Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering

1,141

Published on

Presentation on how to write good Master and PhD dissertations. …

Presentation on how to write good Master and PhD dissertations.

Empirical Methods, Software Engineering, science, computer science, software, methods, positivism, epistemology, onthology, construtivism, critical theory, pragmatism, case study, research action, ethnography

Published in: Technology, Spiritual
0 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,141
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
13
Comments
0
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Selecting Empirical Methods for SE Research Daniel Cukier
  • 2. 5 classes of methodControlled experimentsCase studiesSurvey researchEthnographiesAction research
  • 3. Exploratory questionsExistenceDescription and classificationDescriptive-comparative
  • 4. Base-rate questionsFrequency and distributionDescriptive-process
  • 5. Relationship questionsIs X related to Y?If X occurs, will Y also occur?
  • 6. Causality questionsDoes X cause Y? Does X prevent Y?Causality-ComparativeDoes context affects causality?
  • 7. Design questionsHow effectively achieve X?What helps?What does not help?
  • 8. Empirical truth
  • 9. epistemologythe nature of human knowledge, and how we obtain it. onthology the nature of the worldirrespective of our attempts to understand it.
  • 10. Plato about knowledge to know something, you must believe it to be true, andhave a clear justification for believing it to be true
  • 11. Constructivistswe cannot separate knowledgefrom the language we use to express it
  • 12. The philosophical stancesPositivismConstructivismCritical TheoryPragmatism
  • 13. PositivismAll knowledge comes from a set ofbasic observable facts.ReductionistSometimes comes to wrong conclusionsAssociated to controlled experiment
  • 14. ConstructivismInterpretivismOften adopted in social sciencesQualitative data about human beingsexploratory case studies or surveyresearch
  • 15. Critical TheoryPolitical actEmancipatory and advogacy rolee.g. Open source movement and AgileCommunityAction research and case studies
  • 16. PragmatismAll knowledge is approximate andincomplete and depends on the methodsTruth is whatever works for meTruth is relative to observerValues practical knowledgeMixed methods
  • 17. AbstractTo the positivist, science is the process of veri-fying theories by testing hypotheses derived fromthem.To the constructivist, science is the process ofseeking local theories that emerge from (and explain)the data.To the critical theorist, theoriesare assertions of knowledge (and therefore power), tobe critiqued in terms of how they shape that power.To the pragmatist, theories are the products of aconsensual process among a community of researchers,to be judged for their practical utility.
  • 18. TheoriesTheory becomes a “lens” through which the world is observed
  • 19. Theories Real-world phenomena are simply too rich andcomplex to study without a huge amount of filtering
  • 20. Theories Software Engineering researchers havetraditionally been verypoor at making theories
  • 21. Method SelectionResearch Design is theprocess of selecting amethod for a particular problem
  • 22. Controlled ExperimentsIndependent variables effects over dependent onesPrecondition: a clear hypothesisDemonstrate hypothesis by testing it on arepresentative populationControl unwanted variablesIf critical variables are ignored, experimentmight not generalize real worldTheory-driven is both a strength and a weakness
  • 23. Case StudiesExploratory or confirmatoryCritical caseMultiple caseWeakness: open to interpretation andresearcher biasAll philosophical stances
  • 24. Survey ResearchQuestionnaires for data collectionRepresentative sample from welldefined populationChallenge: control for sampling biasHarder challenge: ensure thatquestions are designed in a way thatyields useful and valid dataPositivism tradition
  • 25. EthnographiesGoal: study community of peopleResult: a rich description of itParticipant observation - possible ifresearcher is technical guyChallenge: avoid preconceptions ondata observation and analysisConstructivism
  • 26. Action ResearchSolve real-problem while study it.Researcher is also a change agentEducation, information science fieldsLong term commitment, expensiveIs a new idea, immature methodIterative processNo attempt to create a control groupCritical theory
  • 27. Mixed-MethodsSequential explanatory - quantitativefollowed by qualitativeSequential exploratory - qualitativefollowed by quantitativeConcurrent triangulation - whatpeople say is different from whatpeople doDifficult to resolve contradictions
  • 28. Data CollectionEach technique has its strengths andweaknessIf different kinds of data supportthe same conclusions, it strengthensthe studyPilot-test the data collection
  • 29. Empirical ValidityConstructInternalExternalReliability
  • 30. Critical Positivism Constructivism Pragmatism Theory Controlled experiment R RCase studies R R R REthnographies R R Survey research R R R Action research R R

×