On October 23rd, 2014, we updated our
By continuing to use LinkedIn’s SlideShare service, you agree to the revised terms, so please take a few minutes to review them.
Source control - what you need to knowPresentation Transcript
> Source Control > What you need to know. Davey McGlade - Kainos
> Intro• Solution Architect ~15 years experience• In Kainos ~ 4 years• Focus on: • .NET • Dynamics CRM 2011 • SharePoint 2010 • Integration technologies
> What is Source Control?• In essence, a backup repository for your work.• Two types: • Centralised: All code on a central server • Distributed: Everyone gets a copy locally• Definitely not: • Google Drive • Drop Box • C: • Email.
> Why?Recoverability Don’t lose work Communication Easily see team changesVersioning Compare and contrast Accountability Who made the change?Solve Problems Find bugs, try new things Facilitate Reuse Avoid writing duplicate code
> Just code?NoAnything and everything that is used to build the solution: – Tools / Installers – Solution Build Scripts – Database Build scripts – Some include Functional Specifications & Design DocsAids the transition into support.
> TermsTrunk • The main ‘code line’. Contains the master code.Branch • A deviation off the main code line.Fork • Independent development on a copy from originalCommit • ‘Saving’ your code to the local/central repositoryPush • Transfer changesets from the local to centralPull • Retrieving changes from the central repositoryChange set • The set of all delta changesMerge • Combining your code changes with existing codeTag • Marking a specific event, i.e. release 1.0 etc.
> Centralised• A single ‘master’ copy of your code, held centrally on a server• Changes are ‘committed’ to this central library.• Once ‘committed’, other programmers can see the change.• You can then ‘pull’ this change to your local machine.• Examples of centralised source control systems – CVS, Subversion (or SVN) Team Foundation Server, Visual SourceSafe
> Workflow (Centralised)1. Access the central server and ‘pull’ down the changes others have made2. Make your changes, and test them3. Commit (*) your changes to the central server, so other programmers can see them.(*) Work out the merge conflicts (windiff, built in tools etc.)
> Example Workflows (Centralised)• Branch by Release V1.0 V1.1 V1.2 Release 1 Branch Merge Release 2 V2.0 V2.1 V2.2• Branch by Feature / Task Feature 2 Branch Merge Main Trunk Branch Merge Feature 1
> Distributed• Each developer ‘clones’ a copy of a repository to their own machine. The full history of the project is on their own hard drive.• Two phase commits: You commit first to your local staging area, and then push to the repository.• Central Repository is not mandatory, but you usually have one• Examples of distributed source control systems – Git, Mercurial, Bazaar
> Workflow (Distributed) • Simple Init/Clone Add Commit Push • Branch by Member/ Features V1.0 V1.1 Main TrunkDevelopment Trunk Developer 1 Developer 2
> Is DVCS ‘better’?• It’s extremely quick. No network traffic, only local file lookups.• You remove the risk of poor networks. Centralised checkouts typically aren’t atomic. Visual SourceSafe = nightmare.• You can work locally, without affecting others. You can share work amongst a select few, without pushing to the team.• You can work offline, and merge your changes when you’re online again.• You have built in redundancy as the work is distributed amongst team members.
> Git / Github demo Demo Time
> Branching & Merging AntipatternsSome examples:• Merge Paranoia—avoiding merging at all cost, usually because of a fear of the consequences.• Big Bang Merge—deferring branch merging to the end of the development effort and attempting to merge all branches simultaneously.• Never-Ending Merge—continuous merging activity because there is always more to merge.• Temporary Branches—branching for changing reasons, so the branch becomes a permanent temporary workspace.• Development Freeze—stopping all development activities while branching, merging, and building new base lines.Source - http://branchingguidance.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Branching%20and%20Merging%20Anti-Patterns
> Taking it further• Continuous Integration, Continuous Delivery • Unit Testing • Code Styling • Performance Monitoring • Broken Build fun• Feature toggling – Martin Fowler, http://martinfowler.com/bliki/FeatureToggle.html