Your SlideShare is downloading.
×

×
# Introducing the official SlideShare app

### Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

#### Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Like this presentation? Why not share!

- Fooled by best practice by Dana Chisnell 403 views
- IACREOT - Plain language for voters... by Dana Chisnell 1412 views
- Chisnell Pew Ballot Testing 120908.Key by Dana Chisnell 1166 views
- What To Do When: Informing design a... by Dana Chisnell 1056 views
- Why keep it to yourself? Teaching e... by Dana Chisnell 4039 views
- Super powers that could change the ... by Dana Chisnell 1328 views
- 102609 Gov Primaries 50m by Monta Vista High ... 156 views
- Understanding the polling process by SSMC 468 views
- Iterations paper prototype by Dana Chisnell 567 views
- Sterile Power Point Training Presen... by KDuffMcCall 568 views
- Counter to intent: Voters' mental m... by Dana Chisnell 2007 views
- 102209 Gov Primaries 50m by Monta Vista High ... 201 views

Like this? Share it with your network
Share

759

views

views

Published on

For a talk I gave with Whitney Quesenbery at EVN 2013 in Atlanta, GA.

For a talk I gave with Whitney Quesenbery at EVN 2013 in Atlanta, GA.

Published in:
Design

No Downloads

Total Views

759

On Slideshare

0

From Embeds

0

Number of Embeds

2

Shares

0

Downloads

1

Comments

0

Likes

1

No embeds

No notes for slide

- 1. Usability testingAnywhere Ballot:before & afterUniversity of BaltimoreDrew DaviesDana ChisnellKathryn SummersMegan McKeever
- 2. PremiseEveryone should vote on the same ballot
- 3. BackgroundAVTI workshops in 2012
- 4. How might we design anaccessible electionexperience for everyone?Open IDEOAVTI workshops in 2012
- 5. What if you could voteanywhere, any time, onany device?
- 6. Effective Designs forthe Administration ofElections, 2007Design forDemocracy
- 7. NIST IR 7556Report: Language ofInstructions onBallots, 2008Redish, Chisnell,Newby,Laskowski, &Lowry
- 8. NIST mediumcomplexity ballotmodiﬁed, slightly18 pages
- 9. Paper prototype18 participants4 days16 versions
- 10. Digital prototype15 participants3 days3-4 versions
- 11. Iteration 1
- 12. Iteration 3
- 13. Instructions to voters
- 14. Iteration 1
- 15. Help version,paper ﬁnal
- 16. How to vote,ﬁnal digital
- 17. Straight party voting
- 18. Iteration 1
- 19. Iteration 5
- 20. Final digital
- 21. Vote for 1
- 22. Iteration 1, selected state
- 23. Iteration 4
- 24. Final digital
- 25. Supplemental content, iteration 1
- 26. Supplemental content, iteration 1
- 27. Supplemental content, iteration 1
- 28. Supplementalcontent,iteration 2
- 29. Supplementalcontent,iteration 2
- 30. Supplementalcontent,digital ﬁnal
- 31. Multi-candidatecontests
- 32. Iteration 1
- 33. Iteration 1, selected state
- 34. Iteration 4
- 35. Iteration 4,scrolled
- 36. Digital ﬁnal
- 37. Judge retentioncontests
- 38. Iteration 1
- 39. Iteration 3
- 40. Digital ﬁnal
- 41. Referenda
- 42. Iteration 1
- 43. Iteration 4
- 44. Digital ﬁnal
- 45. Ballot measures
- 46. Iteration 1
- 47. Iteration 4
- 48. Digital ﬁnal
- 49. Write-ins
- 50. Iteration 1
- 51. Iteration 1
- 52. Iteration 2
- 53. Iteration 2
- 54. Supplementalcontent,iteration 1
- 55. Digital ﬁnal
- 56. Reviewing votes
- 57. Iteration 1
- 58. Iteration 1, scrolled down (page 2)
- 59. Iteration 1, scrolled down (page 3)
- 60. Iteration 1, scrolled to the end
- 61. Iteration 4,scrolled down(page 2)
- 62. Iteration 4,scrolled down(page 3)
- 63. Supplementalcontent,iteration 1
- 64. Digital ﬁnal
- 65. Digital ﬁnal
- 66. Digital ﬁnal
- 67. Changing a vote
- 68. Iteration 1
- 69. Iteration 2
- 70. Iteration 3
- 71. Iteration 4
- 72. Changingvotes,digital iteration1
- 73. Changingvotes,digital iteration2
- 74. Changingvotes,digital ﬁnal
- 75. Casting the vote
- 76. Iteration 1
- 77. Iteration 2
- 78. Digital ﬁnal
- 79. Iteration 1
- 80. Iteration 2
- 81. Digital ﬁnal
- 82. 2 prototypes33 participants7 days20+ versions
- 83. Responsivegood for devicesgood for UOCAVAgood for accessibility standards
- 84. Prevents user errorserror managementtyped write-inhelps voters see impact of straight-party voting
- 85. Focuses on ballotmarkingconnect to any EMSoutput in an appropriate format
- 86. Can run on COTSdevicesmore accessible (own pointer, ownscreen reader)software independent
- 87. Not “voting over theInternet”assume appropriate election systemcan produce printed ballot to castlogic is local (no trips to the server)
- 88. Anywhere ballotdesigned to be responsive to different formatsworks on any deviceaccessible for voters with disabilities
- 89. How can it be part of asecure, veriﬁableelection system? Who will it help? How will it help them? What voter need does it meet?

Be the first to comment