Uploaded on


More in: Business , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads


Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. University Transportation Centers ( (UTC) Program ) g Grant Managers’ Remarks UTC Grantees’ Meeting June 7, 2010 1
  • 2. 1998/99 UTC Grants Closing last of the 26 “old ‘grants dating from the TEA-21 authorization period grants spanned two awarding agencies (RSPA, RITA) and three different accounting systems = final reconciliation not easy thanks for your help obtaining final invoices, reports from your universities invoices 2
  • 3. Sweeps of “Unencumbered” Funds UTCs heard this from somewhere unencumbered = obligated? un-awarded funds are vulnerable in the event of emergency, but -- no indication to date of any such sweeps at US DOT, and -- UTC funds come through FHWA and FTA so they appear somewhat like an obligation FTA, even before award to accelerate award of funds, UTC must provide grant-benefit justification; for RITA, good stewardship t d t d hi trumps speedy award d d flip side of having un-awarded funds: avoids authorization-extension uncertainty 3
  • 4. Change in Submission of Invoices will begin later this month ; instructions via e-mail to UTC and business office mail hard copy directly to RITA’s accounts-payable contractor in Oklahoma City should be fewer invoices lost/destroyed in mail sent to RITA HQ payment not faster, but more reliable USDOT working on electronic grant-payment system for 2011 grant payment 4
  • 5. Revised UTC Grant Reporting Requirements change with this summer’s awards one big unknown = Barbara Post leaving TRB switch to new financial form SF425 update distribution of Final Research Reports -- somewhat more “green”, though no longer same procedure for all recipients new request for reporting stakeholder uses of research results in Annual Report narrative (see next slide) 5
  • 6. Revised Reporting Requirements (continued) Excerpt from new requirements: 6.) Annual Report A. Corporate Style Report: The first part shall be a Corporate-Style Annual Report suitable for general distribution It shall be posted on the Center’s web site and five distribution. Center s hard copies submitted to the RITA Grant Administrator. The report shall include at a minimum the following elements: [skip] □ Examples of products, technologies, or other research results that are being used by stakeholders (state DOTs industry etc ) and description of how they are being DOTs, industry, etc.) used (this may include changes in requirements, laws, regulations, or designs of other products). 6