Wikis at work
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Wikis at work

on

  • 952 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
952
Views on SlideShare
951
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

http://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-ShareAlike License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Wikis at work Wikis at work Presentation Transcript

  • Wikis at work A short introduction to 'wikis' and wikis for biology Dan Bolser and Paolo Romano URL for slides: http://
  • Overview of today's course
    • Session 1 (35 min) :
      • What is a wiki? – A gentle introduction to the wiki concept, and a look at Wikipedia.
    • Session 2 (35 min)‏
      • Biological wikis! – A review of some of the most important wikis for biology (BioWikis).
    • BREAK (15 min)‏
  • Overview of today's course
    • Session 3 (35 min)‏
      • Semantic MediaWiki – Software for 'data wikis'.
      • Cell Lines Wiki – A pilot scientific wiki.
    • Practical session (60 min)‏
      • Editing Wikipedia (for the first time?)‏
      • Working with Cell lines Wiki – A gentle introduction to some of the key features.
  •  
  • Session 1
  • What is a wiki?
  • Wiki means QUICK!
  • Wiki is a quicker way to let people put content on the web Old way:
  • Wiki is a quicker way to let people put content on the web Old way:
  • Wiki is a quicker way to let people put content on the web Old way:
  • Wiki is a quicker way to let people put content on the web Old way:
    • Host
    • HTML editor
    • FTP software
    • Domain name
  • Wiki is a quicker way to let people put content on the web Old way:
  • Wiki is a quicker way to let people put content on the web Old way: Wiki way:
  • Wiki means QUICK!
    • There is no longer one single 'point of control' for managing web content.
    • Content is managed by a decentralized community of participating users.
    Wiki is radically different!
  • Is this good or bad?
  • Other advantages of wiki
    • There are many other advantages over 'traditional' web publishing...
      • Notification of changes
      • History of changes
      • Discussion of changes
  • The rise of the wiki
  • Condensed history
    • 1994: Cunningham coined the term 'wiki'.
      • A site (for software developers) with pages that can be edited via the browser, each with a page history.
    • Over the next five years it spawned alternative wiki applications and websites (wiki culture).
      • By 2000, it had developed lots of of spin-off content, most notably MeatballWiki (for general discussion).
    • 2001, Wikipedia launched.
    • 2007, Wikipedia in the worlds top 10 web sites.
  •  
  • Wikipedia
    • Size
      • Stats.
    • Growth‏
      • Research.
    • Rules
      • e.g. Deleting content.
    • Culture
      • e.g. Anatomy of a talk page.
    Almost all of its articles can be edited by anyone with access to the site, and it has about 90,000 regularly active contributors.
  • Wikipedia
    • Size
      • 19.7 million articles
        • 3.7 million in English
        • 847,069 in Italian (4 th out of 282)‏
      • 2.7 billion monthly hits from the US alone.
      • 7 th most popular site in the world.
      • The largest and most popular general reference work.
  • Wikipedia
    • Growth (Kittur)‏
      • Wikipedia has been growing exponentially since 2002 (Voss)‏
      • “ wisdom of crowds” or “elite users”
        • a large number of people with a small number of edits, or
        • a core group who do most of the work?
  • Wikipedia
    • Rules
      • Their are no rules!
      • The 'five pillars' of Wikipedia'
      • Standard deletion procedure...
  • Wikipedia
    • Culture
      • Their are no rules!
      • The 'five pillars' of Wikipedia'
      • Discussion!
        • (Not bureaucracy)‏
  • Moving on...
    • Is WP, or something like it, the future for science?
    • Lets find out in Session 2!
  • Session 1, References
    • http://wikipedia.org/wiki/ History_of_wikis
    • http://wikipedia.org/wiki/ Wikipedia
    • Voss, J. Measuring Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the ISSI 2005 (Stockholm, Sweden, July 24-28, 2005).
    • Kittur A, Chi EH, Pendleton BA, Suh B, Mytkowicz T. Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. CHI 2007.
    • http://wikipedia.org/wiki/ Wikipedia:Five_pillars
    • http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/ Research: Newsletter/2011-07-25
  •  
  • Session 2
  • Scientific wikis
  • Community annotation
  • Annotation
  • Annotation
  • Community annotation
    • Driven by two key factors:
    • The vast increase in biological data
    • The clear success of Wikipedia
  • BioMoore's Law
    • Over time:
      • Cost per unit of information can be decreased by orders of magnitude.
      • Throughput is increased by orders of magnitude.
        • Fan et al. 2006 . Nat Rev Genet .
    • Comprehensive disease studies that might require ~1bn genotypes would now cost only a few million dollars.
      • Revolution in human genetics.
  • BioMoore's Law
    • Over time:
      • Cost per unit of information can be decreased by orders of magnitude.
      • Throughput is increased by orders of magnitude.
        • Fan et al. 2006 . Nat Rev Genet .
    • Comprehensive disease studies that might require ~1bn genotypes would now cost only a few million dollars.
      • Revolution in human genetics.
  • Community annotation is essential
    • Centralised databases can't cope with annotating the influx of data.
    • Less investment in more specialised data.
      • Fewer people with a stake.
      • Specialists more disparate.
        • Communities are smaller and more focused.
