Evaluating the Quality and Performance of Automatic Atom Mapping Algorithms
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Evaluating the Quality and Performance of Automatic Atom Mapping Algorithms

on

  • 359 views

Presented in the Open Notebook Science/Open Chemistry/Electronic Lab Notebook symposium. 20th August 2012, Philadelphia ACS

Presented in the Open Notebook Science/Open Chemistry/Electronic Lab Notebook symposium. 20th August 2012, Philadelphia ACS

Statistics

Views

Total Views
359
Views on SlideShare
359
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Evaluating the Quality and Performance of Automatic Atom Mapping Algorithms Evaluating the Quality and Performance of Automatic Atom Mapping Algorithms Presentation Transcript

  • Evaluating the Quality andPerformance of Automatic Atom Mapping Algorithms Daniel Lowe and Roger Sayle NextMove Software Cambridge, UK ACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • What is Atom-Mapping? Mapping algorithmACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Why Perform Atom-Mapping?• Assigning roles to reagents• Normalization of reactions for registration ACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Why Perform Atom-Mapping?• More precise database searches – Solvents/catalysts can be distinguished from reactants – Allows the relationship between the reactant atoms and product atoms to be made explicit ACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Example• I want to find reactions converting an alkene to a cyclopropane so I search for C=C>>C1CC1 ACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Why Perform Atom-Mapping?• Identifying suspect reactions: ACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Qualities to look for in an atom mapping algorithm• Chemically plausible atom mappings• Ability to distinguish genuine reactants from solvents/catalysts• Support for unbalanced reactions – Side product not specified – Reactant stoichiometry > 1• Fast run-time ACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Algorithms Evaluated Vendor:Program Version ChemAxon:Marvin 5.10.1 GGA:Indigo 1.1 InfoChem:ICMAP 5.10PerkinElmer:ChemDraw Ultra 12.0 ACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Methodology Test set Reactions Pharmaceutical ELN subset 18,244 ChemReact68 database 67,926 SPRESI database subset 5,230 Reactions extracted from 2008- 562,872 2011 USPTO patent applications** Lowe, D. M. Automated Extraction of Reactions from the Patent Literature.243rd ACS National Meeting & Exposition, San Diego, CA, March 27, 2012. ACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Methodology-cont.• Reaction SMILES were used as input and output for all algorithms bar ICMAP• Input and output was converted to and from RDF for use with ICMAP• Indigo was ran with its default configuration and more lenient settings for matching valences, charges and bond orders• Marvin was configured to use its best quality mapping strategy ACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Ability to map all product atoms ACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • c-c bonds brokenACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Speed Comparison Average 1.7 3.6 1.6 4.0reagents per reaction ACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Simple mappings Marvin/ChemDraw/Indigo/ICMAPACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Simple mappings Marvin/ChemDraw/Indigo/ICMAPACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • More complicated Mappings Marvin ChemDrawACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • More complicated Mappings Indigo ICMAPACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Reuse of reactantsACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Reuse of reactants MarvinACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Reuse of reactants ChemDrawACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Reuse of reactants IndigoACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Reuse of reactants ICMAPACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Single Atom Mapping ICMAP/Marvin ChemDraw/IndigoACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Bugs and quirks• Marvin – 2 unsuccessful mappings produced unchecked exceptions rather than checked exceptions• ChemDraw – Hydrogen on aromatic atoms missing in SMILES output• Indigo – Calculation of valency fails for aromatic sulfur ACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • Bugs and quirks• ICMAP – Single atom products are interpreted as empty molecules or occasionally replaced by a product from a previous reaction (bug reported) – Input files must be < 2gb and use dos line endings ACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • conclusions• ICMAP produced the best quality mappings on the tested sets• Atom mapping isn’t as simple as finding a maximum common subgraph mapping• In all the algorithms there were aspects that could be improved to yield appreciable benefits ACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012
  • acknowledgements• Ed Griffen and Nick Tomkinson, AstraZeneca.• Andrew Wooster, GSK.• Hans Kraut, InfoChem• Thank you for your time. ACS National Meeting, Philadelphia, USA 20th August 2012