Ards guidelines   john
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Ards guidelines john

on

  • 2,533 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,533
Views on SlideShare
2,525
Embed Views
8

Actions

Likes
3
Downloads
62
Comments
0

1 Embed 8

http://www.slideshare.net 8

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Ards guidelines   john Ards guidelines john Presentation Transcript

    • ARDS Guidelines Dr. George John, Critical Care, Christian Medical College, Vellore
    • Causative Factors in ARDS PRIMARY INJURY HOST RESPONSE CONSEQUENCES OF THERAPY
    • SPECTRUM OF LUNG “INJURY” Cardiogenic pulmonary oedema ALI ARDS Altered Starling’s Forces P/F RATIO 200 - 300 P/F RATIO < 200
    • Pulmonary Changes
      • Alveolar Flooding
      • Interstitial inflammation
      • Atelectasis
      • Early Exudative Phase < 1 week
      • Late Fibro Proliferative Phase > 1 week
    • Guidelines
      • Oxygenation
      • Ventilation
      • Position
      • Fluid management
      • Miscellaneous
    • Oxygenation
      • Lowest FiO 2
      • - to keep PaO 2 55 – 80mm Hg
      • Increase Alveolar Recruitment = degree of penetration of gas into poorly / nonaerated lung regions
      • - PEEP
      • - recruitment manoeuver
      • - inverse ratio ventilation
      • Prone positioning ( “proning” )
      • NO (Nitric Oxide)
    • The Pressure Profile Peak Pressure Plateau Pressure Mean Pressure PEEP
    • Ventilation
      • VENTILATION
      • Volume Control mode; I:E ratio 1:1 – 1:3
      • - Tidal Volume 6ml / kg
      • - Plateau Pressure < 30cm H 2 O
      • - High rate if CO 2 high – up to 35 / minute
      • Measures to decrease CO 2 production (sedation, decrease temperature)
      • Permissive hypercapnoea
      • If pH < 7.30 – use HCO 3 infusion
      • Other techniques:
      • ?Tracheal gas insufflation (TGI) / Expiratory washout (EWO)
      • (use humidified gas only)
      • ? Pressure Control Mode with pressure = 30
      • - many with less pressure needed for ventilation in the study
      • - study done with VC mode
    • Position “PRONING”
      • Ventilation in the prone position improves oxygenation but most clinical studies have not shown that prone ventilation improves outcome. In a study of paediatric patients (2 weeks to 18 years of age) with acute lung injury, prone positioning did not significantly reduce ventilator-free days or improve clinical outcome.
      • However, in a study published in 2006, prolonged prone positioning (at least 20 hours a day) in patients greater than 18 years of age showed that it was safe and may reduce mortality.
    • Fluid Management Liberal versus Conservative
      • Conservative strategy:
      • maintain a low target filling pressure (CVP of less than 4mm Hg or PAOP
      • of less than 8 mm Hg)
      • versus
      • Liberal strategy: maintain higher filling pressure CVP 10 – 14mm Hg or
      • PAOP 14-18mm Hg. This was achieved by a combination of bolus fluid
      • administration, use of frusemide or dobutamine, depending on the
      • perfusion, urine output , measured filling pressures and cardiac output (if
      • available).
      • Result:
      • There was no significant difference in mortality (25.5% in the conservative group vs. 28.4% in the liberal group). However, the conservative strategy improved the oxygenation index, lung injury score, increased the number of ventilator free days and days not spent in ICU. The conservative strategy did not increase the incidence or prevalence of shock during the study. In addition, the conservative strategy did not increase the use of dialysis during the first 60 days.
    • Monitoring
      • In a landmark study published in 2006, the use of PA catheter guided therapy did not improve organ function or survival as compared to CVC guided therapy. The PA catheter was associated with more complications (twice as many catheter related complications, predominantly arrhythmias) than CVC guided therapy.
    • Cardiovascular
      • Haemoglobin 8 – 10 g%
      • Maintain Cardiac Output
      • Judicious fluids
      • Use inotropes as needed
    • Other Modalities
      • Steroids
      • Earlier study:
      • Evidence that use of steroids after the first week of ARDS improves prognosis significantly.
      • In 2006:
      • No benefit in the use of methylprednisolone after the first week of ARDS. Use of sterods after 14 days of ARDS was associated with increased mortality at 60 days. This was in spite of the steroid therapy and improving ventilator free shock free days during the first 28 days. Methyprednisolone did not increase infectious complications but was associated with a higher rate of neuromuscular weakness.
      • Nitric Oxide
      • No benefit
      • Beta agonists:
      • The beta agonist lung injury trial (BALTI) has shown that treatment with
      • intravenous albutamol (15ug / kg / hr) reduces extravascular lung water (EVLW)
      • in patients with ALI / ARDS with a reduction in plateau pressures at Day 7.
      • The effect on EVLW started at 48 hours. Patients receiving intravenous
