Uploaded on

 

More in: Education , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
226
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • In our survey we provided the students with different motivating factors from our secondary research and asked them to what extent each influenced them in their decision to enroll at Miami University. As you can see, every single factor: Scholarships for Latinos, a latinamerican community, recruiters, and latino organizations, were most frequently rated as not motivating. Only scholarships had a moderate amount of respondents label it as a motivating factor. This can be attributed to whether they identified as Latino students to Miami when applying.
  • While in our secondary research family played an integral roll in student decisions in higher ed, at Miami only 30% of students thought so.
  • We asked students to in the survey to rate on a scale of 1-5 to what extent Miami provided different developmental factors that we found relevant in our research. Most students rated the factors to say that Miami University provided all developmental categories on average to a lower degree than to a higher degree. The lowest rated were: provision of an advisor, a latinamerican community, and academic resources for latinos
  • While….. Faculty were approached by latino students, showing a need for guidance, ____ % of them had NOT been trained to serve these students needs as Latinos.
  • Interviews indicated no intentionsof students transferring because of their dissatisfaction with Miami’s effortsIn our survey we asked students if they had ever considering transferring from Miami because the university was not addressing their needs as Latinos. We also asked faculty in their survey if they thought that Latino students considered trasnferring out of Miami for these reasons. This goes to show that Latino students are more satisfied with Miami universities initiatives than third parties might assume.
  • 1st HypothesisNo focus on family, lack the dissemination of availability of financial assistance2nd hypothesis The school still needs to figure out a way to create a network of social integration with an organized communication system and provide mentors for students

Transcript

  • 1. A Case Study of Miami University’s Efforts to Recruit,Develop, and Retain Latin American Students By Mariah Torres and Daniela Santisteban
  • 2.  Fastest growing demographic in the US While enrollment rates are improving there is still issues to address.  Completion rate (13%)
  • 3.  At Miami, 2.8% of study body is Latino But enrollment has only increased from .58% in the past 6 years Highest graduation rate of Latinos among all public universities in the state of Ohio.
  • 4.  Primarily focused on community college and Hispanic Serving Institutions Factors that were most pertinent to Latino college students in each segment included:  Recruitment: pre-collegiate preparation, family relationships, and financial support  Development: the ability to contribute to the educational institution, social integration, and faculty interaction  Retention: social integration and competent or improving academic performance
  • 5. 1) Miami University’s methods to attract students are not culturally attentive to Latinos, creating a smaller Latino enrollment pool than expected.2) The support system provided by Miami University for Latinos does not fulfill their desired emotional, social, and academic satisfaction and development.3) The lack of attention geared toward Latino students by Miami University has led to low retention rates for this minority group.
  • 6. Interviews Survey• Associate Vice President • 19 responses of Institutional Diversity• Assistant Director of • Predominantly Diversity Affairs and from LAS and Coordinator of Diverse Spanish Student Development departments
  • 7. Interviews Survey• A junior student • 62 responses• A senior student • All students surveyed• Two transfer students were of Latin American• 2006 alum descent • 15% representation of Latin American community • 72.6% female Percentage of students that identified as Latin American
  • 8. Student Motivating Factors 1 (Not 2 3 (Somewhat 4 5 (Highly Motivating) Motivating) Motivating)Scholarships 39.3% 11.5% 9.8% 9.8% 29.5% offered to Latinos Senses of 45.9% 29.5% 18.0% 3.3% 3.3% Latin AmericanCommunity Recruiters 52.5% 19.7% 19.7% 1.6% 6.6% targeted towards LatinosMiami Latino 44.3% 23.0% 16.4% 9.8% 6.6%Organizations
  • 9.  66.7% of students that identify as LA thought that scholarships were highly motivating Only 16.2% of students that do not identify as LA, thought that scholarships were motivating Faculty also indicated this was the only somewhat motivating factor towards recruiting LA students.
  • 10. Surprisingly,only about30% of LAstudentsconsideredtheir parents“Involved” intheir collegedecision
  • 11. Student rated development factorsStudent 1 (Low 2 3 (Average 4 5 (High Degree) Degree) Degree)An adviser and/or mentor 48.3% 19.0% 19.0% 8.6% 5.2%that is accessible and thatcan discuss Latino relatedissues or concernsOrganization(s) targeted 19.0% 20.7% 31.0% 22.4% 6.9%towards meeting Latinossocial needsEvents focused on Latin 15.5% 10.3% 36.2% 31.0% 6.9%American celebrations orcultureA Latin American community 37.9% 34.5% 20.7% 5.2% 1.7%or presenceAcademic resources 41.4% 32.8% 15.5% 6.9% 3.4%specifically for Latinos
  • 12.  58.8% of surveyed faculty said that they had been approached by a Latino 76.5% of faculty surveyed had not been trained to address Latino student needs VP of Institutional Diversity: There is no advisor designed for Latino students
  • 13.  Students more disappointed in lack of diversity rather than lack of Latin American community. Latino targeted opportunities still lacking: there is not hierarchal form of communication to contact Latino students Lack of contact between existing Latino organizations
  • 14. Satisfaction Rates Students Faculty Satisfied Satisfied 31% 27% NotSatisfied Not 69% Satisfied 73%
  • 15. Students that thought about transferring80% 73.30%70%60%50%40% 27.60%30%20%10% 0% Actual student consideration consideration thoughts on Faculty
  • 16. Hypothesis 1: Supported Miami University’s methods to attractstudents are not culturally attentive to Latinos.Hypothesis 2: Supported  The support system provided by Miami University for Latinos does not fulfill their desired emotional, social, and academic satisfactionHypothesis 3: Not SupportedThe lack of attention geared towardLatino students by Miami Universityhas led to low retention rates
  • 17.  Judgment sampling method versus randomized sample Survey question limitations Interview question limitations Miami Latino profile
  • 18.  Additional interviews o Student that has dropped out o Student that commutes Expanding future research beyond the isolated campus of Miami University for comparative studies Conduct longitudinal studies with a sample Latino population
  • 19. Questions?