• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Aligning The Curriculum

Aligning The Curriculum






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



2 Embeds 11

http://www.slideshare.net 10
http://app.lms.unimelb.edu.au 1



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Early this year I was presented with a DE package for a subject and asked for my opinion of its contents from a teaching & learning point of view. I needed to have a framework for deconstructing the material that was based soundly upon educational principles. I used the approach that I’m going outline briefly in this presentation and have incorporated it into a package that I use to review a subject.I hope there are some practical things that you can take away from this presentation and apply to reflections in your own context.
  • The three fundamentals of curriculum are objectives, activities and assessments, ,which can be considered to be the three vertices of a triangle.If they are the vertices, then the sides represent the connection between these three fundamentals:A: Content validity – how well does assessment measure the objectives?B: How well do the activities fit the objectives?C: Are we teaching what is being tested? Are we testing what is being taught?Curriculum alignment requires a strong link between objectives, instructional activities and materials, and assessment.
  • But first we need to refresh our familiarity with Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. It was developed from about 1949 to 1956 in an attempt to have a framework for classifying test items to measure educational objectives to be able to form a common bank of questions for US universities.Each of these categories was broken into a subcategory; the order runs from simple to complex and from concrete to abstract.The taxonomy has been used throughout the world to classify educational objectives and to demonstrate their spread, or lack of it, across the spectrum of categories.
  • We hear the term “constructive alignment” of the curriculum used often and quite freely. The term was coined by John Biggs in a constructivist context – activities and assessment are aligned to support student learning.Biggs uses his SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes) to define curriculum objectives (where students should be operating) and learning outcomes (where students are actually operating). I’ve not used this taxonomy, but have included it here because I thought I needed to explain where the term “constructive alignment” comes from & means.
  • The tool that I used to evaluate my first DE subject package is based on a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy, that moves it from a 1-dimensional list to a 2-dimensional table. David Krathwohl was one of the original members of Bloom’s team & contributed to the revision of the taxonomy in 2001.Like the original, there is a hierarchy of categories that increases as we go down and across the table.Give an example: remembering a date in history; determine whether a scientific conclusion follows from observed data.The next slide – which is also on a handout – gives more detail about each category.
  • Once armed with such a tool, how can we use it to examine if the curriculum is aligned?Place objectives into the appropriate cell by looking at the verbs and nouns used in the objective, activities and assessmentsRepeat for activities, assessments
  • For example…
  • Once we have done this for objectives, activities and assessments we can make some decisions about the degree of alignment of the curriculum in terms of the spread of the subject’s cognitive demands. This says little or nothing about content.Also make judgements about where gaps might be.
  • Would this be appropriate for one of your subjects? Alignment on its own is not the only goal – need to consider spread across the table & consider demands made of students that are appropriate for the subject. Eg, if part of a Masters course you would expect to find alignment clustered more towards bottom right of the table.
  • Now time to examine the three sides of the triangle…

Aligning The Curriculum Aligning The Curriculum Presentation Transcript

  • Greg Hardham Educational Designer – Division of Learning & Teaching Services School of Community Health School of Environmental Sciences Albury/Thurgoona
  • To what extent do the To what extent does instructional the assessment activities fit the measure the objectives? objectives? (Content validity) Is what we are teaching being tested? Are we teaching what is being tested? Anderson (2002)
  • Bloom’s taxonomy of Educational Objectives Knowledge Recall data or information. Comprehension Understand the meaning, translation, interpolation, and interpretation of instructions and problems. State a problem in one's own words. Application Use a concept in a new situation or unprompted use of an abstraction. Applies what was learned in the classroom into novel situations in the work place. Analysis Separates material or concepts into component parts so that its organizational structure may be understood. Distinguishes between facts and inferences. Synthesis Builds a structure or pattern from diverse elements. Put parts together to form a whole, with emphasis on creating a new meaning or structure. Evaluation Make judgments about the value of ideas or materials. Adapted from Bloom et al (1956)
  • John Biggs (2002, 2003): “constructive alignment” of the curriculum “Constructive” = the learner constructs meaning through learning activities “Alignment” = learning activities & assessments appropriate to achieve learning outcomes Hierarchy of verbs that may be used to form curriculum objectives
  • Anderson & Krathwohl (2001)
  • Anderson & Krathwohl (2001)
  • How can curriculum alignment be measured? Analysis using the taxonomy table: Each objective is placed in its appropriate cell of the table; Each instructional activity is classified; Each assessment task is classified; The three completed tables are compared for alignment. Why conduct this form of analysis? To gauge the degree of spread of objectives, activities and assessment across the cognitive dimensions. Are higher-order demands being made of students? To gauge the extent of alignment of the curriculum. Is the spread of objectives, activities and assessment similar, or for example, are higher level objectives being assessed by lower level tasks?
  • 1. have a general understanding of the structure and function of the organs in the body; 2. apply the principles and techniques of statistics and modelling; 3. demonstrate knowledge of the more significant organisational reforms in policing; 4. be able to critically reflect on their own process as a pastoral counsellor
  • Look for key words in tasks and assessment criteria Task Assessment criteria include Reflectively critique your Critical reflective analysis of the application of evidence-based contribution of own experience to practice in the management of a decision-making client you have treated. Clear implications for own practice as a result of reflection
  • objectives activities assessment
  • objectives activities assessment
  • To what extent does the assessment measure the To what extent do objectives? (Content the instructional validity) activities fit the objectives? Is what we are teaching being tested? Are we teaching what is being tested? Anderson (2002)
  • What makes a “good” learning objective? How do we write effective learning objectives? Do we need to re-visit our subjects’ objectives? We need to choose assessments and learning activities that are outcome-appropriate (Airasian & Miranda) How best to developing curriculum for alignment? Biggs (2002) suggests Objectives Assessment Activities Regularly remind students of the connection between the three components of the aligned curriculum to assist learning (McMahon & Thakore)
  • Airasian, P. W., & Miranda, H. (2002). The Role of Assessment in the Revised Taxonomy. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 249. Anderson, L. W. (2002). Curricular Alignment: A Re-Examination. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 255. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Addison Wesley Longman. Biggs, J. (2002). Aligning the curriculum to promote good learning. Paper presented at the Constructive Alignment in Action: Imaginative Curriculum Symposium. Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, F. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Cognitive Domain (New York, David McKay). Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212. McMahon, T., & Thakore, H. (2006). Achieving constructive alignment: putting outcomes first. The Quality of Higher Education(3).