“…designed to redefine the original MARC record format for the 21st century…”
And yet, the primary purpose of the complex punctuation rules in MARC21 seems to be to ensure that you can still produce perfect catalogue cards… Conspiracy theory #1
What we think our users want…
Conspiracy Theory #2
Are we trying to turn our users into mini librarians?
Thou shalt not use yonder library catalogue or resources until thou hast understanding of:
Dewey Classification
Shelfmarks & Shelf Order
Boolean Logic and Advanced Set Theory
the difference between accruing & outstanding fines
What our users want expect...
S. R. Ranganathan
Five laws of library science (1931)
Fourth Law: Save the time of the Reader
…if readers find what they are looking for in a timely manner they will be more satisfied, and more likely to feel like their needs have been met
ENLITE Journal, circa 1969
Roy Tennant
“ I wish I had known that the solution for needing to teach our users how to search our catalog was to create a system that didn't need to be taught … I wish I had known that we would come to pay the price of our folly by seeing our users flock to commercial companies like Google and Amazon.” - Library Journal, 2005
With hindsight…
Where we went wrong…
Just an online card catalogue?
Just a stock inventory system?
Poor search & refine functionality …but, aren’t libraries supposed to be experts on “search”? ;-)
… does your OPAC suck?
“The OPAC Sucks” song
The OPAC sucks, that's all I gotta say
You're outta luck if you can't spell “Hemingway”
...
The OPAC sucks, a sad calamity
Like it's stuck in 8 million B.C.
The title that I seek
Is buried very deep
(lyrics by Brian Smith , Chicago Librarian)
2007 OPAC survey
On a scale of 1 to 10 (where 1 is extremely unhappy and 10 is extremely happy), how happy are you with your OPAC?
5.1
2007 OPAC survey
One criticism of OPACs is that they rarely have cutting edge features that our users expect from a modern web site.
On a scale of 1 to 10, how well do you think your OPAC meets the needs and expectations of your users?
4.5
2009 OPAC survey
Follow up survey, run by Bowker
Due to the high number of responses, Bowker are donating an entire library via the Oxfam Unwrapped scheme
… the findings should be announced soon!
The OPAC as a “pig”
“After all, you can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still very much a pig.” (Roy Tennant discussing the OPAC, Library Journal , 2005)
“Never try to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and it annoys the pig.” (attrib. Robert Heinlein, author)
pig ugly?
“kissy, kissy?”
Web 2.0
Ann Arbor District Library
Huddersfield
Background
General unhappiness with vendor product
“In-house” enhancements to the existing OPAC…
user suggestions from surveys
“ Web 2.0” inspired features
borrowing good ideas from other web sites
new features launched with no/low publicity
“ perpetual beta”
Required staff buy-in and a willingness to experiment and take risks!
Spell checker
All OPAC keyword searches were monitored over a six month period
Approx 23% of searches gave zero results
74 people entered “renew” as a keyword(!)
Users expect suggestions and prompts, not “dead end” pages
Spell checker
Keyword suggestions (1)
Failed keyword searches are cross referenced with answers.com to provide new search suggestions
Keyword suggestions (2)
Keyword cloud
Borrowing suggestions
Personalised suggestions
Ratings and comments
Other editions
Uses web services provided by OCLC and LibraryThing to locate other editions and related works within local holdings
www.oclc.org/research/projects/xisbn/
www.librarything.com/api
Other editions
Email alerts
RSS feeds
RSS feeds
RSS feeds
Google Book Search
Virtual shelf browser
Was it worth doing?
Borrowing profile Average book loans per month (2002-2008)
“Did you mean” spellchecker Average number of clicks per month
Borrowing suggestions Average number of clicks per month
Virtual shelf browser Average number of clicks per month
Keyword cloud Average number of clicks per month
Borrowing range profile Number of unique titles (bib#) borrowed per calendar year recommendation features added to OPAC at start of 2006
Other libraries…
North Carolina State University
LibraryThing for Libraries
Plymouth State University
Topeka and Shawnee County
University of Warwick
Hennepin County Library
doing it yourself
Encourage suggestions from staff
Include users in decision making process
Encourage play and experimentation
Don’t be afraid to make mistakes!
