Anywhere Ballot iterations

  • 738 views
Uploaded on

For a talk I gave with Whitney Quesenbery at EVN 2013 in Atlanta, GA.

For a talk I gave with Whitney Quesenbery at EVN 2013 in Atlanta, GA.

More in: Design
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
738
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
1

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Usability testingAnywhere Ballot:before & afterUniversity of BaltimoreDrew DaviesDana ChisnellKathryn SummersMegan McKeever
  • 2. PremiseEveryone should vote on the same ballot
  • 3. BackgroundAVTI workshops in 2012
  • 4. How might we design anaccessible electionexperience for everyone?Open IDEOAVTI workshops in 2012
  • 5. What if you could voteanywhere, any time, onany device?
  • 6. Effective Designs forthe Administration ofElections, 2007Design forDemocracy
  • 7. NIST IR 7556Report: Language ofInstructions onBallots, 2008Redish, Chisnell,Newby,Laskowski, &Lowry
  • 8. NIST mediumcomplexity ballotmodified, slightly18 pages
  • 9. Paper prototype18 participants4 days16 versions
  • 10. Digital prototype15 participants3 days3-4 versions
  • 11. Iteration 1
  • 12. Iteration 3
  • 13. Instructions to voters
  • 14. Iteration 1
  • 15. Help version,paper final
  • 16. How to vote,final digital
  • 17. Straight party voting
  • 18. Iteration 1
  • 19. Iteration 5
  • 20. Final digital
  • 21. Vote for 1
  • 22. Iteration 1, selected state
  • 23. Iteration 4
  • 24. Final digital
  • 25. Supplemental content, iteration 1
  • 26. Supplemental content, iteration 1
  • 27. Supplemental content, iteration 1
  • 28. Supplementalcontent,iteration 2
  • 29. Supplementalcontent,iteration 2
  • 30. Supplementalcontent,digital final
  • 31. Multi-candidatecontests
  • 32. Iteration 1
  • 33. Iteration 1, selected state
  • 34. Iteration 4
  • 35. Iteration 4,scrolled
  • 36. Digital final
  • 37. Judge retentioncontests
  • 38. Iteration 1
  • 39. Iteration 3
  • 40. Digital final
  • 41. Referenda
  • 42. Iteration 1
  • 43. Iteration 4
  • 44. Digital final
  • 45. Ballot measures
  • 46. Iteration 1
  • 47. Iteration 4
  • 48. Digital final
  • 49. Write-ins
  • 50. Iteration 1
  • 51. Iteration 1
  • 52. Iteration 2
  • 53. Iteration 2
  • 54. Supplementalcontent,iteration 1
  • 55. Digital final
  • 56. Reviewing votes
  • 57. Iteration 1
  • 58. Iteration 1, scrolled down (page 2)
  • 59. Iteration 1, scrolled down (page 3)
  • 60. Iteration 1, scrolled to the end
  • 61. Iteration 4,scrolled down(page 2)
  • 62. Iteration 4,scrolled down(page 3)
  • 63. Supplementalcontent,iteration 1
  • 64. Digital final
  • 65. Digital final
  • 66. Digital final
  • 67. Changing a vote
  • 68. Iteration 1
  • 69. Iteration 2
  • 70. Iteration 3
  • 71. Iteration 4
  • 72. Changingvotes,digital iteration1
  • 73. Changingvotes,digital iteration2
  • 74. Changingvotes,digital final
  • 75. Casting the vote
  • 76. Iteration 1
  • 77. Iteration 2
  • 78. Digital final
  • 79. Iteration 1
  • 80. Iteration 2
  • 81. Digital final
  • 82. 2 prototypes33 participants7 days20+ versions
  • 83. Responsivegood for devicesgood for UOCAVAgood for accessibility standards
  • 84. Prevents user errorserror managementtyped write-inhelps voters see impact of straight-party voting
  • 85. Focuses on ballotmarkingconnect to any EMSoutput in an appropriate format
  • 86. Can run on COTSdevicesmore accessible (own pointer, ownscreen reader)software independent
  • 87. Not “voting over theInternet”assume appropriate election systemcan produce printed ballot to castlogic is local (no trips to the server)
  • 88. Anywhere ballotdesigned to be responsive to different formatsworks on any deviceaccessible for voters with disabilities
  • 89. How can it be part of asecure, verifiableelection system? Who will it help? How will it help them? What voter need does it meet?