Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
When?
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

When?

6,256

Published on

Published in: Technology, Education
0 Comments
4 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
6,256
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
38
Comments
0
Likes
4
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. When?
  • 2. ‘When...?’ Semantic Web technologies: where next... Dan Brickley <http://danbri.org/>
  • 3. Basket Cases • Lessons (things that happened already) Lesson Trend • Trends (things happening anyway) • Requests (things to make the future sooner) Request
  • 4. Overview • the Semantic Web project: history, hypertext & RDF • Two ‘claims & hypertext’ scenarios • Awkward Bit: learning our lessons • play to our strengths: aggregation • Trends in UI, search and services • Big picture: Web as the new public record Lesson Trend Request
  • 5. 1. HISTORY HYPERTEXT & RDF
  • 6. Geoffrey Sneddon, Tim Berners-Lee, William ‘When?’ Loughborough. W3C Technical Plenary meeting, 2008, Cannes, France.
  • 7. 1968 Douglas Engelbart’s 1968 Demo
  • 8. 1989
  • 9. 1994 “To a computer, the Web is a flat, boring world, devoid of meaning. This is a pity, as in fact documents on the Web describe real objects and imaginary concepts, and give particular relationships between them.” “For example, a document might describe a person. The title document to a house describes a house and also the ownership relation with a person.” Tim Berners-Lee quot;W3 future directionsquot; keynote 1st World Wide Web Conference Geneva, May 1994 “Adding semantics to the Web involves two things: allowing documents which have information in machine-readable forms, and allowing links to be created with relationship values. [this will] help us exploit the information to a greater extent than our own reading.”
  • 10. 2008 The World: ! The Web: !
  • 11. Pages make claims ongoing.org: this is the OpenID for Tim. Tim knows Henry. ongoing.org: Tim’s workplaceHomepage is http://sun.com/ Trend bblfish.net: Henry workplaceHomepage is http://sun.com/ bblfish.net: Henry knows Tim. Henry’s phone number is, [...]
  • 12. Strengths & Weaknesses • Rich mixing, within and between documents • any RDF data can use any RDF/OWL vocab • can mention and describe anything related • can omit information without breaking • Things can be identified in multiple ways
  • 13. A lot to be proud of... • world-class, Web-scale data mixing environment • current best bet for treating the Web as data • optimised for massive decentralization • somewhat chaotic, semi-structured, scruffy • but grounded in formality and simplicity
  • 14. 2. CLAIMS & HYPERTEXT
  • 15. “Does the Web know what you’ve been doing?” http://www.w3.org/People/Alumni 1. Express the basic claim in RDFa. 2. Hyperlinking for discovery from W3C homepage. eg: <a href=”/People/Alumni” Request rel=”xyz:alumniPage”>alumni</a> Trust comes from linked information: claims in context.
  • 16. Problem partition • what is W3C’s homepage? • we can check with Wikipedia/DBpedia • what data/documents do they provide? • via RDFa, RDF/XML, GRDDL, SPARQL • what do they tell us? /People/Alumni etc. • are they up to date? reliable? risky? wikis? • a case-by-case decision
  • 17. foaf:tipjar Revisiting the “oh yeah?” problem with OpenID authentication.
  • 18. Trend Trend
  • 19. BBC Music: view source Q: if we know their homepage and myspace page... ...how does that change what you’ll entrust to Request these OpenIDs if they log into your site?
  • 20. Problem partition • what is the Rumblestrips homepage? • what is their myspace page? • is the OpenID I’ve just seen, one of theirs? • so that tipjar page linked from their FOAF, I can trust it? • ‘dunno mate’. Request
  • 21. 3. THE AWKWARD BIT Lesson Things that might’ve worked out better.
  • 22. The art of compromise... RDF: data spork?
  • 23. Why would Mozilla walk away? Lesson Lesson Lesson
  • 24. Redland+SQLLite+Mozilla = ? Lesson Lesson Lesso
  • 25. Lesson Why would a startup with an RDF- guru CTO not do RDF import? (clue: wanted - stable, packaged pure-Ruby RDF toolkit)
  • 26. Learning Lessons Lesson Read/write is harder than read-only aggregation. Request Tools. Packaging. Testing. QA. Documentation. Request Redland (RDF in C) is important. Lesson So are the scripting languages. All of them. Request
  • 27. Next time around... • Drupal 7 • OpenOffice.org • KDE Request • XMP • Yahoo! SearchMonkey, Google SGAPI, .... • (not to mention widgets, oauth etc.)
