Web Site Usability October 20, 2009 Vincci Kwong Franklin D. Schurz Library Indiana University South Bend Indiana Library Federation Annual Conference
Website Usability
“ The extent to which a product can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use.” (British Standards Institution, 1998)
“ Making whatever you’re working on easier to use for who ever is going to use it.” (Steve Krug, 2001)
“ An element of design, focusing on ‘can this be used when it’s done?’ rather than just making it look good.” (Steve Krug, 2001)
“ On the Web, usability is a necessary condition for survival. If a website is difficult to use, people leave” (Jakob Nielsen, 2003)
Components of Website Usability
The five Es:
Effective
Efficient
Engaging
Error tolerant
Easy to learn
Types of Usability Testing
Scenario-Based Inspection
Heuristic Evaluation
User Observation
Prototyping Test
Card Sorting
Perquisites for all Usability Testing
Information gathering
Who are the users?
What do users do?
What do users want?
Limitation of current system
Understanding of design principles and rules
Scenario-Based Inspection
Evaluator examines the website in which people perform their tasks
Goal Task Task Task Action Action Action Action
Setting Up a Scenario-Based Inspection
Come up with scenarios
Explore different ways in order to accomplish each scenario
Make note on problems encounter when working through each scenario
Heuristic Evaluation
Inspector examines the website to check whether it complies with a set of design principles
- Nielsen’s Heuristics
MILE+ Heuristics
Triacca, Luca, Alessandro Inversini, and Davide Bolchini. “Quality of Web Usability Evaluation Methods: An Empirical Study on MiLE+.” Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Web Site Evolution . 2005. 22-29. Print.
W3C Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
Section 508 Standards
Setting Up a Heuristic Inspection
Choose inspectors
Decide on heuristic criteria
Prepare data collection and analysis form
Prepare task description
Reserve a room
Task Scenario No.: 1 Inspector’s Name: Kelly Session Date: 3/20/2009 Session Start Time: 9:00 am Session End Time: 10:00 am Fig. 1 An example of data collection and analysis form. Heuristic violated Usability defect Comments Navigation Inconsistent overall navigation The user was confused by the different navigation systems. Semiotics Unclear links labels The user would like simple wordings without the use of jargon. Graphics Contrast between text and background The user found it difficult to read the wordings on the webpage.
Pro and Con of Heuristic Evaluation
Pros
Less expensive
Inspectors usually suggest solutions to the problem they identified
Helps to reduce obvious errors
Cons
Inspector’s view points may not reflect those of actual users
Inspector may have their own preferences, biases, and views
Results depends on skills and experiences of inspectors
User Observations
User carries out specific tasks while under observation
Setting Up a User Observation Session
Choose participants
Select facilitator and observers (if any)
Prepare task description
Create evaluation script
Prepare permission form
Decide on how to record session
Pick a location
Choose participants
Real user Vs Representative user
How many participants?
Availability of participant
Select facilitators and observers
Facilitator
Maintains a welcome and relaxed atmosphere
Keeps participant talking
Ensure the purpose of evaluation is fulfilled
Observer
- Observe testing session
Prepare task description
Decide on what function to test
Come up with scenarios
1 scenario per function
Elaborate scenarios
Clear wordings
Document task description
Task card
Create evaluation script
A script used by evaluator to guide participant throughout the testing session
Popular components of evaluation script
Welcome participant
Explain the evaluation and confidentiality
Perform preliminary interview
Administer tasks
Conduct exit interview
Thank the participant
Prepare permission form
Participate Consent Form
Permission to record
Permission for use of data
Permission to share test results
- Nondisclosure agreements
Recording a session
Paper Note
Audio recording
Video recording
Eye tracking
Our Experience with User Observation Session
Choose Users
4 faculty members
4 students
2 staff
Prepare task description
Each user completed five tasks
You have a citation for a journal article that you are interested in and you want to find out if the library has a copy of the journal article.
You are working on a research related to economic recession and you want to find some books that provide information on it.
You are working on a term paper and you need to cite resources used in your paper, however you have no idea on how to do citation. You want to find out if the library provides information on how to do citation.
You just recognized two of the books you checked out from the library are overdue, you want to find out how much you own in the fines.
You have some photos that you want to resize, so you want to find out if Adobe Photoshop is available on the computers at the library.
Create evaluation script
Introduction
Welcome and explain the purpose of the usability test
Preliminary Interview
How much time do you normally spend on the Web in a given week?
Have you used any library website to look up information in the past?
Evaluation Instruction
Task
Wrap Up & Brainstorm
Additional questions you would like to ask
Invite user to provide any suggestion/comment for improvement
Express thanks to user
Decide on how to record data
Record session through video and screen capture
- Laptop
- Webcam
- Microphone
- Camtasia Studio
Testing is over, now what?
Data analysis and Interpretation
Review and summarize data
Quantitative data
Qualitative data
Group findings
Assign Severities
Write evaluation report
Review and summarize data
Quantitative data
Easy to understand
More objective than qualitative data
Qualitative data
Provide insights into cause of problem
Labels and headings not intuitive
Crowded, clustered, clumsy
Nothing stand out to me
Group findings
Chronological order
Severity of defect
Type of issue
Difficulty of fix
Assigning Severities
Helps to prioritize the work list
Severities scale varies
Severity Rating Issue 3 Unclear link labels [Semiotics] Inconsistent overall navigation [Navigation] Information overload [Cognitive] Inefficient search function [Others] Insufficient system reaction to errors for a user [Technology/Performance] Unmatched/unexpected information [Content] 2 Contrast between text and background [Graphics] Backward navigation [Navigation] Duplicate Information [Navigation] Item not in category as expected [Navigation] Image information [Graphics] Scripting errors [Technology/Performance] Video is not able to accommodate all users [Others] 1 Grouping of left navigation bar [Navigation] Visited vs unvisited states [Navigation] Inflexible layout [Graphics] Uncertainty on currency of information [Content] Pop-up windows [Others] Unexpected file format [Others]
Write evaluation report
Document what you did
Serves as a communication tool
Summing up our experience
Pre-test play around
Different task sets
Wordings of task description
Helpful Readings
Stone, Debbie, et al. User Interface Design and Evaluation . Boston: Elsevier, 2005.
Krug, Steve. Don’t Make Me Think . Indianapolis: New Riders, 2000.
Nielsen, Jakob, and Marie Tahir. Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed . Indianapolis: New Riders, 2002.
0 comments
Post a comment