### SlideShare for iOS

by Linkedin Corporation

FREE - On the App Store

For a talk I gave with Whitney Quesenbery at EVN 2013 in Atlanta, GA.

For a talk I gave with Whitney Quesenbery at EVN 2013 in Atlanta, GA.

- Total Views
- 1,080
- Views on SlideShare
- 1,065
- Embed Views

- Likes
- 1
- Downloads
- 0
- Comments
- 0

https://twitter.com | 15 |

Uploaded via SlideShare as Microsoft PowerPoint

© All Rights Reserved

- 1. Usability testingAnywhere Ballot:before & afterUniversity of BaltimoreDrew DaviesDana ChisnellKathryn SummersMegan McKeever
- 2. PremiseEveryone should vote on the same ballot
- 3. BackgroundAVTI workshops in 2012
- 4. How might we design anaccessible electionexperience for everyone?Open IDEOAVTI workshops in 2012
- 5. What if you could voteanywhere, any time, onany device?
- 6. Effective Designs forthe Administration ofElections, 2007Design forDemocracy
- 7. NIST IR 7556Report: Language ofInstructions onBallots, 2008Redish, Chisnell,Newby,Laskowski, &Lowry
- 8. NIST mediumcomplexity ballotmodiﬁed, slightly18 pages
- 9. Paper prototype18 participants4 days16 versions
- 10. Digital prototype15 participants3 days3-4 versions
- 11. Iteration 1
- 12. Iteration 3
- 13. Instructions to voters
- 14. Iteration 1
- 15. Help version,paper ﬁnal
- 16. How to vote,ﬁnal digital
- 17. Straight party voting
- 18. Iteration 1
- 19. Iteration 5
- 20. Final digital
- 21. Vote for 1
- 22. Iteration 1, selected state
- 23. Iteration 4
- 24. Final digital
- 25. Supplemental content, iteration 1
- 26. Supplemental content, iteration 1
- 27. Supplemental content, iteration 1
- 28. Supplementalcontent,iteration 2
- 29. Supplementalcontent,iteration 2
- 30. Supplementalcontent,digital ﬁnal
- 31. Multi-candidatecontests
- 32. Iteration 1
- 33. Iteration 1, selected state
- 34. Iteration 4
- 35. Iteration 4,scrolled
- 36. Digital ﬁnal
- 37. Judge retentioncontests
- 38. Iteration 1
- 39. Iteration 3
- 40. Digital ﬁnal
- 41. Referenda
- 42. Iteration 1
- 43. Iteration 4
- 44. Digital ﬁnal
- 45. Ballot measures
- 46. Iteration 1
- 47. Iteration 4
- 48. Digital ﬁnal
- 49. Write-ins
- 50. Iteration 1
- 51. Iteration 1
- 52. Iteration 2
- 53. Iteration 2
- 54. Supplementalcontent,iteration 1
- 55. Digital ﬁnal
- 56. Reviewing votes
- 57. Iteration 1
- 58. Iteration 1, scrolled down (page 2)
- 59. Iteration 1, scrolled down (page 3)
- 60. Iteration 1, scrolled to the end
- 61. Iteration 4,scrolled down(page 2)
- 62. Iteration 4,scrolled down(page 3)
- 63. Supplementalcontent,iteration 1
- 64. Digital ﬁnal
- 65. Digital ﬁnal
- 66. Digital ﬁnal
- 67. Changing a vote
- 68. Iteration 1
- 69. Iteration 2
- 70. Iteration 3
- 71. Iteration 4
- 72. Changingvotes,digital iteration1
- 73. Changingvotes,digital iteration2
- 74. Changingvotes,digital ﬁnal
- 75. Casting the vote
- 76. Iteration 1
- 77. Iteration 2
- 78. Digital ﬁnal
- 79. Iteration 1
- 80. Iteration 2
- 81. Digital ﬁnal
- 82. 2 prototypes33 participants7 days20+ versions
- 83. Responsivegood for devicesgood for UOCAVAgood for accessibility standards
- 84. Prevents user errorserror managementtyped write-inhelps voters see impact of straight-party voting
- 85. Focuses on ballotmarkingconnect to any EMSoutput in an appropriate format
- 86. Can run on COTSdevicesmore accessible (own pointer, ownscreen reader)software independent
- 87. Not “voting over theInternet”assume appropriate election systemcan produce printed ballot to castlogic is local (no trips to the server)
- 88. Anywhere ballotdesigned to be responsive to different formatsworks on any deviceaccessible for voters with disabilities
- 89. How can it be part of asecure, veriﬁableelection system? Who will it help? How will it help them? What voter need does it meet?

Full NameComment goes here.Whitney Quesenbery, Civic design | UX Research | Storytelling | Accessibility at WQusability & Center for Civic Design 1 year ago