OpenEd 2009 OER Organization Stakeholders

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    noblesse oblige comes from social control masquerading as social benefit.No doubt there are a range of motivations for creating and disseminating Open Education Resources. Some of the motivations will appear quixotic and others will appear unsustainable. Still others will appear self-serving or unethical. We will probably have to wait for history to sort out the categories and expose the ironies.When MIT announced that they were “giving away their courseware” in 2001 it was a radical idea. The disruptive influence of the web on the economics of higher education brought intense debate among established faculties and visionary educators. It also brought marketers, public relations , and enrollment strategists. Clearly courseware now operated on a new stage. People who saw education as a basic human right, also saw Open Education Resources as a “noblesse oblige” of university gatekeepers. Those who had educational resources “should” provide access to locations that did not have them. The goal should be to create more and more open courses as a moral imperative.However, noblesse oblige covers a more sinister goal of status quo maintenance. The powerful and wealthy exist in a linked system to those without power. As goods move from the wealthy to the poor, those links get reinforced. If the nobility fill social needs on their own terms, then status quo is maintained. The education revolutionaries who advocate for mere quantity of open education resources provided from western universities to emerging institutions mask the dependency that flow creates.

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    OpenEd 2009 OER Organization Stakeholders - Presentation Transcript

    1. Striving for Sustaining Values
      Open Education Resource Organization Stakeholders
      Curt Madison, PhD
      Director of eLearning Program Development
      School of Management
      University of Alaska Fairbanks
      Open Ed 2009
      Vancouver, Canada
    2. Three Organization Types
      Traditional University creating OER
      Traditional University importing OER
      Research Entity creating OER
    3. By allowing citizens to “see through” its workings and investigate whether or not their leaders and organizations have met their expectations, the government brings the public into its inner circles and empowers citizens to contribute to decision-making
    4. Exporting OER
      Outreach to community with transparency
      Decrease time-to-degree with transparency
      Higher retention rates with OER success
      Increased learning through pre/post-exposure to OER
      Automatic faculty alignment of sequences
      Increased publication by faculty members
    5. Outreach through transparency
      Native Ways of Knowing
      Recovery.gov
      UCosmic
    6. Openness vs Competition
      There are real opportunities to distribute quality content...But this makes more sense for established institutions with robust brands such as Oxford or, in the US, MIT, than it might for other less established or high-profile institutions. For those with exceptional reputations, it is not the access to the material that attracts students so much as the signal of being accepted and included in its formal provision.
    7. Openness vs Competition 2
      But where the material is more of a direct means to education, there will be greater need to offer a high standard of content and provide it in forms useful to the institution’s own students and to others.
      Peter Bradwell. 2009. the edgeless university: why higher education must embrace technology. Demos
    8. Time to Degree
      Excess Student Credit Hours
    9. Most students attending the state’s public universities graduate with credit hours in excess of graduation requirements, which increases state higher education costs.
      The 780,769 excess hours of students graduating with bachelor’s degrees in FY 2004-05 cost the state $62 million.
      Twenty percent of the students accounted for over one-half (58%) of all credit hours over the minimum graduation requirements.
      Florida House of Representatives
      PCB SPCP 09-02
    10. Days to a Bachelor’s Degree
    11. Higher Retention Rates
      Drop out due to:
      Lack of relevance
      Lack of Preparation in Math
    12. Increased Depth of Learning
      • Preview OCW prior to enrollment
      • Review of material in a sequenced course
    13. Automatic Course Alignment
      Mitigate natural divergence
      Promote transparency among faculty
    14. Reputation Builder
      “Publish” a course with peer review
      Engage public dialog around nascent ideas
    15. Desirable OER Import Features
      Easily Allow Localization - Derive
      Aggregate Reading Lists
      Link Design Choices to Outcomes
    16. Research creating OER
      Outreach PR with Structured Access
      Satisfy NSF grant requirements
      Public Institution mandate to engage k-12
      Disambiguate professional jargon
    17. National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs
      http://www.nsf.gov/dir/index.jsp?org=OPP
    18. What Doesn’t Work
      Selling OER as a franchise revenue stream
      Satisfying noblesse oblige
    19. Philanthropy
      While St. Petersburg College has, in a limited fashion, made contributions in the realm of open courseware... Fiscal needs and concerns are the driving forces behind many administrative policies and decisions; the economic reality is that our institution cannot easily afford to give freely of its resources without some financial compensation in return.
      J. J. Rutledge. UNESCO Forum: Impact of Open Courseware
      for Higher Education in Developing Countries Preliminary Report.
      St. Petersburg College, St. Petersburg, FL
    20. Visual Thesaurus
      “Noblesse Oblige”
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + curtmadisoncurtmadison Nominate

    custom

    141 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Stakeholder analysis of OER producers and users. Pr more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 141
      • 141 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 1
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Tags