 
Relais D2D and the Greater Western Library Alliance
 Arizona State University
 Baylor University
 Brigham Young University
 Colorado State University
 Iowa State Univers...
Resource Sharing and Document
Delivery
+
Collection Development
 Print & Electronic Collection Management Task Force
Charge
o Item 1: Develop a program to efficiently analyze and remove...
 Vast Distances Separate our Schools
 Enormity of the Shared Collection
 Difficult Decision Making
 Sacrificing Presti...
 Budgets Remain Flat
 Space Constraints
 Reality of the Significance of Use and Demonstrable ROI
in State Universities
...
 AFU, 817,96
 AZS, 247,103
 AZU, 461,282
 COD, 223,883
 COF, 141,478
 CSL, 603,424
 FKS, 34,471
 HUH, 601,725
 IA...
 AFU, 32,129
 AZS, 55,260
 AZU, 76,712
 COD, 70,384
 COF, 38738
 CSL, 74662
 FKS, 1,918
 HUH, 64,729
 IAY, 43,366...
 AFU, 2,666
 AZS, 2,665
 AZU, 2,670
 COD, 2,672
 COF, 2,665
 CSL, 2,673
 FKS, 429
 HUH, 2,659
 IAY, 2,667
 ILU, ...
 Cooperative Collection Development
 Cost Savings
 Improved ILL Services
 Load Leveling
 E-Book Discoverabilty
A system like BorrowItNow is essential to fully realize the
possibilities of consortial collaborative collection developme...
 Presented to the GWLA board in Fall 2012
o A division between full implementers and lenders only
 Summer 2013
o August ...
 Patron places the request through their local discovery
layer
 The results lists shows real-time location and availability
 The pertinent information for the request utilizes Open
URL to map an ILLiad request form
 For requests that are not submitted through the Relais
Discovery layer the staff can utilize the BorrowItNow
add-on
 Borrowing – Full Implementers
o Borrowing add-on
o Workform mapping
o Open URL configuration
o Request form mapping
o Ro...
 Jennifer Duncan
jennifer.duncan@usu.edu
 Ryan Litsey
ryan.litsey@ttu.edu
GWLA Relais D2D Project
GWLA Relais D2D Project
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

GWLA Relais D2D Project

266

Published on

We are in the process of a large scale consortial implementation project for Relais D2D. Our session will describe the process and the hurdles in creating a consortial wide shared catalog project. Presentation by Ryan Litsey and Jennifer Duncan

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
266
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

GWLA Relais D2D Project

  1. 1.   Relais D2D and the Greater Western Library Alliance
  2. 2.  Arizona State University  Baylor University  Brigham Young University  Colorado State University  Iowa State University Library  Kansas State University  Oklahoma State University  Oregon State University  Rice University  Southern Illinois University, Carbondale  Southern Methodist University  Texas A&M University  Texas Tech  University of Arizona  University of Arkansas  University of Colorado, Boulder  University of Hawaii at Manoa  University of Houston  University of Illinois, Chicago  University of Kansas  University of Missouri-Columbia  University of Nevada, Las Vegas  University of New Mexico  University of Oklahoma  University of Oregon  University of Southern California  University of Texas, Austin  University of Utah  University of Washington  University of Wyoming  Utah State University  Washington State University  Washington University in St. Louis
  3. 3. Resource Sharing and Document Delivery + Collection Development
  4. 4.  Print & Electronic Collection Management Task Force Charge o Item 1: Develop a program to efficiently analyze and remove duplication from the existing monograph collection o Item 2: Develop strategies to reduce duplicate materials purchases via existing tools and technologies
  5. 5.  Vast Distances Separate our Schools  Enormity of the Shared Collection  Difficult Decision Making  Sacrificing Prestige
  6. 6.  Budgets Remain Flat  Space Constraints  Reality of the Significance of Use and Demonstrable ROI in State Universities  Faculty Recruitment & Retention
  7. 7.  AFU, 817,96  AZS, 247,103  AZU, 461,282  COD, 223,883  COF, 141,478  CSL, 603,424  FKS, 34,471  HUH, 601,725  IAY, 94,649  ILU, 176,887  IQU, 177,588  ISM, 62,808  IWA, 215,716  IXA, 1,105,697  IYU, 136,651  KKS, 191,679  KKU, 454,647  MUU, 291,507  NTE, 243,059  OKS, 162,858  OKU, 439,432  ORE, 103,923  ORU, 232,350  RCE, 164,165  SOI, 194,424  TXA, 366,201  TXH, 102,920  UBY, 884,417  UNL, 66,304  UUM, 382,287  UUS, 114,586  WAU, 1,010,499  WTU, 216,507  WYA, 12,293
  8. 8.  AFU, 32,129  AZS, 55,260  AZU, 76,712  COD, 70,384  COF, 38738  CSL, 74662  FKS, 1,918  HUH, 64,729  IAY, 43,366  ILU, 62,391  IQU, 47,770  ISM, 30,280  IWA, 48,865  IXA, 85,016  IYU, 23,367  KKS, 41,797  KKU, 59,847  MUU, 64,566  NTE, 59,898  OKS, 55,742  OKU, 67,727  ORE, 52,150  ORU, 58,109  RCE, 42,290  SOI, 68,661  TXA, 58,842  TXH, 44,589  UBY, 75,537  UNL, 28,234  UUM, 73,690  UUS, 22,046  WAU, 83,319  WTU, 59,992  WYA, 602
  9. 9.  AFU, 2,666  AZS, 2,665  AZU, 2,670  COD, 2,672  COF, 2,665  CSL, 2,673  FKS, 429  HUH, 2,659  IAY, 2,667  ILU, 2,673  IQU, 2,672  ISM, 2,653  IWA, 2,670  IXA, 2,672  IYU, 2,649  KKS, 2,654  KKU, 2,670  MUU, 2,653  NTE, 2,668  OKS, 2,633  OKU, 2,669  ORE, 2,644  ORU, 2,668  RCE, 2,641  SOI, 2,667  TXA, 2,665  TXH, 2,658  UBY, 2,666  UNL, 2,488  UUM, 2,673  UUS, 2,656  WAU, 2,675  WTU, 2,661  WYA, 136
  10. 10.  Cooperative Collection Development  Cost Savings  Improved ILL Services  Load Leveling  E-Book Discoverabilty
  11. 11. A system like BorrowItNow is essential to fully realize the possibilities of consortial collaborative collection development. With the implementation of this service, we will be able to present our local constituents with a catalog of tens of millions of titles.
  12. 12.  Presented to the GWLA board in Fall 2012 o A division between full implementers and lenders only  Summer 2013 o August - Implementation began • Borrowing add-ons are sent out • Lending's server add-on for full implementers sent out • Configuration of local ILLiad’s  September 2013 o All full implementers are fully operational o All lender only targets are fully operational o Patrons have real-time location and call number access to 31 Research libraries
  13. 13.  Patron places the request through their local discovery layer
  14. 14.  The results lists shows real-time location and availability
  15. 15.  The pertinent information for the request utilizes Open URL to map an ILLiad request form
  16. 16.  For requests that are not submitted through the Relais Discovery layer the staff can utilize the BorrowItNow add-on
  17. 17.  Borrowing – Full Implementers o Borrowing add-on o Workform mapping o Open URL configuration o Request form mapping o Routing rule for OCLC sending o Direct Request enabled  Lending o Lending server add-on o Lending routing rule  Relais Configurations o Z39.50 configurations o Discovery layer
  18. 18.  Jennifer Duncan jennifer.duncan@usu.edu  Ryan Litsey ryan.litsey@ttu.edu
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×