  • 28. Playing to our strengths? Primarily, I think this means aggregation not management of data. This follows from the necessarily patchwork, open-world nature of our data model. And of the Web. RDF is beautiful for aggregation; challenging for data management. GRDDL, SQL-to-SPARQL, RDFa, ... discuss... Request
  • 29. Strengths as weaknesses • Rich mixing, within and between documents • any RDF data can use any RDF/OWL vocab • can mention and describe anything related • can omit information without breaking • Things can be identified in multiple ways
  • 30. The strange appeal of the Semantic Web... ...being greater than the sum of your parts?
  • 31. 4. TRENDS IN UI, SEARCH & SERVICES Trend
  • 32. What will ‘it’ be like?
  • 33. An invisible Semantic Web... Somewhat better search results. Slightly smarter spam filters. A calendar full of useful information. Long-term archival tools. Auto-maintained cross-references. Relevant people grouped in addressbook. Trend A quiet revolution?
  • 34. What, no 3D flythrough?
  • 35. Freebase Parallax (from David Huynh, ex-SIMILE) • From the skyscrapers in Hong Kong • find the architects • take the other buildings they made • plot those on a map Trend <http://code.google.com/p/freebase-parallax/>
  • 36. • or take US presidents • the ones who are republican • their sons and daughters • the schools they went to • the inevitable map... • or timeline, spreadsheet, blog post... Trend
  • 37. Sets and links • The projects you work on • The people who work on them too • their latest public bookmarks Trend
  • 38. Two flavours • skeptical: caring who claimed what Request • trusting: navigating flattened information Trend • dataset selection & the “Oh yeah?” button Request Related UI we’re more familiar with: Google earth layers, overlaying calendars, Photoshop layers...
  • 39. More set-based navigation: gfacet “which cities are the bands that wrote this music from?” Trend
  • 40. Data :) Trend
  • 41. LOD! <http://linkeddata.org/> for details... Trend
  • 42. Search & Services Yandex.ru, Aug 15th 2008: “The FOAF (friend of a friend) standard makes blog search or social network search deeper and more accurate, in particular, it allows searching friend feeds and user profiles” “the largest blog services in the Russian internet including Livejournal.com, Liveinternet.ru and Blogs.Mail.ru, represent user profiles in FOAF.” Trend & Sindice, Garlik Qdos, Falcons, ...
  • 43. Is Google the next Google? “The Social Graph API makes information about the public connections between people on the web more easily available.” “...indexes the public Web for XHTML Friends Network (XFN), Friend of a Friend (FOAF) markup and other publicly declared connections. By supporting open Web standards for describing connections between people, web sites can add to the social infrastructure of the web.” Trend
  • 44. SGAPI: Microformats & FOAF/RDF Claim graph analytics: epeus.blogspot.com: “kevinmarks.com is me!” Request kevinmarks.com: “epeus.blogspot.com is me!” danbri.org: Kevin Marks’ site is http://kevinmarks.com/ danbri.org: his foaf:workplaceHomepage is http://google.com/
  • 45. 5. THE NEW PUBLIC RECORD
  • 46. Who, what, where and when, in... • Government • Healthcare • Journalism • Libraries • Science • Arts • Law • History • Trade • Museums • Research • Education • Agriculture • Archives... an endless list, infinitely interconnected...
  • 47. Already happening • The Web is becoming our common public record • the Semantic Web’s mission is to defragment it Aside: privacy by obscurity is going away fast. Facebook & ‘social graph’ tools are educating a generation about “public”...
  • 48. Libraries revisited: FRBR Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Trend Request
  • 49. FRBR: Trend Credit: William Denton <://www.miskatonic.org/library/2008ola/> Request
  • 50. Libraries revisited, ... ☑Catalogues. ☑Name authority files. ☑Thesauri. ☐ Classification schemes. Trend Keep an eye on: http://openlibrary.org/ Request
  • 51. Douglas Engelbart’s 1968 Demo
  • 52. Trend
  • 53. Re-use Re-cycle Reclaim Repair Anything but seamless.
  • 54. Recap
  • 55. When you’re a data mixing system, be a data mixing system. Lesson There is plenty more code to write, test and document. Lesson Learning from non-‘true believer’ users will speed up adoption. Lesson Stating the obvious?
  • 56. Trend Web increasingly machine-readable - XML, JSON, MFs, SQL, & -yes- RDF/OWL. µf Pages make claims. RDF UI ideas are maturing. Massive datasets are being linked. Integration here plays to our strengths...
  • 57. Request 1. Get the missing code written. Tested. Packaged. Please! 2. Think about the Web as a linked information system. 3. ...and the Semantic Web as a project not a thing.
  • 58. Questions?

×