Look widely for ideas
“Build crappy prototypes fast”
Monitor usage
if usage is poor, rethink it or get rid of it!
Back to the pig…
“ We need to focus more energy on important, systemic changes rather than cosmetic ones. If your system is more difficult to search and less effective than Amazon.com, then you have work to do.
After all, you can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still very much a pig.” (Roy Tennant, Library Journal , 2005)
OPAC 2.0
OPAC 2.0
Second generation web OPACs
Feature list…
relevancy ranking by default
faceted browsing / limiting
spellcheck
RSS feeds, OpenSearch, etc
Marking MARC work harder!
importance of high quality, rich records
OPAC 2.0
However, Web 2.0 seems only to have made a partial impact on OPAC 2.0…
tagging
ratings
reviews
social bookmarking
What’s missing from OPAC 2.0?
We need more serendipity!
borrowing suggestions
“just in time” recommendations
Social features
create links between borrowers
Web services and APIs
encourage users to remix our data
Commerical products
AquaBrowser
Ex Libris : Primo
Innovative Interfaces: Encore
SirsiDynix: Enterprise
Talis Platform: Prism 3
DS: DSArena
Open Source
Open Source OPACs
Scriblio
Plymouth State University
uses WordPress blog software
VuFind
Falvey Memorial Library, Villanova University
Uses PHP & MySQL
LibraryFind
Oregon State University Libraries
uses Ruby on Rails
Open Source OPACs
fac-back-opac
Laurentian University Library
uses Lucene & Solr
Project Blacklight
University of Virginia Libraries
uses Lucene & Solr
The Social OPAC
Darien Library (John Blyberg)
Open Source OPACs
Open Source LMS OPACs
Koha
Evergreen
Lucene
Begun in 1997, became OS in 2000
Apache Software Foundation
fast, full text indexer
powerful search engine
ranking, proximity, etc
text analysers
stemming, soundex matching, etc
Lucene
Sites using Lucene:
AOL
CNET
Blackwell’s Online Bookshop
Monster.com & Guardian Jobs
job search websites
DiVA: Academic Archive On-line
Norwegian digital repository for 22 universities
see http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/PoweredBy
Solr
Begun in 2004, became OS in 2006
Extends Lucene functionality…
facets
highly scalable
stopwords, synonym lists, etc
spellchecker
“ more like this”
VuFind
fac-back-opac
Web services
Web services & APIs
Talis Platform
LibraryThing
thingISBN, thingTitle, thingLang, data feeds
OCLC WorldCat Grid Services
Amazon Web Services
rebranded as “Amazon Associates Web Service” with new conditions of use
Google Book Search API
Google Book Search API
Launched March 2008
Client-side implementation (rather than the more typical server-side)
Link to GBS content:
via ISBN, LCCN and OCLC numbers
front cover thumbnails
preview pages
embeddable book preview
“in book” search
Beyond the OPAC
More than just books
Single search for multiple silos:
library stock (books, journals, etc)
electronic content (ebooks, ejournals, etc)
digital repositories
archive collections
multimedia collections (audio, video photos, etc)
Many users are now format agnostic
Local indexes
Traditional meta-searching too slow
Local indexes = fast searches
Serial Solutions: Summon
web content crawled and indexed in advance
uses Lucene & Solr
Some existing products also support local indexes…
Primo, VuFind, LibraryFind, etc
Getting personal
Data-mining of usage data
JISC TILE+ Project (2009)
aggregation of usage data from many libraries
Let’s share our data!
12/Dec/2008: University of Huddersfield releases aggregated circulation & recommendation data into the Public Domain
14/Dec/2008: University of Mary Washington creates Semantic Web version of the data
Potential benefits?
Students
higher quality recommendations and suggestions
borrowing profiles per course / year of study
Librarians
collection development
Academics
improved reading lists
…and the OPAC?
Will it return to just being an inventory of physical stock?
just one of many silos
What goes around, comes around…
give it a few more years and we’ll probably go back to using card catalogues! ;-)
3 comments
Comments 1 - 3 of 3 previous next Post a comment