Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Limits in developing innovative pedagogy with Moodle: The story of BIM
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Limits in developing innovative pedagogy with Moodle: The story of BIM

1,220
views

Published on

First draft of a presentation to be given at the 2010 Australian MoodleMoot.

First draft of a presentation to be given at the 2010 Australian MoodleMoot.

Published in: Education, Business, Technology

0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,220
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
8
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • The limitations stuff will be downplayed – spend most of the time on show and tell
  • Give an overview of what BIM is and does
  • Talk briefly about why you might use BIM as opposed to something else
  • This marks the bit where I head to a local Moodle installation and show people how BIM works by going through common actions for a coordinator (teacher in charge), a student (or two) and a marker. This will likely be most of the presentation.
  • This will be an optional bit at the end. Essentially a description of the factors that limited the development of BIM. The suggestion is that many of these limits apply more broadly to the general idea of attempting to implement innovative pedagogy within universities (and possibly elsewhere).
  • This will be an optional bit at the end. Essentially a description of the factors that limited the development of BIM. The suggestion is that many of these limits apply more broadly to the general idea of attempting to implement innovative pedagogy within universities (and possibly elsewhere).
  • This will be an optional bit at the end. Essentially a description of the factors that limited the development of BIM. The suggestion is that many of these limits apply more broadly to the general idea of attempting to implement innovative pedagogy within universities (and possibly elsewhere).
  • This will be an optional bit at the end. Essentially a description of the factors that limited the development of BIM. The suggestion is that many of these limits apply more broadly to the general idea of attempting to implement innovative pedagogy within universities (and possibly elsewhere).
  • Transcript

    • 1. Limits in developing innovative pedagogy with Moodle: The story of BIM
      David Jones
      http://davidtjones.wordpress.com
      http://bit.ly/bambim
    • 2. 1. Show and tell of BIM
      2. Identify some limitations to innovative pedagogy
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/sookie/100608625/
    • 3. BAM
      Into
      Moodle
      Activity module for Moodle
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/nolifebeforecoffee/124659356/
    • 4. Blog
      BAM
      Aggregation
      Into
      Management
      Moodle
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/nolifebeforecoffee/124659356/
    • 5. BAM
      (Jones and Luck, 2009)
      A Webfuse tool (2006-2009)
      - 26 offerings, 7 courses
      - 2790+ students
      - 20,000+ blog posts
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/nolifebeforecoffee/124659356/
    • 6. Students create and register blogs/feeds
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/nolifebeforecoffee/124659356/
    • 7. They answer questions (or not)
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/nolifebeforecoffee/124659356/
    • 8. BIM aggregates/mirrors the student posts
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/nolifebeforecoffee/124659356/
    • 9. BIM “allocates” posts to questions
      Unallocated
      Submitted
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/nolifebeforecoffee/124659356/
    • 10. BIM shows students what it knows about their posts
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/nolifebeforecoffee/124659356/
    • 11. BIM provides teaching staff with management interface
      Marker
      Coordinator
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/nolifebeforecoffee/124659356/
    • 12. BIM integrates with Moodle gradebook
    • 13. BIM generates OPML feed for staff
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/nolifebeforecoffee/124659356/
    • 14. http://www.flickr.com/photos/quinnanya/3588989219/
    • 15. Concreteexperience
      ReflectiveObservation
      Activetesting
      Kolb’s learning cycle
      Abstracthypothesis
      http://flickr.com/photos/oberazzi/318947873/
    • 16. (Moyle, 2010)
      “building literacies”
      Reflection/meta-cognition
      Escapingclosed gardens
      (Kim, 2010)
      Connectivism
      (Social)Constructionism
      (Siemens, 2005)
      (Papert & Harel, 1991)
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwworks/3196112134/
    • 17. Coordinator
      Student
      c006
      Marker
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwworks/2850669383/
    • 18. http://bit.ly/bambim
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/80417459@N00/2471314610/
    • 19. http://www.flickr.com/photos/wlodi/2654296462/
    • 20. The “grammar of school”
      (Papert, 1995)
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/wlodi/2654296462/
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/wlodi/2654296462/
    • 21. Limited knowledge
      http://tpack.org
    • 22. Limited knowledge
      http://tpack.org
    • 23. Inappropriate technology
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/wlodi/2654296462/
    • 24. LMS Features
      General versus specific
      Inappropriate technology
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/wlodi/2654296462/
    • 25. LMS Features
      General versus specific
      Inappropriate technology
      Implement “Vanilla”
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/wlodi/2654296462/
    • 26. LMS Features
      General versus specific
      Inappropriate technology
      Implement “Vanilla”
      Low levels abstraction
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/wlodi/2654296462/
    • 27. LMS Features
      General versus specific
      Big upfront design
      Inappropriate technology
      Implement “Vanilla”
      Low levels abstraction
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/wlodi/2654296462/
    • 28. Angelo, T., & Cross, K. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
      Kim, J. (2010, 6 April, 2010). 11 ideas about which I may be wrong. Retrieved 13 April, 2010, from here
      Moyle, K. (2010). Building innovation: learning with technologies. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
      Jones, D., & Luck, J. (2009). Blog AggregationManagement: Reducing the Aggravation of ManagingStudent Blogging. Paper presented at EdMedia’2009
      Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. New York City: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
      Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1).
      Papert, S. (1995). Why School Reform is Impossible. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(4), 417-427.
      http://www.flickr.com/photos/annarbor/4350627292/