U402part a theadversarysystem
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

U402part a theadversarysystem

on

  • 197 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
197
Views on SlideShare
83
Embed Views
114

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

1 Embed 114

http://crystalsworkspace.pbworks.com 114

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

U402part a theadversarysystem U402part a theadversarysystem Presentation Transcript

  • Area of Study 2 Court Processes & Procedures & Engaging in Justice PART A The Adversary System & Criminal Procedures Chapters 7 & 8 Unit 4 Resolution and Justice
  • Outcome U402 Part A •  You should be able to explain the processes and procedures for the resolution of criminal and civil disputes, and evaluate their operation and application, and evaluate the effectiveness of the legal system
  • Key Knowledge •  Elements of an effective legal system: entitlement to a fair and unbiased hearing, effective access to the legal system and timely resolution of disputes •  Major features of the adversary system of trial, including the role of parties, the role of the judge, the need for the rules of evidence and procedure, standard and burden of proof and the need for legal representation •  Strengths and weaknesses of the adversary system of trial •  Major features of the inquisitorial system of trial •  Possible reforms to the adversary system of trial •  Criminal pre-trial procedures and their procedures, including bail and remand and committal hearings •  General purposes of criminal sanctions •  An overview of three types of sanctions and their specific purposes
  • Key Terms •  Adversary system •  Burden of proof •  Inquisitorial system •  Propensity evidence •  Standard of proof •  Accused •  Bail and remand •  Beyond reasonable doubt •  Committal hearing •  Crime •  Hearing •  Indictable and summary offences •  Recidivist •  Sanction •  Summons •  Trial
  • Elements of an effective legal system •  Entitlement to a fair an unbiased hearing •  Effective access to the legal system •  Timely resolution of disputes
  • The Adversary System of Trial •  The adversary system is the system of trial used by most courts in Australia •  It involves; two adversaries putting an argument to an independent umpire who will decide which side is in the right and which side is wrong •  The adversary system is a contest, where parties fight to win
  • Major features of the adversary system •  Role of the parties •  Role of the judge •  Rules of evidence and procedure •  Burden and standard of proof •  Need for legal representation
  • Role of the parties Keywords • active, control Description • parties have control over how they present their case • they decide when to commerce proceedings, what evidence to bring, what law to argue, what witnesses to call, and what questions to ask those witnesses Advantages • parties are more likely to feel satisfied with the result if they have control over the case • the people who know the situation best are the ones in charge of the proceedings Disadvantages • it is stressful and difficult for parties • it gives an advantage to repeat offenders or wealthier parties
  • Role of the Judge Keywords • passive, independent, unbiased Description • the judge presides over the court, ensuring the rules of evidence and procedure are followed • the judge listens to the arguments presented by the parties and makes an unbiased decision Advantages • the judge’s impartiality and lack of bias protect the integrity of the court • the judge can keep an objective view by not interfering in the contest Disadvantages • the judge is unable to assist an unrepresented, inexperienced or otherwise disadvantaged parties • the judge’s experience is wasted
  • The rules of evidence & procedure Keywords • strict, complex Description • rules of evidence govern what evidence is admissible and inadmissible • rules of procedure govern how the trial is run Advantages • strict rules of evidence make sure it is all relevant, reliable and legally obtained • strict rules of procedure ensure a smooth trial and put parties on equal standing Disadvantages • strict & complex rules make it difficult and stressful for parties to present their case • some important evidence can be excluded on a technicality
  • The burden & standard of proof Keywords • person bringing the action, high level Description • the burden of proof is on the plaintiff or prosecution. They bring the action, and so have the responsibility to prove it • the standard is the amount of proof required: on the balance of probabilities (civil), or beyond reasonable doubt (criminal) Advantages • they ensure unfounded claims do not succeed, and protect the presumption innocence Disadvantages • the party that has been wronged has total responsibility to prove the case • this adds further stress and cost
