss more flexible approaches to communication and matching, including real-time matching as opposed to T+1 reconciliation a single-window approach to complex communications Why asset class sometimes really doesn’t matter
  • real-time matching as opposed to T+1 reconciliation a single-window approach to complex communications Why asset class sometimes really doesn’t matter
  • Known unknowns – regulatory uncertainty, changing trading patterns, risk mitigation All lead to requirements for additional external connectivity, matching & handling of changes of scale Problem needs to be tackled in light of legacy ops.
  • Known unknowns – regulatory uncertainty, changing trading patterns, risk mitigation All lead to requirements for additional external connectivity, matching & handling of changes of scale Problem needs to be tackled in light of legacy ops.
  • Known unknowns – regulatory uncertainty, changing trading patterns, risk mitigation All lead to requirements for additional external connectivity, matching & handling of changes of scale Problem needs to be tackled in light of legacy ops.
  • Known unknowns – regulatory uncertainty, changing trading patterns, risk mitigation All lead to requirements for additional external connectivity, matching & handling of changes of scale Problem needs to be tackled in light of legacy ops.
  • real-time matching as opposed to T+1 reconciliation a single-window approach to complex communications Why asset class sometimes really doesn’t matter
  • Future Proof Post-Trade Matching

    1. 1. Future proof post-trade matching Guy Eden, Head of Product Management SIBOS 2011, Toronto Guy Eden
    2. 2. <ul><li>Communication </li></ul><ul><li>Matching </li></ul>
    3. 3. <ul><li>Regulatory uncertainty </li></ul><ul><li>Changing trading patterns </li></ul><ul><li>Risk mitigation </li></ul>
    4. 4. <ul><li>Regulatory uncertainty </li></ul><ul><li>Changing trading patterns </li></ul><ul><li>Risk mitigation </li></ul>
    5. 5. <ul><li>Regulatory uncertainty </li></ul><ul><li>Changing trading patterns </li></ul><ul><li>Risk mitigation </li></ul><ul><li>Connectivity </li></ul><ul><li>Matching </li></ul><ul><li>Scale </li></ul>
    6. 6. Increasing regulation <ul><li>Dodd-Frank </li></ul><ul><li>FIN48 </li></ul><ul><li>HIRE </li></ul><ul><li>MiFID / MiFID II </li></ul><ul><li>EMIR </li></ul><ul><li>UCITS </li></ul>
    7. 7. Changes in scale - equity growth
    8. 8. Changes in scale - ETF growth
    9. 9. Changes in scale
    10. 10. Risk reduction - 2008
    11. 11. Risk Reduction
    12. 12. Risk Reduction
    13. 13. Risk Reduction
    14. 14. Risk Reduction
    15. 15. Risk Reduction - 2011
    16. 16. Legacy challenges
    17. 17. Summary
    18. 18. Summary
    19. 21. Stand L114

    ×