• Like


Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Individual Evaluation Sheet_Version 1

Uploaded on

For use of evaluating speech; Edited by me

For use of evaluating speech; Edited by me

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads


Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. Sung-Jin’s Note on Evaluation for David’s Speech1. Speech Title:2. Date:3. Time Taken: (out of 5-to-7 minutes)4. Objectives of Speech: Use stance, movement, gestures, facial expressions and eye contact to express your message and achieve your speech’s purpose, “Your Body Speaks”; Make your body language smooth and natural.5. Evaluation Criteria POSTURE: nervous / uneasy  poised uncertain  confident uncomfortable  comfortable slouching  erect stiff  relaxed GESTURES: artificial / wooden  natural / spontaneous random  meaningful passive  lively furtive (=seeming to keep something secret or hidden)  expansive vague  precise detracted from verbal message  enhanced verbal message BODY MOVEMENTS lifeless / dull  fluid / animated awkward  graceful random  purposeful drew attention away from speech  enhanced attentiveness to speech FACIAL EXPRESSIONS deadpan (= appearing to be serious and hiding the fact that you’re joking)  animated unfriendly  friendly artificial  natural / genuine incongruent (= not fit together well)  appropriate to speech content EYE CONTACT forced / artificial  natural / smooth followed set pattern  no set pattern did not establish visual bonds  established bonds with listeners
  • 2. Sung-Jin’s Note on Evaluation for David’s Speech6. Notes on Evaluation 1) It’s a pleasure to evaluate David’s speech about _________________________________________. 2) I remember his opening because: (immediate engaging / interesting) _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________. The body structure was: (easy to follow and understand, and well-constructed) _________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________. 3) From my seat he: (approach, position, personal appearance, facial expression, gestures, detracting mannerisms) ___________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________. 4) He ended strongly by: (reinforcing, climactic) _______________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________. 5) I have two recommendations that David might think about that would make his future speeches even better.  Recommendation 1 - What? - Alternative example! - Why?  Recommendation 2 - What? - Alternative example! - Why? 6) In summary, here is a speech that David commended well: _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________. 7) It could have been improved by recommendations: _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________. 8) However, it worked because David _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________.