  • The need for legal representation Keywords • high need, necessary for success Description • because of the other features of the adversary system, legal representation is vital in gaining a proper chance of success Advantages • a confident, experienced and trained professional can put the case as efficiently and persuasively as possible • lawyers take the pressure off parties Disadvantages • good representation is too expensive for most people to afford • the cost of barristers can give wealthier parties an unfair chance of success
  • The Inquisitorial System •  The inquisitorial system is the system of trial used in many other countries such as France, and in some Australian courts such as the Family Court and Coroner’s Court •  It is based on the idea that a trained professional investigates both sides of the mater and has access to all the information about it so the truth will be discovered •  Rather than being a contest, the inquisitorial system is an investigation
  • Comparison to Adversary •  Inquisitorial System: Role of the parties Keywords • inactive, passive Description • parties observe and can have input via statements and making requests of the judges, but they do not control proceedings or evidence Better than adversary • the burden of proof is taken off parties, so it is less stressful and expensive for them Worse than adversary • parties may feel at the mercy of the judges and therefore less satisfied with the decision
  • Comparison to Adversary •  Inquisitorial System: Role of the judge Keywords • active, in control, investigatory Description • the judge exercises almost complete control over the case • they collect and examine evidence, choose which witnesses to hear from, and decide both the relevant law and the facts Better than adversary • the judge’s expertise is used • parties are not able to hide or manipulate unfavourable evidence Worse than adversary • the judge may lose some of their impartiality, being so involved in the investigation • the judge does not have to investigate angles the parties think are important
  • Comparison to Adversary •  Inquisitorial System: Rules of evidence & procedure Keywords • flexible, loose Description • rules of evidence are almost non-existent: hearsay, prior convictions and written evidence are all allowed • rules of procedure are not necessary, as the judge conducts proceedings Better than adversary • parties do not have to navigate complex and stressful procedures • all relevant evidence is taken into account Worse than adversary • evidence such as prior convictions may be unfairly prejudicial to the defendant • documentary and hearsay evidence cannot be tested thoroughly
  • Comparison to Adversary •  Inquisitorial System: Burden & standard of proof Keywords • absent burden, high standard Description • there is no formal burden of proof, as the judge investigates all angles of the case simultaneously • there must still be significant evidence to show that the defendant was at fault Better than adversary • the injured party does not need to bear the burden of conducting the case • unfounded criminal or civil claims should still not succeed Worse than adversary • because the defence’s cases is examined before fault has been proven, the notion that the defendant is innocent until proven guilty is not felt strongly
  • Comparison to Adversary •  Inquisitorial System: Need for legal representation Keywords • supportive role, not necessary Description • legal representation support the parties, explain the proceedings to them and can make requests of the judge • they may also assist the judge with the investigating the case Better than adversary • a party’s success does not rest with their legal representation, so it decreases costs and doesn’t benefit wealthier parties as much Worse than adversary • parties cannot choose the person they trust the most to argue for them give them the best chance of success
  • Possible Reforms to the Adversary System of Trial •  Many recent reforms to the adversary system involve adopting aspects of the inquisitorial system •  TASK: complete the above table with the other two reforms listed in the text Reform Benefits • Greater investigative role of the judge allowing them to question witnesses and gather evidence • unrepresented parties could be assisted, and the judge’s expertise would be utilised • it is more likely that all evidence would be uncovered • Greater use of written statements by relaxing the rules of evidence • flexible rules would be easier to navigate and less stressful for parties. A more complex picture of events would emerge
  • Effectiveness of the Adversary System of Trial •  Arguments for and against on each element of an effective legal system: •  Fair & unbiased hearing •  Effective access to the legal system •  Timely resolution of disputes See Handout Summary •  Practice Questions: •  Discuss the effectiveness of the Adversary System of Trial (6 marks) •  “A more inquisitorial system of trial is more beneficial than the adversary.” Discuss the extent to which you agree with this statement (8 marks)