    • Do wikis hold the answer?
      • Wikipedia as a model…
  • But Wikipedia isn’t always the answer ...
    • Wikipedia is an educational resource.
      • All articles are encyclopaedic in style.
      • Explicitly forbids data from ‘original research’:
        • http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research
          • “ Wikipedia does not publish original research” .
      • No tools for the specific analysis, presentation, or collection of ‘biological’ data.
    • BioWikis!
  • BioWikis
    • Wikis with a biological subject matter, customized for analysis, presentation and collection of specific biological data and biological data types:
  • Wikis for biology
  • Proteopedia
    • http://proteopedia.org/
    • Aim – To make knowledge about proteins accessible.
    • Features:
      • Interactive 3D viz.
      • Contributions linked to publications.
    • Problems
      • Doesn't work on all browsers.
      • Can be slow.
    • Reference
      • Hodis, E. et al., 2008. Proteopedia - a scientific “wiki” bridging the rift between three-dimensional structure and function of biomacromolecules. Genome biology, 9(8), p.R121.
  • WikiPathways
    • http://wikipathways.org
    • Aim – The curation of biological pathways.
    • Features:
      • Interactive pathway editing.
      • Integrated to many biological databases.
    • Problems
      • Doesn't work on all browsers.
      • Can be slow.
    • Reference
      • Pico, A.R. et al., 2008. WikiPathways: pathway editing for the people. PLoS biology, 6(7), p.e184.
  • EcoliWiki
    • http://ecoliwiki.net/
    • Aim – Share info related to non-pathogenic E. coli.
    • Features:
      • Very extensive and well structured domain information.
      • Referencing is good.
    • Problems
      • Big resource
      • Specific focus, could it be applied to others?
    • Reference
      • EcoliWiki, 2007. EcoliHub’s subsystem for community annotation. http://ecoliwiki.net.
  • CHDWiki
    • http://goo.gl/info/Zxg8H
    • Aim(?) – Geneticists, clinicians, and mol. biologists working on Congenital Heart Defects.
    • Features:
      • Curated gene lists.
      • PPI browser.
    • Problems
      • Very old MediaWiki fork
      • Used?
    • Reference
      • Barriot, R. et al., 2010. Collaboratively charting the gene-to-phenotype network of human congenital heart defects. Genome medicine, 2(3), p.16.
  • SEQwiki
    • http://seqwiki.org
    • Aim – a catalogue of analysis tools and, technologies for NGS.
    • Features
      • Structured data.
      • Linked to an established forum.
    • Problems
      • Data can become error prone.
      • Data is difficult to centrally manage.
    • Reference
      • Li J.W., et. al. 2012. The SEQanswers wiki: A wiki database of tools for high throughput sequencing analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 2012 Database special issue.
  • Listing of biowikis...
    • http://bioinformatics.org/wiki/BioWiki
  • BioWikis
    • There is a variety of different systems.
    • All seek to 'recognize' contributors (biologists) in a way more familiar to scientists than Wikipedia.
    • Most have features not found in Wikipedia.
      • Some projects use the base of Wikipedia to successfully build integrated 'sub-projects'...
  • The MCB Portal in Wikipedia
    • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Wikipedia:MCB
    • Aim – Better organize information related to molecular and cell biology on Wikipedia.
    • Features
      • Integrated with WP
    • Problems
      • The project can be confusing to those unfamiliar with Wikipedia.
    • Reference
      • ...
  • Gene Wiki
    • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Portal:Gene_Wiki
    • Aim – applying community intelligence to gene annotation.
    • Special features:
      • Semi-automatic gene curation system.
    • Problems
      • The project can be confusing to those unfamiliar with Wikipedia.
    • Reference
      • Huss, J.W. et al., 2008. A gene wiki for community annotation of gene function. PLoS biology, 6(7), p.e175.
  • Wikis for Cancer?
  • Some aditional references
    • Fan JB, Chee MS, Gunderson KL. Highly parallel genomic assays. Nature reviews. Genetics 7, 632-44 (2006).
    • The Molecular modelling blog post http://rosettadesigngroup.com/blog/373/scientific-wikis-part-i/
    • http://bifx.org/wiki/BioWiki
    • Daub, J. et al., 2008. The RNA WikiProject: community annotation of RNA families. RNA (New York, N.Y.), 14(12), pp.2462-4.
    • Stehr, H. et al., 2010. PDBWiki: added value through community annotation of the Protein Data Bank. Database, p.baq009-baq009.
    • Flórez, L.A. et al., 2009. A community-curated consensual annotation that is continuously updated: the Bacillus subtilis centred wiki SubtiWiki. Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, p.bap012
  •  
  • Session 3
  • Semantic MediaWiki
  • Semantic MediaWiki (a data wiki engine)‏
    • What is SMW?
    • Motivation
    • Frontend
      • What you see as a user of SMW.
    • Backend
      • What you do as a SMW site developer...
    • Data
    • Properties and types
    • Classes
    • Templates
    • Forms
    • Queries
  • References
    • SMW Homepage: http://semantic-mediawiki.org
    • MW Templates: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Templates
    • SF Homepage: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/ Extension:Semantic_Forms
    • SMW #ask: http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/ Help:Inline_queries
    • SMW demo sites:
      • http://pgscdemo.referata.com
      • http://discoursedb.org
      • http://sandbox.referata.com
  • Cell Lines Wiki