Uploaded on

 

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
400
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2

Actions

Shares
Downloads
11
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1.
  • 2. Gaussian Elimination
    This method, which is a variation of Gauss elimination method, can solve up to 15 or 20 simultaneous equations, with 8 or 10 significant digits in the arithmetic of the computer.
    This procedure differs from the Gaussian method in which when you delete an unknown, is removed from all remaining equations, ie, the preceding equation as well as pivot to follow.
    Also all the rows are normalized when taken as pivot equation. The end result of such disposal creates an identity matrix instead of a triangular Gauss as it does, so do not use the back substitution.
  • 3. EXAMPLE
    Resoverthe following system of equations.
    3X1 -0.1X2 - 0.2 X 3 = 7.85
    0.1X1 +7X2 - 0.3 X 3 = -19.5
    0.3X1 -0.2X2 +10 X 3 = 7.85
    First we express the coefficients and the vector of independent terms as an augmented matrix.
  • 4. The first line is normalized by dividing by 3 for
    The term X1 can be removed from the second row by subtracting 0.1 times the first in the second row. In a similar way, subtracting 0.3 times the first in the third line delete the term with the third row X1F2-0.1F1F3-0.3F1
  • 5. Then, the second line is normalized by dividing by 7.00333:
    Reducing X2 terms in the first and third equation is obtained:F1+ 0.033 F2F3+0.0190 F2
  • 6. The third line is normalized dividing by 10 010:
    Finally, the terms with X3 be reduced in the first and second equation to get:F1+ 0.068 F3F3+0.0425 F2
    X1=3
    X2=-2.499
    X3=7.001
  • 7. ADVANTAGES OF THE METHOD OF GAUSS-JORDAN
    Note that back substitution is required for the solution.Although the methods of Gauss-Jordan and Gauss elimination can look almost identical, the former requires approximately 50% fewer operations.One of the main reasons for including the Gauss-Jordan, is to provide a direct method for obtaining the inverse matrix.
  • 8. BIBLIOGRAPHY
    • http://personal.redestb.es/ztt/tem/t6_matrices.htm
    • 9. http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matriz_(matem%C3%A1tica)
    • 10. http://www.gaussjordan.edu.mx/metodogj.html
    • 11. http://docencia.udea.edu.co/GeometriaVectorial/uni2/seccion21.html
    • 12. http://thales.cica.es/rd/Recursos/rd99/ed99-0289-02/inv02.html