  • Criminal Procedures •  Introduction to Criminal Law •  Definition crime •  Types of offences •  Actus reus & Mens rea •  Age of criminal responsibility •  Parties in a case •  Burden & Standard of proof •  Criminal vs Civil Law •  Make a mind map addressing each of the above points. Use pages 433 - 436
  • Criminal Pre-Trial Procedures •  Commence once an accused has been charged and arrested but before trial •  Main purposes: •  Assist police •  Rights / Powers •  Bail hearings •  Clarify issues •  Determine strength of evidence •  Plea hearings
  • Police Powers Vs Individual Rights •  Watch this clip …. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ob-xNDGMO1c •  Jot down the police powers / individual rights either shown and/or breached in the clip
  • Bail •  Bail provides for the release of the accused from custody until the time of trial on the understanding he/she will appear at the trail. •  This is consistent with the principle of innocent until proven guilty. •  Upon reasonable grounds, in some circumstances bail will not be granted
  • Grounds for refusing bail •  There is an unacceptable risk that the accused may •  Fail to appear for trail/hearing •  Commit an offence whilst on bail •  Endanger the safety of the public •  Obstruct course of justice and/or interfere with a witness •  Charge is murder or treason •  Charge is trafficking, or cultivating a drug of dependence, or importing a traffickable or commercial quantity of drugs •  Already in custody serving another offence and/or failed to meet bail previously •  Accused requires protective custody
  • Conditions to bail •  In some circumstances conditions may be attached to the granting of bail •  Such conditions may to ensure the likelihood of the accused appearing in court and include: •  Surety •  Surrender passport •  Check in with police
  • Remand •  If bail is denied, the accused is remanded in custody •  It is designed to protect the community
  • Restorative Justice •  Focus on rebuilding broken relationships to overcome the affects of crime on victim and offender •  Alternative avenue to trail •  Encouraged for young offenders (<18) http://youtu.be/WrEApuJ-DTE
  • Committal Proceedings Applicability of charge Sufficient evidence Plea hearing Ensure a fair trial Prima Facie case Handout Magistrate’s Court – committal proceedings
  • Committal hearings Definition • Committal hearings are held in the Magistrates’ Court for all indictable offences going to the County or the Supreme Court • The magistrate will look at a summary of the prosecution’s evidence Purpose • To see if there is enough evidence to secure a conviction in a higher court. This is known as a Prima Facie case • It prevents weak cases from going to trial Details • Most committals are conducted using written evidence such as witness statements and interview transcripts. These are submitted in a ‘hand up brief’
  • Evaluation of pre-trial procedures
  • Criminal Trials •  Criminal trail is not examinable HOWEVER you need to have an understanding of how a trial is conducted in order to understand the workings of the adversary system and the jury system Refer to the Going Further Box “Criminal Trials” pg 460-461 Justice & Outcomes Textbook
  • Criminal Sanctions: Purposes •  Punish •  Deter •  Rehabilitate •  Denunciate •  Protect Pretty Dancers Ride Donkeys & Ponies
  • Criminal Sanctions: types •  Must know three for exam: •  IMPRISONMENT •  FINE •  COMMUNITY CORRECTION ORDER (CCO)
  • Imprisonment •  Imprisonment is the detaining of an offender in jail for a period of time determined on a level system •  Last resort sanction •  Aims: punish, protect, deter, denunciate & may rehabilitate
  • Fine •  A fine is a monetary penalty paid by the offender to the court and expressed as penalty units in 2011-12 a penalty unit was equal to $122.14 •  Aims of fines: punish & deter and at times can denunciate
  • Community Corrections Order (CCO) •  CCO is a supervised sentence served in the community which includes special conditions such as treatment and unpaid community work for a specified number of hours •  Aims of CCO: punish, deter, protect & rehabilitate
  • Effectiveness of Criminal Procedure •  When assessing the effective operation of criminal procedure we must consider if the three elements of an effective legal system is achieved •  Within each element we need to consider •  Processes & procedures that help •  Processes & procedures that hinder Element of effective legal system Processes/ procedures that help Processes/ procedures that hinder Fair and unbiased hearing Effective access to the legal system Timely resolution of disputes Pgs 494 – 502 will assist you
  • End of Part A •  SAC – Thursday 14th August & Friday 15th August •  Look ahead at Part B – begin with Chapter 9 Civil Procedures
  • References •  Beazer, Humphreys & Filippin (2012) Justice & Outcomes 12e, Oxford University Press •  Aldous (2008) Making & Breaking the Law, 8th edition, Macmillan Education Australia •  Humphreys (2011) Legal Notes Units 3 & 4, 2nd edition, Nelson Cengage Learning •  Jacaranda online, www.studyon.com.au