      • salbutamol had a higher incidence ofsupraventricular arrhythmias these were not
      • sustained as the dose of salbutamol was modified in these patients. There was
      • no improvement in mortality with the use of salbutamol – however the study was
      • not Powered to detect a difference in mortality.
    • “ Imitators”
      • Acute Interstitial Pneumonia (AIP)
      • Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia
      • Acute BOOP
      • DAH
      • Acute HP
    • Suspecting “ Imitators”
      • Common features: fever, cough, myalgia, raised WBC, CRP, LDH
      • Distinguishing features: BAL, Lung Biopsy, Response to steroids and prognosis (in some)
    • Possible Approach
      • Early BAL – infectious agents, differential WBC count
      • Serological tests for autoimmune disease, CK (polymyositis)
      • Haematocrit – serial
      • Ferritin (increased in adult Still’s)
      • Renal function
      • Urine microscopy
      • Lung biopsy – if BAL is inconclusive, after considering risk vs. benefit. Specially important in DAH (vasculitis induced) ; necessary for immunofluorecent staing for ABMA.
      •   The suggestion to start all these patients initially on steroids for 3 days till the BAL results / other tests are available is controversial and needs to be evaluated in a RCT.
    • References - 1
      • Bernard GR et al. The American European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 149: 818 – 824
      • Meduri et al. Corticosteroid rescue treatment of progressive fibroproliferation in late ARDS. Patterns of response and predictors of outcome. Chest 1994; 105: 1516 – 1527
      • Meduri GU et al. Effect of prolonged methylprednisoloine therapy in unresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998; 280: 159 – 165
      • Brun-Buisson C and Brochard L. Corticosteroid therapy in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Better late than never? JAMA 1998; 280: 182 – 183
      • Cook D et al. A comparison of Sucralfate and Ranitidine for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 791 - 79
      • Amato MBP et al. Effect of protective ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 347 - 354
      • Stewart TE et al. Evaluation of a ventilation strategy to prevent barotrauma in patients at high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1998: 338: 355 – 361
      • Richecoeur J et al. Respiratory washout versus optimisation of mechanical ventilation during permissive hypercapnoea in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999; 160: 77 - 85
      • The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1301 – 1308
      • Gattinoni L et al. Effect of prone positioning on the survival of patients with acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 568 – 573
      • Nuckton T et al. Pulmonary dead space fraction as a risk factor for death in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1281 – 1286
      • New Management strategies in ARDS. Editor Levy MM. Critical Care Clinics, January 2002  
      • Jindal SK et al. Adult respiratory distress syndrome in the tropics. Clin Chest Med 2002; 23: 445 – 455
    • References - 2
      • Kopp R et al. Evidence based medicine in the therapy of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Medicine 2002; 28: 244 – 245
      • The ARDS Clinical Trials Network. Effects of recruitment manoeuvers in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated with high positive end expiratory pressure. Crit. Care Med. 2003; 31: 2592 – 2597
      • Marini JJ. Are recruiting maneuvers needed when ventilating acute respiratory distress syndrome? Crit. Care Med. 2003; 31: 2701 – 2702
      • Barbas CSV. Lung recruitment menoeuvers in acute respiratory distress syndrome and facilitating resolution. Crit. Care Med. 2003; 31 (Suppl): S265 – S271
      • Marini J & Gattinoni L. Ventilatory management of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a consensus of two Crit. Care Med 2004; 32: 250 – 255
      • The Margaux IV Conference on Critical Illness: Acute Lung Injury – Understanding the mechanisms of injury and repair. Crit. Care Med. 2003; 31 (Suppl): S183 – S342
      • Schwarz MI et al. “Imitators” of the ARDS. Implications for diagnosis and treatment. Chest 2004; 125: 1530- 1535
      • Mancebo J et al. A multicenter trial of prolonged prone ventilation in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006; 173: 1233 – 1239
      • Barrett NA & Kam PCA. Transfusion-related lung injury: a literature review. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 777 – 785
      • ARDS Clinical Trials Network. Pulmonary Artery versus Central Venous Catheter to guide treatment of Acute Lung Injury. The New Engl. J Med. 2006; 354: 2213 - 2224
      • ARDS CLINICAL Trials Network. Comparison of two fluid management strategies in Acute Lung Injury. The New Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 2564 – 2575
      • Rivers EP. Fluid Management Strategies in Acute Lung Injury – Liberal or Conservative or both? The New Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 2598 – 2600