olcos

915 views
847 views

Published on

OLCOS perspective
Julià Minguillón
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
915
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
37
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
8
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

olcos

  1. 1. Strategy implementation seminar for Open Universities belonging to the MORIL consortium MORIL under the OLCOS perspective Julià Minguillón Universitat Oberta de Catalunya 28/05/2008
  2. 2. Table of contents <ul><li>OLCOS basics </li></ul><ul><li>OER lifecycle </li></ul><ul><li>Key issues </li></ul><ul><li>Research challenges </li></ul><ul><li>OER in a European perspective </li></ul><ul><li>Enablers and barriers </li></ul><ul><li>Recommendations </li></ul><ul><li>Conclusions </li></ul>
  3. 3. OLCOS project <ul><li>Open eLearning Content Observatory Services </li></ul><ul><li>Transversal action funded by the EC under the eLearning programme, 2006-2007 </li></ul><ul><li>Partners: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>European Center for Media Competence, Germany </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>European Distance Elearning Network, Hungary </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>FernUniversitaet in Hagen, Germany </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Mediamaisteri Group, Finland </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Spain </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Salzburg Research, Austria (project coordinator)‏ </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. OLCOS main goals <ul><li>To foster the creation, sharing and reuse of open educational resources, including: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Content for teaching and learning </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Software based tools and services </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Licenses </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Three main results: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>OLCOS roadmap 2012 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Tutorials </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Community creation and engagement </li></ul></ul>
  5. 5. OLCOS methodology <ul><li>Qualitative research: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Data gathering </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Focus groups and communities of practice </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Experts were interviewed </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Dissemination: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>OLCOS roadmap 2012 (book and PDF)‏ </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Tutorials (wiki)‏ </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Promotional videos </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>OLCOS web site: www.olcos.org </li></ul></ul>
  6. 6. Project focus <ul><li>OLCOS focuses on the educational practice, not on the result </li></ul><ul><li>OER lifecycle: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Create </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Re-use / modify </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>License </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Share </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Search </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Use </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Manage </li></ul></ul>
  7. 7. Project outcomes <ul><li>The OLCOS Roadmap 2012 aims to provide educational decision makers with orientation and recommendations about OER: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Current situation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Strategical advice </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Tutorials are practical recommendations for creating, sharing, licensing and using OER, mainly for teachers and students </li></ul><ul><li>List of selected OER related projects and resources </li></ul>
  8. 8. Key issues <ul><li>Technology </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Powerpoint is not open </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Methodology </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Learning is more than just contents </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Sustainability </li></ul><ul><ul><li>CAREO has been recently closed </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Licensing </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Lack of copyright does not mean open access </li></ul></ul>
  9. 9. Research challenges <ul><li>Methodological: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Critical mass, granularity and integration </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Quality assesment </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Technological: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Efficient search (semantic)‏ </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Supporting OER lifecycle </li></ul></ul><ul><li>CC Licensing covers authors, not editors </li></ul><ul><li>Socio-cultural issues </li></ul><ul><li>Organizational and infrastructure changes </li></ul>
  10. 10. OER in a European perspective <ul><li>Slow growth in a situation of fragmentation </li></ul><ul><li>International collaborative efforts need to be strengthened </li></ul><ul><li>Valorisation of public sector information hampered by lack of open access </li></ul><ul><li>Little impact of project based digital repositories </li></ul><ul><li>The European digital library as a flagship </li></ul><ul><li>Communities of interest and practice and knowledge technologies as critical success </li></ul>
  11. 11. Areas and topics covered <ul><li>Three main groups: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Policies, institution frameworks and business models </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Open access and open content repositories </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Laboratories of open educational practices and resources (research)‏ </li></ul></ul><ul><li>For each area: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Drivers and enablers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Barriers </li></ul></ul>
  12. 12. Policies, institutional frameworks and business models <ul><li>Enablers: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Policies emphasise educational innovation and organisational change </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ICT based lifelong learning needs to be promoted </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>International interest in (and funding of) OER opportunities </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>CC licensing is firmly established and increasingly used </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Healthy competition among leading institutions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Open and distance education more attractive </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The Bologna process is a driver for collaboration </li></ul></ul>
  13. 13. Policies, institutional frameworks and business models <ul><li>Barriers: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Business models in OER are tricky </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Lack of institutional policies and incentives for educators to excel in OER cause hesitation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Considerable effort on teacher training and support </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Difficulty of finding a balanced marketing for open and commercial educational offerings </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Little innovation by most academic and educational publishers, lack of culture changing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Possible implementation of rigid DRM systems </li></ul></ul>
  14. 14. Open access and open content repositories <ul><li>Enablers: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Strong breakthrough and adoption of the Open Access principle in academic publishing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Funding bodies require that project results be made available as open access </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Widespread tried and tested know-how in distributed open access repositories (OAI)‏ </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Open content repositories increasingly surface from the deep web </li></ul></ul>
  15. 15. Open access and open content repositories <ul><li>Barriers: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Fears of low recognition and reputation among researchers and academics </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Need to reinforce institutional open access policies and measures </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Barriers to making research data openly available </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Creation of rich educational metadata is costly </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ontology based educational semantic webs still a promise, not a reality </li></ul></ul>
  16. 16. Laboratories of open educational practices and resources <ul><li>Enablers: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Free and open source software is widely used in higher education and further education institutions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The “industrialist” Learning Object approach has run out of steam, needs new impulse from OER </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>New systems for creating Learning Designs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Social software tools and services empower learners to create, share and license content </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>RSS feeds enrich and keep up-to-date educational portals and learners' sites </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Emergence of personal learning environments and semantic applications for accesing knowledge </li></ul></ul>
  17. 17. Laboratories of open educational practices and resources <ul><li>Barriers: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>More cooperation between tool developers and educators is needed </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Lack of know-how for enabling and promoting innovative education </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Educational repositories need to think how to become communities of practice, and to implement advanced tools and services </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Library services may be slow to find their place in open environments </li></ul></ul>
  18. 18. Recommendations <ul><li>Devised for: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Educational policy makers and funding bodies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Boards, directors and supervisors of educational institutions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Teachers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Students </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Educational repositories </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>E-learning tools and enviroments developers </li></ul></ul>
  19. 19. Recommendations for boards, directors and supervisors <ul><li>Scrutinise whether educational institutions are employing innovative approaches beyond teacher centered knowledge transfer </li></ul><ul><li>Promote sharing and re-use of OER and experiences from open educational practices </li></ul><ul><li>Establish reward mechanisms and supportive measures for developing and sharing OER </li></ul><ul><li>Clarify copyrights and define licensing schemes for making OER available </li></ul>
  20. 20. Conclusions <ul><li>Main MORIL concerns are aligned with OLCOS: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Business model and sustainability issues </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Learning model and innovative pedagogies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Marketing and reaching new audiences </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Any proposal should address: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Organisational changes </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Methodological changes </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Technological changes </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Sustainability issues </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Licensing </li></ul></ul>

×